Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh tingkat korupsi, keberadaan komisi anti korupsi, dan intervensi pemerintah terhadap pengambilan risiko bank di Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, dan Korea Selatan pada tahun 1995-2016 dengan menggunakan metode analisis fixed effect model GLS. Variabel dalam penelitian ini dibagi menjadi variabel korupsi, variabel spesifik bank, variabel mikroekonomi, variabel dummy, dan variabel interaksi untuk estimasi pengambilan risiko bank. Menggunakan data 76 bank dari negara Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, dan Korea Selatan selama 21 tahun, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa bank melakukan transaksi yang lebih berisiko di negara dengan tingkat korupsi yang tinggi. Intervensi pemerintah ketika terjadinya krisis finansial juga meningkatkan pengambilan risiko bank. Namun kegiatan berisiko bank tersebut diminimalkan dengan keberadaan komisi anti korupsi. Selain itu, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa intervensi pemerintah memperkuat pengaruh tingkat korupsi terhadap pengambilan risiko bank karena moral hazard yang tinggi serta pengawasan yang rendah.

---

This paper aims to addresses the impact of corruption, anti corruption commission, and government intervention on bank rsquo s risk taking using banks in Asian Countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and South of Korea during the period 1995 2016. This paper uses corruption variable, bank specific variables, macroeconomic variables, dummy variables, and interaction variable to estimate bank rsquo s risk taking variable. Using data from 76 banks in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and South Korea over 21 years, this research finds consistent evidence that higher level of corruption and government intervention in crisis situation will increase the risk taking behaviour of banks. In the other hand, bank risk taking behaviour minimized by the existence of anti corruption commission. In addition, this paper also finds that government intervention amplifies corruption rsquo s effect on bank rsquo s risk taking behaviour because of strong signs of moral hazard and weaknesses in the governance and supervision."

"Once acting as local representatives of the national government and content to let their larger counterparts do the "heavy lifting", state and provincial governments are increasingly expected to be stewards of their economies and deliver sustained growth rates for their citizens. Spurred on by increasing competition, not least from neighbouring territories, sub-national governments are increasingly formulating their own plans for economic development, taking out loans, investing in specialist facilities, and establishing marketing offices abroad."

"Judicial independence, integrity and impartiality are crucial to public trust in the judiciary. Justice must also be seen to be dispensed fairly and without fear or favour. In the context of themes and perspectives as well as comparative theories of independence, this book provides a contemporary analysis of the role and independence of judges in fifteen countries in the Asia-Pacific. Expert analyses include countries that are governed by authoritarian governments or are beset by dramatic government changes, which undermine judges by attacking and preventing their independence, to more democratic countries where there are strides towards judicial independence. The problems confronting judges and courts are explained and analysed, with the aim of establishing a commonality of standards which can be developed to strengthen and promote the important values of judicial independence, impartiality and integrity. Solutions for the Asia-Pacific region are also proposed."

"ABSTRACTThe political commitment of the highest political leader in a country is the key to the success and failure of an anti-corruption institution body. In the first era of President Joko Widodo's leadership, the KPK faced a roller coaster of the agenda of eradication corruption. Various threats that present uncertainty about the future of the KPK has been carried out by external and internal forces of the KPK. This had a significant impact on the effectiveness of the KPK anti-corruption engine. This article tries to explain and evaluate the quality of President Joko Widodo's first-period government support (2014-2019) to the KPK and how it impacts on the continuation of the anti-corruption agenda in Indonesia. This article concludes that economic development targets that require socio-political stability make anti-corruption work is less adequately addressed. As a result, the Corruption Eradication Commission was hit by a counterattack from various political-business interest groups. Responding to the situation, President Joko Widodo chose to play it safe and did not show a precise alignment on the KPK. In this period also, there was no visible cooperation that took root and made the eradication and prevention of corruption as the main agenda that was systematic and sustainable."