Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini menganalisis mengenai Singapore Convention on Mediation yang merupakan solusi bagi beberapa pihak yang tidak memilih penyelesaian sengketa perdagangan internasional melalui mediasi karena tidak memiliki kekuatan legitimasi internasional. Konvensi ini diterbitkan oleh UNCITRAL pada tanggal 7 Agustus 2019 dan secara resmi diberlakukan terhitung tanggal 12 September 2020. Dalam perkembangannya, konvensi ini semakin diminati dalam upaya sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan yang sampai saat ini masih belum sepenuhnya mengakomodasi kebutuhan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa secara cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan. Mengingat konvensi ini baru saja disepakati dan belum diterapkan secara efektif oleh negara-negara lain, dan untuk itu, dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai pertimbangan-pertimbangan Indonesia dalam menentukan sikap keikutsertaan dalam konvensi ini sebagai solusi penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan efisien. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Singapore Convention on Mediation adalah salah satu upaya untuk meningkatkan Ease of Doing Business (EODB) di Indonesia, namun tetap harus mempertimbangkan apakah proses aksesi dibutuhkan oleh negara Indonesia, atau merupakan kepentingan negara lain untuk memudahkan proses eksekusi dari kesepakatan hasil mediasi yang dilakukan di luar negara Indonesia.

---

This thesis discusses the Singapore Convention on Mediation which is a solution for some parties who do not choose to settle international trade disputes through mediation because they do not have the power of international legitimacy. This convention was published by UNCITRAL on 7 August 2019 and officially entered into force on 12 September 2020. In its development, this convention is increasingly in demand as an alternative to out-of-court dispute resolution which until now has not fully accommodated the need to resolve disputes quickly, simple, and low cost. Considering that this convention has just been agreed upon and has not been effectively implemented by other countries, and for that, this research will discuss Indonesia's considerations in determining its participation in this convention as an effective and efficient dispute resolution solution. The research method used is normative juridical research. The Singapore Convention on Mediation is one of the efforts to increase the Ease of Doing Business (EODB) in Indonesia, but still has to consider whether the accession process is required by the Indonesian state, or is in the interest of other countries to facilitate the execution process of the mediation result agreement conducted outside the Indonesia."

""Written by one of the world's leading international lawyers, this is a landmark publication in the teaching of international law. International law can be defined as 'the rules governing the legal relationship between nations and states', but reality is much more complex, with political, diplomatic and socio-economic factors shaping the law and its application. This refreshingly clear, concise textbook encourages students to view international law as a dynamic system of organizing the world. Bringing international law back to its first principles, the book is organized around four questions: where does it come from? to whom does it apply? how does it resolve conflict? what does it say? Building on these questions with both academic rigour and clarity of expression, Professor Klabbers breathes life and energy into the subject. Footnotes point students to the wider academic debate while chapter introductions and final remarks reinforce learning""

"Penelitian ini akan fokus pada kerja sama Indonesia-Malaysia di dalam penanggulangan bencana gempa bumi dan tsunami di Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai tahun 2010. Data-data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan kerangka analisis diplomasi bencana dengan variabel kedekatan geografis dan identitas antara Indonesia-Malaysia, relasi bantuan Indonesia-Malaysia, keterlibatan negara dan tingkatan diplomasi bencana Indonesia-Malaysia, tujuan pemberian bantuan oleh Malaysia kepada Indonesia. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa kerja sama yang dilakukan oleh Indonesia dan Malaysia hanya bertujuan untuk menunjukkan solidaritas. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kerja sama Indonesia-Malaysia tidak berhasil karena tensi konflik kedua negara tidak menurun. Oleh karena itu, riset ini memberi rekomendasi pembuatan standar operasional prosedur (SOP) di dalam kerja sama internasional penanggulangan bencana, melibatkan masyarakat di dalam struktur resmi dan formal Pusat Komando Tanggap Darurat, dan kecepatan strategi serta pemberdayaan fasilitas darurat untuk menunjang distribusi bantuan.

