Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Hak-hak lama atas tanah wajib dilakukan konversi ke dalam sistem hak atas tanah nasional sebagaimana diatur dalam Diktum Kedua Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dengan tujuan untuk terciptanya unifikasi hukum tanah di Indonesia. Pada realitanya, sampai saat ini masih banyak hak-hak lama yang tidak dikonversi. Tidak adanya kepastian hukum terhadap tanah yang ditempati seringkali menimbulkan sengketa, terutama ketika tanah sudah dikuasai secara fisik oleh pihak lain seperti pada Putusan Nomor 109 Pk/Pdt/2022 antara Keluarga Muller dan PT. Dago Intigraha melawan warga Dago Elos. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mengkaji kekuatan bekas Hak Eigendom dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia dan pemberian hak prioritas kepada subjek hukum yang menguasai tanah bekas Hak Eigendom tersebut. Kajian dilakukan menggunakan metode penulisan yuridis normatif dan didukung oleh hasil wawancara kepada narasumber. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kekuatan eigendom verponding yang dimiliki oleh Keluarga Muller masih berlaku sebagai bukti tertulis untuk mendaftarkan tanah sebagaimana Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997, namun tanah yang dilekati eigendom sudah menjadi tanah negara sebagaimana ketentuan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 32 Tahun 1979. Selain itu, penerapan pemberian hak prioritas atas tanah negara bekas Hak Eigendom dalam Putusan Nomor 109 Pk/Pdt/2022 belum tepat karena tidak mempertimbangkan unsur-unsur kriteria pemberian hak prioritas, melainkan hanya mengacu pada bukti akta eigendom verponding saja. Kemudian tidak diuraikan pula apakah akta eigendom memenuhi syarat pembuktian hak lama dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Dengan demikian, diperlukan penegasan terhadap hak-hak lama yang belum dikonversi karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian dan ketidakadilan hukum, terutama terhadap tanah yang sudah dikuasai oleh pihak lain yang berbeda dengan pemilik hak lama. Selain itu perlu juga diatur mengenai ketentuan hak prioritas atas tanah secara jelas.

---

Old land rights must be converted into the national land rights system as stipulated in the Second Dictum of the Basic Agrarian Law with the aim of creating unification of land laws in Indonesia. In fact, until now there are still many old rights that are not restricted. The absence of legal certainty regarding the land occupied often creates disputes, especially when the land is physically controlled by another party, as in Decision Number 109 Pk/Pdt/2022 between the Muller Family and PT. Dago Intigraha against the people of Dago Elos. Therefore, this study examines the strength of the former Eigendom Rights in the laws and regulations in Indonesia and gives priority to rights to legal subjects who control the land of the former Eigendom Rights. The study was carried out using normative juridical writing methods and was supported by the results of interviews with informants. The results of this study found that the power of eigendom verponding owned by the Muller Family is still valid as written evidence for registering land as in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, but the land attached to the eigendom is already state land as stipulated in Presidential Decree Number 32 of 1979. In addition, the implementation of granting priority rights to state land of former Eigendom Rights in Decision Number 109 Pk/Pdt/2022 is not completely correct because it does not consider the elements of the criteria for granting priority rights, but only refers to evidence of priority rights eigendom verponding. Then it is also not spelled out whether the eigendom deed fulfills the requirements for proving old rights in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. Thus, it is necessary to confirm old rights that have not been released because they can lead to legal injustice, especially to land already controlled by other parties different from the previous owner. In addition, it is also necessary to clearly regulate the provision of priority rights over land.

