Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Analisis terhadap implementasi kebijakan reformasi administrasi perlu dilakukan untuk mengetahui proses dan hasil pelaksanaan serta faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Sebagai tempat penelitian dipilih Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat sebagai salah satu kementerian/lembaga yang telah dianggap sudah memenuhi syarat diterapkannya reformasi birokrasi di lingkungannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa implementasi refromasi administrasi di Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat belum efektif. Untuk memperbaiki disarankan meningkatkan kualitas SDM aparatur di Kemenko Kesra melalui peningkatan kompetensi, mendorong penggunaan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) dalam berbagai kegiatan untuk tercapainya efektivitas dan efisiensi dalam pelaksanaan manajemen pemerintahan dan memperkuat sistem promosi jabatan tinggi yang telah berjalan.

---

The implementation of administrative reform need to be analyzed in order to know the results of the implementation and some factors affecting the process. The research selected The Coordinating Ministry For People’s Welfare as an agency which is implementing administrative reform in their organization. This research applied a qualitative approach with in-depth interviews.

The conclusion of this research is that the implementation of administrative reform in The Coordinating Ministry For People’s Welfare is not effective. Some recommendations to improve the implementation are improving the capacity of its Human Resource, improving the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in various units is necessary to enable the employees work more quickly, accurately, efficiently and effectively and give more effort on the open selection program."

"Since eradicating corruption having been continously encouraged by late governments ? and until now ? , there would not be less important as to retracting the corrupted assets. There are many aspects to be considered in doing such action, such as manifesting the legal aspects of administrative law, and so other applied national regulations. By these regulations, such as Law No. 7 of 2006 on Ratification of United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa Anti-Korupsi, 2003), Law Number 25 of 2003 On Amendment to Law Number 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering, Act 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission, Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, and Government Regulation Number 65 of 1999 on Implementation Procedures for Examination of State Property, retraction the corrupted assets should be define in order to get known about eradicating corruption. Another issue that urgently to be defined, as it also become main subject of retracting assets, is the asset itself. Indeed, as the asset which become mainly discussed about is State assets. So, it would be very necessary to clearly have a distinction between State responsibility and that of irresponsibility of the State, in order to settle down, as an after effect, many interpretations."