Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perjanjian perkawinan belum diketahui secara luas oleh masyarakat Indonesia. Meskipun demikian, perjanjian perkawinan dapat dianggap penting terutama dalam perkawinan campuran mengingat dampak yang dihasilkan dari perkawinan itu sendiri cukup besar. Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pengaturan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran di Indonesia yakni dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan membandingkan pengaturan di Texas, Amerika Serikat yakni Texas Family Code dan Uniform Premarital Agreement Act. Penelitian yang digunakan dalam skripsi ini adalah penelitian doktrinal untuk melakukan perbandingan pengaturan antara Indonesia dan Texas, Amerika Serikat. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pengaturan mengenai perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran di Indonesia diperlukan adanya kepastian hukum karena dalam prakteknya masih terdapat ketidaksesuaian berkaitan dengan pengaturan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran. Hal ini dapat dilakukan dengan pemerintah sebagai lembaga yang berwenang untuk lebih memperhatikan pengaturan mengenai perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran agar prosedur, akibat hukum, serta legalitas dari perjanjian perkawinan itu sendiri memiliki kepastian.

---

Prenuptial agreement is still not widely known by the Indonesian people. However, marriage agreements can be considered important, especially in mixed marriages, considering the significant impact of the marriage itself. This thesis discusses the regulation of prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages in Indonesia namely in the Indonesian Civil Code and the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 and compares the with those in Texas, United States namely Texas Family Code and Uniform Premarital Agreement Act. The research used in this thesis is doctrinal research to compare the regulations between Indonesia and Texas, United States. The results of this study are that the regulation of prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages in Indonesia requires legal certainty because in practice there are still inconsistencies related to the regulation of prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages. This can be done by the government as the authorized institution to pay more attention to the regulation of prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages so that the procedures, legal consequences, and legality of the prenuptial agreement themselves have certainty."

"Skripsi ini mengeksplorasi implikasi hukum dari perjanjian pranikah dan perjanjian pascaperkawinan dalam konteks harta perkawinan dalam kerangka perkawinan campuran, dengan fokus khusus pada Hukum Internasional Swasta Indonesia. Di era globalisasi yang semakin meningkat, perkawinan campuran yang melibatkan individu-individu dari latar belakang hukum dan budaya yang berbeda menjadi semakin lazim. Penelitian ini mengkaji kompleksitas dan tantangan yang terkait dengan penentuan hak atas harta perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran, dengan mempertimbangkan beragam sistem hukum dan norma-norma budaya yang berlaku. Melalui analisis mendalam terhadap ketentuan hukum Indonesia yang relevan dan kerangka hukum internasional, tesis ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman yang komprehensif mengenai bagaimana perjanjian pranikah dan perjanjian pascaperkawinan mempengaruhi pembagian harta perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran. Dengan menyoroti kerumitan hukum yang terlibat, penelitian ini berkontribusi pada wacana yang lebih luas tentang hukum keluarga dan hukum internasional privat, menawarkan wawasan yang dapat memandu para pembuat kebijakan, praktisi hukum, dan individu dalam menavigasi kerumitan perkawinan campuran di Indonesia.

---

This thesis explores the legal implications of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements in the context of marital property within the framework of mixed marriages, with a specific focus on Indonesian Private International Law. In an era of increasing globalization, mixed marriages involving individuals from different legal and cultural backgrounds have become more prevalent. The study examines the complexities and challenges associated with determining marital property rights in such unions, considering the diverse legal systems and cultural norms at play. Through an in-depth analysis of relevant Indonesian legal provisions and international legal frameworks, the thesis aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how prenuptial and postnuptial agreements impact the division of marital property in mixed marriages. By shedding light on the legal intricacies involved, this research contributes to the broader discourse on family law and private international law, offering insights that may guide policymakers, legal practitioners, and individuals navigating the complexities of mixed marriages in Indonesia."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai perkawinan campuran diantara Warga Negara Indonesia dengan Warga Negara Irlandia yang dilangsungkan di Hong Kong. Perjanjian kawin yang dibuat pasca perkawinan. Pokok permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah akta perjanjian kawin yang dibuat oleh Notaris terhadap perkawinan campuran, serta peran notaris selaku pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat perjanjian kawin pada pernikahan yang berbeda warga negara dan akibatnya apabila terjadi perceraian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yuridis normatif, dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian: Notaris sebelum membuat akta perjanjian perkawinan wajib melihat apakah sudah ada penetapan pengadilan terhadap permohonan para pihak atau suami istri yang hendak membuat perjanjian perkawinan di dalam masa perkawinan. Setelah adanya penetapan maka dalam membuat akta perjanjian kawin Notaris tunduk kepada ketentuan Pasal 15 dan Pasal 16 Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris. Peran Notaris adalah membuat dan memastikan perjanjian perkawinan mengikuti ketentuan perundang-undangan, dalam melaksanakan peran tersebut Notaris wajib bertanggung jawab secara Pidana, Perdata, dan Administratif.

