Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Kinerja kejaksaan dinilai lemah dan jauh dari harapan untuk menjawab masalah yang timbul masa kini dan masa mendatang atau tantangan global, misalnya dengan akan diratifikasinya konvensi anti korupsi kejahatan money laundering, cyver crime, teroris dan lain-lain"

"Komisi Kejaksaan sebagai lembaga pengawas eksternal Kejaksaan dibentuk untuk meningkatkan kualitas dan kinerja lembaga Kejaksaan. Kinerja lembaga Kejaksaan yang dinilai masyarakat belum optimal menjadi dasar pembentukan lembaga ini sehingga di dalam Undang-udang No. 16 tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan RI pada Pasal 38 dimungkinkan adanya sebuah komisi yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas dan kinerja lembaga kejaksaan. Sebagai tindak lanjut dari Pasal tersebut maka Presiden mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden No. 18 tahun 2011 tentang Komisi Kejaksaan sebagai payung hukum melaksanakan tugas dan wewenangnnya. Namun di dalam PerPres ini tidak mengatur secara tegas bagaimana mekanisme tugas pengawasan dan pelaksanaan kewenangan Komisi Kejaksaan. Selain itu didalam pelaksanaan tugas dan wewenangnya Komisi Kejaksaan mengalami hambatan-hambatan. Bagaimana Komisi Kejaksaan mengatasi hambatan-hambatan dan memaksimalkan kewenangan yang diberikan untuk mencapai tujuan dibentuknya lembaga ini.

---

Komisi Kejaksaan as an external supervisory institution for the Atourney General Office, formed to improve the the quality and performance of the Atourney General Office. Performance of the public prosecutor has not been assessed to be optimal basis for the establishment of this institution so that in the Act (Undang-undang No. 16 tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan RI) about the Attorney General on Article 38 made possible the existence of a commission that aims for improve the quality and performance of prosecutor's institutes. As a follow-up of the article the President issued Presidential Regulation or "PerPres No. 18 tahun 2011 tentang Komisi Kejaksaan RI" on the Commission as an legal protection to perform Komisi Kejaksaan ini their duties and responsibilities. But in this regulation does not expressly regulate how the mechanisms of supervision task and how to actuate the authority. In addition the implementation of the duties and responsibilities of commission experienced barriers. How does the Commission overcome barriers and maximize the authority given to achieve the aim of the institute."

"Dalam lembaga Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia, bidang Intelijen Kejaksaan memikili peran yang sangat vital dalam pengungkapan kasus yang berhubungan dengan penangan kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Berbagai masalah secara internal dan eksternal masih menjadi tantangan bagi Operasi Intelijen Yustisial dalam upaya penyelidikan yang menyangkut tindak pidana korupsi. Efektifitas operasi intelijen yustisial dalam melakukan pengumpulan bahan keterangan (Pulbaket) dalam kasus dugaan tindak pidana korupsi dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. Adapun faktor yang mempengaruhi efektifitas operasi intelijen kejaksaan tidak terlepas dari faktor Pengambil Keputusan (user), Kewenangan, Aktivitas/Operasi, dan Agen Intelijen. Penelitian ini mengambil studi kasus pada Kegiatan Operasi Intelijen Yustisial Dilingkungan badan kesbanglinmas Tahun Anggaran 2008 dan 2009 Kalimantan Barat. Keempat faktor yang menjadi landasan dalam penelitian ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan beberapa metode dalam penelitian diantaranya metode kualitatif, wawancara, dan kepustakaan. Untuk mendapatkan gambaran yang utuh tentang akar permasalahan dalam efektifitas operasi intelijen kejaksaan maka pada penelitian ini digunakan metode analisis Tulang Ikan (Fishbone).

