Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini mengkaji fenomena mobilitas sosial intragenerasi yang dialami oleh penerima manfaat program bantuan sosial pemerintah di salah satu kecamatan termiskin di Jakarta Timur (Kecamatan Cakung). Studi-studi terdahulu telah menempatkan kebijakan sosial (seperti program bansos, rumah layak huni, dan kredit mikro) sebagai salah satu faktor pendorong mobilitas sosial dan pengentasan kemiskinan. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa Keluarga Penerima Manfaat Program Keluarga Harapan (KPM PKH) yang berhasil mengalami mobilitas sosial intragenerasi naik adalah mereka yang mampu memanfaatkan dengan baik bantuan sosial tersebut untuk meningkatkan status sosial-ekonomi mereka serta mampu terhindar dari berbagai efek negatif dari bantuan sosial tersebut. Kemampuan mereka ini pun tak bisa lepas dari faktor seperti sifat individu serta karakteristik sosial-ekonomi mereka yang dapat mendorong maupun menghambat proses mobilitas sosial. Penelitian ini juga menyoroti pentingnya memperhatikan pemahaman subjektif dari para penerima manfaat kebijakan terkait perpindahan status-ekonomi yang mereka alami. Untuk itu, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian studi kasus; dengan metode pengumpulan data berupa wawancara mendalam dan studi dokumen. Informan kunci dalam penelitian ini adalah 8 orang perempuan anggota KPM Transisi (telah menerima bantuan lebih dari 5 tahun) yang merupakan penerima langsung dari PKH. Perempuan (khususnya ibu) dalam masyarakat kita umumnya juga memiliki peran sosial lebih dalam mengurus keluarga, sehingga bisa jadi memiliki pemahaman lebih terkait kondisi sosial-ekonomi keluarganya.Hasil Penelitian menemukan adanya KPM PKH yang mengalami proses mobilitas intragenerasi naik (movers), mobilitas turun (fallers), dan tetap (always poor/never poor). KPM yang berhasil mengalami mobilitas intragenerasi naik adalah mereka yang secara objektif mampu memanfaatkan dengan baik bantuan sosial tersebut untuk meningkatkan status sosial-ekonomi (peningkatan pendapatan, pengembangan usaha) serta secara subjektif telah menilai bahwa dirinya telah mengalami peningkatan (misal: tidak lagi membutuhkan bantuan sosial). Keberhasilan tersebut pun tak lepas dari faktor-faktor di luar pelaksanaan kebijakan sosial (PKH) seperti sifat individu serta karakteristik sosial-ekonomi dari KPM.

---

This study examines the phenomenon of intragenerational social mobility experienced by beneficiaries of a governmental social assistance program in one of the poorest sub-districts in East Jakarta (Cakung District). Previous studies have placed social policies (such as social assistance programs, livable housing, and microcredit) as one of the factors driving social mobility and poverty alleviation. This research argues that Beneficiary Families of the Family Hope Program (KPM PKH) who are successful in experiencing upward intragenerational social mobility are those who can make good use of this social assistance to improve their socioeconomic status and can avoid its various negative effects. Their abilities cannot be separated from factors such as their individual characteristics and socio-economic characteristics which can encourage or hinder the process of social mobility. This research also highlights the importance of noticing the subjective understanding of policy beneficiaries regarding the shift in economic status that they experience. For this reason, this research uses a qualitative approach with a case study type of research; with data collection methods in the form of in-depth interviews and document studies. The key informants in this research were 9 female members of Transition KPMs (who had received assistance for more than 5 years) who are direct recipients of PKH. Women (especially mothers) in our society generally also have more social roles in taking care of the family so that they may have a better understanding of their family’s socio-economic conditions. Research results found that there are KPM PKH who experience a process of intragenerational upward mobility (movers), downward mobility (fallers), and immobility (always poor/never poor). KPMs who are successful in experiencing intragenerational upward mobility are those who are objectively able to make good use of social assistance to improve their socio-economic status (e.g. increased income or business development) and subjectively assess that they have experienced improvement (e.g. no longer need social assistance). This success cannot be separated from factors outside the implementation of social policy (PKH), such as KPM's individual and socio-economic characteristics."

"Machine generated contents note: pt. I Objectives and political economy of social protection reforms1.Rescuing social protection from the poverty trap: new programmes and historical lessons /​ Sarah Cook2.Social protection for poverty reduction: approaches, effectiveness and challenges /​ Armando Barrientos3.The political economy of social protection reforms in developing countries: what is to be explained and how? /​ Katja Bender4.Social cohesion: does it matter for growth and development? /​ Annalisa Prizzonpt. II The legal framework of social protection reforms5.The human rights-based approach to social protection /​ Markus Kaltenborn6.The role of law and legal institutions in the reform of social protection systems: experiences from South Africa /​ Ockert Dupper7.The role of the law of regional organisations in reforms of social protection systems: portability of social security benefits in the East African Community /​ Tulia AcksonContents note continued: 8.Reforms of social protection systems in Latin America: the legal context /​ Lorena Ossio Bustillospt. III Political feasibility of basic social protection9.Attitudes towards hard work and redistributive preferences in developing countries /​ Anil Duman10.Populous, precarious - protected? The paradox of social security for South Asian agricultural workers /​ Karin Astrid Siegmann11.Whom to target - an obvious choice? /​ Franziska Gassmann12.003E How to target: overview on current targeting methods in social protection /​ Christian Pfleidererpt. IV Social protection systems: between fragmentation and integration13.Building social protection and labour systems /​ Ian Walker14.The political economy of social protection reforms in Indonesia /​ Bambang Widianto15.Social protection reforms in Vietnam: experiences and challenges /​ Matthias MeissnerContents note continued: 16.Social protection: political reform and policy innovations in South Asia /​ Gabriele Koehler17.Caring for the urban middle class: the political economy of social protection in Arab countries /​ Markus Loewept. V Social protection reforms: international contexts18.Building national social protection floors and social security systems: the ILO's two-dimensional social security strategy /​ Christina Behrendt19.Developing countries' social protection measures in reaction to the global economic and financial crisis /​ Nina Thelen20.Social protection and the four horsemen of the donor apocalypse /​ Nicholas Freeland."