"

"Penelitian dengan judul diatas memperoleh kepastian bahwa konversi terhadap tanah eks hak barat (tanah eigendom) telah berakhir sejak tanggal 24 September 1980, akibat dari konversi tersebut adalah hak atas tanah eks barat (tanah eigendom) tersebut telah dikuasai langsung oleh negara. Selama bidang tanah tidak dipergunakan oleh negara untuk kepentingan umum, maka pemegang hak dapat langsung mengajukan permohonan hak baru atas tanah eks barat (tanah eigendom) dalam rangka memperoleh alat bukti kepemilikan berupa sertipikat yang nantinya berfungsi sebagai jaminan akan perlindungan hukum dan penunjang utama dalam aspek kepastian hukum apabila dikemudian hari terjadi sengketa kepemilikan terhadap tanah eks barat (tanah eigendom) tersebut. Adapun penguasaan fisik terhadap tanah eks barat (tanah eigendom) harus didasarkan dengan alas hak yang benar dan kuat dengan berdasarkan pada ketentuan PP No.24 Tahun 1997.

---

Research with the above title assurance that the conversion of the western land rights (land eigendom) has expired since 24 September 1980, as a result of such conversion is the former western land rights (land eigendom) has been directly controlled by the state. During the plot is not used by the state for the public interest, then the rights holders can immediately apply new rights on land the former west (land eigendom) in order to obtain evidence of ownership in the form of a certificate that will serve as a guarantee of legal protection and the main support in the rigidity the law for the future ownership disputes over land the former west (land eigendom) is. As for the physical control of the former western land (land eigendom) should be based with the right base is correctly and securely with based on the provisions of Regulation 24 of 1997."

"[ABSTRAKRisalah Lelang merupakan akta otentik yang membuktikan telah terjadinya lelangdan berfungsi sebagai alas hak untuk melakukan balik nama, khususnya dalam halobjek lelang berupa tanah dan bangunan. Seperti halnya akta notaris, RisalahLelang dapat dibuat dalam bentuk minuta, salinan dan grosse. Minuta RisalahLelang merupakan arsip negara yang wajib disimpan dan dipelihara secara baikoleh Juru Lelang/Kantor Lelang. Dalam penelitian ini, permasalahan munculsebagai dampak dari diterbitkannya surat keterangan sebagai pengganti salinanRisalah Lelang oleh Kepala Kantor Lelang Negara, yang tidak memiliki minuta.Mengenai bidang tanah/bangunan yang telah dijual lelang oleh Kantor LelangNegara tersebut, bagaimanapun, telah diterbitkan sertipikat Hak Guna Bangunanatas nama pihak lain oleh Kantor Pertanahan sebagai tindak lanjut dari adanyaketentuan konversi tanah berdasarkan UUPA. Selain itu, sertipikat Hak GunaBangunan tersebut telah pula ditingkatkan menjadi Hak Milik. Penelitian inibertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian antara prosedur lelang dan proseskonversi tanah yang telah dilakukan dengan peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku dibidang hukum lelang dan pertanahan. Penelitian ini menggunakan bentuk yuridisnormatif dengan tipe diagnostik fact-finding. Jenis data yang digunakan adalahdata sekunder yang dianalis secara kualitatif sehingga menghasilkan laporan yangbersifat diagnostik analisis. Penulis menyimpulkan bahwa lelang yang telahdilakukan mengandung beberapa cacat prosedur dan surat keterangan sebagaipengganti salinan Risalah Lelang tersebut tidak dapat diterima sebagai alat buktiyang sah dan sempurna, namun hanya sebagai bukti permulaan.

