Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Patient with severe condition which single conventional orthodontic treatment cannot be carried out, it must be considered to undergo combination treatment between orthodontic and orthognathic surgery, so that patient's complaint about aesthetic, mastication and speech function can receive better correction. The aim of performing the orthodontic treatment before orthognathic surgery is to place teeth position ideally to the bone base before correcting the abnormality of its sceletal bone. After the orthognathic surgery there is still the orthodontic treatment to be done which has the aim to achieve good teeth occlusion, inclination and angulation. if possible comparable to the conditions described by Andrew in Six Keys of Normal Occlusion."

"Pendahuluan: Interpretasi asimetri dentokraniofasial sangat penting dalam penegakkan diagnosis dan pembuatan rencana perawatan ortodonti. Walaupun sefalometri PA merupakan standar prosedur asimetri dentokraniofasial, namun memberi tambahan paparan radiasi bagi pasien, serta memerlukan biaya tambahan. Apabila OPG dapat digunakan sebagai interpretasi dentokraniofasial, maka akan lebih efektif dan efisien. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk Menganalisis perbedaan interpretasi asimetri dentokraniofasial antara OPG dan sefalogram PA dengan analisis linear vertikal dan angular. Metode: Interpretasi asimetri dentokraniofasial analisis linear vertikal dan angular menggunakan Winceph 11 dari 30 subjek penelitian didapatkan sesuai kriteria inklusi. Terdapat 5 parameter yang dianalisis, yaitu Orbitale, Condyle, Sigmoid Notch Point, Gonion, Menton. Uji McNemar digunakan untuk menguji perbedaan kedua metode. Bland-Altman plot dan Kappa digunakan untuk menguji reliabilitas antara kedua metode. Hasil: Interpretasi asimetri dentokraniofasial dengan parameter orbitale, condyle, dan sigmoid notch point tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada pengukuran linear vertikal dan angular, namun pada parameter gonion dan menton didapatkan berbeda bermakna (p<0.05) antara gambaran OPG dan Sefalometri PA pada analisis angular. Seluruh parameter menunjukkan kesepakatan hampir sempurna antara kedua metode (Kappa>0.81). Kesimpulan: OPG dapat digunakan sebagai alat bantu interpretasi awal asimetri dentokraniofasial, namun untuk penegakan interpretasi asimetri dentokraniofasial utamanya menggunakan sefalogram PA.

---

Introduction: Interpretation of dentocraniofacial asymmetry is crucial in establishing the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plans. Although PA cephalometry is the standard procedure for dentocraniofacial asymmetry, it provides additional radiation exposure for patients and requires additional costs. If OPG can be used as a dentocraniofacial interpretation, it will be more effective and efficient. Objective: This study aims to analyze the differences in dentocraniofacial asymmetry interpretation between OPG and PA cephalogram with vertical and angular linear analysis. Methods: Interpretation of dentocraniofacial asymmetry vertical and angular linear analysis using Winceph 11 of 30 subjects were obtained according to the inclusion criteria. The parameters are Orbitale, Condyle, Sigmoid Notch Point, Gonion, and Menton. McNemar test was used to evaluate the differences between the two methods. Bland-Altman plot and Kappa were used to evaluate the reliability between the two methods. Results: Interpretation of dentocraniofacial asymmetry with orbitale, condyle, and sigmoid notch point parameters presented no significant differences in vertical linear and angular measurements, but in gonion and menton parameters, there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between OPG and PA cephalometry in angular analysis. All parameters showed almost perfect agreement between the two methods (Kappa> 0.81). Conclusion: OPG can be used as an aid in the initial interpretation of dentocraniofacial asymmetry, but PA cephalogram is mainly used to enforce the interpretation of dentocraniofacial asymmetry."

