Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 90 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Elza Ibrahim Auerkari
"Forensic odontology (dental forensics) can provide useful evidence in both criminal and civil cases, and therefore remains a part of the wider discipline of forensic science. As an example from the toolbox of forensic odontology, the practice and experience on bitemark analysis is reviewed here in brief. The principle of using visible bitemarks in crime victims or in other objects as evidence is fundamentally based on the observation that the detailed pattern of dental imprints tend to be practically unique for each individual. Therefore, finding such an imprint as a bitemark can bear a strong testimony that it was produced by the individual that has the matching dental pattern. However, the comparison of the observed bitemark and the suspected set of teeth will necessarily require human interpretation, and this is not infallible. Both technical challenges in the bitemarks and human errors in the interpretation are possible. To minimise such errors and to maximise the value of bitemark analysis, dedicated procedures and protocols have been developed, and the personnel taking care of the analysis need to be properly trained. In principle the action within the discipline should be conducted as in evidence-based dentristy, i.e. accepted procedures should have known error rates. Because of the involvement of human interpretation, even personal performance statistics may be required from legal expert statements. The requirements have been introduced largely due to cases where false convictions based on bitemark analysis have been overturned after DNA analysis."
Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia, 2008
AJ-Pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Sulistyowati Irianto
"Seen as a breakthrough in protecting migrant workers, of whom are predominantly female, Law No. 18/2017 on the Protection of Indonesian
Migrant Workers (The Migrant Workers Act of 2017), replacing Law No. 39/2004, is not void of imperfections. Prima facie, the act may be seen as progressive development in protecting Indonesian migrant workers, having embraced the many experiences and realities their profession entails. However, upon investigating the Act under the careful lens
of Feminist Jurisprudence as well as other national legal instruments for gender equality, the Migrant Workers Act of 2017 still provides unsatisfactory details in regards to the protection of female workers;
if the government does not quickly act by making corresponding regulations, the Act will in fact, introduce us to new problems from
what was seen as a one-size fits all solution. In its implementation, legal literacy becomes one of the most profound challenges the 2017 Act faces. Field research findings in three areas (Sukabumi, Lampung, and Jakarta) show that legal literacy on this Act remains sparse. This article will address problems in regards to the 2017 Act, its implementation,
and solutions to develop more tangible legal instruments in protecting Indonesian migrant workers, in particular, women, who, in foreign
lands, often face the risk of violence and abuse on a daily basis with little to no protection."
Jakarta: Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan, 2020
305 JP 23:2 (2020)
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Atik Andrian
"Secara garis besar bisa dikatakan hanya Hukum Keluargalah, ruh syari'ah (wahyu Ilahi dan sunnah Rasulullah) yang masih di berlakukan sebagai hukum positif di berbagai negeri Islam. Untuk konteks Indonesia, hukum keluarga Islam yang masih berlaku adalah Kompilasi Hukum Islam yang terdiri dari hukum perkawinan, hukum kewarisan, dan hukum wakaf. Kajian ini berusaha melihat isi Kompilasi Hukum Islam bagian hukum perkawinan dari dua sisi yaitu (1) Perspektif Fikih Konvensional, yang meliputi (a) Pengertian dan Tujuan Perkawinan (b) Hak dan Kewajiban Suami Istri (c) Larangan Kawin (d) Iddah, serta alasan Kompilasi merujuk kepada Fikih Konvensional dalam empat masalah tersebut; dan (2) Perspektif Pembaruan, yang meliputi (a) Pencatatan Perkawinan (b) Syarat dan Izin Berpoligami (c) Prosedur Perceraian (d) Prosedur Rujuk, serta metode yang digunakan Kompilasi dalam pembaruan tersebut.
Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif untuk menggambarkan secara sistematis, faktual, akurat dan menganalisa isi talcs Kompilasi Hukum Islam bidang perkawinan dan Kitab-kitab Fikih Konvensional, kemudian menyimpulkannya. Setelah dikaji, diketahui pertama, ada sebagian materi Kompilasi Hukum Islam yang merujuk secara total kepada kitab-kitab fikih konvensional, disebabkan dalil-dalil normatif yang dirujuk adalah sangat tegas dinyatakan didalam al-Qur'an dan Sunnah; kedua, dari kajian ini, ditemukan juga sebagian materi Kompilasi Hukum Islam yang sudah mengalami pembaruan, yang ditujukan untuk ketertiban administrasi dan kepentingan wanita. Metode yang digunakan Kompilasi dalam pernbaruan adalah siyasah .syar'iyah/takhsish al-gadha mashlahah mursalah, dan lalfiq.