---

ABSTRACTThe main topic of this Thesis is to discuss about an intermarriage between a Indonesian citizen and a Ireland citizen, that takes place in Hong Kong. The prenuptial agreement is made after they were married. The main problems in this thesis is the prenuptial agreement deed that rsquo s been made by the Notary about this intermarriage, and also the role of a Notary as a public attendant that have the rights to make a prenuptial agreement on a intermarriage, and the consequences if the marriage end in a Divorce. The Research Method used in writing this thesis is Juridical Normative, with Descriptive Analysis, with a qualitative approach. The result of this research before making a prenuptial agreement deed a Notary must check if there is already a court arrangement towards the applicant that wants to make the Prenuptial Agreement while in the marriage period. After the assignation when making of a Prenuptial Agreement a Notary must obey the clause 15 and 16 section in the Notary Billet Act. The role of a Notary is to make a deed and to make sure the Prenuptial Agreement follows the rules of the Act, in managing that role a Notary is obligated take responsibility for Criminal Law, Civil Law, and Administratif Law."

"Pada umumnya masyarakat yang melakukan perkawinan campuran tidak memperhatikan dan mengetahui hal-hal yang harus dilakukan sebelum mereka melakukan perkawinan campuran terutama hal-hal yang menyangkut mengenai harta bersama yang diperoleh sepanjang perkawinan mereka. Pada dasarnya seseorang yang melakukan perkawinan campuran tidaklah dapat secara bebas untuk membeli hak-hak atas tanah di Indonesia dikarenakan pasangannya yang berkewarganegaraan asing tetap mempunyai hak tersebut karena adanya harta bersama. Hal ini karena adanya pembatasan hak kepemilikan tanah yang diatur dalam hukum pertanahan Indonesia pasal 1 jo pasal 21 Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 yang berazaskan kebangsaan.Penelitian kali ini berjudul "Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Kawin Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Terhadap Harta Bersama" dengan menggunakan metode kepustakaan yang bersifat normatif dengan jenis penelitian menarik asas hukum untuk mendapatkan gambaran menyeluruh terhadap permasalahan yang diteliti serta wawancara kepada narasumber atau informan untuk menambah informasi atas penelitian. Juga menganalisa putusan Pengadilan Agama Bandung nomor 495/Pdt.G/2005/PA.Bdg sebagai salah satu contoh perkawinan campuran. Seseorang yang melakukan perkawinan campuran harus membuat perjanjian kawin diluar persekutuan harta dan benda sebelum melakukan perkawinan serta didaftarkan agar dapat mengikat pihak ketiga serta adanya kepastian hukum.Hal ini agar tidak terdapat persatuan harta dan benda dalam bentuk apapun antara suami dan istri tersebut sesuai yang diatur dalam pasal 29 Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 jo pasal 139 Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Pada kenyataannya, masih banyak masyarakat yang melakukan perkawinan campuran dengan tidak membuat perjanjian kawin diluar persekutan harta dan benda karena unsur ketidaktahuan atau tidak adanya budaya membuat perjanjian kawin dalam perkawinan di Indonesia. Sehingga ketika terjadi perceraian dan pewarisan menimbulkan permasalahan dan dalam pelaksanaannya sering terjadi penyelundupan hukum. Ini dapat menyebabkan seseorang kehilangan atas hak atas tanah tersebut.

