Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pemberian hibah oleh orang tua kepada anak diberikan atas dasar kasih sayang demi kesejahteraan anak. Permasalahan muncul ketika orang tua sebagai pemberi hibah menarik kembali atau melakukan pembatalan terhadap hibah yang telah diberikan. Seperti hal yang terjadi pada gugatan perkara nomor Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jambi No. 602/pdt.g/2020/PA.Jmb. Penggugat menggugat anak-anak kandungnya untuk melakukan pembatalan akta hibah yang telah diberikan dan telah terjadi peralihan sertipikat atas nama penerima hibah akibat timbulnya akta hibah tersebut. Pokok Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai akibat hukum terhadap pembatalan akta hibah yang telah terjadi peralihan hak ke penerima hibah dan proses pemulihan setelah adanya putusan pembatalan di Pengadilan Agama Jambi terhadap salah satu objek hibah tanah yang telah terjadi peralihan sertipikat. Dalam menjawab pertanyaaan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif, dengan alat studi pengumpulan studi yaitu studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka dan wawancara terhadap pihak-pihak berwenang.  Hasil dari analisis tersebut adalah pembatalan akta hibah dapat dilakukan oleh orang tua kepada anak-anaknya sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 212 Kompilasi Hukum Islam sehingga akta hibah beserta turunan-turunan sertipikatnya tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat bagi para pihak. Mengenai proses pemulihan terhadap objek hibah tanah yang sudah terjadi peralihan berada dalam wewenang Badan Pertanahan Nasional adalah Pemohon mengajukan permohonan pembatalan yang didasarkan telah ada putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap dengan melengkapi dokumen-dokumen persyaratan lainnya yang kemudian akan diteliti oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kota Jambi dengan membentuk tim untuk menangani penyelesaian kasus. Selanjutnya jika disetujui maka Kantor Pertanahan akan menerbitkan putusan mengenai pembatalan sertipikat. Pembatalan sertipikat tersebut haruslah dicatat dalam buku tanah.

---

Grant by parent to children granted on basis of affection for the welfare of the children. Problem arises when the parent as the grantor grant, withdraws or cancels the grant that has been given. As what happened in the case lawsuit No. Jambi Religious Court Decision No. 602/pdt.g/2020/PA.Jmb, As what happened in the case lawsuit No. Jambi Religious Court Decision No. 602/pdt.g/2020/PA.Jmb, the Plaintiff is suing his biological children to cancel or withdraw the grant deed that has been granted where there has been a transfer of rights on behalf of the grantee to the object of the land grant. The issues raised in this study are the legal consequences of the withdrawal of the grant deed of transfer of rights that have occurred to the grantee and the recovery process after the decision of the cancellation in Jambi Religious Court against one of the objects land grant that a shift of the certificate. To answer these questions, a normative juridical legal research method is used, with study collection tools, namely document studies or library materials and interviews with the authorities. The result of the analysis is that the withdrawal or cancellation of grants can be carried out by parents to their children as regulated in Article 212 Compilation of Islamic Law and the process of restoring land grant objects that have been transferred is the authority of the National Land Agency because it is related to administration land. Regarding the process of recovering the object of the land grant which has been transferred to the authority of the National Land Agency, the Petitioner submits an application for cancellation based on a court decision that has permanent legal force by completing other required documents which will then be examined by the Jambi City Land Office with forming a team to handle case resolution. Furthermore, if approved, the Land Office will issue a decision regarding the cancellation of the certificate. The cancellation of the certificate must be recorded in the land book."

"Hibah adalah sebuah perjanjian yaitu pemberian yang dilakukan oleh satu pihak kepada pihak yang lain pada saat pemberi hibah masih hidup. Perjanjian hibah tidak dapat dibatalkan kecuali memenuhi syarat syarat pembatalan hibah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bahwa putusan pembatalan hibah di pengadilan Negeri Manado No: 06/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Mnd telah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku dan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum dari pembatalan akta hibah di dalam putusan No 06/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Mnd. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang bersifat preskriptif, teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi dokumen. Dari penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa hibah dibatalkan oleh majelis hakim karena hibah terjadi saat pemberi hibah sudah meninggal dan akibat hukum yang terjadi adalah harta yang menjadi objek sengketa kembali kepada ahli waris pemberi hibah serta semua perjanjian dan kuasa yang dibuat dengan mengguanakan akta hibah dianggap batal dan tidak sah. Tujuan dari penulisan tesis ini adalah diharapkan dapat membantu dan memberi saran serta masukan pengetahuan bagi para pihak yang terkait dengan masalah yang diteliti.