The fact, only Islamic Family law still be used by majority Muslim countries as positive law today. And specially for Indonesia, the Islamic Family Law still valid is marriage law, inheritance law, and endowment law. This study try to know the contents of marriage law in Indonesia into two part (1) Perspective Islamic Jurisprudence, its contains four issues there are (a) Marriage Definition (b) Obligation and Entitle of Couple (c) Women not allowed to Marry (d) Iddah, and the reason of Family Law took four issues above from classic Islamic Jurisprudence; and (2) Perspective Reformation, it's contains four issues also, there are (a) Marriage Registration (b) Polygamy (c) Divorce in Courts (d) Revocation of divorce in Courts, and also the methods used by the Family Law in reformation.
By descriptive method, the study have shown that half contents of marriage law took opinions of Islamic Jurisprudence books, because the Qur'anic and Sunnah statements about that, are very detail and clear. And the study also have shown that half contents of marriage law are reformed and departed from classical texts of Islamic Jurisprudence to the contemporary conceptual law, its for regularity administration and interest of women. The methods used by Family Law in reformation are siycrsah syar'iyah/takhsish al-gadha , mashlahah mursalah, and lalfiq ".
"
Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia, 2004
T11943
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Soerjono Soekanto
Jakarta: Rajawali , 1982
340 SOE k
Buku Teks SO  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Soerjono Soekanto
Jakarta: Rajawali, 1980
340.115 SOE p
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1985
340 HIM
Buku Teks SO  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
"This collection of rich, empirically grounded case studies investigates the conditions and consequences of ?juridification? - the use of law by ordinary individuals as a form of protest against ?the state?. Starting from the actual practices of claimants, these case studies address the translation and interpretation of legal norms into local concepts, actions and practices in a way that highlights the social and cultural dynamism and multivocality of communities in their interaction with the law and legal norms. The contributors to this volume challenge the image of homogeneous and primordially norm-bound cultures that has been (unintentionally) perpetuated by some of the more prevalent treatments of law and culture. This volume highlights the heterogeneous geography of law and the ways boundaries between different legal bodies are transcended in struggles for rights. Contributions include case studies from South Africa, Malawi, Sierra Leone, Turkey, India, Papua New Guinea, Suriname, the Marshall Islands and Russia"
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012
344.009 LAW
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Puri Rahayu Arinta
"ABSTRAK
Penelitianini berupaya menunjukkan kekurangan sistem hukum yurisprudensi analitik dan yurisprudensi historis yang mempengaruhi kehidupan bersosial masyarakatserta mengajukan Sociological Jurisprudence sebagai alternatifnya. Melalui metode analisis kritis terhadap cara kerja yurisprudensi tersebut dapat ditemukan pengaruhsosial terhadapkeadilan serta kepastian hukum di dalam konsep yurisprudensi. Yurisprudensi analitik memiliki konsep hukum yang lebih condong ke arahperkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, sehingga hukum dianggaplebih bertujuan objektif danterlepas dari realitas sosial yang dinamis melaluipenggunaan metode saintifiknya. Disisi lain,yurisprudensihistorismemberikan respon atas hal tersebut dengan mengembalikan hukum pada realitas yang berjalan. Hukum adalah hal yang hidup dan terjadi pada masyarakat. Ia bukanlahseperangkat analogi yang dibentuk untuk disesuaikan dengan realitas masyarakat. Dalam tegangan di antara kedua jenis yurisprudensi ini, penulis beranggapan bahwadibutuhkan adanya alternatif yurisprudensi yang terbarukan sehinggamampu menjawab kekurangan dari yurisprudensi analitik dan historis, yaitu sociological jurisprudence / yurisprudensi sosiologis.Sociological Jurisprudence merupakan pemikiran hukumyang menyatakanbahwa hukum harus stabilnamundisisi lain iaharusmampu menyesuaikan dirinya dengan perkembangan sosial yang dinamis.

