Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Seorang penerjemah perlu menyadari bahwa bahasa yang berbeda memiliki cara yang berbeda dalam membangun kohesi. Dalam bahasa yang sama pun, jika genre berbeda, kohesi berpotensi berbeda. Penelitian ini membandingkan penggunaan repetisi, yang adalah salah satu jenis kohesi, dalam pasangan bahasa Jepang dan bahasa Indonesia. Bahasa Jepang berperan sebagai bahasa sumber, sedangkan bahasa Indonesia berperan sebagai bahasa sasaran. Penelitian ini juga mencari tahu validitas repetition avoidance hypotheses yang mengatakan bahwa teks terjemahan umumnya memiliki lebih sedikit repetisi daripada teks sumber. Sumber data untuk penelitian ini adalah dialog film A Whisker Away (2020) yang digarap oleh studio Colorido. Data dikumpulkan dengan membandingkan dialog bahasa Jepang dengan takarir bahasa Indonesia film tersebut. Hasil perbandingan memperlihatkan terjadinya pergeseran kohesi repetisi dalam bentuk perubahan kategori alat kohesi yang digunakan serta penghilangan dan penambahan repetisi. Jumlah penghilangan repetisi yang terjadi melebihi jumlah penambahan repetisi, yang dengan demikian meneguhkan repetition avoidance hypotheses.

---

translator needs to be aware that each language, and even different genres in the same language, have different ways of establishing cohesion. This study compares the use of repetition, a type of cohesion, in the Japanese-Indonesian language pair. The source text is in Japanese, while the target text is in Indonesian. This study also seeks to find out the validity of the repetition avoidance hypotheses which claims that translated texts commonly have less instances of repetition than the source text. The source of data for this study is the dialog from the movie A Whisker Away (2020) which was produced by Studio Colorido. Data is collected by comparing the Japanese script with the Indonesian subtitle of the movie. Results show shifts in cohesion including changes in the category of the cohesive device used and the omission and insertion of repetitions. There are more omissions than insertions of repetitions in the target text, which aligns with the repetition avoidance hypotheses."

"Seorang penerjemah perlu menyadari bahwa bahasa yang berbeda memiliki cara yang berbeda dalam membangun kohesi. Dalam bahasa yang sama pun, jika genre berbeda, kohesi berpotensi berbeda. Penelitian ini membandingkan penggunaan repetisi, yang adalah salah satu jenis kohesi, dalam pasangan bahasa Jepang dan bahasa Indonesia. Bahasa Jepang berperan sebagai bahasa sumber, sedangkan bahasa Indonesia berperan sebagai bahasa sasaran. Penelitian ini juga mencari tahu validitas repetition avoidance hypotheses yang mengatakan bahwa teks terjemahan umumnya memiliki lebih sedikit repetisi daripada teks sumber. Sumber data untuk penelitian ini adalah dialog film A Whisker Away (2020) yang digarap oleh studio Colorido. Data dikumpulkan dengan membandingkan dialog bahasa Jepang dengan takarir bahasa Indonesia film tersebut. Hasil perbandingan memperlihatkan terjadinya pergeseran kohesi repetisi dalam bentuk perubahan kategori alat kohesi yang digunakan serta penghilangan dan penambahan repetisi. Jumlah penghilangan repetisi yang terjadi melebihi jumlah penambahan repetisi, yang dengan demikian meneguhkan repetition avoidance hypotheses.

---

translator needs to be aware that each language, and even different genres in the same language, have different ways of establishing cohesion. This study compares the use of repetition, a type of cohesion, in the Japanese-Indonesian language pair. The source text is in Japanese, while the target text is in Indonesian. This study also seeks to find out the validity of the repetition avoidance hypotheses which claims that translated texts commonly have less instances of repetition than the source text. The source of data for this study is the dialog from the movie A Whisker Away (2020) which was produced by Studio Colorido. Data is collected by comparing the Japanese script with the Indonesian subtitle of the movie. Results show shifts in cohesion including changes in the category of the cohesive device used and the omission and insertion of repetitions. There are more omissions than insertions of repetitions in the target text, which aligns with the repetition avoidance hypotheses."