---

A grant is an agreement, which is a gift made by one party to another while the donor of the grant is still alive. A grant cannot be canceled unless it meets the conditions for the cancellation of the grant. This study aims to find out that the decision to cancel the grant at the Manado District Court No: 06/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Mnd is in accordance with the applicable legal regulations and to find out the legal consequences of the cancellation of the grant in case No 06/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Mnd. This research was conducted with a prescriptive normative juridical research method, the data collection technique used was document study. From this research, it was found that the grant was canceled by the panel of judges because the grant occurred when the grant donor had died and the legal consequence was that the property which became the object of the dispute returned to the beneficiary of the grant as well as all agreements and power of attorney made using the grant deed were considered null and invalid. The purpose of writing this law paper is hopefully to be able to help and provide advice and input of knowledge for parties related to the problem under study. "

"Skripsi ini membahas secara khusus mengenaihibah berdasarkan teori dan KUHPerdata yang kemudian diterapakan dalam studi kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1818 K/Pdt/2008 mengenai Pembatalan Akta Hibah oleh Ahli Waris dari Pemberi Hibah. Hal ini bertujuan agar hibah dapat dilakukan dengan tata cara yang tepat, sehingga tidak merugikanahli waris sebagai akibat pemberian hibah dikemudian hari. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis normative dan bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian menyatakan bahwa kepada ahli waris sebaiknya diberitahukan terlebih dahulu sebelum dilaksanakannya hibah, serta pelaksanaan hibah memperhatikan Legitieme Portie setiap ahli waris. Sehingga dengan terlanggarnya Legitieme Portie setiap ahli waris akibat pemberian hibah, maka ahli waris dapat mengajukan permohonan pembatalan hibah tersebut kepada pengadilan.

---

This thesis discusses the particulars of the grant either based on the theory or by the Civil Code system, which is then applied in the case study of the decision of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1818 K/Pdt/2008 regarding Cancellation Deed of Grant by Heirs Grant Giver. It is intended that the grant can be done in the right manner, so as not to harm the heirs as a result of the grant in the future. This research is the normative juridical approach is descriptive and analytical.

Results of the study suggested that the heirs should be informed in advance before implementation of the grant, as well as the implementation of the grant notice Legitieme portie any heirs. So with any violation of the provisions of Legitieme portie grant, the heirs may apply for cancellation of the grant to the court."