"[ABSTRAKPendahuluan: Pengukuran indeks PAR umumnya dilakukan secara manual. Seiring dengan perkembangan teknologi, maka dikembangkan piranti lunak indeks PAR untuk membantu ortodontis dalam mengukur indeks PAR secara digital. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan hasil pengukuran skor indeks PAR (komponen 1-6) secara manual dan digital. Material dan Metode:Enam puluh subyek penelitian yang sesuai kriteria inklusi dilakukan pemindaian dengan menggunakan alat pindai datar/scanner HP Scanjet G4050 sehingga didapatkan model studi digital dua dimensi (2D). Dilakukan pengukuran skor indeks PAR (komponen 1-6) secara manual pada model studi konvensional dengan menggunakan penggaris plastik PAR dan pengukuran secara digital pada model studi digital 2D dengan menggunakan piranti lunak indeks PAR.Hasil: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara pengukuran skor indeks PAR (komponen 1-6) pada model studi konvensional dengan model studi digital 2D (p>0,05).Kesimpulan: Pengukuran pada model studi digital 2D sama akurat dengan model studi konvensional.

---

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Over the years, PAR index measurement is usually recorded using manual assessment. Along with the technology improvements, PAR index software are being developed to help orthodontists in measuring the PAR index digitally.Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the result of PAR score index (component 1-6)between the manual and digital measurement.Materials and Methods: Sixty samples that match the inclusion criteria were scanned using HP Scanjet G4050 scanner device to obtain 2D digital study models. Manual measurements of the PAR score index (component 1-6) was assessed using PAR plastic ruler, while the 2D digital study models were measured using PAR index software.Results:There were no significant differences between the measurement of PAR score index (component 1-6) in conventional and 2D digital study models (p>0,05).Conclusions: The measurements on 2D digital study models are as accurate as conventional study models., Introduction: Over the years, PAR index measurement is usually recorded using manual assessment. Along with the technology improvements, PAR index software are being developed to help orthodontists in measuring the PAR index digitally.Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the result of PAR score index (component 1-6)between the manual and digital measurement.Materials and Methods: Sixty samples that match the inclusion criteria were scanned using HP Scanjet G4050 scanner device to obtain 2D digital study models. Manual measurements of the PAR score index (component 1-6) was assessed using PAR plastic ruler, while the 2D digital study models were measured using PAR index software.Results:There were no significant differences between the measurement of PAR score index (component 1-6) in conventional and 2D digital study models (p>0,05).Conclusions: The measurements on 2D digital study models are as accurate as conventional study models.]"

"Latar Belakang: Whistle deformity merupakan deformitas yang paling sering terjadi pasca labioplasti.Tujuan: untuk membandingkan ukuran tinggi cupid bow sisi non celah, midline dan cupid bow sisi celah pasca Labioplasti dengan teknik Cronin pada pasien UCLP bibir istirahat dan berfungsi dan mengevaluasi apakah terjadi whistle deformity atau tidak.Metode: Penilaian whistle deformity berdasarkan skala antropometri dari data fotograf wajah, yaitu ukuran tinggi cupid bow sisi non celah, midline dan sisi celah pada 24 pasien UCLP pasca labioplasti dengan teknik Cronin, dan pada pasien whistle deformity dilakukan saat bibir istirahat dan berfungsi.Hasil: Dari hasil statistik didapatkan P0,05.Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada tinggi cupid bow sisi non celah dan sisi celah, tinggi cupid bow sisi non celah, sisi celah dan midline pasien whistle deformity bibir berfungsi dan istirahat, tinggi cupid bow sisi kanan dan kiri pada anak nomal bibir berfungsi dan istirahat, tinggi cupid bow anak normal dengan whistle deformity saat berfungsi. Sedangkan tinggi midline anak normal dan tinggi cupid rsquo;s bow anak normal dan whistle deformity saat bibir istirahat terdapat perbedaan bermakna.

---

Background: Whistle deformity is one of the lip deformities post labioplasty usually occurs.

Objectives: To compare the height of cupid bow in the normal side, midline and the cleft side post Cronin method labioplasty in the UCLP patient while the lips in function and rest and evaluate is there whistle deformity or not.

