Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKA dan B membina suatu hubungan bersama yang tidak terikat dalam suatuperkawinan yang sah. Hasil hubungan tersebut melahirkan anak luar kawinbernama X. X lahir berdasarkan Akta Kelahiran Nomor 924/U/PROP/2000dengan tertulis bahwa A dan B adalah orang tua darinya. X di dalam AktaKelahiran tersebut seharusnya tertulis nama ibunya saja yaitu B. Selain itu jugaada Penetapan 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG yang menetapkan bahwa X adalah anakkandung dari A dan B. Bagaimana pengaturan anak luar kawin dan aktakelahiran menurut peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia?mengapa terdapat akta kelahiran yang masih memerlukan penetapan dariPengadilan Negeri? Penulis mempergunakan metode penelitian hukum normatifdidukung dengan wawancara. Data Penelitian yang diperoleh Penulis bahwa Adan B tidak pernah terikat dalam perkawinan yang sah. X adalah benar anak luarkawin Akta kelahiran X dikatakan tidak terdaftar di Kantor Catatan Sipil DKIJakarta. Penulis berpendapat seharusnya Akta Kelahiran X hanya tertulis namaibunya saja berdasarkan Pasal 43 ayat (1) KUHPer. Masalah pembuktiankebenaran akta tersebut harus melalui suatu proses pembuktian di Pengadilan dansiapa yang mendalilkan dialah yang harus membuktikan ketidakbenaran akan isiakta tersebut. Bentuk perlindungan hukum yang bisa diberikan kepada X sebagaianak luar kawin adalah pengakuan anak. Kantor Catatan Sipil dan PengadilanNegeri haruslah lebih teliti dalam melaksanakan ketentuan pengakuan anak luarkawin sesuai dengan yang telah diatur di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan.

---

ABSTRACTA and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage.The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X wasborn by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B arethe parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There wasalso 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B.How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to thelegislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still RequiredDetermination from district court? The writer use this issue using the methodnormatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and Bnever been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outsidemarriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office ofDKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is Bbase on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificatesmust be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be proveuncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that canbe given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registryOffice and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out theprovisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage thathas been set in the legislation.;A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage.The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X wasborn by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B arethe parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There wasalso 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B.How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to thelegislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still RequiredDetermination from district court? The writer use this issue using the methodnormatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and Bnever been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outsidemarriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office ofDKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is Bbase on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificatesmust be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be proveuncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that canbe given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registryOffice and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out theprovisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage thathas been set in the legislation.;A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage.The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X wasborn by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B arethe parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There wasalso 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B.How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to thelegislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still RequiredDetermination from district court? The writer use this issue using the methodnormatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and Bnever been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outsidemarriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office ofDKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is Bbase on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificatesmust be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be proveuncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that canbe given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registryOffice and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out theprovisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage thathas been set in the legislation.;A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage.The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X wasborn by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B arethe parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There wasalso 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B.How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to thelegislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still RequiredDetermination from district court? The writer use this issue using the methodnormatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and Bnever been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outsidemarriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office ofDKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is Bbase on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificatesmust be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be proveuncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that canbe given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registryOffice and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out theprovisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage thathas been set in the legislation., A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage.The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X wasborn by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B arethe parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There wasalso 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B.How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to thelegislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still RequiredDetermination from district court? The writer use this issue using the methodnormatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and Bnever been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outsidemarriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office ofDKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is Bbase on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificatesmust be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be proveuncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that canbe given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registryOffice and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out theprovisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage thathas been set in the legislation.]"

"[ABSTRAKPerkawinan adalah ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dan seorang wanita dengantujuan untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan keTuhananYang Maha Esa. Penulis berasumsi bahwa salah satu tujuan perkawinan adalah untukmendapatkan keturunan atau anak. Dalam penelitian ini pokok permasalahan yangpenulis angkat adalah mengenai kedudukan anak luar kawin ditinjau dari Pasal 43Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan analisis terhadapPenetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim. Penulismenggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pasal 43 Undang-Undang Nomor 1tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan menyatakan bahwa anak luar kawin hanya memilikihubungan hukum dengan ibu dan keluarga ibunya. Tindakan hukum yang dapatdilakukan anak luar kawin memiliki hubungan hukum dengan ayah dan keluargaayahnya adalah melalui pengakuan terhadap anak luar kawin dan pengesahan anakluar kawin pada saat perkawinan kedua orangtuanya. Dalam Penetapan PengadilanNegeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim orang tua dari anak luar kawin tidakmelakukan pengesahan terhadap anak luar kawin mereka pada saat perkawinan,sehingga meminta penetapan pengadilan negeri. Pengakuan dan Pengesahan Anakyang telah melebihi jangka waktu yang telah ditetapkan Pasal 49 dan Pasal 50Undang-Undang Nomor 24 tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor23 tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan harus melalui PenetapanPengadilan Negeri. Penulis setuju dengan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalamPenetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim.

---

ABSTRACTMarriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM., Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father’sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child’s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.]"