"[Pengertian hibah yang diatur dalam Pasal 1666 KUH Perdata adalahperjanjian yang dilakukan oleh penghibah ketika masih hidup untukmemberikan suatu barang dengan cuma-cuma kepada penerima hibah dantidak dapat ditarik kembali. Kata-kata “tidak dapat ditarik kembali” iniberarti pencabutan hibah baru dapat dilakukan jika penerima hibahmemberi persetujuan kepada pemberi hibah. Syarat dan tata cara untukmelakukan hibah adalah harus dengan akta notaris untuk objek hibahberupa benda bergerak seperti disebutkan dalam Pasal 1682 KUHPerdata, dan dengan akta PPAT untuk tanah dan bangunan seperti yangdisebutkan dalam Pasal 37 ayat (1) PP No. 24/1997. Yang akandibicarakan dalam tesis ini adalah bagaimana syarat-syarat untukpembuatan akta hibah terutama terhadap barang tetap (tanah) serta tatacara pencabutan terhadap akta hibah otentik, dan bagaimana akibathukum terhadap pembatalan akta hibah yang dilakukan dengan suratpernyataan pencabutan yang dibuat di bawah tangan dan diwaarmerkingoleh Notaris. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metodekualitatif yang berbentuk yuridis normatif untuk memberikanpemahaman mengenai analisis terhadap implikasi pembatalan akta hibahsecara sepihak dengan surat pernyataan di bawah tangan yang diwaarmerking danperalihan hak atas tanah yang dibuat tanpa akta PPAT. Hibah atas barang tetap(tanah) yang dibuat tanpa akta PPAT tidak menyebabkan perbuatanhukum hibahnya menjadi batal atau akta hibahnya menjadi tidak sah,karena hal ini hanya menyangkut akta hibahnya saja, sedangkan untukpendaftaran peralihan haknya dapat dibuat kembali di hadapan PPATyang nantinya digunakan sebagai dasar untuk peralihan hak ke KantorPertanahan. Akta hibah yang telah memenuhi persyaratan pembuatanakta otentik sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 1868 KUH Perdata makapembatalannya tidak dapat dilakukan secara sepihak dengan suratpernyataan di bawah dan diwaarmerking, melainkan harus diajukan kepengadilan umum. Dengan demikian, surat pernyataan pembatalan aktahibah yang dibuat di bawah tangan tersebut adalah tidak sah dan bataldemi hukum.;The definition of grant provided for in Article 1666 of the Civil Code is anagreement made by grantor while still alive to give an item for free to granteesand irrevocable. The words "irrevocable" means repeal the new grant can be doneif the grantee to give consent to the grantor. Requirements and procedures to carryout the grant is to be the object of a notarial deed for a grant in the form ofmoving objects as mentioned in Article 1682 Civil Code, and the PPAT deed forthe land and buildings as mentioned in Article 37 paragraph (1) PP 24/1997.Which will be discussed in this thesis is how the conditions for the grant deed,especially against goods fixed (ground) as well as the procedure for revocation ofthe authentic grant deed, and how the legal consequences of the cancellation ofthe grant deed performed by a letter of revocation declaration made under thehand and waarmerkened by Notary. The method used in this study is a qualitativemethod in the form of normative to provide an understanding of the analysis ofthe implications of the cancellation of the deed of grant unilaterally by waiverunder waarmerken hands and transfer of rights on land made without PPAT deed.Grants of goods fixed (ground) are made without PPAT deed does not lead tolegal action grants will be canceled or deed grants become invalid, because itconcerns only its grant deed alone, while for the registration of transfer of rightscan be made back before PPAT that will be used as the basis for the transfer ofrights to the Land Office. Grant deed that has met the requirements of makingauthentic document as referred to in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, thecancellation can not be done unilaterally by the letter of the statement below andunder waarmerken, but should be brought to public trial. Thus, a statement ofcancellation of the deed grants made under the hand is invalid and void.;The definition of grant provided for in Article 1666 of the Civil Code is anagreement made by grantor while still alive to give an item for free to granteesand irrevocable. The words "irrevocable" means repeal the new grant can be doneif the grantee to give consent to the grantor. Requirements and procedures to carryout the grant is to be the object of a notarial deed for a grant in the form ofmoving objects as mentioned in Article 1682 Civil Code, and the PPAT deed forthe land and buildings as mentioned in Article 37 paragraph (1) PP 24/1997.Which will be discussed in this thesis is how the conditions for the grant deed,especially against goods fixed (ground) as well as the procedure for revocation ofthe authentic grant deed, and how the legal consequences of the cancellation ofthe grant deed performed by a letter of revocation declaration made under thehand and waarmerkened by Notary. The method used in this study is a qualitativemethod in the form of normative to provide an understanding of the analysis ofthe implications of the cancellation of the deed of grant unilaterally by waiverunder waarmerken hands and transfer of rights on land made without PPAT deed.Grants of goods fixed (ground) are made without PPAT deed does not lead tolegal action grants will be canceled or deed grants become invalid, because itconcerns only its grant deed alone, while for the registration of transfer of rightscan be made back before PPAT that will be used as the basis for the transfer ofrights to the Land Office. Grant deed that has met the requirements of makingauthentic document as referred to in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, thecancellation can not be done unilaterally by the letter of the statement below andunder waarmerken, but should be brought to public trial. Thus, a statement ofcancellation of the deed grants made under the hand is invalid and void.;The definition of grant provided for in Article 1666 of the Civil Code is anagreement made by grantor while still alive to give an item for free to granteesand irrevocable. The words "irrevocable" means repeal the new grant can be doneif the grantee to give consent to the grantor. Requirements and procedures to carryout the grant is to be the object of a notarial deed for a grant in the form ofmoving objects as mentioned in Article 1682 Civil Code, and the PPAT deed forthe land and buildings as mentioned in Article 37 paragraph (1) PP 24/1997.Which will be discussed in this thesis is how the conditions for the grant deed,especially against goods fixed (ground) as well as the procedure for revocation ofthe authentic grant deed, and how the legal consequences of the cancellation ofthe grant deed performed by a letter of revocation declaration made under thehand and waarmerkened by Notary. The method used in this study is a qualitativemethod in the form of normative to provide an understanding of the analysis ofthe implications of the cancellation of the deed of grant unilaterally by waiverunder waarmerken hands and transfer of rights on land made without PPAT deed.Grants of goods fixed (ground) are made without PPAT deed does not lead tolegal action grants will be canceled or deed grants become invalid, because itconcerns only its grant deed alone, while for the registration of transfer of rightscan be made back before PPAT that will be used as the basis for the transfer ofrights to the Land Office. Grant deed that has met the requirements of makingauthentic document as referred to in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, thecancellation can not be done unilaterally by the letter of the statement below andunder waarmerken, but should be brought to public trial. Thus, a statement ofcancellation of the deed grants made under the hand is invalid and void., The definition of grant provided for in Article 1666 of the Civil Code is anagreement made by grantor while still alive to give an item for free to granteesand irrevocable. The words "irrevocable" means repeal the new grant can be doneif the grantee to give consent to the grantor. Requirements and procedures to carryout the grant is to be the object of a notarial deed for a grant in the form ofmoving objects as mentioned in Article 1682 Civil Code, and the PPAT deed forthe land and buildings as mentioned in Article 37 paragraph (1) PP 24/1997.Which will be discussed in this thesis is how the conditions for the grant deed,especially against goods fixed (ground) as well as the procedure for revocation ofthe authentic grant deed, and how the legal consequences of the cancellation ofthe grant deed performed by a letter of revocation declaration made under thehand and waarmerkened by Notary. The method used in this study is a qualitativemethod in the form of normative to provide an understanding of the analysis ofthe implications of the cancellation of the deed of grant unilaterally by waiverunder waarmerken hands and transfer of rights on land made without PPAT deed.Grants of goods fixed (ground) are made without PPAT deed does not lead tolegal action grants will be canceled or deed grants become invalid, because itconcerns only its grant deed alone, while for the registration of transfer of rightscan be made back before PPAT that will be used as the basis for the transfer ofrights to the Land Office. Grant deed that has met the requirements of makingauthentic document as referred to in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, thecancellation can not be done unilaterally by the letter of the statement below andunder waarmerken, but should be brought to public trial. Thus, a statement ofcancellation of the deed grants made under the hand is invalid and void.]"