---

In Indonesian, Attorney General, Attorney Intelligence Divisions has a very vital role in the case of disclosure of the case relating for handling corruption cases. Effectiveness of judicial intelligence operations in collecting information materials (Pulbaket) in the case of alleged corruption is influenced by several factors. The factors that influence the effectiveness of intelligence operations prosecutor can not be separated from the Decision Maker (user), the Authority, Activity/Operations Intelligence Agency's environtment Kesbanglinmas Fiscal Year of 2008 and 2009 in west Kalimantan. These four factors are the bedrock in this study used a qualitative approach, interviews, and literature. To get a full picture of the effectiveness of intelligence operations, the prosecutor in this study using the analysis of Fish Bone method(Fishbone)."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang Peranan Kejaksaan dalam pengawasan aliran kepercayaan yang dapat membahayakan masyarakat dan negara dan pencegahan penyalahgunaan dan/atau penodaan agama yang diatur dalam Pasal 30 ayat (3) huruf d dan e Undang-undang Nomor 16 tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, yang merupakan lingkup tugas, wewenang serta fungsi Kejaksaan di bidang Intelijen Yustisial (law Intellegence) yang mengarah pada kegiatan Penyelidikan, Pengamanan dan Penggalangan untuk melakukan pencegahan tindak pidana, yang selanjutnya oleh Jaksa Agung dibentuk Tim Pakem (Pengawasan Kepercayaan Dalam Masyarakat) yang memiliki peran penting terhadap status penilaian apakah kepercayaan atau agama yang dianut seseorang dianggap sesat/menyimpang atau tidak. Ditemukan kendala-kendala yang dihadapi antara lain Tim Pakem tidak memiliki metode untuk menilai sebuah aliran kepercayaan maupun ajaran agama. Tim Pakem tidak memiliki Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) yang dapat dijadikan pedoman dalam mengambil suatu tindakan, dan kemampuan personil yang kurang professional, sehingga mengakibatkan gerak pengawasan kurang cepat dalam menghadapi ulah aliran kepercayaan menyimpang. Sementara itu kedudukan Undang-Undang No.1/PNPS/1965 tentang Penyalahgunaan dan/atau Penodaan Agama dalam mengatasi masalah penodaan agama masih tetap dibutuhkan sebagai pengendali ketertiban umum dalam rangka kerukunan umat beragama. Undang-Undang No.1/PNPS/1965 semula adalah Penetapan Presiden yang dikeluarkan pada tahun 1965 dan kemudian pada tahun 1969 diangkat menjadi undang-undang dengan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1969. Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Penjelasan Umum Undang-Undang No.1/PNPS/1965 pada butir 3 dan 4, salah satu tujuan penerbitan UU itu adalah agar ketentraman beragama dapat dinikmati oleh segenap rakyat di seluruh wilayah Indonesia, dan untuk melindungi ketentraman beragama tersebut dari penodaan atau penghinaan. Dengan kata lain, UU ini diterbitkan dengan tujuan antara lain untuk memelihara kerukunan umat beragama, baik kerukunan internal umat beragama maupun antarumat beragama.

---

The thesis discusses the role of the District Attorney?s Office in supervising any beliefs which may be harmful for the society and the state and in preventing the misuse and/or the disgrace of a religion governed in Article 30 clause (3) letters d and e of the Law No. 16 of the year 2004 on the District Attorney?s Office of the Republic of Indonesia, which includes the scope of duty, authority, and functions of the District Attorney?s Office in law intelligence specializing in Investigation, Security, and Support to prevent criminal acts; in order to do those, further, the DA (District Attorney) has formed a team, namely Tim Pakem, which supervises any beliefs in society and has significant roles in evaluating whether a belief or a religion followed by someone is considered misleading/deviating or not. It is discovered that there have been some problems faced by Tim Pakem; for example, it does not have a method to evaluate a belief or a religion teaching. It does not have SOP (Standard Operational Procedure) which may become guidance to act, and its personnel are not yet professional, so the supervision movement is not fast enough to deal with any deviating belief. Meanwhile, the function of the Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 on the Misuse and/or the Disgrace of a Religion in overcoming the problems of the disgrace of a religion is still needed as the control of public order to have harmony among religious followers. The Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 was a President Decree issued in 1965, and then in 1969 it was enacted to become a law with the Law No. 5 of the year 1969. As referred to in the General Explanation of the Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 in points 3 and 4, one of the purposes to issue that law is to ensure that the harmony among religious followers can be enjoyed by all the people in Indonesia, and to protect that harmony from a disgrace or an insult. In other words, this law is issued in order to maintain the harmony among religious followers, either the harmony in the same religion followers or the harmony among different religion followers."

