Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Indigenous hunting has always been an indigenous human rights core issue that has received high attention in the conflict between national laws and indigenous legal traditions. J.Y. Interpretation No. 803 affirmed indigenous hunting culture is a constitutional guaranteed fundamental right enjoyed by individual indigenous people. Nevertheless, the said Interpretation did not satisfy indigenous claimant’s assertions. The most critical are the collective nature of indigenous right and the aboriginal title still in the predicament of unclear concept and undetermined content. This article starts with a brief comparative law study, and then analyzes the said Interpretation, and continues with the theory of multicultural constitutionalism to make the argument based on the indigenous claims of traditional territorial rights."

"Penelitian ini memaparkan tentang pemaknaan self-determination yang awalnya dipahami sebagai hak untuk merdeka dan memisahkan diri melalui Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Peoples, menjadi hak untuk menentukan nasib sendiri dalam konteks HAM bagi indigenous peoples. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif interpretif, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi perdebatan pada proses penyusunan teks deklarasi indigenous rights di PBB yang dimulai pada tahun 1984-2007. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, walaupun pemaknaan pada akhirnya diterima secara resmi sebagai self-determination yang dibatasi, masih terdapat unsur-unsur ldquo;kolonialisme berlanjut rdquo; advanced colonialism yang masih berlanjut yang menyebabkan masih sulitnya negara menerima pemaknaan self-determination yang bersifat internal. Selain itu, dipaparkan pula mengenai kondisi pengakuan masyarakat adat di Indonesia sebagai refleksi atas permasalahan terhadap pemaknaan self-determination.

---

This study elaborates the meaning of self determination which was originally conceived as the right to independence and secession by Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Peoples, becomes the rights to self determination in the context of rights for indigenous peoples. By using qualitative interpretive approach, this study explores the debate on the process of preparing the text of the UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights from 1984 2007. The result shows that,even though the meaning is accepted formally in form of restricted self determination, there are elements of advanced colonialism that led to the difficulty for states to accept the context of internal meaning of self determination. This study also presents the condition on recognition of ldquo masyarakat adat rdquo in Indonesia as a reflection on the problems on the meaning of self determination."

""The intersections between culture and human rights are shown to have engaged some of the most heated and controversial debates across international law and theory. As understandings of culture have evolved in recent decades to encompass culture as ways of life, there has been a shift in emphasis from national cultures to cultural diversity within and across states. This has entailed a push to more fully articulate cultural rights within human rights law.This volume provides a taster of the responses by international law, and particularly human rights law, to some of the thorniest, perennial, and ... sometimes violent confrontations and contestations fuelled by culture in relations between individuals, groups, and the state in international society."--Front jacket flap."

"Penulisan tesis ini berangkat dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 terkait uji meteri beberapa pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan karena dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuanketentuan yang ada dalam UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Salah satu putusan penting Mahkamah Konstitusi adalah mengubah Pasal 1 angka 6 dengan menghapus kata "negara" sehingga menjadi ?hutan adat adalah hutan yang berada dalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat?. Dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut, status hutan adat dipulihkan kembali menjadi salah satu obyek hak ulayat dalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat. Dengan banyaknya pengakuan atau klaim dari masyarakat hukum adat atas hutan adat, maka diperlukan analisis mengenai pemulihan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012, khususnya terkait kriteria kepemilikan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat dalam konsep negara kesatuan, status kepemilikan atas tanah dan izin pada hutan adat serta mekanisme dan peran pemerintah dalam rangka pemulihan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat. Metodologi yang digunakan yaitu studi normatif dan empiris dengan model deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa untuk membuktikan kepemilikan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat diperlukan penelitian terhadap keberlangsungan penguasaan dan penggunaan hutan adat baik sebagai tempat tinggal maupun tempat memenuhi kebutuhan hidup seharihari dan tidak hanya sekedar pengakuan atau klaim semata. Hasil penelitian tersebut merupakan salah satu dasar pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat dan hak ulayatnya oleh Pemerintah Daerah melalui Peraturan Daerah, dan selanjutnya menjadi rujukan bagi Pemerintah Pusat untuk menetapkan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat. Dengan penetapan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat tidak ternyata menghapus hak-hak pihak lain atas tanah maupun izin yang diperoleh sebelum penetapan hutan adat. Kesimpulan penting dari hasil analisis yaitu penetapan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat harus sesuai prinsip-prinsip negara kesatuan dengan batasanbatasan yang telah ditentukan baik dalam UU Kehutanan maupun UU tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria.

---

This thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number 35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 on Forestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, the status of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction of communal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims of indigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recovery of the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decision number 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communal rights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownership and permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role of government in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. The methodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The results of the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rights of indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure and forest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and not just a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basic recognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments through local legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government to establish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. The determination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn?t remove the rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment of indigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of the communal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of the unitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation laws on agrarian basis points."