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas pembatalan hibah orangtua kepada anak kandung menuruthukum Islam dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 643 K/AG/2011. Pokok masalah yang akan dibahas adalah Bagaimanakah hibah yang tidak memenuhi syarat-syarat dan rukun hibah menurut hukum Islam? dan Bagaimanakah putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 643 K/AG/2011 menurut hukum Islam dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI)? Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif dengan tipologi penelitian preskriptif. Suatu hibah akan sah apabila memenuhi rukun dan syarat hibah menurut hukum Islam. Hibah yang dilakukan apabila tidak memenuhi rukun dan syarat hibah itu tidak sah dan batal demi hukum, tetapi akibat hukum pembatalan baru berlaku setelah ada putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the cancellation of the parent?s grants to biological children according to Islamic law by analyzing the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 643 K / AG / 2011. Issues that will be discussed is How a gran that be done not based on the condition and principle of Islamic law?.How is the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 643 K/AG/2011 according to Islamic law and Islamic Law Compilation (KHI)? The method used in this research is normative research method by prescriptive research typology. A grant will be valid when it qualify based on the condition and principle of Islamic law. A grant that be done not based on the condition and principle of Islamic law does not valid by the law, but legal impact of new defeasance will be effective after court?s decision of power law declared fixed"

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pelaksanaan tanggung jawab pelaku usaha penerbangan terhadap penumpang dalam hal terjadinya pembatalan penerbangan secara sepihak. Dalam penelitian ini yang menjadi permasalahan adalah pelanggaran hukum apa yang terjadi dalam pembatalan penerbangan secara sepihak oleh pelaku usaha, bagaimana bentuk pertanggungjawaban dari pelaku usaha tersebut terhadap konsumen, serta apakah putusan No. 441/PDT.G/2013/PN.JKT.PST berkaitan dengan tanggung jawab PT Lion air terhadap Mauliate yang menjadi studi kasus dalam penelitian ini sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan yang berlaku.Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dimana penulis menganalisis menggunakan data sekunder atau berupa norma hukum tertulis. Analisis dilakukan dengan dasar hukum Undang-undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan, dan peraturan Menteri Perhubungan yang terkait dengan tanggung jawab terhadap pembatalan penerbangan.

