Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"There are several substantial problems remain on intellectual property rights in the focal society of Indonesia. The needed for the protection of intellectual property did not come from the civil society itself but from the pressure of external factor. Intellectual Properly Regime is also known as capitalistic regime and that is the problem. The protection is given to the one who own the right, not for the real author. The characteristic of intellectual property is to protect individually. In the other hand, the background of local society of Indonesia, V which consists of many tribes, lived based on communalistic, The opposite of concept did not avoid Indonesia for taking a step into ratification of international instruments of intellectual property rights protection. The reason behind is the position of Indonesia as a developing country which has powerless bargaining position put side by side with developed countries. This article attempts to offer another point of view to find out what is the real matter, the root of the problems, why intellectual property regime can not be implemented well in Indonesia."

"Buku kecil ini ingin memberikan sebuah gambaran yang sesungguhnya, bahwa masih saja terjadi disparitas, perbedaan, antara keadilan sebagai substansi dengan keadilan sebagai formalitas yang terkadang memupuskan hak-hak warga negara untuk mendapatkan keadilan dan perlindungan hukum yang semestinya."

"Penyerangan terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Kepemilikan dan Penggunaan Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Dalam buku membahas secara lebih spesifik tentang aspek hukum pidana."

"Industrial property is is being used by an increasing number ofdeveloping countries as an important tool of technological andeconomic development. Developing countries have also been madeaware that it is in their best interest to establish national industrialproperty systems. Indonesia as a signatory member of the Agreementon Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) ofthe World Trade Organization (WTO), Indonesia has enacted Law No.31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design on 20 December 2000. Sincethe enactment of Law No. 31 of 2000 several cases have occurred andbeen brought before the Commercial Court involving the cancellationof lawsuits with regard to issues of the lack of ?novelty? of an industrialdesign which have already been granted to other people. There areseveral weak aspects of Law No. 31 of 2000 which in practice cancreate legal uncertainty and may potentially cause a barrier towardsthe effectiveness of the implementation of Law No. 31 of 2000."