"Seorang penerjemah perlu menyadari bahwa bahasa yang berbeda memiliki cara yang berbeda dalam membangun kohesi. Dalam bahasa yang sama pun, jika genre berbeda, kohesi berpotensi berbeda. Penelitian ini membandingkan penggunaan repetisi, yang adalah salah satu jenis kohesi, dalam pasangan bahasa Jepang dan bahasa Indonesia. Bahasa Jepang berperan sebagai bahasa sumber, sedangkan bahasa Indonesia berperan sebagai bahasa sasaran. Penelitian ini juga mencari tahu validitas repetition avoidance hypotheses yang mengatakan bahwa teks terjemahan umumnya memiliki lebih sedikit repetisi daripada teks sumber. Sumber data untuk penelitian ini adalah dialog film A Whisker Away (2020) yang digarap oleh studio Colorido. Data dikumpulkan dengan membandingkan dialog bahasa Jepang dengan takarir bahasa Indonesia film tersebut. Hasil perbandingan memperlihatkan terjadinya pergeseran kohesi repetisi dalam bentuk perubahan kategori alat kohesi yang digunakan serta penghilangan dan penambahan repetisi. Jumlah penghilangan repetisi yang terjadi melebihi jumlah penambahan repetisi, yang dengan demikian meneguhkan repetition avoidance hypotheses.

---

A translator needs to be aware that each language, and even different genres in the same language, have different ways of establishing cohesion. This study compares the use of repetition, a type of cohesion, in the Japanese-Indonesian language pair. The source text is in Japanese, while the target text is in Indonesian. This study also seeks to find out the validity of the repetition avoidance hypotheses which claims that translated texts commonly have less instances of repetition than the source text. The source of data for this study is the dialog from the movie A Whisker Away (2020) which was produced by Studio Colorido. Data is collected by comparing the Japanese script with the Indonesian subtitle of the movie. Results show shifts in cohesion including changes in the category of the cohesive device used and the omission and insertion of repetitions. There are more omissions than insertions of repetitions in the target text, which aligns with the repetition avoidance hypotheses."

"A discourse generally consists of a number of sentences. In this case one sentence and another sentence should be related to each other. The relations among them can be identified through the components connecting those sentences, which are called cohesive devices.

This research aims at describing cohesion in Javanese discourses, especially concerning the grammatical and lexical cohesive devices. Also, the cohesive ties among their components in various discourses are examined.

The theory for this analysis is based on Halliday and Hasan's Cohesion in English (1979) and Language, Context and Text (1985). The theory is chosen since it is relevant to the subject and is also by far the most comprehensive.

The data for this research is taken from various sources so that it is expected to represent the real uses of Javanese. The data is collected through the observation method, that is, by using the techniques of recording and noting on the data cards. Then, the data are analyzed by a distributional method.

In this research, a great variety of grammatical cohesive devices, lexical cohesive devices, and even cohesive ties are found. There are four types of grammatical cohesive devices, i.e. reference, substitution, ellipsis, and con-junction; and six types of lexical cohesion, viz, repetition, synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, and collocation. For the group of the grammatical cohesions, some types of reference, covering personal pronouns, demonstrative pronouns, and reference by definite markers are obtained; substitution comprises noun and clause substitution; ellipsis covers noun, verb, and clause ellipsis; while the con-junctions are indicated by some marks of conjunctive relations. Besides, the semantic conjunctive ties are analyzed, comprising additive, adversative, causal, temporal, conditional, alternative, conclusive, validity and intensity. For the group of lexical cohesion, the types of repetition are shown by complete repetition, modified repetition, partial repetition, and additional repetition; synonymy is marked by the linguistic unit with similar or the same meaning; antonymy is realized through the lingual unit with binary, polar, relational and multiple taxonomic antonymy; hyponymy is constructed by superordinate-hyponym, hyponymsuperordinate and co-hyponym relations; meronymy is organized by holonym-meronym, meronym-holonym, and co-meronym, while collocation can be identified through noun and verb collocations. From the analysis of the cohesive ties, the cohesive devices used in one type of discourse and another type vary respectively, whereas the distance between the constituents is dominated by the immediate ties."

"There are several kinds of language that using in newspaper. Its depend on the character of informations. According to Hoed (1976a), the various of languages in newspaper base on the ideas of sociolinguistics field that regarded language in reality is not monolitic, but consist of several variations. One of the inner problem in Indonesian mass media and become the focus of this research is the cohession. The goals of this research, which the tittle is "Kohesi dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Atas Teks Tajuk Rencana Lima Surat Kabar Harlan di Jakarta", is to describe the editorial cohession (tajuk rencana) in Indonesian daily newspapers. Through this research, I hope that I am be able to describe (i) cohession mecanism as the tie of propositions in editorial discourse; (ii) language units which's used as cohession marker in editorial text; and (iii) the kinds of cohession marker which's frequently used in editorial text and their causal factors. This research use Halliday and Hasan theory (1979) which combined with Cruse theory (1986). In this research I found that the same cohession is not always using in editorial text eventhough in the same newspaper. But, it's an unabsolutely using the all cohesion marker in editorial. The result of the research show that there is a tendency in using cohession marker which depend on the "topic" of the news. The language units that places as cohession marker in editorial are ia, dia, mereka, -nya, itu, ini, ini, itu, begini, and di sini; conjunction sejak, karenanya, tetapi, akan tetapi, namun, semen tare itu, clan, ketimbang, bahwa, sebab, sehingga, meskipun; and OIeh karena itu. And, I also found the using of noun, noun phrase, verb, verb phrase, and clause in the editorial. Through the comprehensive analysis of the six topic of editorial, which represented by one every topic, this research found 254 cohession marker, both gramatical or lexical. The lexical cohession marker repetition is the most frequently use, i.e. 117 (45.9%). Then the reference 53 {21.1%), collocation 28 (11%), conjunctive relation 20 (7.8%), substitution 8 (3.1%), ellipsis 8 (3.1%), paronymy 7 (2.8%), synonymy 6 (2.4%), hyponymy 5 (2%), and meronymy 2 (0.8%)."