---

This study discusses the implementation of the responsibilities of business operators flying to passengers in case of flight cancellations unilaterally. In this study, the problem is lawlessness that happened in the flight cancellation unilaterally by businesses, how to shape the accountability of businesses to consumers, as well as whether the verdict No. 441 / PDT.G / 2013 / PN.JKT.PST relating to the responsibility of PT Lion Air to Mauliate as the case studies in this study are in accordance with the provisions of applicable regulations.To answer these problems used normative juridical research method in which the authors analyzed using secondary data or in the form of written legal norms. The analysis was performed with the legal basis of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Law No. 1 Year 2009 on Aviation, and Minister of Transportation regulations relating to responsibility for flight cancellations."

"ABSTRAKHukum waris di Indonesia bersifat pluralistik, karena masih berlaku beberapasitem hukum kewarisan, yaitu hukum waris adat, hukum waris islam dan hukumwaris menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Ke pluralistikan ini terbukti dari belum adanya pengaturan khusus yang bersifat nasional mengenai sistem hukum kewarisan di Indonesia, yang mengakibatkan masyarakat Indonesia menggunakan aturan hukum yang berbeda-beda untuk menentukan pembagian warisan. Begitu pula dengan aturan mengenai hibah di Indonesia. Saat ini di Indonesia, pengaturan hukum yang mengatur hibah berlaku lebih dari satu sistem hukum, yaitu diatur baik menurut hukum islam, hukum perdata berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, maupun hukum adat. Tesis ini akan membahas tentang hak waris anak angkat dan istri menurut hukum waris di Indonesia dan status hukum atas warisan yang menjadi objek hibah yang dibatalkan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian deskriptif dengan data sekunder yang bersumber dari kepustakaan. Dari hari pembahasan ditemukan bahwa hibahnya tidak sah karena dibuat oleh pihak yang tidak berwenang untuk membuat hibah tersebut.

---

ABSTRACTInheritance law in Indonesia is pluralistic, because they apply some system ofinheritance law, namely customary inheritance law, inheritance law and theIslamic law of inheritance according to the Book of the Law of Civil Law. Thisdiversity is proven because there are no special arrangement which is nationalheritage of the legal system in Indonesia, which resulted in the Indonesian people using legal rules different to determine the division of inheritance. Similary, the rules on grants in Indonesia. Currently in Indonesia, the legal rules governing the grant applies more than one legal system, which is governed both by Islamic Law, civil law based on the Book of the Law of Civil Law, as well as Customary Law. This thesis will discuss the inheritance rights of an adopted child and the wife of the heir according to inheritance law in Indonesia and the legal status of heritage is the object of the grant is canceled. The method used in this research is normative with descriptive type with secondary data obtained from the literature. The result og the research, it was found that the grant does is illegitimate, because the grant was made by the subject that unauthorized."

"Pemberian hibah adalah salah satu metode pengalihan hak atas benda milik penghibah kepada penerima hibah berdasarkan kehendak dari pihak penghibah, dengan membuat akta hibah di hadapan Notaris/Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Apabila harta benda pemberi hibah dihibahkan semuanya maka memiliki dampak bagi pemberi hibah dan eksistensi dari akta hibah itu sendiri, sebab adanya hubungan erat antara hibah dan waris. Oleh karena itu, permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah berkaitan dengan kedudukan dari akta hibah yang cacat hukum dan melampaui batas maksimum hibah serta pertimbangan hukumnya dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kraksaan Nomor 1092/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Krs mengenai hal tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah doktrinal. Hasil yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa hibah dapat dikatakan “melampaui batas maksimum hibah yaitu sepertiga bagian dari harta kekayaaan pemberi hibah” pada saat pewaris meninggal dunia dengan memperhatikan persetujuan ahli waris dan tidak melanggar hak mutlak mereka. PPAT dan/atau PPATS tidak memiliki legalitas dalam hal pembubuhan cap jempol terhadap pemberi hibah yang buta huruf, sebab Pasal 1874 KUHPerdata jo. Pasal 1874a KUHPerdata menjelaskan Notaris atau seorang pejabat lain yang ditunjuk undang-undang yang berhak untuk itu. Pemberi hibah dapat mengajukan pembatalan hibah ke pengadilan di mana objek hibah berada, supaya hibah yang telah diberikan itu dibatalkan dan dikembalikan padanya berdasarkan syarat dan alasan-alasan yang sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Dengan demikian, PPAT dan/atau PPATS sangat menentukan dalam membantu terciptanya kepastian hukum, ketertiban hukum, dan hukum perlindungan bagi masyarakat, terutama yang berhubungan langsung dengan tanah.

