Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Dalam menghadapi perekonomian yang semakin global, Pemerintah menginginkan BUMN-BUMN memiliki daya saing. Untuk mewujudkan hal tersebut, upaya yang dilakukan Pemerintah adalah dengan mengeluarkan kebijakan yang mendorong terjadinya sinergi di antara BUMN, Anak Perusahaan BUMN, dan Perusahaan Terafiliasi BUMN. Kebijakan untuk mendorong terjadinya Sinergi BUMN tersebut, saat ini diterapkan oleh pemerintah melalui Peraturan Menteri BUMN Nomor: Per-15/MBU/2012. Sinergi yang dimaksud dalam peraturan tersebut pada dasarnya adalah dorongan untuk saling melakukan penunjukan langsung di antara BUMN, anak perusahaan dan perusahaan terafiliasinya. Terhadap hal tersebut, KPPU menilai Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN bertentangan dengan prinsip persaingan usaha yang utamanya tercermin dalam putusan dan saran atas perkara nomor 07/KPPU-I/2013.

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana perspektif kebijakan dan ekonomi persaingan usaha terhadap Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN. Guna menjawab hal tersebut, penelitian ini akan melakukan analisis dengan menggunakan data kualitatif dan data kuantitatif dengan pembatasan studi pada industri jasa teknologi informasi. Data kualitatif dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode penelitian non-doctrinal legal research, sedangkan data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan cara melakukan perhitungan konsentrasi industri. Dari analisis kualitatif yang dilakukan, dapatlah disimpulkan bahwa secara material Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN memiliki beberapa kekurangan yang dapat berdampak terhadap kompetisi ataupun efisiensi. Kendati demikian, oleh karena secara legal formal Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN tetap dapat dilakukan maka diperlukan beberapa perbaikan dalam aturan pelaksanaannya sehingga Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN menjadi tidak berpotensi merugikan persaingan secara luas. Adapun dari pengolahan data kuantitatif yang dilakukan, dapat diketahui bahwa pada industri jasa teknologi informasi khususnya pasar data center services, Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN dapat berpotensi membatasi persaingan. Hal tersebut terlihat dari angka pertumbuhan kinerja pelaku usaha pesaing, meningkatnya penguasaan pasar dan rendahnya efisiensi Perusahaan Terafiliasi BUMN.

---

ABSTRACT
In the face of an increasing global economy, Government wants State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) to be more competitive. In order to realize that goal, Government made an effort by issuing policies that foster synergy among SOEs, its Subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. Currently, policy to encourage business synergy between SOEs is implemented by the Government through SOE?s Minister Regulations No. Per-15 / MBU / 2012. Synergy that stipulated in the minister regulations is basically to permit and encourage procurement with direct appointment method among SOEs, its subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. On the contrary, the Antitrust Commission considers such kind of policy is against to the principles of competition. Such consideration was mainly reflected in the Commision verdicts and suggestion on case number 07 / KPPU-I / 2013.

