Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKReligious pluralisme is a term used to refer to positive attitudes toward world religions e.g., Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Budhism, Catholic, etc with the aim of creating a harmonious, peaceful, and prosperous life within a pluralist society by upholding peoples equal rights to live peacefully in this world. The aim of this article is to elaborate on the concept of religious pluralism and its relation to Islamic education. There have been a controversy caused by the differing definitions of religious pluralism, which has led to certain misconceptions and hence its alienation from Islamic education in general. In the face of such challenges, efforts must continually be made to foster mutual understanding and respect between people of different religions in order to avoid potential conflicts, either between people embracing different religions or people within the same religion. It is this positive awareness which religious pluralism seeks to foster. Thus, incorporating the concept of pluralism into Islamic education is a must, especially by making change to the system of Islamic education which for a long time has focused only on building individual or communal piety. The new priority should be given to the creation of social sensitivity toward pluralism, either through cultural, language, or religious interventions. This all aims at reinforcing the notion of Islam as Rahmatallilalamin."

"ABSTRACTPendidikan tidak dapat terlepas dari kepentingan politik dan kekuasaan. Paulo Freire melihat pendidikan dalam dua wajah yang berlawanan. Pertama, pendidikan sebagai bentuk penindasan. Kedua, pendidikan sebagai bentuk pembebasan. Pendidikan yang menindas terjadi lantaran peserta didik diarahkan hanya untuk memiliki kesadaran naif. Kesadaran naif pada peserta didik mempermudah mekanisme hegemoni. Sedangkan pendidikan yang membebaskan mengarahkan peserta didik untuk memiliki kesadaran kritis. Kesadaran kritis pada peserta didik mampu memicu terjadinya kontra hegemoni. Kesadaran naif pada peserta didik terjadi melalui suatu sistem pendidikan gaya-bank dengan prinsip antidialog. Sedangkan kesadaran kritis pada peserta didik tumbuh melalui suatu sistem pendidikan hadap-masalah dengan prinsip dialog. Dialog menekankan relasi pendidik-peserta didik sebagai subjek yang setara. Sedangkan antidialog menekankan relasi pendidik-peserta didik sebagai subjek-objek. Paulo Freire percaya bahwa humanisasi adalah permasalahan sentral bagi manusia. Sebuah rezim berkuasa yang hendak mempertahankan kekuasaannya melakukan dehumanisasi pada masyarakat melalui mekanisme hegemoni. Filsafat pendidikan yang dikonsepkan oleh Paulo Freire merupakan upaya humanisasi. Humanisasi dalam pendidikan ditandai dengan relasi yang setara antara pendidik-peserta didik sebagai subjek. Sehingga, pendidikan hadap-masalah merupakan pendidikan yang membebaskan serta mendukung proses humanisasi dan kontra hegemoni.

---

ABSTRACTEducation can not be separated from political interests and power. Paulo Freire sees education in two opposite faces. First, education as a form of oppression. Second, education as a form of liberation. The oppressive education occurs because learners are directed only to have a naive consciousness. Naive consciousness in learners facilitates hegemony mechanism. While liberating education leads learners to have critical consciousness. Critical consciousness in learners can trigger the occurrence of counter hegemony. Naive conscousness of the learners occurs through a banking concept of education with the principle of antidialogue. While critical awareness in learners grows through a problem-posing education with the principle of dialogue. Dialogue emphasizes the relation of educator-learners as an equivalent subject. While antidialog emphasizes the relationship of educators-learners as subject-objects. Paulo Freire believes that humanization is a central issue for humans. A ruling regime that wants to defend its power to dehumanize the society through the mechanism of hegemony. The philosophy of education conceptualized by Paulo Freire is a humanization effort. Humanization in education is characterized by an equal relationship between educators and learners. Thus, problem-posing educiation is education that liberates and supports the process of humanization and counter hegemony."

"[Utilizing concepts from Marx, Foucault, Bourdieu and Baudrillard this book challenges those who claim that ‘there is no alternative’ to neoliberal insecurity and reduce education to a consumerist training of entrepreneurial consumer-citizens who can continually invest in themselves and the market. Through an analysis of consumer fi nancial literacy education’s present and historical supports, as well as its likely effects, this book argues that the choice before us is not fi nancial illiteracy or fi nancial literacy. Rather, the choice is between subjugation to the requirements of perpetual competition or overcoming alienation, insecurity and exploitation, aims the critical fi nancial literacy education outlined at the end of this book supports. ;Utilizing concepts from Marx, Foucault, Bourdieu and Baudrillard this book challenges those who claim that ‘there is no alternative’ to neoliberal insecurity and reduce education to a consumerist training of entrepreneurial consumer-citizens who can continually invest in themselves and the market. Through an analysis of consumer fi nancial literacy education’s present and historical supports, as well as its likely effects, this book argues that the choice before us is not fi nancial illiteracy or fi nancial literacy. Rather, the choice is between subjugation to the requirements of perpetual competition or overcoming alienation, insecurity and exploitation, aims the critical fi nancial literacy education outlined at the end of this book supports. , Utilizing concepts from Marx, Foucault, Bourdieu and Baudrillard this book challenges those who claim that ‘there is no alternative’ to neoliberal insecurity and reduce education to a consumerist training of entrepreneurial consumer-citizens who can continually invest in themselves and the market. Through an analysis of consumer fi nancial literacy education’s present and historical supports, as well as its likely effects, this book argues that the choice before us is not fi nancial illiteracy or fi nancial literacy. Rather, the choice is between subjugation to the requirements of perpetual competition or overcoming alienation, insecurity and exploitation, aims the critical fi nancial literacy education outlined at the end of this book supports. ]"