Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini termotivasi karena kasus korupsi yang cenderung mengalami kenaikan dari tahun ke tahun, dimana modus suap menempati urutan pertama dalam jumlah kasus korupsi yang paling banyak terjadi. Bahkan, sebanyak 128 kasus suap berstatus inkracht  terjadi pada pemerintah daerah yang menerima opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian (WTP) dari BPK. Dengan menggunakan  regresi panel Zero Inflated Poisson (ZIP), penelitian ini menelaah korelasi antara opini BPK dengan jumlah kasus korupsi suap pada 478 entitas pemerintah daerah di Indonesia.  Dari hasil analisis terhadap 258 kasus suap pada pemerintah daerah yang  telah inkracht di KPK dalam kurun waktu 2008-2017, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tidak ada korelasi antara opini BPK dengan jumlah kasus suap. Hanya kenaikan jumlah belanja modal dan belanja barang jasa yang berhubungan dengan kenaikan jumlah kasus suap. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar BPK mempertimbangkan untuk meningkatkan porsi audit belanja dengan prosedur audit yang lebih mengarah pada investigatif serta memasukkan faktor nilai realisasi belanja modal dan belanja barang jasa dalam variabel penentuan objek audit guna mengakomodir celah kecurangan yang meningkat akibat kenaikan nilai belanja.

---

This research is encouraged to be executed because corruption cases tend to increase from year to year, where the bribery ranks first in the number of corruption cases that occur most. In fact, as many as 128 cases of bribery with inkracht status occurred in the regional government that received unqualified opinion from the Audit Board of Republic of Indonesia (BPK). By using the Zero Inflated Poisson (ZIP) panel regression, This study identifies corellation between financial statement opinion and the number of bribery corruption case based on 258 bribery cases that have been handled by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the period 2008-2017. The estimation result show that there was no correlation between financial statement opinion and the number of bribery cases. Only the increase in the amount of capital expenditure and expenditure on goods and services is related to the increase in the number of bribery cases. This study recommends that BPK consider increasing the portion of the audit of expences with audit procedures that are more investigative and include the capital expenditure realization value factor and service goods expenditure in the audit object determination variable in order to accommodate fraudulent loopholes that increase due to increases in spending value.

Abstrak :
This study is motivated by the trend of corruption cases which increase from year to year, where bribery is the first number in corruption cases. As many as 128 cases of bribery with in kracht status occurred in the local government that received an unqualified opinion from the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI). Using the Zero Inflated Poisson (ZIP) Panel Regression, this study examines the correlation between financial statement opinion and the number of bribery corruption cases based on 258 bribery cases that have been handled by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the period 2008-2017. The estimation result shows that there was no correlation between financial statement opinion and the number of bribery cases. However, the increase in the amount of capital expenditure also goods and services expenditure is related to the increase in the number of bribery cases. This study recommends BPK to consider improving the quality of fraud detection through audit procedures on financial statements, especially in regions that have a relatively high value of capital expenditure and service goods expenditure.