"The amendments through Indonesian Constitution of i945 (UUD I945) have impacted to various change including to government system. The change an the government system has came about UUD 1945 (at pre-amendments) is the semi-presidential then it's become hilly presidential system after amended. The -author here also scrutinizes on the government system which had appeared in not only the constitutional level but also on the practice in the national implementations. The author also presents her advices for the legislator members to deeper grasped toward basic concepts which had been exercised by UUD l 945 post-amendments, including the presidential system. its directed to the presidential power to make legislations will not disregard to UUD 1945."

"The changes in sectors and linkages in Indonesian economy have been changing thus affecting the structure. This study aims to evaluate the changes in the nation's economic structure by focusing on the development of intra/inter sectors and intra/inter regions linkage using interregional Input-Output (IRIO) model in 1995 and 2000 data. The model analyzes the changes by applying the concept of technical coefficient stability, testing changes on the coefficients, and exploring the basic IRIO model. The study found that there has been a significant decrease of relative relationship between sectors and regions in Indonesian economy albeit of seemingly insignificant. Further, the analysis in intro and inter regions showed that an increase in intra regions relationship has not been significant meanwhile the decrease of inter regions relationship has been significant. The studies also revealed that industry was a high potential sector in national development priorities not only because of its high multiplier but also its role in strengthening and increasing the interactions of intra/inter sectors and intra/inter regions. "

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas penerapan konsep good governance dalam salah satu program unggulan Kementerian Pemuda dan Olahraga (Kemenpora) RI yaitu program Kota Layak Pemuda (KLP) yang terfokus pada penerapan tiga elemen utama dari good governanceyaitu transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan partisipasi dalam salah satu program unggulan Kota Bandung untuk menuju Kota Layak Pemuda yaitu Program Inovasi Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Kewilayahan (PIPPK) yang dalam pelaksanaannya melibatkan stakeholders dan berbagai elemen masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi penerapan tiga elemen good governancedalam pelaksanaan program KLP studi kasus PIPPK di Kota Bandung, mengorelasikan elemen-elemen tersebut dalam praktik good governance, dan menganalisis penerapan tiga elemen tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif analisis deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara, studi literatur, dan studi dokumentasi. Informan penelitian terdiri dari pemuda Kota Bandung, Dispora Kota Bandung dan Kemenpora RI. Kota Bandung menjadi kota percontohan karena memenuhi indikator yang ditetapkan oleh Kemenpora yaitu adanya Peraturan Daerah (Perda) tentang kepemudaan (regulasi), tersedianya ruang berekspresi dan kreasi (infrastruktur), keaktifan organisasi dan komunitas pemuda (kelembagaan), dan kemandirian pemuda dalam bidang UMKM (Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah).

---

ABSTRACTThis study discusses the application of the concept of good governance in one of the flagship programs of the Indonesian Ministry of Youth and Sports (Kemenpora), namely the Youth Friendly City Program (KLP) in Bandung which focuses on applying the three main principles of good governance in one of flagship program of Bandung City namely Innovation Development Program and Regional Empowerment (PIPPK). First, the principle of agreement that applies aspects of the importance of aspects of public communication by the government and the right of the community to obtain clear and accurate information. Second, the principle of participation that sees community participation in bureaucratic processes and decision making. Third, the principle of accountability in implementing it answers the needs and asks policy actors. This study aims to discuss and analyze the application of the three elements of good governance in the implementation of the KLP program in Bandung City, and to improve these elements in good governance practices. This study uses descriptive qualitative analysis. Data collection is done by interviews, literature studies, and documentation studies. The research informants consisted of young people from Bandung City, Services of Youth and Sports Bandung City, Bandung City Government and Indonesian Ministry of Youth and Sports Affairs. The city of Bandung is a pilot city because it fulfills the indicators determined by Kemenpora, namely representing Regional Regulations (Perda) on youth (regulations), the availability of expression and creation space (infrastructure), activeness of youth organizations and organizations (safety), and youth independence in the UMKM sector (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises)."