Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Artikel ini membahas perencanaan dan pembangunan Kota Bandung sebagai upaya pemindahan ibu kota Hindia Belanda pada 1916–1933. Rencana pemindahan ibu kota berawal ketika adanya permasalahan higenitas di Batavia pada awal dekade 1900-an. Kemudian pada 1916, muncul H.F. Tillema yang melaporkan kota-kota di pantai utara Jawa kurang menyehatkannya jika dijadikan pusat kegiatan administrasi pemerintah kolonial, sehingga disarankan ibu kota Hindia Belanda sebaiknya dipindahkan ke Kota Bandung. Proses perencanaan dan pembangunan terus berlangsung hingga didirikannya Technische Hoogeschool te Bandoeng, Gedung Sate, stasiun radio Malabar, hingga fasilitas dan sarana kota lainnya. Sayangnya pembangunan Kota Bandung kurang mendapatkan dukungan dari pemerintah pusat sebagai persiapan pemindahan ibu kota Hindia-Belanda dan harus terhenti pada 1933, dikarenakan adanya Krisis Malaise yang terjadi sejak 1929. Penelitian ini berfokus pada perencanaan dan pembangunan Kota Bandung dalam persiapan pemindahan ibu kota Hindia Belanda pada 1916–1933 dengan menggunakan metode sejarah yang terdiri dari heuristik, verifikasi, interpretasi, dan historiografi.

---

This article discuss the plan and development of Bandung City as an initiative to relocate the capital of the Netherlands East Indies in 1916-1933. The plan to relocate the capital city began when there were hygiene problems in Batavia in the early 1900s. In 1916, H.F. Tillema reported that the cities on the north coast of Java were incapable to be used as the center of administrative colonial government activities because of its unhealthiness, thus recommended that the capital of the Netherlands East Indies should be relocated to the Bandung City. The planning and development process continued until the establishment of the Technische Hoogeschool te Bandoeng, Gedung Sate, Malabar radio station, and other city facilities and infrastructure. Unfortunately, the development of Bandung City lacked support from the central government in preparation for the relocation of the capital of the Netherlands East Indies and was stopped in 1933, due to the Malaise Crisis that had occurred since 1929. This research focuses on the planning and development of Bandung City in preparation for the transfer of the capital of the Netherlands East Indies in 1916-1933 using historical methods consisting of heuristic, verification, interpretation, and historiography."

"[;;, ]"

"Tesis ini membahas tentang perkembangan kota Mimika pada periode 1967-1999. Pada 1967 adalah tahun penandatanganan Kontrak Karya pertama antara PT. Freeport dan orang Indonesia Pemerintah mengenai izin pemrosesan pertambangan di Mimika. Melalui kontrak itu, Freeport mulai untuk mengeksplorasi dan memproses produk pertambangan di Mimika. Kegiatan penambangan di Mimika mendorong cepat pengembangan di Mimika. Selain pembangunan, tingkat pertumbuhan ekonomi di Mimika juga kualitas tinggi. Banyak penduduk dari luar daerah Mimika bahkan di luar Papua tertarik untuk mencari pekerjaan Mimika. Selain menambang, bidang bisnis di Mimika juga beragam, membuat Mimika lebih dinamis. Nilai-nilai tradisional cara hidup penduduk asli di Mimika mulai bergeser ke nilai-nilai yang lebih modern karena penduduk asli mulai berinteraksi dengan penduduk asing dan di luar Papua yang datang ke Mimika. Peningkatan populasi dan perkembangan di daerah Mimika telah menyebabkan Mimika untuk mengubah status administratifnya dari yang dulunya merupakan kecamatan dari Kabupaten Fakfak, ke kabupaten baru bernama Kabupaten Mimika. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode historis, seperti heuristik, kritik, interpretasi dan historiografi. Sumber yang digunakan adalah arsip, buku, artikel, jurnal, tesis dan disertasi sebelumnya.