---

ABSTRACTAn Auction Deed is an authentic deed to prove that an auction has occured and itbecomes the legal basis the transfer of title from a vendor to a purchaser,particularly in relation to land and builidng. Similiar to a notary deed, TheAuction Deed may be drawn as a minute, an exemplified copy, and anengrossment. As state archives, the minute of Auction Deeds must be kept andmaintained well by auctioneers. In this research, problems arise as a result of theissuance of letters of evidence by the Head of State Auction Office as a substitutefor an exemplified copy of an auction deed, that do not has the minute. Withregard to the property sold by the aforementioned State Auction Office, however,the Land Office has granted Building Rights Certificate under the name of otherpeople based on the conversion policy of land titles in conformity with the BasicAgrarian Law (UUPA). Besides, The Building Rights has been increased into theOwnership (Freehold) Rights. This study aims to examine the suitability of theauction procedure, conversion of land rights procedure with the auction and landregulations. The research uses normative juridical with fact-finding diagnostic.The type of data used are secondary data were analyzed qualitatively so as toproduce a diagnostic report analysis. The writer concluded that there were flaws inauction procedure and the letters of evidence could not be accepted as perfect andconvincing/legitimate evidence, but merely as preliminary evidence.;An Auction Deed is an authentic deed to prove that an auction has occured and itbecomes the legal basis the transfer of title from a vendor to a purchaser,particularly in relation to land and builidng. Similiar to a notary deed, TheAuction Deed may be drawn as a minute, an exemplified copy, and anengrossment. As state archives, the minute of Auction Deeds must be kept andmaintained well by auctioneers. In this research, problems arise as a result of theissuance of letters of evidence by the Head of State Auction Office as a substitutefor an exemplified copy of an auction deed, that do not has the minute. Withregard to the property sold by the aforementioned State Auction Office, however,the Land Office has granted Building Rights Certificate under the name of otherpeople based on the conversion policy of land titles in conformity with the BasicAgrarian Law (UUPA). Besides, The Building Rights has been increased into theOwnership (Freehold) Rights. This study aims to examine the suitability of theauction procedure, conversion of land rights procedure with the auction and landregulations. The research uses normative juridical with fact-finding diagnostic.The type of data used are secondary data were analyzed qualitatively so as toproduce a diagnostic report analysis. The writer concluded that there were flaws inauction procedure and the letters of evidence could not be accepted as perfect andconvincing/legitimate evidence, but merely as preliminary evidence.;An Auction Deed is an authentic deed to prove that an auction has occured and itbecomes the legal basis the transfer of title from a vendor to a purchaser,particularly in relation to land and builidng. Similiar to a notary deed, TheAuction Deed may be drawn as a minute, an exemplified copy, and anengrossment. As state archives, the minute of Auction Deeds must be kept andmaintained well by auctioneers. In this research, problems arise as a result of theissuance of letters of evidence by the Head of State Auction Office as a substitutefor an exemplified copy of an auction deed, that do not has the minute. Withregard to the property sold by the aforementioned State Auction Office, however,the Land Office has granted Building Rights Certificate under the name of otherpeople based on the conversion policy of land titles in conformity with the BasicAgrarian Law (UUPA). Besides, The Building Rights has been increased into theOwnership (Freehold) Rights. This study aims to examine the suitability of theauction procedure, conversion of land rights procedure with the auction and landregulations. The research uses normative juridical with fact-finding diagnostic.The type of data used are secondary data were analyzed qualitatively so as toproduce a diagnostic report analysis. The writer concluded that there were flaws inauction procedure and the letters of evidence could not be accepted as perfect andconvincing/legitimate evidence, but merely as preliminary evidence., An Auction Deed is an authentic deed to prove that an auction has occured and itbecomes the legal basis the transfer of title from a vendor to a purchaser,particularly in relation to land and builidng. Similiar to a notary deed, TheAuction Deed may be drawn as a minute, an exemplified copy, and anengrossment. As state archives, the minute of Auction Deeds must be kept andmaintained well by auctioneers. In this research, problems arise as a result of theissuance of letters of evidence by the Head of State Auction Office as a substitutefor an exemplified copy of an auction deed, that do not has the minute. Withregard to the property sold by the aforementioned State Auction Office, however,the Land Office has granted Building Rights Certificate under the name of otherpeople based on the conversion policy of land titles in conformity with the BasicAgrarian Law (UUPA). Besides, The Building Rights has been increased into theOwnership (Freehold) Rights. This study aims to examine the suitability of theauction procedure, conversion of land rights procedure with the auction and landregulations. The research uses normative juridical with fact-finding diagnostic.The type of data used are secondary data were analyzed qualitatively so as toproduce a diagnostic report analysis. The writer concluded that there were flaws inauction procedure and the letters of evidence could not be accepted as perfect andconvincing/legitimate evidence, but merely as preliminary evidence.]"

