Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKIndonesia dan Filipina yang sama-sama merupakan negara demokrasi memiliki respons yang berbeda dalam menghadapi isu terorisme. Indonesia melihat isu terorisme sebagai suatu tindak pidana yang direspons dengan penggunaan kekuatan unit khusus kepolisian. Filipina di satu sisi menggunakan respons operasional yang cenderung agresif dengan penggunaan kekuatan militer. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya perbedaan dalam respons yang terjadi, khususnya dengan melihat dari studi kasus Jemaah Islamiyah JI di Indonesia dan Filipina yang memiliki hubungan dengan jaringan Al-Qaeda. Penelitian ini melihat dari pengaruh persepsi ancaman terhadap tingkat respons negara. Beberapa faktor yang akan digunakan untuk melihat perbedaan respons ini adalah: 1 faktor ideologi, melihat karakteristik kelompok JI 2 target serangan karakter serangan , 3 karakteristik negara. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan dalam karakteristik kelompok terorisme dalam hal ideologi dan target serangan di kedua negara yang mempengaruhi persepsi ancaman negara. Adanya hubungan JI dengan kelompok separatis merubah karakter serangan dan aktivitasnya di Filipina. Karakter ini berbeda dengan aktivitas JI di Indonesia sehingga hal ini lah yang menyebabkan Filipina memilih untuk menggunakan militer. Lebih lanjut, pemilihan penggunaan aktor dalam kebijakan kontra terorisme di Indonesia besar dipengaruhi oleh karakter negara, khususnya hubungan sipil-militer di kedua negara. Filipina menunjukkan tingkat hubungan sipil-militer yang lebih kuat dibandingkan Indonesia, hubungan sipil militer di Filipina ini telah dikuatkan sejak pemerintahan Marcos.

---

ABSTRAKIndonesia and the Philippines are both democratic countries, but each has different responses to terrorism. Indonesia perceives terrorism as crime and responds to it through due process of law and the use of special police force. On the other hand, the Philippines responses to terrorism tend to be aggressive with the use of the military. This research aims to reveal the factors that cause differences in those responses, by comparing the response of the two states to the presence of Al Qaeda linked Jemaah Islamiyah JI and its affiliation in the respective territories. This research test the hypothesis that different threat perceptions to a terrorist group affect the character of their responses. Such threat perception is built by 1 ideological factors, 2 attack targets, and 3 states characteristics and these are factors that will be analyzed in this research. The findings indicate differences in the characteristics of terrorist groups in terms of ideology and attacks in both countries. JI affiliation with the rebel group in the Philippines has changed their character of attacks and activities in the Philippine, while Indonesia is still affected by ideology. Furthermore, the choice of actors in the counter terrorism measures is also affected by civil military relations in both states, where civil military relations have been strengthened since after Marcos administration. While Indonesia civil military relations is heavily affected by Soekarno era causing certain sentiment in the use of the military in counter terrorism measures. "

"Summary: On Islam and politics and social problems in Indonesia."

"Indonesia's Islamic organizations sustain the country's thriving civil society, democracy, and reputation for tolerance amid diversity. Yet scholars poorly understand how these organizations envision the accommodation of religious difference. What does tolerance mean to the world's largest Islamic organizations? What are the implications for democracy in Indonesia and the broader Muslim world? Jeremy Menchik argues that answering these questions requires decoupling tolerance from liberalism and investigating the historical and political conditions that engender democratic values. Drawing on archival documents, ethnographic observation, comparative political theory, and an original survey, Islam and Democracy in Indonesia demonstrates that Indonesia's Muslim leaders favor a democracy in which individual rights and group-differentiated rights converge within a system of legal pluralism, a vision at odds with American-style secular government but common in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe."

"Essays on socio-religious aspects of Islam in Indonesia"

"History of Islam in Indonesia; collection of articles."

"This book examines the relationship between the state state implementation of Sharia and diverse lived realities of everyday Islam in contemporary Aceh, Indonesia. With chapters covering topics ranging from NGOs and diaspora politics to female ulama and punk rockers, the volume opens new perspectives on the complexity of Muslim discourse and practice in a society that has experienced tremendous changes since the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. These detailed accounts of and critical reflections on how different groups in Acehnese society negotiate their experiences and understandings of Islam highlight the complexity of the ways in which the state is both a formative and a limited force with regard to religious and social transformation. "