Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
PT. Jakarta International Container Terminal (JICT) sudah terlalu penuh dan direncanakan untuk dikembangkan. Berbagai proposal rencana pengembangan telah diterima. Kami mencoba mensimulasikan hasil implementasi dari proposal tersebut menggunakan simulasi sistem logistik berbasis agen. Proposal tersebut diterjemahkan sebagai perubahan parameter yang mempengaruhi perilaku agen saat menjalankan tugas masing-masing. Keluarannya adalah perbandingan proyeksi kondisi JICT pasca implementasi berdasarkan kapasitasnya, dibandingkan antar proposal. Perbandingan ini memperlihatkan bahwa proposal yang diterima hanya dapat mengakomodir sementara dari visi JICT. Perbandingan ini dapat digunakan sebagai masukan kepada pemegang kepentingan JICT untuk menegosiasikan ulang rencana agar visi JICT tercapai.

---

ABSTRACT
Jakarta International Container Terminal (JICT) is overcrowded and planned to be expanded. Various expansion plan has been proposed. We try to find out possible implementation result by simulating those plans as scenario in agent-based logistic system simulation. The plans were translated as change in various parameter which in turn affect the agent’s behavior. The outputs are comparison of simulated JICT condition post implementation measured by its throughput, based on each expansion plan. This comparison show that some of the plan close enough to match JICT vision. This comparison could be used as an input for decision maker to either choose one of the plans or renegotiate the plan to reach closest simulated condition compared to JICT vision.

Abstrak :
Jakarta International Container Terminal (JICT), which is the main international port of Indonesia, is overcrowded and is going to be expanded. Various expansion plans are considered, so the aim of the current paper is to simulate the plans using an agent-based modeling approach. The plans are treated as scenarios in the agent-based simulation model. Then, the throughputs from all scenarios are compared. The comparison shows that some of the plans can support the JICT vision. The results can be used as an input for the decision maker to either choose one of the plans or renegotiate the plans to achieve results that greatly support the JICT vision.