""Self-determination is on the agenda of Indigenous peoples all over the world. This analysis by an Indigenous feminist scholar challenges the United Nations-based human rights agendas and colonial theory that until now have shaped Indigenous models of self-determination. Gender inequality and gender violence, Dian Million argues, are critically important elements in the process of self-determination. Million contends that nation-state relations are influenced by a theory of trauma ascendant with the rise of neoliberalism. Such use of trauma theory regarding human rights corresponds to a therapeutic narrative by Western governments negotiating with Indigenous nations as they seek self-determination. Focusing on Canada and drawing comparisons with the United States and Australia, Million brings a genealogical understanding of trauma against a historical filter. Illustrating how Indigenous people are positioned differently in Canada, Australia, and the United States in their articulation of trauma, the author particularly addresses the violence against women as a language within a greater politic. The book introduces an Indigenous feminist critique of this violence against the medicalized framework of addressing trauma and looks to the larger goals of decolonization. Noting the influence of humanitarian psychiatry, Million goes on to confront the implications of simply dismissing Indigenous healing and storytelling traditions. Therapeutic Nations is the first book to demonstrate affect and trauma's wide-ranging historical origins in an Indigenous setting, offering insights into community healing programs. The author's theoretical sophistication and original research make the book relevant across a range of disciplines as it challenges key concepts of American Indian and Indigenous studies"--"

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas jejaring advokasi transnasional yang dilakukan non-state actor dalam menyelesaikan konflik HAM yang muncul di dalam sebuah Negara. Dalam skripsi ini, penulis meneliti AMAN sebagai non-state actor di Indonesia dalam menyelesaikan pelanggaran hak yang dialami indigenous peoples Kepulauan Aru sebagai studi kasus. Dengan menggunakan Transnational Advocacy Network TAN dari Keck dan Sikkink sebagai model analisis, penulis berupaya menganalisis strategi advokasi transnasional yang dilakukan AMAN dalam melindungi dan menegakkan hak-hak indigenous peoples Kepulauan Aru. Hal ini dikarenakan terdapat investor yang memasuki wilayah hutan Aru yang merupakan wilayah adat indigenous peoples. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa AMAN sebagai non-state actor mampu membentuk jejaring transnasional sehingga memberikan tekanan kepada Pemerintah Indonesia dengan menggunakan 4 empat tipologi analisis taktik TAN, yaitu: information politics politik informasi , symbolic politics politik simbolik , leverage politics politik pengaruh , dan accountability politics politik tanggung jawab.

---

ABSTRAKThis study discussed transnational advocacy network on indigenous peoples rsquo rights. In this thesis, the writer analyzed AMAN as non state actor in Indonesia and its advocacy to address human rights violation of indigenous peoples in Kabupaten Kepulauan Aru. Using Transnational Advocacy Network TAN of Keck and Sikkink as frame of thought, the writer analyzed the transnational advocacy conducted by AMAN to protect and maintain the rights of indigenous peoples in Kepulauan Aru. The finding of this study showed that AMAN as non state actor is able to conduct a transnational network. AMANS succeed giving pressure to Indonesia government by using four typology of TAN tactics, which are information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, and accountability politics."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai kiprah Lembaga Musyawarah Adat Suku Amungme dalam memperjuangkan hak masyarakat terkait kesetaraan sebagai penduduk sekitar pertambangan PT Freeport Indonesia khususnya suku Amungme di wilayah Mimika sepanjang tahun 1994-2001. Penelitian yang dilakukan menggunakan metode sejarah, yaitu heuristik, kritik, interpretasi dan historiografi. Sumber yang digunakan adalah arsip dan koran sezaman, serta buku, artikel, jurnal, tesis dan disertasi. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan sumbangsih pengetahuan terutama studi sejarah sosial di Indonesia bagian timur. Penelitian ini juga diharapkan dapat digunakan dalam pengambilan kebijakan di wilayah Mimika, terkait persoalan-persoalan mengenai keberadaan pertambangan Freeport.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the movement of Amungme Indigenous Consultative Organization in the fight for equality rights of the peoples as residents around Freeport Indonesia Company, particularly Amungme in Mimika region throughout the year of 1994 2001. This research conducted using the historical method, which are heuristic, criticism, interpretation and historiography. Sources used are archival and contemporary newspapers, as well as books, articles, journals, theses and dissertations. This research is expected to contribute to knowledge, especially the study of social history in eastern Indonesia. This research is also expected to be used in public policy making for Mimika region, related to issues concerning the existence of the Freeport mining."