Method: Evaluation whistle deformity according to anthropometry scale from profile photograph, which are the height cupid bow normal side, midline and cleft side in 24 UCLP patients post Cronin method labioplasty, in the whistle deformity patients while lips function and rest.

Result: Base on statistic, the result showed P0,05.

Conclusion: There is no significant difference between height cupid bow in the normal side and cleft side, height cupid bow in the normal side, cleft side and midline in the whistle deformity while lips function and rest, height cupid bow of the right and left side in the normal children while lips function and rest, height cupid bow in the normal children and whistle deformity while lips function. On the other side, there is significant difference between height midline in the normal children and height cupid bow in the normal children and whistle deformity while lips rest."

"[Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan persepsi ortodontis dan orang awam Indonesia terhadap posisi bibir pada profil wajah orang Indonesia ras Deutero-Malayid. Metode: Posisi bibir pada foto profil wanita ras Deutero-Malayid dimodifikasi secara digital dalam arah anteroposterior terhadap garis E Ricketts sehingga diperoleh tujuh posisi bibir. Ketujuh foto ini kemudian dinilai oleh 24 ortodontis dan 24 orang awam wanita ras Deutero-Malayid berusia 25-55 tahun. Penilaian dilakukan dengan metode Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) dan pemilihan satu posisi bibir yang paling disukai. Hasil: Perbedaan persepsi ortodontis dan orang awam yang bermakna dapat ditemukan pada penilaian VAS posisi bibir atas -2 mm dan posisi bibir bawah 0 mm; posisi bibir atas +4 mm dan posisi bibir bawah +6 mm; sertaposisi bibir atas +6 mm dan posisi bibir bawah +8 mm. Baik ortodontis maupun orang awam memilih posisi bibir atas -2 mm dan posisi bibir bawah 0 mm sebagai posisi bibir yang paling disukai. Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan persepsi ortodontis dan orang awam terhadap posisi bibir pada profil wajah dalam hal kekritisan penilaian namun terdapat kesamaan pemilihan posisi bibir., Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the perception of Indonesian orthodontists and laypersons to various lip positions in Indonesian Deutero-Malayid facial profile. Method: The lip position in a female Deutero-Malayid profile photo was digitally adjusted in anteroposterior direction from Ricketts' E-line to obtain seven lip positions. These seven photos were then assessed by 24 female orthodontists and 24 female laypersons (25-55 years). Assessment were done with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and selection of the most preferred lip position. Result: Significant differences between perception of orthodontists and laypersons were found for upper lip -2 mm and lower lip 0 mm; upper lip +4mm and lower lip +6 mm; upper lip +6 mm and lower lip +8 mm. Orthodontists and laypersons selected upper lips -2 mm and lower lips 0 mm as the most preferred lip position. Conclusion: There were significant differences between orthodontists' and laypersons' perception regarding evaluation criticality toward lip positions in facial profile. However, both groups show same preference for lip position.]"

"Pendahuluan: Perkembangan digital di bidang ortodontik semakin berkembang. Penggunaan intraoral scanner merupakan babak penting dalam evolusi ini. Intraoral scanner merupakan sebuah perangkat yang diproduksi untuk menghasilkan cetakan digital langsung dalam kedokteran gigi. Penggunaan model studi konvesional yang selama ini menjadi baku emas dalam penegakan diagnosis mulai bergeser. Penelitian mengenai penggunaan intraoral scanner akhir-akhir ini banyak dilakukan terutama untuk melihat akurasi. Namun di Indonesia belum ada yang mengamati dari segi persepi pasien. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan persepsi pasien terhadap pencetakan metode konvensional dengan pencetakan digital. Metode: Subjek penelitian sebanyak 46 sampel yang telah memenuhi kriteria inklusi dicetak menggunakan teknik pencetakan konvensional (alginate) dan digital (3D intraoral scanner). Kemudian subjek penelitian diberikan kuesioner untuk menilai persepsi pasien menggunakan VAS (visual analogue scale). Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan signifikan secara statistik pada rasa nyaman, sensitifitas gigi atau gusi, kesan kesulitan bernapas, dan refleks tersedak selama prosedur teknik pencetakan dengan teknik konvensional maupun digital dengan nilai (p<0.05). Kesimpulan: Persepsi pasien terhadap rasa nyaman, sensitifitas gigi atau gusi, kesan kesulitan bernapas, dan refleks tersedak adalah bermakna secara statistik dimana teknik pencetakan digital lebih dipilih dibandingkan dengan teknik konvensional.