"Kehidupan ekonomi masyarakat dewasa ini telah membuat tanah menjadi komoditas dan faktor produksi yang dicari oleh manusia. benda-benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah yang dapat dibebani dengan Hak Tanggungan tidak terbatas kepada benda-benda yang merupakan milik pemegang hak atas tanah yang bersangkutan, tapi juga yang bukan dimiliki oleh pemegang hak atas tanah tersebut. Hapusnya Hak Atas Tanah banyak terjadi karena lewatnya waktu, untuk mana hak itu diberikan. Hak-hak yang lebih rendah tingkatannya daripada Hak Milik seperti Hak Guna Bangunan, Hak Guna Usaha dan Hak Pakai terbatas waktu berlakunya, sekalipun secara fisik masih tetap ada. Dengan berakhirnya hak Atas Tanah yang bersangkutan, maka Hak Atas Tanah yang bersangkutan kembali kepada pemiliknya dan kalau hak tersebut diberikan oleh Negara, maka tanah tersebut kembali kepada kekuasaan Negara. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian adalah penelitian normatif, yakni penelitian hukum yang meletakkan hukum sebagai sebuah bangunan sistem norma meliputi penelitian terhadap asas-asas hukum, sumber-sumber hukum, peraturan perundangundangan yang bersifat teoritis ilmiah serta dapat menganalisa permasalahan yang dibahas.

---

The economic life has grown to make the land and the production of commodities sought by humans. Objects related to land that can be encumbered with pledge not confined to the objects that belonged to the holder of the land in question, but it also belongs to the right of the fatherland. Nullification land rights much happens because the passage of time, rights for which it was given. The lower than right of ownership such as the right to cultivate, right of use of structures, right of use with limited enactment, through physically still persists. In the end oof land rights concerned, the rights on land rights concerned to back or return to the owners when the rights provided by the state, then the land returned to the state. The research method used in the study is a normative research , legal research that lays the law as a system of building norms include research into the principles of law, the sources of law, legislation that theoretical science and can analyze the issues discussed."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai Kepemilikan Hak-Hak atas Tanah bagi Warga Negara Asing yang ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA) dan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan. Kewarganegaraan ganda artinya adalah seseorang selain mempunyai kewarganegaraan Indonesia, juga mempunyai kewarganegaraan negara lain (asing). Hal ini dapat terjadi karena adanya perkawinan campuran antara warga negara Indonesia (WNI) dengan warga negara asing (WNA), yang mana menyebabkan anak-anak keturunan mereka akan mempunyai kewarganegaraan ganda. Apabila anak hasil dari perkawinan campuran tersebut tetap menginginkan kewarganegaraan Indonesia-nya tidak hilang, anak-anak keturunannya juga tetap sebagai warga negara Indonesia, dan agar dapat memiliki tanah yang berstatus Hak Milik atau Hak Guna Bangunan, maka harus diperlakukan sebagai seorang WNI sampai berusia 18 tahun, apabila nanti ingin melepaskan WNI-nya barulah Sertipikat Tanah-nya gugur dan kembali ke Negara.

---

This Thesis discusses the Ownership Rights of Land for foreign citizens in terms of Act No 5 Year 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles and Law No. 12 Year 2006 on Citizenship. Dual citizenship, meaning that the person has Indonesian nationality and also has the citizenship of other countries (foreign). This can occur because of mixed marriages between Indonesian citizens (WNI) by foreign nationals (WNA), which led to the children of their offspring will have dual citizenship. If the child is the result of mixed marriages still wants his Indonesian citizenship, and children are also descendants remain as a citizen of Indonesia, and in order to have leased hold land Ownership or Right to Build, then it should be treated as a citizen until the age of 18 years, if he wants to release its citizenship then Land Certificates will fall back to the State."

