Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Universal Design Learning (UDL) menjadi salah satu upaya dalam memenuhi hak pendidikan bagi Mahasiswa Berkebutuhan Khusus (MBK). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat peran regulasi diri dosen terhadap praktik Universal Design Learning (UDL) di Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode kuantitatif yang melibatkan 249 partisipan dalam penelitian non-eksperimental. Variabel praktik UDL diukur menggunakan Inclusive Teaching Strategies Inventory (ITSI) versi Bahasa Indonesia, sedangkan variabel Regulasi Diri diukur menggunakan Teachers Self-Regulation Scale (TSRS). Adapun analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linear sederhana dalam menguji hipotesis. Hasil menunjukan terdapat peran yang signifikan dari regulasi diri terhadap praktik UDL F(1,253) = 20.23, p <0,001), R2= 0.245. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa semakin tinggi tingkat regulasi diri dosen, maka semakin tinggi pula tingkat praktik UDL dalam praktik pengajarannya.

---

Universal Design Learning (UDL) is one of the way to fulfill the educational rights of Students with Special Needs. This research aims to understand the role of Lecturer’s self-regulation in the implementation of Universal Design Learning (UDL) in Indonesian Higher Education. This research was conducted using quantitative methods, involving 249 participants in non-experimental research. The UDL practice variable was measured using the Indonesian version of the Inclusive Teaching Strategies Inventory (ITSI), while the Self-Regulation variable was measured using the Teachers Self-Regulation Scale (TSRS).In this research, we used simple linear regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The result showed that there is a significant role of self-regulation on UDL practice F(1,253) = 20.23, p <0.001), R2= 0.245. From the result it can be said that the higher level of lecturer’s self-regulation, results in the higher level of UDL implementation in their teaching practice."

"This new book presents a comprehensive overview of the current ?state of the art? of ranking in higher education and research, and introduces a completely new approach called ?multidimensional ranking?. In part 1 rankings are discussed in the broader context of quality assurance and transparency in higher education and research. In addition the many current ranking methodologies are analyzed and critized, and their impacts are explored. In part 2 a new approach to ranking is introduced, based on the basic idea that higher education and research institutions have different profiles and missions and that the performances of these institutions should reflect these differences. This multidimensional approach is operationalized in a new multidimensional and user-driven ranking tool, called U-Multirank. U-Multirank is the outcome of a pilot project, sponsored by the European Commission, in which the new ranking instrument was designed and tested at a global scale."