---

This research focuses on disaster management of Indonesia-Malaysia cooperation on earthquake and tsunami disaster in Mentawai District in 2010. The data was analysed with the theory of disaster diplomacy using five variables: propinquity of Indonesia-Malaysia, aid relationship of Indonesia-Malaysia, state involvement, actors of diplomacy, and purpose of assistance. The research finds that Indonesia-Malaysia cooperation has a purpose to show solidarity between both countries. Thus, conclusion of the research is the cooperation between Indonesia-Malaysia fail because the tension doesn‟t decrease. Finally, this research recommends the creation of operational standard procedure, people involvement, and reformulation the strategy of aid distribution."

"Summary:The purpose of this volume is to explore what role ethical discourse plays in international law"

"Populisme merupakan sebuah instrumen politik yang efektif dalam realm demokrasi; populisme dapat mengartikulasikan apa yang menjadi kehendak mayoritas masyarakat, yang seringkali tidak selalu rasional, sebagai diskursus untuk menekan tatanan pemerintahan domestik. Keterkaitan antara politik domestik dengan hubungan internasional menjadikan fenomena kebangkitan populisme problematis, sebab narasi-narasi yang banyak diangkat justru merupakan anti-tesis terhadap apa yang membentuk stabilitas tatanan dunia internasional saat ini. Kemunculan populisme sayap kanan yang semakin lazim di berbagai tataran politik domestik kontemporer mengisyaratkan adanya sebuah tren baru dalam dinamika politik internasional yang menyebabkan narasi-narasi populisme sayap kanan radikal menjadi lebih diminati dan memperoleh basis politik yang besar di tingkat domestik; serta menghasilkan tekanan yang besar terhadap keberlangsungan tata kelola dunia internasional saat ini. Tulisan ini berupaya untuk melihat bagaimana perkembangan narasi-narasi populisme dalam diskursus politik internasional pasca Perang Dunia II, serta lebih jauh lagi berupaya untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan mengapa varian populisme sayap kanan kemudian mampu mendominasi diskursus politik internasional kontemporer.

---

Populism is an effective political instrument within the realm of democracy; which articulates what was considered the general will of the society, which often proved to be irrational, as the counter-narrative to the dominance of established political elites and their discourses. The linkage between domestic politics and international relations has framed the rise of the populists to be problematic: as the narrative that they (populists) endorse has pushed the idea of anti-globalization, anti-establishment, and anti-internationalist, which poses a threat to the very stability of contemporary international order. The rise of right-wing populism that prevails on many domestic-level politic, implies the existence of a new trend on the dynamic of international politic which favored the narrative of radical right-wing populism into the mainstream political discourses. This writing attempts to signify the development of the narrative of right-wing populism within the discourse of post-World War international political order. It also attempts to analyze and explain why the variety of right-wing populism has successfully dominating the discourses of contemporary international politics."

"Summary: What is the relationship between politics and international law? Rather than exploring this question through the lens of the dominant paradigms of international relations theory - realism, liberalism and constructivism - this book proposes a different approach. Based on the premise that the relationship varies depending on the sites where it unfolds, and inspired by comparative politics and socio-legal studies, the book develops a novel framework for comparative analysis of politics and international law at different stages of governance and in different governance systems. Expert contributors apply this analytical framework to diverse fields of law and politics. Part I examines the problems of compliance, effectiveness and the domestic enforcement of international law, and legal institutions including domestic and international courts, national legislatures and regime complexes. Part II covers substantive fields of governance such as global financial regulation, environmental standards, trade, intellectual property and human rights. The final chapters in this Part tackle emerging yet critical issues in international law, including terrorism, cyber conflict and Internet regulation. Together, the chapters represent a significant step forward in the comparative analysis of politics and international law. This Research Handbook will be essential reading for students and academics in political science and law alike"