---

This thesis discusses the development of the city of Mimika in the period 1967-1999. In 1967 it was year of signing of the first Contract of Work between PT. Freeport and Indonesians Government processing permits in Mimika. Through the contract, Freeport began to explore and process mining products at Mimika. Mining activities in Mimika are encouraging fast development at Mimika. In addition to development, the level of economic growth in Mimika as well high quality. Many residents from outside the Mimika area even outside Papua are interested in finding work Mimika. In addition to mining, the business fields at Mimika are also diverse, making Mimika more dynamic. The traditional values ​​of the way of life of indigenous people in Mimika began to shift to more modern values ​​because the natives began to interact with foreigners and outside Papua who came to Mimika. The increase in population and development in the Mimika area has caused Mimika to change its administrative status from what was once a sub-district of Fakfak Regency, to a new district called Mimika Regency. This research uses historical methods, such as heuristics, criticism, interpretation and historiography. Sources used are archives, books, articles, journals, previous theses and dissertatiregarding miningons."

"[ ABSTRAK Untuk tiga berturut-turut, Melbourne telah dinobatkan sebagai kota paling layak huni di dunia oleh survei Economist Intelligence Unit. Indeks ini mendefinisikan lima elemen kunci yaitu pendidikan, infrastruktur, budaya dan lingkungan, kesehatan, dan stabilitas sebagai dasar untuk menentukan kota paling layak huni di dunia. Pertanyaan dapat diajukan terhadap keaslian dan keandalan survei EIU ini. Kelayakan huni sebuah kota telah menjadi faktor yang signifikan dalam menentukan tempat untuk melakukan perjalanan liburan dan menetap bagi banyak individu dan keluarga. Oleh karena itu indeks EIU ini membawa bobot yang besar dalam menentukan keputusan dan gerakan rakyat baik untuk berlibur maupun menetap. Mengingat pentingnya tambahan ini, maka diputuskan untuk menganalisis dan mengevaluasi signifikansi dari lima faktor dalam menentukan kota sebagai layak huni. Sangat diharapkan bahwa probabilitas yang dihitung berasal dari model akan memungkinkan analis untuk menyoroti pentingnya faktor tertentu yang mempengaruhi kelayakan huni dari sebuah kota. Dengan hasil ini, kami akan dapat menganalisis keaslian survei Economist Intelligence Unit serta dengan efektif mengevaluasi skala yang dapat diandalkan untuk lokasi yang dapat ditinggali. Kota dan otoritas perencanaan masing-masing juga akan lebih siap dalam mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor kontribusi potensial yang mempengaruhi kesesuaian dan kenyamanan bagi warganya.

---

ABSTRACT For the third consecutive year, Melbourne has been crowned the world?s most liveable city by the Economist Intelligence Unit?s (EIU) global liveability survey. This index defines the five key elements of education, infrastructure, culture and environment, health care and stability, as the foundation for defining the world?s most liveable city. Questions can be raised however, into the authenticity and reliability the EIU?s survey. City liveability has become a significant factor in deciding a place to travel and locate for many individuals and families. The EIU?s index therefore carries substantial weight in determining people?s decisions and movements. Considering this additional significance, it was decided to analyse and evaluate the significance of the five factors in determining a city as liveable.It is expected that the calculated probability derived from the model will enable analysts to highlight the importance of the specific factors influencing the liveability of a city. With these results, one will be enabled to analyse the authenticity of the Economist Intelligence Unit?s survey as well as effectively evaluate a reliable scale of liveable locations. Cities and their respective planning authorities will also be better equipped in identifying potential contributing factors that influence suitability and comfort for its citizens., For the third consecutive year, Melbourne has been crowned the world’s most liveable city by the Economist Intelligence Unit’s (EIU) global liveability survey. This index defines the five key elements of education, infrastructure, culture and environment, health care and stability, as the foundation for defining the world’s most liveable city. Questions can be raised however, into the authenticity and reliability the EIU’s survey. City liveability has become a significant factor in deciding a place to travel and locate for many individuals and families. The EIU’s index therefore carries substantial weight in determining people’s decisions and movements. Considering this additional significance, it was decided to analyse and evaluate the significance of the five factors in determining a city as liveable.It is expected that the calculated probability derived from the model will enable analysts to highlight the importance of the specific factors influencing the liveability of a city. With these results, one will be enabled to analyse the authenticity of the Economist Intelligence Unit’s survey as well as effectively evaluate a reliable scale of liveable locations. Cities and their respective planning authorities will also be better equipped in identifying potential contributing factors that influence suitability and comfort for its citizens.]"