Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Contents :- Table of Contents by Author - The Use of Intelligent Compression for Future IPTV Networks - The IPTV/VoD Challenge: Upcoming Business Models - IPTV and End-to-End Video Solution - NOW Broadband TV - Enhancing the IPTV Service Architecture to Enable Service Innovation - Next-Generation Architecture for IPTV Middleware - The Set-Top Conundrum: A Market Case for Customized Integrated Media Devices - The IPTV Challenge for Telco Operators - Internet TV versus IPTV versus Web TV - Community TV: A Social and Personalized TV Experience - Maximizing IPTV Triple-Play Market Potential - Considerations for Deployment of IPTV on Passive Optical Networks - Toward Less Homogenous TV - nPVR and Integrated Caching Module (NCM) - Network Management, Surveillance, and Testing for IPTV Service Assurance - Emerging IPTV Solution Deployment: Riding on a Telco�s Network - Requirements of the New IPTV Network: Beyond Optimization - IPTV Operators� Strategies and the Italian Experience - Video Network Architectures for the Telcos: Challenges and Solutions - IPTV: The Clear Picture - The Convergence of IPTV and HTPC - Toward a Set-Top Box Portable Software Stack - Service Implications of Switching, Multiplexing, and QoS in Broadband Metro Networks - Looking Inside IPTV - The IPTV Challenge - Driving IPTV Growth: The Challenges and Perspectives - IPTV Has Become a Global Reality and Has Improved Quality of Service - Achieving High Performance with Your Video-over�IP Strategy - IPTV Success: Lessons from the Front Line - Acronym Guide "

"Tesis ini membahas tentang adanya kekosongan hukum yang terjadi dalam penyiaran yang dikaitkan dengan perkembangan platform digital di Indonesia. Hal ini terjadi karena Pemerintah tidak memodernisasi Undang – Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran sesuai dengan perkembangan teknologi yang ada. Kekosongan hukum yang terjadi ini menyebabkan adanya kelemahan dalam pengawasan konten dalam penyiaran di platform digital. Karena platform digital ini tidak dikategorikan sebagai pelaksana penyiaran dalam Undang – Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran, maka Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika tidak berwenang dalam mengawasi konten pada platform digital. Walaupun pengawasan pada konten platform digital ini bisa menggunakan peraturan – peraturan lain, seperti contohnya bisa dikaitkan dengan pengaturan dalam Undang – Undang Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik jika terdapat isi konten yang mengandung pornografi dan SARA. Tetapi hal ini tidak cukup karena tidak adanya pengawasan yang pasti dari negara. Perlunya merombak Undang – Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran ini dikarenakan sudah banyak konten – konten pada platform digital ini yang terkesan lebih bebas dari siaran di televisi dan radio. Bahkan tidak sedikit juga lembaga penyiaran yang ikut membuat akun dalam platform digital tersebut agar dapat menyiarkan siaran – siaran yang kurang memenuhi kaidah – kaidah penyiaran yang diatur dalam Undang – Undang

---

This thesis discusses the existence of a legal vacuum that occurs in broadcasting, which is associated with the development of digital platforms in Indonesia. This happened because the government did not modernize Act Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting in accordance with existing technological developments. This legal vacuum has led to a weakness in content supervision in broadcasting on digital platforms. Since this digital platform is not categorized as a broadcasting operator in Act Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting, the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission and the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology are not authorized to supervise content on digital platforms. Although the supervision of the content of this digital platform can use other regulations, for example, it can be related to the regulations in the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions if there is content that contains pornography and SARA. But this is not enough because there is no definite supervision from the state. The need to overhaul Act Number 32 of 2002 concerning broadcasting is because there is already a lot of content on this digital platform, which seems to be freer than broadcasts on television and radio. In fact, quite a few broadcasters are even involved in creating accounts on the digital platform in order to be able to broadcast that do not meet the broadcasting rules regulated in the Act."