---

Introduction: Digital orthodontics are increasingly in this era. The use of intraoral scanners is an important chapter in this evolution. An intraoral scanner is a device manufactured to produce direct digital impressions in dentistry. The use of conventional study models, which have been the gold standard in making diagnosis, is starting to shift. Recently, much studies has been carried out regarding the use of intraoral scanners, especially to look at the accuracy. However, in Indonesia, no one has observed the differences of patient perception in conventional and digital impressions. Objective: This study aims to determine the differences of patient perception in conventional and digital impression. Methods: 46 subjects were obtained according to the inclusion criteria using conventional (alginate) and digital (3D intraoral scanner) impression techniques. Then the subjects were given a questionnaire to see the patient's perception and assessed using a VAS (visual analogue scale). Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the feeling of comfort, sensitivity of teeth or gums, feeling difficulty of breathing, and gagging reflex during the impression procedure with conventional and digital technique with p value <0.05. Conclusion: The patient perception of comfort, sensitivity of teeth or gums, feeling difficulty of breathing, and gagging reflex are statistically significant where digital impression techniques are preferred compared to conventional techniques."

"Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbedaan besar friksi kinetik antara kombinasi braket Stainless Steel (SS) Edgewise slot .018 dan kawatSS .017X.025, dengan kombinasi braket slot .022 dan kawat SS.019X.025 pada saat pergerakan sliding gigi kaninus. Metode: Penelitian laboratoris ini terdiri dari 96 sampel yang terbagi atas dua kelompok slot braket, dan setiap kelompok slot braket terbagi atas empat kelompok beban tahanan. Besar friksi kinetik diukur dengan Universal Testing Machine merk ChatillonTM pada kedua kelompok slot braket saat pergerakan sliding gigi kaninus yang diberi beban tahanan 0, 50 gr, 100 gr, dan 150 gr. Hasil: Friksi kinetik pada kelompok braket slot .018 lebih besar daripada slot .022 secara bermakna pada kelompok beban tahanan 0, 50 gr, dan 100 gr, namun tidak bermakna pada kelompok beban tahanan 150 gr. Besar friksi kinetik meningkat secara bermakna seiring peningkatan besar beban tahanan 50 gr, 100 gr, dan 150 gr pada kedua kelompok slot braket. Kesimpulan: Friksi kinetik pada kombinasi braket SS Edgewise slot .018 dan kawat SS .017X.025 terjadi lebih besar daripada kombinasi braket slot .022 dan kawat SS .019X.025.

---

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare kinetic frictional force of Stainless Steel (SS) Edgewise bracket between .018 slot coupled with .017X.025 SS wire and .022 slot coupled with .019X.025 SS wire in simulated sliding canine movement.

Methods: This in-vitro study was done to measure kinetic frictional force of 96 samples, divided into two bracket slot groups and each of bracket slot groups was divided into four retarding force groups. Kinetic frictional force was measured byChatillonTM UniversalTesting Machine for both bracket slot groups, in simulated sliding canine movement using 0, 50 gr, 100 gr, and 150 gr retarding forces.

Results: Kinetic frictional force was significantly greater for the .018 than .022 bracket slot in the 0, 50 gr, and 100 gr retarding force groups, but it was not significant in the 150 gr retarding force group. Frictional force increased with the increasing of the 50 gr, 100 gr, and 150 gr retarding forces for both bracket slot groups.

Conclusions: Kinetic frictional force of the .018 SS Edgewise bracket slot coupled with .017X.025 SS wire is greater than the .022 bracket slot coupled with .019X.025 SS wire."