Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Tesis ini membahas tentang penolakan Indonesia terhadap inisiatif kontra terorisme Amerika Serikat di wilayah laut yang disebut Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif yang bersifat eksplanatif. Kajian literatur dalam penelitian ini melihat penolakan Indonesia terhadap PSI berdasarkan cost and benefit analysis pada aspek internal (kepentingan politik, kepentingan ekonomi, dan kepentingan militer) dan eksternal (posisi tawar menawar dan logika konsekuensi). Kesimpulan atas penolakan tersebut adalah adanya ketidaksesuaian komponen dalam negeri dan kebijakan luar negeri Indonesia dengan prinsip PSI yang membuktikan lebih banyaknya pengeluaran yang akan ditanggung daripada keuntungan yang diperoleh.

---

ABSTRACT
This thesis discusses the refusal of Indonesia to the United States counterterrorism initiatives in the sea area called Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI). This study is a qualitative interpretive. Literature review in this study perceives the refusal of Indonesia towards PSI is based on cost and benefit analysis on the internal aspects (political interests, economic interests, military interests) and external aspects (bargaining position and logic of consequences). Conclusions for the refusal is the discrepancy between domestic component and Indonesia's foreign policy with PSI principles that proves more costs will be incurred rather than benefits gained.;This thesis discusses the refusal of Indonesia to the United States counterterrorism initiatives in the sea area called Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI). This study is a qualitative interpretive. Literature review in this study perceives the refusal of Indonesia towards PSI is based on cost and benefit analysis on the internal aspects (political interests, economic interests, military interests) and external aspects (bargaining position and logic of consequences). Conclusions for the refusal is the discrepancy between domestic component and Indonesia's foreign policy with PSI principles that proves more costs will be incurred rather than benefits gained., This thesis discusses the refusal of Indonesia to the United States counterterrorism initiatives in the sea area called Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI). This study is a qualitative interpretive. Literature review in this study perceives the refusal of Indonesia towards PSI is based on cost and benefit analysis on the internal aspects (political interests, economic interests, military interests) and external aspects (bargaining position and logic of consequences). Conclusions for the refusal is the discrepancy between domestic component and Indonesia's foreign policy with PSI principles that proves more costs will be incurred rather than benefits gained.]