---

In General, Couples of mixed marriage do not care and know what they should do before they enter married life, especially about their marital property. Principally, a person who did this marriage has limitation to posses land, because based on Article 1 jo article 21 Law Number 5 Year 1960 every possession that is purchased by a mixed couple after they are married is considered a collective possession. The couple would lose the right to own land because one of the parties was an expatriate.The research is entitled "Judicial Review Of Prenuptial Agreement In Mixed Marriage On Marital Property". The normative library method is used in this research for getting full description about the problem. Interview with the informant is used to add information for the research. I also analyze verdict of religious court of Bandung Number 495/Pdt.G/2005/PA.Bdg as an example of mixed marriage case. An Indonesian (man or woman) in a mixed marriage has to make prenuptial agreement for separation property before they married to protect their assets and limit parties? right. After that the prenuptial agreement has to be registered to bind third party and legal certainty.The prenuptial agreement to avoid joint marital property which is in line with article 29 Law Number 1 Year 1974 jo article 139 The Burgerlijk Wetboek.However, many mixed married couples who do not make prenuptial agreement in Indonesian marriage, since they are not familiar with making prenuptial agreement. Consequently, they find many problems when they divorce or one of them dies. Sometimes there is smuggling law which prohibit in our country and they can lose the right to own land."

"Perjanjian perkawinan yang mengatur mengenai harta benda perkawinan suami isteri tidak begitu dikenal oleh masyarakat muslim di Indonesia sebagai subyek hukum yang tunduk pada hukum Islam, sehingga jarang dilakukan karena kurangnya sosialisasi dan pemahaman mengenai hal tersebut. Dalam penelitian tesis ini, dibahas mengenai bagaimana kedudukan hukum perjanjian perkawinan antara subyek hukum beragama Islam menurut hukum Islam, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (UU Perkawinan), dan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) serta bagaimana akibat hukum dari perjanjian perkawinan antara subyek hukum beragama Islam yang tidak didaftarkan terhadap pembagian harta bersama dalam perceraian, dengan menganalisis kasus Putusan Nomor 0502/Pdt.G/2013/PA JS dan kesesuaian putusan tersebut dengan hukum Islam, UU Perkawinan, dan KHI. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Pada prinsipnya, hukum dasar dari membuat perjanjian perkawinan dalam Islam adalah mu?bah (boleh) sepanjang perjanjian tersebut tidak berisi hal-hal yang dilarang atau diharamkan syariat Islam (Surat Al-Maidah ayat 1). UU Perkawinan mengaturnya dalam Pasal 29 dan diatur lebih lanjut dalam Pasal 45 -52 KHI khusus bagi orang-orang yang beragama Islam (subyek hukum beragama Islam). Pasal 29 UU Perkawinan mengatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan harus didaftarkan/disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan. Akibat hukum dari perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak didaftarkan adalah tetap mengikat kedua belah pihak, namun tidak mengikat pihak ketiga. Perjanjian perkawinan tersebut dapat disahkan oleh hakim sepanjang isi perjanjiannya memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dan bagi kedua belah pihak perjanjian perkawinan tersebut tetap berlaku sebagai undang-undang (Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata).

---

The prenuptial agreement governing the property of conjugal marriage is not so well known by the moslems community in Indonesia as subjects of law subject to Islamic law, so it is rarely done due to lack of awareness and understanding on the matter. In the thesis, explained about how the legal position of the prenuptial agreement between the moslems legal subjects according to Islamic law, the law of marriage no. 1/1974 and compilation of Islamic law, as well as how the legal consequences of the prenuptial agreement between the moslems legal subjects which is not registered to the division of joint property in divorce, by analysing the verdict no. 0502/Pdt.G/2013/PA JS and the verdict conformity with Islamic law, the law of marriage no. 1/1974 and compilation of Islamic law. This thesis uses literature research method that is juridical normative. In principle, the basic law of making prenuptial agreement in Islam is mu?bah (allowed) as long as the agreement does not contain things that are prohibited or forbidden by Islamic shariah (Surah Al-Maidah ayah 1). The marriage law set down in Article 29 and further stipulated in Article 45-52 in compilation of Islamic, specifically for moslems (moslems legal subjects). Article 29 of the marriage law stipulates that the prenuptial agreement to be registered/authorized by the marriage registrar employees. The legal consequences of prenuptial agreements that are not registered are still binding on both sides of husband and wife, but does not bind third parties. The prenuptial agreement can be ratified by the judge throughout the content of the agreement meets the provisions of Article 1320 BW and for both sides of the prenuptial agreement is still valid as a law (Article 1338 BW)."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"ABSTRAKPerjanjian perkawinan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Perkawinan tidak memberikan pengertian maupun pengaturan mengenai isi perjanjian perkawinan. Undang-Undang Perkawinan hanya mengatur perjanjian perkawinan dibuat pada waktu atau sebelum perkawinan secara tertulis dan berlaku sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan. Perjanjian tersebut tidak boleh melanggar batas-batas hukum, agama dan kesusilaan, serta disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan setelah mana isinya berlaku juga bagi pihak ketiga sepanjang pihak ketiga tersangkut. Tesis ini membahas mengenai isi suatu perjanjian perkawinan dan keabsahan perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak disahkan Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan, serta pertimbangan hakim mengenai keabsahan surat kesepakatan pembagian harta bersama dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak disahkan Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan tetap berlaku sah dan mengikat para pihak yang membuatnya, akan tetapi tidak berlaku bagi pihak ketiga. Pertimbangan hakim mengenai keabsahan surat kesepakatan pembagian harta bersama kurang tepat dikarenakan isi surat kesepakatan antara Penggugat dan Tergugat mengenai proses perceraian tidak berkaitan dengan harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan, sehingga ketentuan yang berlaku secara sah dan mengikat Penggugat dan Tergugat hanya terkait pembagian harta bersama serta daftar harta bersama yang wajib dilaksanakan sesuai dengan apa yang tercantum dalam surat kesepakatan tersebut.

