Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The problem of temporary dismissal of public officials frequently emerges along with the problem of corruption eradication. some public officials who don't agree with the temporary dismissal procedures usually requested a petition or judicial review process to constitutional court (MK) related laws regulating about his/her public position. the procedures of temporary dismissal for public officials are stipulated in one or more laws regulating the function and role of a public institution where the public officials were used to work before. There are some terms and mechanisms within the related laws. But the point, the main reason why such public officials are dismissed temporaly from office is cause by a criminal accusation against the public official.Temporary dismissal left us with some very crucial quetions, one of them is about the particular period of the dismissal that has to be obeyed by the public officials. The relaated law only provides an answer in normative way.it is stated that the public officials shall be released or appointed again when the court confirm that he/ she is not guilty at ll, then his/ her power and name will be rehabilitated. This kind of uncertainty of the length on the dismissal period which is why is why usually considered to be a legal basis in order to propose a judicial review to MK, because the requester perceives that his/ her loss can be categorized as a constituitional loss. Besides, he/ she would be thinking that the dismissal can be also considered as a violation to presumption of innocent principle. Another main problem is could it be right if the litigant considered thath the temporary dismissal is a constitutional issue and then sending it to MK to be reviewed constitutionally. According to several MK's decision about these cases, MK has affirmed that the temporary dismissal is not a constitutional issue and can not be accepted as a constitutional loss. The exact place to argue that issue is DPR through legislative review. This research itself uses 3 types of approaches those are statute approach, comparative approach, and case approach."

"The problem of corruption in Indonesia is related to the opportunities of public officials to abuse the authority in their own scope of position. In Indonesia, this condition exists at every level of public administration and public position. In order to reduce abusive and corruptive behavior, Parliament (DPR) and President through legislation have made some standard procedures to temporarily remove public officials accused of having committed corruption. But in many cases, practically, this problem amounts some legal difficulties. One of which is related to the constitutionality of the dismissal norm. In legal culture perspective, resigning temporarily when being accused for doing a shameful behavior is not a popular option; this is because of the presumption of innocent principles? requirement of the legal basis in criminal law. This article tried to analyse some parts of these problems.

---

Masalah korupsi di Indonesia berkaitan dengan peluang pejabat publik dalam menyalahgunakan kewenangan didalam lingkup posisi mereka sendiri. Di Indonesia, kondisi ini ada pada setiap tingkat administrasi publik dan jabatan publik. Dalam rangka untuk mengurangi perilaku koruptif, Parlemen (DPR) dan Presiden melalui undang-undang telah membuat beberapa prosedur standar untuk sementara memberhentikan pejabat publik yang dituduh melakukan korupsi. Namun dalam banyak kasus, praktik, masalah ini dalam jumlahnya mengalami beberapa kesulitan hukum. Salah satunya berkaitan dengan undang-undang norma pemecatan. Dalam perspektif budaya hukum, mengundurkan diri sementara ketika dituduh untuk melakukan perilaku memalukan bukanlah pilihan yang populer, karena kebutuhan dari prinsip praduga tak bersalah sebagai dasar hukum dalam hukum pidana. Artikel ini mencoba untuk menganalisis beberapa bagian dari masalah ini."