"Dalam proses pendaftaran tanah seringkali timbul suatu masalah yang salah satunya adalah terbitnya tumpang tindih sertipikat diatas suatu bidang tanah yang sama. Salah satu contoh kasusnya terdapat pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 734 PK/Pdt/2017 yang terjadi di Kota Bandung. Dalam kasus ini, penulis melakukan analisis mengenai bagaimana kesesuaian pertimbangan dan amar putusan majelis hakim dan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas tanah pada kasus tumpang tindih dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 734 PK/Pdt/2017. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan studi dokumen. Berdasarkan analisis Penulis maka ditemukan bahwa penyebab terjadinya tumpang tindih sertipikat adalah adanya ketidaktelitian dari Kepala Kantor Pertanahan Kota Bandung yang melakukan pelanggaran asas-asas umum pemerintahan baik. Simpulan dari penelitian adalah terdapat pertimbangan hakim yang kurang tepat mengenai asal-usul objek sengketa yang merupakan tanah negara dan pemenuhan syarat sah perjanjian serta juga perlindungan hukum pemegang hak berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 734 Pk/Pdt/2017 belum tercapai karena belum diterapkan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagaimana mestinya.

---

In the land registration process, problems often arise and one which is the issuance of overlapping land certificates on the same plot of land. One example of this issue is the Supreme Court Decision Number 734/PK/Pdt/2017 which occurred in the city of Bandung. In this case, the author analyzes how the considerations and decisions made by the panel of judges match the law and legal protection for the right land holders in overlapping cases in the Supreme Court Decision Number 734/PK/Pdt/2017. The research method used in this thesis is normative juridical using document studies. Based on the author’s analysis, it was found that the cause of overlapping certificates was the inaccuracy of the Head of Bandung City Land Office who violated the general principles of good governance. The conclusion of the research is there is an inappropriate judge’s consideration regarding the origin of the object of dispute which is a state land and the fulfillment of legal requirements of the agreements as well as the legal protection of the right holder based on the Supreme Court Decision Number 734/PK/Pdt/2017 has not been achieved."

"Hibah mengenai benda tidak bergerak seperti tanah harus dinyatakan dalam bentuk akta yang dibuat oleh pejabat yang berwenang dan didaftarkan pemindahan haknya. PPAT bewenang dalam pembuatan akta hibah sebagai alat bukti yang secara sah menyatakan telah dilakukannya perbuatan hukum hibah mengenai suatu hak atas tanah. Hibah merupakan pemberian secara sukarela yang dilakukan dengan cuma-cuma dan tidak memuat syarat maka tidak dapat dicabut atau ditarik kembali. Akan tetapi, hibah dapat diberlakukan suatu kebatalan jika ada cacat yuridis yang mengakibatkan perbuatan hukumnya menjadi tidak berlaku. Permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah status hukum akta hibah yang memuat syarat dan tanggung jawab PPAT terhadap akta yang telah dibuatnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian eksplanatoris dan preskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder dianalisa secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu status hukum akta hibah yang memuat syarat adalah batal demi hukum sehingga kembali pada keadaan semula atau berlaku surut (ex tunc). Hal ini karena hibah yang dilakukan bertentangan dengan undang-undang maka tidak memenuhi syarat objektif dari syarat sahnya perjanjian menurut Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata yaitu sebab yang halal. PPAT yang membuat Akta Hibah harus bertanggungjawab karena secara materiil akta tersebut bertentangan dengan undang-undang.

