Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas dua permasalahan: alasan mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia perlu memiliki kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara pengaduan konstitusional; dan bagaimana seharusnya mengatur penambahan kewenangan tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini adalah: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia perlu mendapatkan kewenangan ini demi menjalankan prinsip negara hukum yang dianut Republik Indonesia, melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia, menegakkan supremasi konstitusi, menjalankan checks and balances, memenuhi esensi pendirian mahkamah konstitusi di dunia, menjalankan fungsi pengujian konstitusional secara utuh, dan secara empiris banyak kasus yang bersubstansi pengaduan konstitusional sudah diajukan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia; dan penambahan kewenangan tersebut hanya bisa dilakukan dengan amandemen undang-undang dasar.

---

ABSTRACT

, This thesis mainly discusses two problems: the urgency of giving the

jurisdiction for constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia over constitutional

complaint; and how the jurisdiction is supposedly given. This thesis concludes

that: constitutional court should have jurisdiction over constitutional complaint in

order to implement the principles of ‘rule of law’, protect human rights, uphold

the supremacy of constitution, maintain checks and balances function, fulfill the

essence of establishing constitutional court, and completely implement the

function of constitutional review, and empirically there has been many cases in

constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia that contain constitutional complaint

substance; and the only way to give the jurisdiction to constitutional court of

Republic of Indonesia is to amend the constitution.]"

"Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum/normatif. Penelitian ini membahas kasus Pilav v. Bosnia Herzegovina yang diadili di European Court of Human Rights. Dalam tesis ini dibahas kedudukan konstitusi negara sebagai bentuk pelaksanaan kedaulatan negara, yang dilindungi dari intervensi asing oleh hukum internasional. Dibahas pula perkembangan penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia yang berimbas pada pembatasan terhadap jurisdiksi domestik negara untuk menetapkan hukum bagi wilayah dan warga negaranya, termasuk adanya kewenangan pengadilan internasional untuk mengadili konstitusi negara yang bertentangan dengan norma hukum internasional tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Dalam hal pertentangan antara konstitusi negara dengan aturan hukum internasional tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, digunakan sudut pandang hukum internasional dan hukum nasional. Kedua sudut pandang ini digunakan untuk menganalisis putusan European Court of Human Rights dalam kasus Pilav v. Bosnia Herzegovina.

---

The purpose of this thesis is to present a case study of Pilav v. Bosnia Herzegovina before European Court of Human Rights. This thesis uses theoretical arguments and international law instruments to analyse the violation of international norms on human rights by state constitution. This thesis discusses the legal status of state constitution as a part of domaine r serv, which is protected from foreign intervention according to international law. It also discusses the development of international law on human rights, which leads to the limitation on domestic jurisdiction of a state including the emergence of international courts which have the jurisdiction to adjudicate violation of international norms on human rights by state constitution. In the conflict between international norms on human rights and state constitution, there are two perspectives that can be used international law and national law. These two perspectives are used in this thesis to examine ECtHR rsquo s jurisdiction on this case."

"Skripsi ini membahas dua permasalahan: alasan mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia perlu memiliki kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara pengaduan konstitusional; dan bagaimana seharusnya mengatur penambahan kewenangan tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini adalah: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia perlu mendapatkan kewenangan ini demi menjalankan prinsip negara hukum yang dianut Republik Indonesia, melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia, menegakkan supremasi konstitusi, menjalankan checks and balances, memenuhi esensi pendirian mahkamah konstitusi di dunia, menjalankan fungsi pengujian konstitusional secara utuh, dan secara empiris banyak kasus yang bersubstansi pengaduan konstitusional sudah diajukan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia; dan penambahan kewenangan tersebut hanya bisa dilakukan dengan amandemen undang-undang dasar.

---

This thesis mainly discusses two problems: the urgency of giving the jurisdiction for constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia over constitutional complaint; and how the jurisdiction is supposedly given. This thesis concludes that: constitutional court should have jurisdiction over constitutional complaint in order to implement the principles of ‘rule of law’, protect human rights, uphold the supremacy of constitution, maintain checks and balances function, fulfill the essence of establishing constitutional court, and completely implement the function of constitutional review, and empirically there has been many cases in constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia that contain constitutional complaint substance; and the only way to give the jurisdiction to constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia is to amend the constitution."