---

ABSTRACTPrenuptial agreement as arranged in Article 29 Marriage Law does not provide definition nor regulation regarding the contents of the prenuptial agreement. The law only regulates prenuptial agreement can be made at the time of or prior to the marriage performance, in writing, and takes effect as from the marriage being concluded. The agreement cannot be legalized if contrary to the restrictions set by the law, religion and morality, and should be legalized by the Registrar of Marriage where upon the contents shall also be binding to third parties as long as the third party involved. This thesis discusses the content of a prenuptial agreement and the validity of the prenuptial agreement that is not legalized by the Registrar of Marriage, as well as judge 39 s consideration regarding the validity of the joint property division agreement in Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 539 Pdt.G 2014 PN.Jkt.Pst. The author uses juridical normative research method with qualitative approach which is analytical descriptive. The results show prenuptial agreement that is not legalized by the Registrar of Marriage will remain valid and binding the parties, but will not apply to third party. The judge 39 s consideration regarding the validity of the joint property division agreement is inappropriate because the contents of the agreement concerning the divorce process are not related to the property in the marriage, so only the clause related to the division of the joint property and lists of the joint property are valid and binding the parties, which have to be carried out in accordance of what was stated in the agreement."

"Sebuah perjanjian pranikah adalah perjanjian yang dibuat oleh beberapa sebelum menikah untuk mengatur konsekuensi dari pernikahan ke properti. Berdasarkan pasal 29 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia, agar perjanjian pranikah dapat mengikat pihak ketiga, harus didaftarkan oleh catatan sipil pernikahan. Di sebuah Kasus pihak telah lalai untuk mendaftarkan perjanjian pranikah mereka, kata perjanjian tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat lebih pihak ketiga. Metode analisis adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Data dan bahan hukum yang diperoleh melalui penelitian sastra dan wawancara dengan Notaris dan Ex Notaris. Itu Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan dasar hukum dari pendaftaran pranikah perjanjian setelah menikah dan untuk mengetahui hukum mengikat perjanjian yang ke Pihak ketiga. Berdasarkan penelitian, ada peraturan mengenai pendaftaran perjanjian pranikah setelah menikah dalam hukum yang ada dan peraturan. Namun, ada kemungkinan bahwa Hakim berbasis keputusannya pada analogi hukum untuk mendaftar bahwa perjanjian pranikah sesuai dengan Peraturan di Perdata Indonesia tentang kelalaian mendaftarkan acara hukum (pernikahan, kematian) dalam pencatatan sipil dapat dilakukan melalui pengadilan. Untuk mendaftar (setelah itu) oleh kantor catatan sipil. pranikah yang Perjanjian yang telah terdaftar setelah menikah tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat terhadap pihak ketiga yang memiliki hubungan hukum sebelum pendaftaran itu.