---

Grants regarding immovable objects such as land must be stated in the form of a deed made by an authorized official and registered for the transfer of rights. PPAT has the authority to make a grant deed as evidence that legally states that a legal grant act has been carried out regarding a land right. A grant is a voluntary gift made free of charge and does not contain conditions, so it cannot be revoked or withdrawn. However, a grant can be canceled if a juridical defect causes the legal action to become invalid. The problem with this thesis is the legal status of the grant deed, which contains the terms and responsibilities PPAT had to the deed he had made. This study uses a normative juridical research method with explanatory and prescriptive research types. The type of data used in this research is secondary data, which is analyzed qualitatively. The results obtained are the legal status of the grant deed, which contains the condition that it is null and void so that it returns to its original state or applies retroactively (ex tunc). This is because the grant made is contrary to the law, so it does not meet the objective requirements of the agreement's validity according to Article 1320 of the Civil Code, which is a legal cause. The PPAT who made the Deed of Grant must be responsible because materially, the deed is contrary to the law."

"Tanah merupakan kebutuhan dasar manusia sejak manusia tersebut lahir sampai dengan meninggal dunia, manusia senantiasa membutuhkan tanah sebagai tempat tinggal hidupnya, oleh karena itu dapat disimpulkan, tanah adalah tempat manusia tinggal, tempat darimana manusia berasal, dan juga tempat kemana mereka akan pergi. Studi kasus yang akan dibahas dalam tesis ini memaparkan tentang apa yang terdapat dalam teori belum tentu sepenuhnya benar, karena dalam Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 582 PK/Pdt/2011 antara Perkumpulan Kelompok Tani Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Tani dan Nelayan Pesisir Pantai Kabupaten Mamuju Utara melawan PT. Unggul Widya Teknologi Lestari berakhir dengan kemenangan Pihak Kelompok Tani. Kelompok Tani ini memiliki tanah tersebut atas dasar lokasi dibuka sendiri maupun secara berkelompok yang berasal dari Tanah Negara seluas kurang lebih 2722 Ha (dua ribu tujuh ratus dua puluh dua hektar) sejak Tahun 1982 (seribu Sembilan ratus delapan puluh dua) yang terletak di Kabupaten Mamuju Utara, Propinsi Sulawesi Barat yang akhirnya dikukuhkan oleh Pemerintah Desa dan Kabupaten Mamuju pada Tahun 1994 yaitu dikeluarkannya SKP (Surat Keterangan Pemilikan Tanah), SKT (Surat Keterangan Tanah) dan Sporadik tentang Pemberian Hak Kepemilikan atas Tanah Negara, sedangkan PT. Unggul Widya Teknologi Lestari memiliki tanah tersebut berdasarkan Sertipikat HGU (Hak Guna Usaha) yang mendapatkan pengakuan dari Pemerintah Negara Republik Indonesia yang dikeluarkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Republik Indonesia Kabupaten Mamuju Utara. Seperti apakah kekuatan dan kepastian hukum yang diberikan oleh Hukum Negara Indonesia terhadap hak prioritas atas tanah bagi masyarakat adat setempat, khususnya dalam Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 582 PK/Pdt/2011 dan apakah putusan Majelis Peninjauan Kembali sudah sesuai dengan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang berlaku.

---

The soil is basic human needs since human beings are born to die, humans always need land as a place to live his life, therefore it can be inferred, the land is where humans live, a place where humans came from, and also the place where they will go. Case studies will be discussed in this thesis lays out about what there is in theory not necessarily entirely correct, because in the Interim Review of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 582 PK/Pdt/2011 between farmer groups Gathering community empowerment of farmers and fishermen Coastal North Mamuju Regency against PT. Superior Sustainable Technology Widya ended with the victory of The farmers group. This group of farmers have land on the basis of such a location was opened and in groups originating from the State land covering an area of approximately 2263 Ha (two thousand seven hundred twenty-two acres) since 1982 (one thousand nine hundred eighty-two) located in North Mamuju Regency of West Sulawesi Province, which was eventually confirmed by the Government of the village and Mamuju Regency in 1994, namely the promulgation of the SKP (Affidavits Landholdings), SKT (Ground Clearance) and Sporadic on Granting ownership of State land, while PT Widya Superior Sustainable Technologies have the land based on the certificate HGU (Business use rights) are getting recognition from the Government of the Republic of Indonesia issued by the Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Land North Mamuju Regency. Such is the power and legal certainty afforded by State law rights against Indonesia's top priority lands for indigenous peoples, especially in the Review Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 582 PK/Pdt/2011 and whether the verdict of the judicial review is in accordance with the rules applicable law."

