Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini berfokus pada penanganan imigran ilegal di Indonesia khususnya dalam bidang keimigrasian yang fokus kepada pencari suaka dan pengungsi pada saat penghentian kerjasama antara Indonesia dan Australia pada akhir tahun 2013. Selain itu, berdasarkan data yang didapatkan, Indonesia masih menghadapi ancaman berupa kedatangan imigran ilegal walaupun Australia telah mengefektifkan kebijakan Operation Sovereign Borders yang menghalau semua imigran ilegal yang mencoba masuk wilayah Australia melalui jalur laut.Penelitian ini menggunakan teori Robbins dalam merumuskan strategi yang terdiri dari analisis internal yang berupa Strengths dan weakness of Organisation dan analisis eksternal yang terdiri dari Threats and opportunities yang ada di lingkungan organisasi. Selanjutnya, peneliti menggunakan variabel-variabel berdasarkan teori Rangkuti melalui proses wawancara terbuka untuk menentukan faktor- faktor internal dan eksternal tersebut,Teknik wawancara mendalam dilakukan untuk menggali informasi yang sedalam-dalamnya mengenai permasalahan imigran ilegal kepada empat responden sebagai narasumber yakni Kepala Sub Direktorat kerjasama Asia Timur dan Pasifik, Kepala Sub Direktorat Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Kepala Sub Direktorat Detensi dan Pendeportasian dan Kasi Imigran Ilegal.Setelah mendapatkan variabel faktor internal dan eksternal, peneliti menggunakan matriks EFAS/IFAS berdasarkan teknik analisis SWOT kualitatif untuk mendapatkan alternatif strategi untuk Direkotrat Jenderal Imigrasi. alternatif strategi yang telah tersedia kemudian diseleksi kembali untuk mendapatkan strategi prioritas dengan menggunakan teori Duttweiler yang menetapkan cara- cara menentukan prioritas strategi. Kemudian cara tersebut diaplikasikan berdasarkan teori geopolitik.Hasil analisis menyimpulkan bahwa Direktorat Jenderal Imigrasi harus meningkatkan efektivitas dan memaksimalkan sarana dan prasarana yang dimiliki terhadap program yang telah berjalan sebelumnya seperti operasi gabungan dengan melibatkan instansi lain (SIPORA) karena ancaman paling potensial berada pada wilayah perairan Indonesia yang menjadi titik rawan masuknya imigran ilegal ke wilayah Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThis study focuses on the handling of illegal immigrants in Indonesia, particularly in the field of immigration that focus on refugees and asylum seekers during the discontinuation of the cooperation between Indonesia and Australia at the end of 2013. Moreover, based on the data obtained, Indonesia still faces the threat of illegal immigrants even though Australia has effective policies Sovereign Borders Operation that banishes all illegal immigrants trying to enter Australian territory by sea.This study uses the Robbins theory in formulating a strategy that consists of an internal analysis in the form of Strengths and Weakness of Organisation and external analysis consists of Threats and opportunities that exist within the organization. Furthermore, the researcher uses variables based on Rangkuti?s theory through an open interview process that will determine the internal and the external factors. An in-depth interviewing techniques is conducted to gather information about the deepest problems of illegal immigrants to the four respondents as the guest speaker Deputy Director for East Asia and Pacific cooperation, Deputy Director of International Cooperation, Deputy Director for Detention and Deportation and Illegal Immigrants Head Officer.After getting the internal and external factors, the researchers used the matrix EFAS / IFAS based techniques to obtain qualitative SWOT analysis of alternative strategies for Direkotrat General of Immigration. Alternative strategies available is then selected again to get priority strategy using Duttweiler theory that establishes the ways to determine strategic priorities. Then the method is applied based on the geopolitical theoriesThe results of the analysis concluded that the Directorate General of Immigration should improve effectiveness and maximize infrastructure owned by the program that has been run previously as a joint operation involving other agencies (SIPORA) due to the potential threats in the Indonesian waters which are becoming critical points of entry of illegal immigrants into Indonesian territory.;This study focuses on the handling of illegal immigrants in Indonesia, particularly in the field of immigration that focus on refugees and asylum seekers during the discontinuation of the cooperation between Indonesia and Australia at the end of 2013. Moreover, based on the data obtained, Indonesia still faces the threat of illegal immigrants even though Australia has effective policies Sovereign Borders Operation that banishes all illegal immigrants trying to enter Australian territory by sea.This study uses the Robbins theory in formulating a strategy that consists of an internal analysis in the form of Strengths and Weakness of Organisation and external analysis consists of Threats and opportunities that exist within the organization. Furthermore, the researcher uses variables based on Rangkuti’s theory through an open interview process that will determine the internal and the external factors. An in-depth interviewing techniques is conducted to gather information about the deepest problems of illegal immigrants to the four respondents as the guest speaker Deputy Director for East Asia and Pacific cooperation, Deputy Director of International Cooperation, Deputy Director for Detention and Deportation and Illegal Immigrants Head Officer.After getting the internal and external factors, the researchers used the matrix EFAS / IFAS based techniques to obtain qualitative SWOT analysis of alternative strategies for Direkotrat General of Immigration. Alternative strategies available is then selected again to get priority strategy using Duttweiler theory that establishes the ways to determine strategic priorities. Then the method is applied based on the geopolitical theoriesThe results of the analysis concluded that the Directorate General of Immigration should improve effectiveness and maximize infrastructure owned by the program that has been run previously as a joint operation involving other agencies (SIPORA) due to the potential threats in the Indonesian waters which are becoming critical points of entry of illegal immigrants into Indonesian territory., This study focuses on the handling of illegal immigrants in Indonesia, particularly in the field of immigration that focus on refugees and asylum seekers during the discontinuation of the cooperation between Indonesia and Australia at the end of 2013. Moreover, based on the data obtained, Indonesia still faces the threat of illegal immigrants even though Australia has effective policies Sovereign Borders Operation that banishes all illegal immigrants trying to enter Australian territory by sea.This study uses the Robbins theory in formulating a strategy that consists of an internal analysis in the form of Strengths and Weakness of Organisation and external analysis consists of Threats and opportunities that exist within the organization. Furthermore, the researcher uses variables based on Rangkuti’s theory through an open interview process that will determine the internal and the external factors. An in-depth interviewing techniques is conducted to gather information about the deepest problems of illegal immigrants to the four respondents as the guest speaker Deputy Director for East Asia and Pacific cooperation, Deputy Director of International Cooperation, Deputy Director for Detention and Deportation and Illegal Immigrants Head Officer.After getting the internal and external factors, the researchers used the matrix EFAS / IFAS based techniques to obtain qualitative SWOT analysis of alternative strategies for Direkotrat General of Immigration. Alternative strategies available is then selected again to get priority strategy using Duttweiler theory that establishes the ways to determine strategic priorities. Then the method is applied based on the geopolitical theoriesThe results of the analysis concluded that the Directorate General of Immigration should improve effectiveness and maximize infrastructure owned by the program that has been run previously as a joint operation involving other agencies (SIPORA) due to the potential threats in the Indonesian waters which are becoming critical points of entry of illegal immigrants into Indonesian territory.]"

