Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Den Haag pada tahun 2011 memutuskan untuk menerima klaim gugatan yang diajukan oleh keluarga para korban pembantaian Rawagedeh yang dilakukan oleh tentara Belanda pada tahun 1947 silam. Pengajuan klaim ganti kerugian dilakukan dengan cara mengajukan gugatan perdata ke muka Pengadilan Negeri Den Haag. Hal ini dilakukan sebagai upaya hukum terakhir yang dapat dilakukan oleh penggugat mengingat tidak adanya penyelesaian perkara yang seharusnya dilakukan oleh negara Belanda secara publik. Meskipun Pengadilan Negeri Den Haag mengabulkan klaim gugatan atas pemulihan para keluarga korban, akan tetapi dalam amar putusannya tidak menjelaskan bentuk pelanggaran atas kewajiban internasional yang dilakukan oleh Belanda atas pembantaian Rawagedeh. Oleh karena itu, penulisan skripsi ini dimaksudkan untuk menganalisis bentuk tanggung jawab negara Belanda kepada para keluarga korban Rawagedeh menurut hukum internasional.

---

The Hague District Court in 2011 decided to accept the claims filed by the relatives of the Rawagedeh massacre victims back in 1947 conducted by the Dutch troops. The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit for reparations through civil procedure to the District Court of The Hague. This action is seen as the last resort taken by the plaintiff given the absence of any judicial process the Dutch authority should have conducted publicly. Although the Hague District Court has granted these lawsuit, but the verdict did not explain what kind of violation of international obligations taken by the Dutch troop in Rawagedeh massacre. Thus, this thesis is aimed to analyze the Dutch responsibility to give remedies to the families of the victims in Rawagedeh under international law.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Over the past few years, one of Indonesias state-owned enterprises, PLN, has conducted dialogues focusing on developing a new value-creative business model to transform itself, a sleepy regulated utility, into a truly competitive electricity service provider. However, efforts to preserve the prominence of the Countrys electricity sector have been ongoing as the sector is still experiencing sustained rolling blackouts, net import dependency and lack of transmission facility enforcement throughout the Indonesian archipelago. Such efforts have been varied from the incentivise policy and programs such as the Public-Private Partnership and the two phases of Fast Track Program. The reformation of electricity law dated back on the 1985, 2002 and 2009 to attract investors in the development of Indonesias electricity sector have been enacted, but a controversial issue arose from the annulment of the Law No. 20 Year 2002 on Electricity by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 001- 021-022/PUU-I/2003 stating that such law which clearly stating that the requirement to privatise electricity operation was unconstitutional. This article will try to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of such decision with the common practice adopted by the EU which has successfully implemented its deregulation and separation of the electricitys business chain through unbundling the sector as part of liberalisation.