"Sebagaimana yang dinyatakan dalam Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan TataRuang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentangPendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap, Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap yang selanjutnya disingkat PTSL adalah kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah untuk pertama kali yang dilakukan secara serentak bagi semua obyek Pendaftaran Tanah di seluruh wilayah Republik Indonesia dalam satu wilayah desa/kelurahan atau nama lainnya yang setingkat dengan itu, yang meliputi pengumpulan data fisik dan data yuridis mengenai satu atau beberapa obyek Pendaftaran Tanah untuk keperluan pendaftarannya. Program ini digadang-gadangkan sebagai pendaftarantanah yang gratis atau tanpa pungutan biaya. Namun, pada kenyataannya tidak seperti itu. Seperti yang terjadi di Kelurahan Bukit Duri, Kecamatan Tebet, Jakarta Selatan, banyak warga yang mengeluhkan bahwa pengajuan PTSL mereka ditolak. Adapun yang menjadi alas an penolakan pengajuan penerbitan sertifikat tanah warga tersebut salah satunya adalah masalah status tanah eks-kotapraja.Dari latar belakang permasalahan tersebut didapatkan dua pokok permasalahan yakni yang pertama adalah bagaimana ketentuan yang mengatur tentang pendaftaran tanah eks-kotapraja dalam rangka PTSL di Jakarta Selatan, dan yang kedua adalah bagaimana implikasi pengaturan mengenai tanah eks-kotapraja dalam pelaksanaan PTSL. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa adanya pengaturan mengenai tanah eks-kotapraja berimplikasi dalam kegiatan pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap. Mengingat bahwa seperti yang disebutkan sebelumnya bahwa tujuan pendaftaran tanah adalah untukmenjamin kepastian hukum sehingga tercipta perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak, hal ini tidak dapat dilaksanakan karena masyarakat yang memiliki tanah ekskotapraja kemudian mendaftarkannya melalui PTSL, maka akan terhambat prosesnya akibat diharuskan terlebih dahulu untuk membayar retribusi agar terbit rekomendasi dari Gubernur DKI Jakarta, sehingga tidak terjamin kepastian hukum atas pemilik tanah eks-kotapraja.As stated in the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and GovernanceRoom/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 concerningComplete Systematic Land Registration, Complete Systematic Land Registration, hereinafter abbreviated as PTSL, is a Land Registration activity for the first time which is carried out simultaneously for all Land Registration objects throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia in one village/kelurahan area or other names of the same level, which include collection of physical data and juridical data regarding one or several objects of Land Registration for the purposes of its registration. This program is predicted as registrationfree or free land. However, in reality it is not like that. As happened in Bukit Duri Village, Tebet District, South Jakarta, many residents complained that their PTSL applications were rejected. One of the reasons for the refusal to apply for the issuance of the residents' land certificates was the issue of the status of the ex-municipal land.From the background of these problems, two main problems were obtained, namely the first is how the provisions governing the registration of ex-municipal land in the context of PTSL in South Jakarta, and the second is how the implications of regulations regarding ex-municipal land in the implementation of PTSL are. The method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the study indicate that the regulation regarding ex-municipal land has implications for the implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration. Bearing in mind that as previously mentioned that the purpose of land registration is to guaranteeing legal certainty so as to create legal protection for rights holders, this cannot be implemented because people who own exkotapraja land then register it through PTSL, the process will be hampered due to being required to first pay a levy in order to issue a recommendation from the Governor of DKI Jakarta, so there is no guarantee of certainty law on ex-municipal land owners."