ABSTRACT
This study seeks to show the lack of a legal system of analytic jurisprudence and historical jurisprudence that influences the social life of society and proposes Sociological Jurisprudence as an alternative. Through the method of critical analysis of the workings of jurisprudence can be found social influence on justice and legal certainty in the concept of jurisprudence. Analytic jurisprudence has a legal concept that is more inclined towards the development of science, so that the law is considered more objective and independent of dynamic social reality through the use of scientific methods. On the other hand, historical jurisprudence responds to this by returning the law to the reality that is running. Law is a real thing and happens to society. It is not a set of analogies that are formed to suit the reality of society. In the tension between the two types of jurisprudence, the author assumes that there is an alternative need for jurisprudence that is renewable so as to answer the shortcomings of analytical and historical jurisprudence, namely sociological jurisprudence. Sociological Jurisprudence is a legal thought which states that law must be stable but on the other hand it must be able to adapt itself to dynamic social development."
2018
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
al-Hilli, al-Allamah
"Foundations of Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Imami Shi i Legal Theory is a critical edition of the Arabic text with a parallel English translation of Mabadi al-wusul ila ilm al-usul by al-Allamah al-Hilli, introduced, edited and translated by Sayyid Amjad H. Shah Naqavi.
Al-Allamah al-Hilli participated in the leading debates of his day and applied his vast erudition in philosophy, logic, and theology to the paramount subject of jurisprudence. This text presents an exemplar of the rich revival of Shi i scholarship in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries of the Common Era. Concise, yet comprehensive, this work sets the standard for the subsequent development and discussion of Imami Shi i legal theory, such that its influence can be traced through to modern times. This dual-text edition is indispensable for students and scholars of Imami Shi i jurisprudence."
Leiden: Brill, 2017
e20498016
eBooks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Angky Anggia Ayu
"Norma mengenai pengangkatan anak yang diatur baik dalam Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 yang memuat bahwa proses pengangkatan anak harus melalui proses penetapan pengadilan, maupun dalam Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1413K/Pdt/1988 yang dalam kaidah hukumnya menyatakan bahwa untuk menentukan status anak angkat bukan dilihat hanya dari formalitas pengangkatan anak, tetapi juga dilihat dari bagaimana realita pemeliharaan anak angkat tersebut oleh orang tua angkatnya, tampak saling bertentangan dan tidak sejalan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan yurisprudensi dalam konteks Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan Nomor 324/Pdt/2020/PT MDN Tahun 2020. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal. Metode analisis data yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode kualitatif, yaitu setelah dilakukan pengumpulan data sekunder. Selanjutnya penelitian ini ditulis dalam bentuk deskriptif analitis. SEMA memiliki daya ikat yang berlaku hanya kepada institusi internal sebagai pedoman dalam memutus perkara. Sedangkan yurisprudensi apabila diterapkan dalam putusan hakim dalam kasus yang serupa, menjadi suatu hukum yang harus dipatuhi dan memiliki daya ikat dan memaksa untuk dilaksanakan bagi masyarakat, kekuatan mengikat yurisprudensi lebih kuat apabila dibandingkan dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA). Dalam penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa kedudukan JP sebagai anak angkat jika berdasarkan SEMA Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 adalah tidak sah sedangkan jika berdasarkan yurisprudensi Nomor 1413K/Pdt/1988 adalah sah. Sedangkan kekuatan hukum Surat Pernyataan Penyerahan dan Pengakuan Anak hanya dapat dimaknai sebagai alat bukti yang masuk ke dalam Akta Autentik yang terdapat dalam Buku Ke 4 KUHPerdata.

The norms concerning adoption process are regulated both in the Supreme Court Letter (SEMA) No.6 of 1983, which states the adoption process must go through a court decision process, and in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence No. 1413K/Pdt/1988 which states that to determine the status of an adopted child is not seen only from the formalities of adoption of the child, but also from the reality how the adopted parents take care of the child, appears to be contradictory and inconsistent. The research will analyze the position of the jurisprudence in the context of the High Court of the Field Decision Number 324/Pdt/2020/PT MDN 2020. This research was carried out using doctrinal law research methods. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative and uses secondary data collection. Furthermore, this research is written in a descriptive form. SEMA has a binding power that only applies to internal institutions as a guideline in settling matters. Whereas jurisprudence, when applied in judgments for similar cases, becomes a law to be obeyed and has binding power and force to be enforced for the public, the binding force of jurisdiction is stronger when compared to SEMA. In this research it can be concluded that the position of JP as an adopted child if based on SEMA No. 6 of 1983 is invalid while based on jurisprudence Number 1413K/Pdt/1988 is valid. Whereas the legal force of the Declaration of Surrender and Confession of Child can only be interpreted as evidence which is included in the authentic deed based on the Fourth Book of the Indonesian Civil Code. "
Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2024
T-pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   3 4 5 6 7 8 9   >>