"ABSTRAKPerkembangan kemajuan proyek di Indonesia berkembang semakin pesat. Dalam penyelenggaraan proyek, seluruh aktivitas yang berlangsung di dalamnya tidak terlepas dari kontrak. Oleh karena itu, kita harus benar-benar mengerti dan memahami isi kontrak tersebut agar tidak terjadi kesalahpahaman. Hal-hal yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban dan hak salah satu pihak sebagaimana yang tercantum dalam kontrak dapat menyebabkan timbulnya klaim. Berdasarkan 10 Putusan Pengadilan Negeri yang didapat, penyebab utama klaim adalah wanprestasi serta faktor alam dan administrasi. Klaim dapat diselesaikan melalui Pengadilan Negeri dan Arbitrase. Banyak perusahaan yang lebih memilih menyelesaikan klaim melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI) karena sifat persidangannya yang tertutup diibandingkan melalui Pengadilan Negeri yang bersifat terbuka. Namun biaya yang harus dikeluarkan melalui BANI berkisar antara Rp 200.000.000,00 ? Rp 850.000.000,00, berbeda jauh dengan Pengadilan Negeri yang berkisar Rp 350.000,00 ? Rp 600.000,00. Klaim yang diputuskan melalui Arbitrase dapat dibatalkan melalui Pengadilan Negeri berdasarkan Pasal 70 UU No. 30/1999, yaitu adanya dokumen palsu atau dinyatakan palsu, adanya dokumen yang bersifat menentukan disembunyikan, dan adanya tipu muslihat. Selain dari tiga hal di atas, maka alasan apapun tidak dapat dijadikan untuk membatalkan putusan BANI.

---

ABSTRACTThe progress of the project in Indonesia is growing more rapidly. In the operation of the project, all the activity that takes place in it can not be separated from the contract, therefore, we must thoroughly understand and comprehend the contents of the contract in order to avoid misunderstandings. Things that do not fulfill one of the obligations and rights of the parties as specified in the contract may lead to a claim. Based on the 10 District Court obtained, the main cause of the claim is in default as well and force major and administration. Claims can be settled by the District Court and Arbitration. Many companies prefer to resolve claims through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) due to the closed trial than using District Court because it is open trial. But the costs to be incurred through BANI ranges between Rp 200.000.000,00 - Rp 850.000.000,00, far with the District Court that ranges from Rp 350.000,00 - Rp. 600.000,00. Claims are decided through arbitration can be canceled by the District Court based to Article 70 of Law No. 30/1999, which is the existence of false documents or false otherwise, the decisive document is hidden, and the ruse. Apart from the three above, then any reason can not be used to overturn the decision of BANI"

"Hukuman yang berat dengan hukuman mati bila dilaksanakan secara tegas dan konsisten akan mengurangi kejahatan narkoba. Namun adanya Grasi sebagai kekuasaan yang absolut tersebut tidak dapat dikontrol atau dinilai oleh pengadilan merupakan hal yang dapat menggugurkan leak untuk melaksanakan eksekusi. Pennasalahan yang menjadi kajian dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai pengaruh grasi terhadap eksekusi hukuman mati khususnya kepada terpidana kasus narkoba diwilayah pengadilan Tangerang. Serta berupaya untuk mengupas masaiah yang berkenaan dengan penerapan Undang-undang Grasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif-sosiologis dan metode deskriptif analitis. Metode yuridis nonnatif-sosiologis, yang menitikberatkan penelitian terhadap data sekunder berupa Mahan hukum primer. Sedangkan metode deskriptif analitis untuk memperoleh gambaran secara integral dan komprehensif serta sistematis tentang teori-teori hukum pidana dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap masyarakat dari para pelaku tindak pidana narkoba. HashI penelitian menunjukkan bahwa grasi dalam rangka menyelenggarakan keadilan bagi masyarakat, sebagai salah satu fungsi Pemerintah menjaiankan tanggung jawabnya untuk menciptakan kondisi yang kondusif. Pada dasarnya sikap Presiden keras, tegas, dan konsisten terhadap pemberantasan narkoba dan tidak alum .memberikan grasi kepada mereka yang merusak generasi muds, menghancurkan masa depan. Hal ini jelas menunda dan menangguhkan eksekusi mati terpidana. Adanya kasus terpidana yang mengajukan grasi untuk kedua kalinya dan putusan penolakan grasi yang sulit dilaksanakan menunjukkan Undang-undang Grasi perlu ditinjau kembali. Dan eksekusi hukuman mati terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkoba merupakan salah satu upaya penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Serta hanya bagian dari upaya dalam pemberantasan kejahatan narkoba selain adanya peran langsung dari masyarakat.

---

The hardest sentence by death sentence if it is realized consistently and firmly, then, it will reduce criminal case of narcotics and elicit drugs. Nevertheless, such a pardon granted by state as absolute power that may not be controlled or valued by court it may result in the abortion of right to realize execution. The problem arising in this research is regarding a pardon impact against execution of death sentence for case of narcotics and elicit drugs in district court of Tangerang specially. And also to discuss the problems pertaining to application of laws on a pardon granted by state. This research used both normative-sociologic juridical and descriptive analytical methods. Normative-sociologic juridical method underlying secondary data such as primary legal books, whereas, descriptive analytical method in order to obtain integral and comprehensive illustration and systematic of criminal law theory to give legal protection for society from criminal actors of narcotics and elicit drugs. Research result indicating that a pardon within framework to perform justice for society as one government functions to implement their duties and responsibilities to create conducive condition. Basically, the attitude of President is firm, consistent and strong to fight narcotics and elicit drugs and will not give a pardon for who had destructed young generation and eliminate the national future. Obviously, it had postponed and delayed death sentence execution. The case of criminal actor who had filed the second a pardon and judgement of a pardon refusal that may not be realized easily, it indicates that laws on a pardon should be reviewed. And execution of death sentence against criminal actor of narcotics and elicit drugs is one of efforts to enforce law in Indonesia. And as part of efforts to fight criminal commitment of narcotics and elicit drugs as well as direct participation from society."