Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2008 tentang Surat Berharga Syariah Negara menghasilkan conflict of law atas beberapa pengaturannya dengan hukum positif Indonesia. Pokok permasalahan terkait conflict of law tersebut ialah bagaimana UU SBSN mengakomodir status badan hukum SPV dan pemindahtanganan Barang Milik Negara yang juga diatur di KUH Perdata dan UU Perbendaharaan Negara, serta kesesuaian keduanya menurut hukum Islam. Penelitian ini menganalisis kedudukan hukum SPV sebagai Perusahaan Penerbit SBSN dan keabsahan Barang Milik Negara sebagai Underlying Asset, serta pelaksanaannya dalam akad ijarah Asset To Be Leased. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif analitis deskriptif, didukung hasil wawancara dengan narasumber. Berdasarkan metode yang digunakan, didapati bahwa SPV adalah Badan Hukum khusus yang diadakan oleh kekuasaan umum untuk melaksanakan rangkaian kegiatan penerbitan SBSN yang tugas, fungsi, peran, pendirian dan pertanggungjawabannya diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah tersendiri. Selain itu, keabsahan Barang Milik Negara sebagai Underlying Asset dikarenakan UU SBSN memiliki kekhususan dari UU Perbendaharaan Negara, yaitu aset SBSN bukanlah jaminan melainkan dasar penerbitan berupa bukti penyertaan pemilikan hak manfaat atas aset SBSN yang tidak terdapat pemindahan kepemilikan secara hak milik. Selain itu, pengaplikasiannya dalam SBSN ijarah Asset To Be Leased seri SR-005 telah sesuai syariah compliance.

---

Indonesian Law Number 19 Year 2008 on Sovereign Syariah Securities (Law on SBSN) is a legal breakthrough which leads conflict of laws to some arrangement with Indonesian laws. The conflict of laws relates on how Law on SBSN accommodate the legality of SPV and how the alienation mechanism of State-Owned Asset which also regulated on Indonesian Civil Code and Law on State Treasury (Law Number 1 Year 2004), also the suitability of both according to Islamic law. This Research analyzes the legal standing of SPV as corporate issuer of SBSN and validity of State-Owned Asset as an Underlying Asset, as well as its implementation on the contract of Ijarah Asset To Be Leased. The method use a juridical normative descriptive analytical, supported by interviews to sources. Based on used method, found that SPV is a special legal entity held by the sovereign authority to issues SBSN. Its tasks, functions, roles, and the establishment of accountability further stipulated by Government Regulation. Therefore, the validity of the Underlying Asset is allowed, because Law on SBSN is a lex specialist against the Law on State Treasury, that stipulated the underlying asset is not a collateral for SBSN issuance, which mean it only an underlying of beneficiary ownership over the asset without a transfer of ownership. Moreover,its applicability in product SBSN ijarah To Be Leased Asset SR-005 series was complied to the syariah compliance."

"Pidana tambahan uang pengganti dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi pada Bank BUMN Persero selama ini belum berjalan secara maksimal, karena dalam hal terpidana tidak dapat membayar pidana uang pengganti, terpidana dimungkinkan memilih opsi berupa pidana penjara tambahan sebagai alternatif dari uang pengganti tersebut. Penelitian ini menganalisa kerugian Negara atau kerugian BUMN Persero menurut hukum keuangan publik dan memberikan solusi agar pengembalian kerugian melalui pidana uang pengganti tersebut dapat efektif. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif doktrinal, dengan pendekatan kasus untuk menghasilkan output berupa pemecahan masalah secara preskriptif evaluatif. Berdasarkan metode yang digunakan, didapati bahwa terdapat dualisme dalam mengidentifikasi kerugian negara atau kerugian BUMN Persero pasca putusan pengadilan perkara pidana yang berkekuatan hukum tetap, yaitu apakah berdasarkan dari sisa kewajiban yang belum dibayar atau total seluruh kerugian, Selain itu agar kerugian tersebut tidak selalu diklasifikasikan sebagai kerugian Negara yang berujung pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi, penerapan prinsip prudential banking, dan Business Judgement Rule oleh pihak BUMN Persero mutlak harus diterapkan. Uang pengganti dapat diefektifkan melalui mekanisme Tuntutan Ganti Rugi kerugian negara dan Gugatan Perdata kerugian Bank BUMN Persero, pengembalian kerugian dimaksud dapat mengadopsi konsep pemulihan kerugian pada Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 38 tahun 2016 tentang Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Negara secara mutatis mutandis.

---

An additional penalty of compensation in State Owned Enterprises corruption case has not been maximally executed, it happened because if the convict can not pay the additional penalty of compensation, they might choose additional imprisonment as another alternative. This study analyzes the State`s or State Owned Bank Enterprise`s losses according to the public financial law and then provides solution so that the reversion of the State`s or State Owned Bank Enterprise`s losses could get an effective execution. The method used in this study is normative juridical doctrinal , with case approach to bring a problem solving which is evaluative prescriptively as an output.

Based on the method used, it is found that there was a dualismin defining state`s loss or State Owned Bank Enterprise`s losses after a court verdict, which its judgement define by the outstanding of its losses or by total state`s loss. Besides, in order that the losses are not always considered as a state`s losses which will lead to the corruption case, the implementation of prudential banking and Business Judgment Rule principles must be implemented. The additional penalty of compensation can be effective through the mechanism of Recovery Law Suit state`s losses or Civil Law Suit State Owned Bank Enterprise`s losses , then the recovery procedure can adopt the concept in Government Regulation No. 38 of 2016 regarding State Recovery Law Suit as mutatis mutandis basis."