---

A prenuptial agreement is an agreement made by a couple before marriage to arrange the consequences of a marriage to the property. Based on article 29 Paragraph 1 of the Indonesian Marriage Act, in order that a prenuptial agreement can bind the third parties, it must be registered by a civil registrar of marriage. In a case the parties have been negligent to register their prenuptial agreement, said agreement does not have binding power over third parties. The analytical method is a normative juridical approach. The legal data and materials are obtained through literary research and interviews with a Notary and Ex Notary. The purpose of this research is to find the legal basis of the registration of a prenuptial agreement after marriage and to know the legal binding of that agreement to the third parties. Based on the research, there is no regulation concerning the registration of a prenuptial agreement after marriage in the existing laws and regulation. However, there is a possibility that a Judge based his decision on a legal analogy to register that prenuptial agreement in accordance with the regulation in the Indonesian Civil Code concerning the negligence to register a legal event (marriage, death) in the civil registration can be done through a court order to register (afterwards) by the civil registration office. That prenuptial agreement that has been registered after marriage does not have binding power towards the third parties who have a legal relation before that registration."

"Perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran adalah fenomena yang marak terjadi di masyarakat dunia. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, tulisan ini menjelaskan peranan HPI dalam pengaturan dan keberlakuan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran oleh karena adanya interaksi antara dua atau lebih stelsel hukum. Berdasarkan pembahasan perjanjian-perjanjian perkawinan tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa masing-masing negara memiliki pengaturan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang berbeda dan para pihak diharapkan memperhatikan hal tersebut sebelum menyusun perjanjian.

---

Prenuptial agreement in mixed marriage is a worldwide phenomenon. With the research methodology of normative law, this writing explains the role of Private International Law/PIL in regulation and enforcement of prenuptial agreement because of the interaction between two or more laws. Based on the discussion of the prenuptial agreements, it can be concluded that each country has different regulation on prenuptial agreement in mixed marriage and it is best for the parties to pay attention on this matter before getting into agreement."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai tinjauan akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di Indonesia oleh notaris di Indonesia untuk perkawinan campuran beda kewarganegaraan antar Warga Negara Indonesia dengan Warga Negara Australia yang mana perkawinannya itu dilangsungkan di negara bagian New South Wales - Australia berdasarkan hukum perkawinan Australia. Maka timbul permasalahan mengenai kedudukan akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di Indonesia dalam hukum perkawinan di Australia. Apakah akta perjanjian perkawinan tersebut berlaku dan diakui kedudukannya sebagai perjanjian perkawinan di Australia atau tidak. Permasalahan ini diteliti dengan menggunakan pendekatan metode yuridis normatif dan deskripsi analitis, yaitu berupa kajian terhadap asas-asas dan norma hukum yang terdapat dalam ketentuan perundang-undangan Indonesia yang berkaitan dengan perjanjian perkawinan campuran beda kewarganegaraan dan dilihat dari teori-teori Hukum Perdata Internasional yang terkait dengan masalah perjanjian perkawinan yang bersifat internasional ini. Serta peraturan dan perundang-undangan Australia yang mengatur mengenai perkawinan, perjanjian perkawinan dan pengakuan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di luar Australia. Sebagai hasil dari penelitian ini, bahwa Australia hanya mengakui perjanjian perkawinan asing bilamana segala persyaratan tentang tata cara pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan Bindin Financial Agreement di Australia. Jadi dalam kasus tesis ini akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat oleh notaris di Indonesia tidak diakui dan secara hukum tidak mengikat. Perjanjian perkawinan tersebut hanya dipakai oleh hakim di Pengadilan Keluarga Australia sebagai bahan pertimbangan saja.

---

This thesis is the review of a prenuptial agreement deed that made in Indonesia by Indonesian Public Notary for a mixed marriage with different nationalities between an Indonesian nationality and an Australian nationality, where the wedding was held in New South Wales - Australia. Is the prenuptial deed above valid and recognise as prenuptial agreement in Australia. The above conflicts, has been reviewed and obsereved by the writer using a yuridis normative method and deskriptive analitic, law principles rules by Indonesian regulation related with mixed marriage prenuptial agreement subject, also using the principles by International Private Law, Australian Acts and regulation that rules international mixed marriage on how foreign prenuptual agreement is recognise in Australia. The result has come up that Australian only recognise foreign prenuptial agreement as long as it meet with all the requirements on how Australian make a binding financial agreement. So in this case, the prenuptial agreement deed made by Indonesian public notary in Indonesia does not recognise and does not binding in Australian. Its use for the judge in Family Court for a concideration only. "