Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This book presents a summary of the key ideas that seek to explain criminal behaviour and the measures that have been developed to prevent crime. A broad overview of the criminal justice system is provided in order to explain the operations of the key criminal justice agencies and the processes that are involved in bringing offenders to justice. Readers are encouraged to develop the basic knowledge they have obtained in these areas by tackling a number of questions, making use of additional reading of key texts suggested in the book. Attention is devoted to key sources from which information regarding crime and the criminal justice system can be explained. Good practice regarding the presentation and assessment of written work is also provided, in particular in connection with referencing. Readers are also introduced to the wide variety of methods that can be used to carry out criminological research and are invited to engage in exercises that include the marking of sample essays and the design of a questionnaire."

"Sejak tahun 2019, Direktorat Kriminal Khusus SubDit IV Tindak Pidana Cybercrime telah memulai untuk penanganan kasus kejahatan penagihan hutang pinjaman online yang berujung pada penyalahgunaan data pribadi, hal ini dilakukan oleh debt collector dari fintech peer to peer lending. Sampai bulan Oktober tahun 2020, telah ada 12 data aduan yang masuk terkait penyalahgunaan data pribadi. Kasus-kasus tersebut terjadi karena fintech menggunakan data pribadi untuk melakukan verifikasi pinjaman. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini diperlukan untuk mendiskusikan aturan apa yang diperlukan untuk melindungi data pribadi dalam hal fintech peer to peer lending. Metode peneltiain yang digunakan adalah hukum Normatif dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan melakukan wawancara mendalam dan terstruktur dengan lembaga terkait yaitu YLKI. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini, 1) Perlu adanya peraturan khusus yang mengatur terkait pengaturan dan pengawasan fintech di sektor peer to peer lending, aturan yang dikeluarkan oleh OJK dan AFPI masih memiliki masalah kepastian hukum; 2) Aturan untuk pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap penyalahgunaan data oleh fintech peer to peer lending, masih menggunakan aturan konvensional yaitu KUHP yang sifatnya umum atau generik berlaku; 3) Penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana penyalahgunaan data masih menggunakan KUHP. Namun, jika permasalahan yang timbul lebih kompleks seperti hacking, maka KUHP saja menjadi tidak cukup. Oleh karena itu perlu segera dirumuskan dan disahkannya UU Perlindungan data pribadi yang tidak hanya berlaku untuk individu tetapi juga penyelenggara fintech, selain itu kewenangan OJK dan AFPI juga perlu diperluas tidak hanya penyelenggara fintech peer to peer lending tetapi juga peminjam individu

---

Since 2019, the Special Criminal Directorate of Sub-Directorate IV for Cybercrime has started to handle criminal cases involving online loan debt collection dissemination of personal data, this is done by debt collectors from peer to peer lending fintechs. Until October 2020, there have been 12 complaints relating the misuse of personal data filed. These cases occured because fintech uses personal data to make loan verification. Hence, this research attemps to discuss regulatory framework to protect personal data in the context of peer to peer lending. The method used in this research is a normative legal approach based on literature studies particulary, primary legal and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques used in this research is literature studies and structured in-depth interviews with related institutions, namely YLKI. It is argued here that, 1) there is no specific law regulating fintech in the peer to peer lending sector because the rules currently used are not complete considering that this crime is quite complex, regulations issued by OJK and AFPI still cannot provide significant protection leading to legal uncertainity; 2) rules for criminal liability for misuse of data in fintech peer to peer lending, still applies conventional rules, namely the Criminal Code, which are generic in nature; 3) in the practice, the application of criminal responsibility for data misuse can still use the Criminal Code. However, if the problems that arise are more complex, such as hacking, then the Criminal Code alone is not enough. Here the act should be applicable not only to individual user but also fintech operations. For that reason, the outreach of OJK and AFPI should be extended: not only be focusing on peer to peer lending fintech providers but also to individual borrowers."

"ABSTRAKPembebasan bersyarat merupakan bagian dari sistem pemasyarakatan yang dianut oleh Indonesia, dimana setiap narapidana dan anak didik pemasyarakatan, kecuali anak didik berhak memperolehnya setelah menjalani pidana sekurang-kurangnya 2/3 (dua per tiga) dari masa pidana dengan 2/3 (dua per tiga) masa pidana tersebut tidak kurang dari sembilan bulan. Dalam menjalankan pembebasan bersyarat, terpidana diharuskan mentaati persyaratan yang telah ditetapkan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan persyaratan yang ditetapkan oleh pihak yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan pembebasan bersyarat, yaitu Kejaksaan Negeri dan Balai Pemasyarakatan. Salah satu persyaratan yang harus ditaati oleh terpidana selama menjalani pembebasan bersyarat terdapat dalam Pasal 16 ayat (4) Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia No. M.2.PK.04-10 Tahun 2007 tentang Asimilasi, Pembebasan Bersyarat, dan Cuti Menjelang Bebas, bahwa terpidana yang menjalani pembebasan bersyarat dilarang pergi keluar wilayah Indonesia kecuali mendapatkan izin Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Persyaratan tersebut terkait dengan pencegahan yang merupakan larangan yang bersifat sementara terhadap orang-orang tertentu untuk ke luar dari wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia berdasarkan alasan tertentu, dimana keputusan pencegahan tersebut merupakan kewenangan dari Jaksa Agung yang merupakan pimpinan dari lembaga Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia termasuk di dalamnya adalah Kejaksaan Negeri, pengawas pelaksanaan pembebasan bersyarat. Dalam skripsi ini, penulis akan menguraikan mengenai keharusan pihak Kejaksaan Negeri melakukan pencegahan terhadap terpidana yang menjalani pembebasan bersyarat berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada dan melakukan studi kasus pelaksanaan pengawasan pembebasan bersyarat terpidana David Nusa Wijaya, dimana pada saat menjalani pembebasan bersyarat, David Nusa Wijaya pergi ke Hongkong tanpa seizin Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.

---

ABSTRACTRelease with requirements is a part of prison system carried out by Indonesia, in which each accused, except under age accused, has the right after being in prison 2/3 (two per three) of the criminal term, which is not less than nine months. During having a release with requirements, the accused should obey all of the requirements stipulated in the laws and regulations made by parties having the rights to construct supervisions on the implementation of release with requirements, namely: Domestic Attorney and Correction Center. One of the requirements should be obeyed by the accused during having he release with requirements is stated in Article 16 paragraph (4) of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. M.2.PK.04-10 of 2007 regarding Assimilation, Release with Requirements, and Leave Before Released, that the accused having release with requirements is forbidden to go out form the Indonesian territory without permission of the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The requirement is related to the prevention, which is a temporary forbid for certain people to go out from the territory of the Republic of Indonesia based on certain reasons, in which the prevention stipulation is the right of General Attorney, the leader of Attorney institution of the Republic of Indonesia, including the Domestic Attorney, the supervisor for the implementation of release with requirements. In this script, the writer shall describe the significance for the Domestic Attorney to conduct prevention against the accused having release with requirements based on the effective laws and also performed a cases study on the implementation of release with requirements supervision to the accused David Nusa Wijaya, in which when having release with requirements, David Nusa Wijaya left for Hongkong without any permission of the Minister of Laws and Human Rights."