This research was conducted to determine how the perspective of antitrust economic and policy towards synergy of the SOEs. To answer this, this research performed analysis using quantitative and qualitative data. Such data is limited to the information technology services industry. Qualitative data was analyzed by using non-doctrinal legal research method, while quantitative data was analyzed by calculating industry concentration. From the qualitative analysis carried out, it can be concluded that the SOE? Synergy Policy contains some risks that can influence competition and efficiency. However, because SOE? Synergy Policy still can be legally implemented, some policy-improvements are needed to ensure that implementation of the policy will not harm competition. From the quantitative data processed, it can be known that competition in information technology services industry in particular market of data center services is potentially damaged by the SOE? Synergy Policy. This is evident from the performance of the competitors as well as market share and efficiency of Affiliated Companies of the SOE.;In the face of an increasing global economy, Government wants State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) to be more competitive. In order to realize that goal, Government made an effort by issuing policies that foster synergy among SOEs, its Subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. Currently, policy to encourage business synergy between SOEs is implemented by the Government through SOE?s Minister Regulations No. Per-15 / MBU / 2012. Synergy that stipulated in the minister regulations is basically to permit and encourage procurement with direct appointment method among SOEs, its subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. On the contrary, the Antitrust-Commission considers such kind of policy is against to the principles of competition. Such consideration was mainly reflected in the Commision?s verdicts and suggestion on case number 07 / KPPU-I / 2013. This research was conducted to determine how the perspective of antitrust economic and policy towards synergy of the SOEs. To answer this, this research performed analysis using quantitative and qualitative data. Such data is limited to the information technology services industry. Qualitative data was analyzed by using non-doctrinal legal research method, while quantitative data was analyzed by calculating industry concentration. From the qualitative analysis carried out, it can be concluded that the SOE? Synergy Policy contains some risks that can influence competition and efficiency. However, because SOE? Synergy Policy still can be legally implemented, some policy-improvements are needed to ensure that implementation of the policy will not harm competition. From the quantitative data processed, it can be known that competition in information technology services industry in particular market of data center services is potentially damaged by the SOE? Synergy Policy. This is evident from the performance of the competitors as well as market share and efficiency of Affiliated Companies of the SOE.;In the face of an increasing global economy, Government wants State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) to be more competitive. In order to realize that goal, Government made an effort by issuing policies that foster synergy among SOEs, its Subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. Currently, policy to encourage business synergy between SOEs is implemented by the Government through SOE?s Minister Regulations No. Per-15 / MBU / 2012. Synergy that stipulated in the minister regulations is basically to permit and encourage procurement with direct appointment method among SOEs, its subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. On the contrary, the Antitrust-Commission considers such kind of policy is against to the principles of competition. Such consideration was mainly reflected in the Commision?s verdicts and suggestion on case number 07 / KPPU-I / 2013. This research was conducted to determine how the perspective of antitrust economic and policy towards synergy of the SOEs. To answer this, this research performed analysis using quantitative and qualitative data. Such data is limited to the information technology services industry. Qualitative data was analyzed by using non-doctrinal legal research method, while quantitative data was analyzed by calculating industry concentration. From the qualitative analysis carried out, it can be concluded that the SOE? Synergy Policy contains some risks that can influence competition and efficiency. However, because SOE? Synergy Policy still can be legally implemented, some policy-improvements are needed to ensure that implementation of the policy will not harm competition. From the quantitative data processed, it can be known that competition in information technology services industry in particular market of data center services is potentially damaged by the SOE? Synergy Policy. This is evident from the performance of the competitors as well as market share and efficiency of Affiliated Companies of the SOE.;In the face of an increasing global economy, Government wants State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) to be more competitive. In order to realize that goal, Government made an effort by issuing policies that foster synergy among SOEs, its Subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. Currently, policy to encourage business synergy between SOEs is implemented by the Government through SOE?s Minister Regulations No. Per-15 / MBU / 2012. Synergy that stipulated in the minister regulations is basically to permit and encourage procurement with direct appointment method among SOEs, its subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. On the contrary, the Antitrust-Commission considers such kind of policy is against to the principles of competition. Such consideration was mainly reflected in the Commision?s verdicts and suggestion on case number 07 / KPPU-I / 2013. This research was conducted to determine how the perspective of antitrust economic and policy towards synergy of the SOEs. To answer this, this research performed analysis using quantitative and qualitative data. Such data is limited to the information technology services industry. Qualitative data was analyzed by using non-doctrinal legal research method, while quantitative data was analyzed by calculating industry concentration. From the qualitative analysis carried out, it can be concluded that the SOE? Synergy Policy contains some risks that can influence competition and efficiency. However, because SOE? Synergy Policy still can be legally implemented, some policy-improvements are needed to ensure that implementation of the policy will not harm competition. From the quantitative data processed, it can be known that competition in information technology services industry in particular market of data center services is potentially damaged by the SOE? Synergy Policy. This is evident from the performance of the competitors as well as market share and efficiency of Affiliated Companies of the SOE., In the face of an increasing global economy, Government wants State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) to be more competitive. In order to realize that goal, Government made an effort by issuing policies that foster synergy among SOEs, its Subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. Currently, policy to encourage business synergy between SOEs is implemented by the Government through SOE’s Minister Regulations No. Per-15 / MBU / 2012. Synergy that stipulated in the minister regulations is basically to permit and encourage procurement with direct appointment method among SOEs, its subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. On the contrary, the Antitrust-Commission considers such kind of policy is against to the principles of competition. Such consideration was mainly reflected in the Commision’s verdicts and suggestion on case number 07 / KPPU-I / 2013. This research was conducted to determine how the perspective of antitrust economic and policy towards synergy of the SOEs. To answer this, this research performed analysis using quantitative and qualitative data. Such data is limited to the information technology services industry. Qualitative data was analyzed by using non-doctrinal legal research method, while quantitative data was analyzed by calculating industry concentration. From the qualitative analysis carried out, it can be concluded that the SOE’ Synergy Policy contains some risks that can influence competition and efficiency. However, because SOE’ Synergy Policy still can be legally implemented, some policy-improvements are needed to ensure that implementation of the policy will not harm competition. From the quantitative data processed, it can be known that competition in information technology services industry in particular market of data center services is potentially damaged by the SOE’ Synergy Policy. This is evident from the performance of the competitors as well as market share and efficiency of Affiliated Companies of the SOE.]