"ABSTRAKTelaah ini memiliki dua tujuan pokok. Tujuan pertama adalah untuk menyelidiki sejauh mana eksistensi pemarkah kohesi dalam teks bacaan dalam buku English for the Senior High School, yang diterbitkan oleh Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan pada tahun 1996, mempengaruhi pemahaman peserta didik. Tujuan kedua adalah untuk mengetahui jenis pemarkah kohesi apa raja yang dominan muncul dalam teks bacaan yang diteliti.Metode yang diterapkan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif yang memanfaatkan teknik kalkulasi t-test, koefisien korelasi Pearson, dan analisis persentase, dengan 40 siswa kelas 2 SMU tahun ajaran 1998/1999 sebagai sampel. Para siswa tersebut berasal dari SMU Negeri 38, Jakarta Selatan. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes isi rumpang (TIR) dan tes tanya jawab (TTJ).Ada dua penemuan pokok dalam penelitian ini. Pertama, rekognisi pemarkah kohesif cenderung berperan penting dalam keterpahaman teks. Hasil eksperimen menunjukkan bahwa pemberian input tentang rekognisi pemarkah kohesif kepada kelompok eksperimental cenderung meningkatkan prestasi kelompok ini jika dibandingkan dengan kelompok kontrol yang tidak diberikan input. Kedua, berdasarkan tingkat frekuensi kemunculan pemarkah kohesi dalam empat teks eksposisi yang dianalisis, pemarkah kohesi leksikal cenderung memiliki persentase tinggi, yakni 60,61 %. Urutan kedua setelah kohesi leksikal ialah acuan, yakni 28,28%. Urutan ketiga ialah konjungsi, yakni 8,08%. Urutan keempat ialah elipsis, yakni 3,03%, sedangkan urutan terakhir ialah substitusi, yakni 0%.Berdasarkan analisis peranan rantai kohesi dalam keterpahaman teks, rantai kohesi dapat dijadikan alat untuk membantu peserta didik memahami teks bacaan eksposisi dengan lebih efisien. Dengan perkataan lain, pemarkah kohesi berperan penting dalam peningkatan keterpahaman teks jika digunakan sebagai alat penuntun. peserta didik dalam menentukan pikiran utama dalam bagian teks.

---

ABSTRACT

This study has two objectives. First, it aims at seeking how far the existence of cohesive markers in the reading texts in " English for Senior High School ", published by the Department of Education and Culture ini 1996, influences the student's comprehension. Second, it aims at searching what categories of cohesive markers which dominantly occur in the reading texts observed.

The method applied in this research is a quantitative one, making use of the t-test, the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and the percentage analysis, with 40 second-year students of a Senior High School in the academic year 1998/1999 as the sample. The students are taken from a State Senior High School (SMU Negeri), Jakarta Selatan. The data are collected through the cloze test and the comprehension question test.

There are two main findings in this research. Firstly, the recognition of cohesive markers tends to play an important role in the text comprehensibility. The result of the experiment showed that presenting input on the recognition of cohesive markers to the experimental group tended to improve their performance in both tests compared to the control group who are not given the input.

Secondly, based on the frequency of occurrence of cohesive markers in four of the analyzed expository texts, lexical cohesive markers tended to occur most frequently, i.e. 60.61%. Reference comes the second, i.e. 28.28%. Conjunction comes the third, i.e. 8.08%. Ellipsis comes the fourth, i.e. 3.03%, while substitution comes the last, i.e. 0%.

Based on the analysis of the roles of the cohesive chains in the text comprehensibility, the cohesive chains can be utilized to help the students to comprehend the expository reading texts more efficiently. In other words, the cohesive markers play an important role in improving the text comprehensibility if they are utilized to guide the students in determining the main ideas in a passage."