Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan Amicus Curiae dalam pembuktian tindak pidana dan untuk mengetahui apakah pendapat Amicus Curiae dijadikan pertimbangan oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Adapun masalah yang dibahas adalah bagaimanakah kedudukan Amicus Curiae dalam pembuktian tindak pidana dan apakah pendapat Amicus Curiae dijadikan pertimbangan oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi lapangan, yakni melakukan wawancara langsung dengan sejumlah hakim, dan studi kepustakaan dengan membaca dokumen yang berkaitan dengan masalah yang diteliti untuk mencari konsep-konsep, teori-teori, pendapat ataupun penemuan-penemuan yang berhubungan dengan pokok permasalahan. Kesimpulannya terdapat pengaturan yang jelas tentang amicus curiae dalam sistem Common Law sedangkan di negara Civil Law seperti Indonesia, tidak terdapat pengaturan yang jelas mengenai amicus curiae. Namun pada kenyataannya beberapa kasus di Indonesia, amicus curiae cukup diperhatikan oleh hakim seperti pada kasus pidana atas nama Prita Mulyasari.;This study aims to determine the position of Amicus Curiae in the proof of criminal acts and to determine whether Amicus Curiae opinion taken into consideration by the judge in the verdict. The problem discussed is how the position of Amicus Curiae in proving criminal acts and whether Amicus Curiae opinion taken into consideration by the judge in the verdict.This study was done using data collection through field studies by direct interviews with a number of judges, and the study of literature by reading documents related to the problems examined to find the concepts, theories, opinions or findings related to the subject problems. The conclusion is that in common law the regulation about amicus curiae is clear. But in civil law country like Indonesia the regulation is not clear. However, we can find some cases related with amicus curiae in Indonesia. The judge also paid attention to the amicus curiae, such as in Prita case.;This study aims to determine the position of Amicus Curiae in the proof of criminal acts and to determine whether Amicus Curiae opinion taken into consideration by the judge in the verdict. The problem discussed is how the position of Amicus Curiae in proving criminal acts and whether Amicus Curiae opinion taken into consideration by the judge in the verdict.This study was done using data collection through field studies by direct interviews with a number of judges, and the study of literature by reading documents related to the problems examined to find the concepts, theories, opinions or findings related to the subject problems. The conclusion is that in common law the regulation about amicus curiae is clear. But in civil law country like Indonesia the regulation is not clear. However, we can find some cases related with amicus curiae in Indonesia. The judge also paid attention to the amicus curiae, such as in Prita case., This study aims to determine the position of Amicus Curiae in the proof of criminal acts and to determine whether Amicus Curiae opinion taken into consideration by the judge in the verdict. The problem discussed is how the position of Amicus Curiae in proving criminal acts and whether Amicus Curiae opinion taken into consideration by the judge in the verdict.This study was done using data collection through field studies by direct interviews with a number of judges, and the study of literature by reading documents related to the problems examined to find the concepts, theories, opinions or findings related to the subject problems. The conclusion is that in common law the regulation about amicus curiae is clear. But in civil law country like Indonesia the regulation is not clear. However, we can find some cases related with amicus curiae in Indonesia. The judge also paid attention to the amicus curiae, such as in Prita case.]"

"Skripsi ini dilatar belakangi oleh perkembangan bidang seni rupa Art . Dengan definisi awal bahwa seni haruslah lsquo;indah rsquo; dan enak dipandang, berubah menjadi bagaimana karya seni tersebut menganut konsep yang mendalam. Sama halnya dengan arsitektur, dahulu manusia berlomba-lomba untuk membuat bangunan yang mewah dilengkapi dengan dekorasi-dekorasi yang megah. Kemudian pada masa kini pemikiran manusia berubah, untuk membuat bangunan yang sederhana namun tetap dapat mewadahi berbagai macam kebutuhannya. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menelusuri perkembangan pemikiran konsep pada lukisan dan arsitektur yang saling mempengaruhi, dengan metode studi kasus pada gerakan Suprematisme dan De Stijl menurut konsep Noumena Immanuel Kant.

---

This paper is based on the development of the faculty of fine arts Art . With the previous definition that art should be 39 beautiful 39 and pleasing to the eye, turns into how the Art embraces the profound concept. Same with architecture. In the past, human contend to create a spacious building equipped with magnificent decorations. And now. human thought is changed to make a simple building that can accommodate various programs and needs. This paper aims is to trace the development of conceptual thinking on painting and architecture that affect each other, with case study method on Suprematism and De Stijl according to Noumena rsquo s concept by Immanuel Kant."