Abstrak :
Dalam menghadapi perekonomian yang semakin global, Pemerintah menginginkan BUMN-BUMN memiliki daya saing. Untuk mewujudkan hal tersebut, upaya yang dilakukan Pemerintah adalah dengan mengeluarkan kebijakan yang mendorong terjadinya sinergi di antara BUMN, Anak Perusahaan BUMN, dan Perusahaan Terafiliasi BUMN. Kebijakan untuk mendorong terjadinya Sinergi BUMN tersebut, saat ini diterapkan oleh pemerintah melalui Peraturan Menteri BUMN Nomor: Per-15/MBU/2012. Sinergi yang dimaksud dalam peraturan tersebut pada dasarnya adalah dorongan untuk saling melakukan penunjukan langsung di antara BUMN, anak perusahaan dan perusahaan terafiliasinya. Terhadap hal tersebut, KPPU menilai Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN bertentangan dengan prinsip persaingan usaha yang utamanya tercermin dalam putusan dan saran atas perkara nomor 07/KPPU-I/2013. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana perspektif kebijakan dan ekonomi persaingan usaha terhadap Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN. Guna menjawab hal tersebut, penelitian ini akan melakukan analisis dengan menggunakan data kualitatif dan data kuantitatif dengan pembatasan studi pada industri jasa teknologi informasi. Data kualitatif dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode penelitian non-doctrinal legal research, sedangkan data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan cara melakukan perhitungan konsentrasi industri. Dari analisis kualitatif yang dilakukan, dapatlah disimpulkan bahwa secara material Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN memiliki beberapa kekurangan yang dapat berdampak terhadap kompetisi ataupun efisiensi. Kendati demikian, oleh karena secara legal formal Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN tetap dapat dilakukan maka diperlukan beberapa perbaikan dalam aturan pelaksanaannya sehingga Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN menjadi tidak berpotensi merugikan persaingan secara luas. Adapun dari pengolahan data kuantitatif yang dilakukan, dapat diketahui bahwa pada industri jasa teknologi informasi khususnya pasar data center services, Kebijakan Sinergi BUMN dapat berpotensi membatasi persaingan. Hal tersebut terlihat dari angka pertumbuhan kinerja pelaku usaha pesaing, meningkatnya penguasaan pasar dan rendahnya efisiensi Perusahaan Terafiliasi BUMN.

---

In the face of an increasing global economy, Government wants State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) to be more competitive. In order to realize that goal, Government made an effort by issuing policies that foster synergy among SOEs, its Subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. Currently, policy to encourage business synergy between SOEs is implemented by the Government through SOE?s Minister Regulations No. Per-15 / MBU / 2012. Synergy that stipulated in the minister regulations is basically to permit and encourage procurement with direct appointment method among SOEs, its subsidiaries, and Affiliated Companies of the SOE. On the contrary, the Antitrust-Commission considers such kind of policy is against to the principles of competition. Such consideration was mainly reflected in the Commision?s verdicts and suggestion on case number 07 / KPPU-I / 2013. This research was conducted to determine how the perspective of antitrust economic and policy towards synergy of the SOEs. To answer this, this research performed analysis using quantitative and qualitative data. Such data is limited to the information technology services industry. Qualitative data was analyzed by using non-doctrinal legal research method, while quantitative data was analyzed by calculating industry concentration. From the qualitative analysis carried out, it can be concluded that the SOE? Synergy Policy contains some risks that can influence competition and efficiency. However, because SOE? Synergy Policy still can be legally implemented, some policy-improvements are needed to ensure that implementation of the policy will not harm competition. From the quantitative data processed, it can be known that competition in information technology services industry in particular market of data center services is potentially damaged by the SOE? Synergy Policy. This is evident from the performance of the competitors as well as market share and efficiency of Affiliated Companies of the SOE.

Abstrak :
Proyek pengeboran eksplorasi minyak dan gas bumi merupakan proyek berisiko yang sebagian besar pekerjaannya dilaksanakan oleh kontraktor vendor . Risiko atas proyek yang dikerjakan oleh kontraktor umumnya dikelola dengan suatu kontrak. Penelitian ini dilakukan karena terdapat potensi membengkaknya biaya proyek yang dikarenakan lemahnya pengelolaan kontrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan kerangka kerja manajemen kontrak untuk mengendalikan biaya proyek pengeboran eksplorasi. Pengembangan kerangka kerja tersebut dilakukan dengan menerapkan proses manajemen risiko. Dari pengumpulan data dan analisis yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini dihasilkan 276 items checklist untuk meminimalkan probabilitas terjadinya 67 risiko yang berkaitan dengan 172 aktivitas manajemen kontrak. Di samping itu, untuk memitigasi dampak dari suatu risiko dalam penelitian ini juga disusun 8 klausula kontrak yang berkaitan dengan risiko yaitu hak dan kewajiban, tata cara pembayaran, sanksi dan denda, mediasi/pra litigasi, penyelesaian sengketa, ganti kerugian, asuransi, dan pembagian tugas. ......Oil and gas exploration drilling project is a risky project which most of its works is executed by a contractor vendor . Risks of a project carried out by vendors should be managed by a contract. This research was initiated because there is possibility for increased project costs due to a weak contract management. This study aims to develop a contract management framework to control cost of drilling project. Such framework is developed by conducting risk management process. From data collection and analysis conducted in this research, 276 checklist items were produced to minimize the probability of 67 risks that related to 172 contract management activities. In addition, to mitigate the impact of the risks, this research proposed 8 risk related contract clauses, including rights and obligations, payment procedures, sanctions and penalties, mediation pre litigation, dispute resolution, compensation, insurance, and matrix of duties.