---

Giving a gift is a method of transferring rights to objects belonging to the donor to the recipient of the gift based on the wishes of the grantor by making a deed of gift before a notary or land deed official. If all of the gift giver's assets are donated, this will have an impact on the gift giver and the existence of the gift deed itself because there is a close relationship between the gift and the inheritance. Therefore, the problem raised in this research is related to the position of the grant deed, which is legally flawed and exceeds the maximum grant limit, as well as the legal considerations in Kraksaan Religious Court Decision Number 1092/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Krs regarding this matter. The research method used is doctrinal. The results obtained from this research state that a gift can be said to "exceed the maximum grant limit, namely one third of the grantor's assets," when the heir dies, taking into account the consent of the heirs and not violating their absolute rights. The Land Registrar's Office and/or the Temporary Land Registrars' Office do not have legality in terms of affixing a thumbprint to an illiterate grantor because Article 1874 of the Civil Code, jo. Article 1874a of the Civil Code, explains that a notary or other official appointed by law has the right to do so. The grantor can submit a request for cancellation of the gift to the court where the object of the gift is located, so that the gift that has been given is canceled and returned to him based on the conditions and reasons in accordance with the applicable regulations. Thus, The Land Registrar's Office and/or the Temporary Land Registrars' Office are very crucial in helping to create legal certainty, legal order, and legal protection for the community, especially those directly related to land."

"Sengketa keabsahan hibah atas tanah harus memperhatikan hukum yang berlaku bagi para pihak maupun hukum atas obyek perkara dan pembuktian. Hal demikian namun tidak dipertimbangkan dengan cermat oleh Majelis Hakim pada tiap-tiap tahap peradilan agama dan pada tingkat kasasi gugatan atas sengketa hibah tanah dibatalkan dan perkara dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima namun tidak mempertimbangkan aspek materiil pada perkara a quo. Oleh karena itu permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai pertimbangan Majelis Hakim mengenai keabsahan hibah tanah yang melebihi satu pertiga harta pemberi hibah dan status kepemilikan harta hibah pada putusan a quo. Untuk menjawab permasalahan digunakan bentuk penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa pertimbangan Majelis Hakim adalah kurang tepat karena tidak cermat dalam melihat pembuktian Para Penggugat dan status harta hibah adalah tetap berada pada penerima hibah. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, PPAT hendaknya memastikan identitas lengkap penghadap terkait kewenangan dan keberlakuan hukum, serta memastikan bahwa hibah adalah tidak lebih dari 1/3 harta pemberi hibah yang mana para pihak dalam hibah juga dapat mengajukan perhitungan nilai harta pemberi hibah melalui bantuan profesional.

---

Disputes over the validity of grants on land must take into account the law that applies to the parties as well as the law on the object of the case and evidence. However, this matter was not carefully considered by the Panel of Judges at each stage of the religious court and at the cassation level the lawsuit over the land grant dispute was canceled and the case was declared unacceptable but did not consider the material aspects of the a quo case. Therefore, the problem studied in this research is regarding the consideration of the Panel of Judges regarding the validity of the land grant which exceeds one third of the grantor's property and the status of ownership of the grant property in the a quo decision. To answer the problems used a form of juridical-normative research with an approach to legislation and decisions that were analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study found that the consideration of the Panel of Judges was inaccurate because they were not careful in looking at the evidence of the Plaintiffs and the status of the grant assets remained with the recipient of the grant. Based on this, the PPAT should ensure the complete identity of the appearers regarding the authority and enforceability of the law, and ensure that the grant is no more than 1/3 of the assets of the grantor in which the parties to the grant can also apply for the calculation of the value of the grantor's assets through professional assistance."

"Pemberian hibah sering dilakukan pada saat pemberi hibah dalam keadaan sakit berat, atau sakit hampir meninggal. Namun hibah seringkali menimbulkan konflik, apalagi jika objek hibah yang diberikan adalah tanah. Oleh karena itu proses pemberian hibah harus memperhatikan ketentuan yang telah diatur agar peralihan hak melalui hibah menjadi sah. Ada persyaratan khusus mengenai hibah yang dilakukan jika hibah dilakukan pada saat pemberi hibah sakit. Dalam Pasal 213 KHI dijelaskan bahwa jika seseorang dalam keadaan sakit mendekati kematian, hibah yang akan dilakukan harus mendapat persetujuan dari ahli waris pemberi hibah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis ketentuan hukum Islam mengenai status dan keabsahan objek tanah wakaf ketika pemberi hibah sakit dalam perkara Putusan Nomor 269/Pdt.G/2019/PA.MS, dan menganalisis bagaimana parameter penyakit pemberi hibah yang menyebabkan hibah tidak sah dalam kasus Putusan Nomor 269/Pdt.G/2019/PA.MS menurut hukum Islam. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, tulisan ini menganalisis Putusan Nomor 269/Pdt.G/2019/PA.MS mengenai sah tidaknya pemberian hibah yang dilakukan pada saat pemberi hibah sakit dan besarnya penyakit pemberi hibah sehingga hibah yang diberikan menjadi tidak sah. Pertama Jika pemberi hibah sakit, maka berdasarkan pasal 213 KHI mensyaratkan hibah disetujui oleh anak pemberi hibah. Sebelum proses pemberian hibah oleh pemberi hibah kepada penerima hibah. Pemberi hibah harus meminta persetujuan ahli warisnya yang berjumlah lima orang untuk dapat hadir dan memberikan persetujuan. Dengan persetujuan anak-anak Pemberi Hibah, telah terpenuhi syarat-syarat hibah dalam keadaan sakit sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 213 KHI. Kedua dalam Pasal 213 KHI, syarat seseorang merupakan syarat tambahan dalam pemberian hibah, dimana jika seseorang mengalami sakit yang mendekati kematian, maka hibah tersebut wajib mendapat persetujuan dari ahli waris. Berdasarkan yurispudensi Nomor 225 K/Sip/1960 disebutkan bahwa hibah yang dilakukan oleh orang yang sehat jasmani tidak perlu persetujuan ahli waris. Untuk mengetahui apakah seseorang memiliki jiwa yang sehat, harus ada pernyataan kesehatan dari segi psikologis oleh dokter spesialis kejiwaan.

---

Giving grants is often done when the grantor is in a state of serious illness, or a near-death illness. However, grants often cause conflicts, especially if the object of the grant given is land. Therefore, the process of giving a grant must pay attention to the provisions that have been regulated so that the transfer of rights through the grant becomes legal. There are special requirements regarding grants made if the grants are made when the grantor is sick, in which case this is regulated in Article 213 KHI which explains that if a person is in a state of near-death illness, the grants to be made must obtain approval from the heirs of the grantor. The purpose of this research is to analyze the provisions of Islamic law regarding the status and validity of the donated land object when the grantor is sick in the case of Decision Number 269/Pdt.G/2019/PA.MS, and to analyze how the parameters of the grantor's illness result in an invalid grant in the case of Decision Number 269/Pdt.G/2019/PA.MS according to Islamic law. By using normative juridical research methods, this paper analyzes Decision Number 269/Pdt.G/2019/PA.MS. Regarding the legitimacy of giving grants made when the grantor is sick and the size of the grantor's illness so that the grant given becomes invalid. From the results of the research it can be concluded 1) If the grantor is sick, then based on article 213 KHI requires that the grant is approved by Grantor's children. Prior to the process of awarding grants by grantors to grantees. The grant giver must seek approval from his heirs, totaling five people, to be able to attend and give approval. With the approval of the Grant Giver's children, the conditions for grants in sickness have been fulfilled as stipulated in article 213 KHI. 2) In Article 213 KHI, a person's condition is an additional condition in granting grants, where if a person experiences an illness close to death, it is obligatory for the grant to obtain approval from the heirs. Based on Jurisprudence Number 225 K/Sip/1960 it is stated that grants made by people who are healthy in spirit do not require the approval of the heirs. In order to find out if someone has a healthy soul, there must be a statement of health from a psychological perspective by a psychiatric specialist."