"Hubungan Indonesia - Australia dapat dikatakan sebagai ‘strange neighbour karena kedua negara memiliki kedekatan secara geografis tetapi merniliki kesenjangan sosio historis yang sangat besar. Tesis ini berupaya menjelaskan hubungan bilateral yang teijadi diantara kedua negara berdasarkan kebijakan luar negeri kedua negara. Sebagai sebuah negara yang memiliki sistem pemerintahan yang telah mapan, kebijakan luar negeri Australia secara umum telah digariskan dalam buku putih pertahanan Australia. Dalam hal ini, penulis berupaya memetakan pola kebijakan luar negeri yang dimiliki berdasarkan buku putih pertahanan yang ditetapkan dcngan btiku putih pertahananyang dimiliki oleh AustraIia.,Di sisi Iain, buku putih pertahanan Indonesia tidak banyak mcnggambarkan kebijakan luar negeri yang dirniliki oleh negara ini, sehingga pola kebijakan luar negeri yang dimiliki oleh Indonesia dipetakan melaui periode pemerintahan di Indonesia. Meskipun dalam tcsis ini kcbijakan luar negeri Australia yang dibahas didasarkan pada buku putih pertahanan yang dimiliki, perubahan konstelasi politik intemasional dan aktor penting di Australia juga akan tetap dibahas. Mengingat faktor intemasional, negara clan aktor sebuah negara tidak dapat dipisahkan dalam pembuatan kebijakan luar negeri. peran Indonesia dalam dunia internasional juga akan dibahas sebagai upaya menjelaskan kebijakan luar negeri Indonesia secara umum. Dengan melakukan komparasi terhadap kebijakan luar negeri kedua negara, dapat digambarkan kemungkinan kebijakan luar negeri yang akan ditetapkan Australia terhadap Indonesia, schingga dapat mcmberikan masukan kepada Indonesia dalam menetapkan kebijakan luar negerinya terutama dalam menjalin hubungan bilateral dcngan Australia.

---

Indonesia - Australia relations can be mentioned as a “strange neighbour" because of these countries close geographis and huge sociohistoric discrepancy. This thesis try to explain the bilateral relations between both countries based on their foreign policies.

As a country that has established its governmental system, Australia’s foreign policy has been outlined in Austra1ia’s defence white papers. On the oher hand, Indonesia’s defence white papers does not much describe its foreign policy, therefore the pattem of Indonesia’s foreign policy is mapped by the period ofthe government in Indonesia.

Although in this thesis, Australian foreign policy is dismissed based on its defence white papers,the changes of intemational political constellation, state and important actor in Australia will remained to be discussed. Given the intemational factor, thc state and a _state actor can not be separated in the making of tbreign policy. Indoncsia’s role in the intemational world will also be discussed as an attempt to explain lndonesia‘s foreign policy in general.

By doing a comparison to the foreign policy of both countries, the Australia's foreign policy to Indonesia can be estimated, so as to provide input to Indonesia in the making of its foreign policies especially in the bilateral relationship with Australia."

"Tesis ini membahas peran media massa milik Pemerintah Indonesia dan Australia, yaitu Antaranews.com dan ABC Online dalam mengangkat isu yang sensitif dalam hubungan internasional, seperti kasus penyadapan Presiden Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Penelitian ini menggunakan model interaksi media-hubungan internasional milik Tsvetelina Yordanova untuk mengetahui peran media massa di ranah domestik dan internasional. Dalam kasus penyadapan Presiden Yudhoyono, Antaranews.com dan ABC Online menekankan pada Australia sebagai sumber permasalahan utama. Kedua media ini juga banyak memberitakan pengkajian ulang kerja sama Indonesia dan Australia sebagai rekomendasi terbaik bagi Indonesia. Selain itu, kedua media ini juga merekomendasikan kepada Pemerintah Australia untuk meminta maaf dan memberikan klarifikasi kepada Indonesia, serta merekomendasikan kedua negara tersebut untuk menerapkan kode etik dalam kerja sama di masa depan. Perbedaan di antara kedua media ini adalah tingkat ketergantungannya terhadap pemerintah. Sebagai aktor domestik, Antaranews.com masih banyak mengandalkan Pemerintah Indonesia dan elit politik sebagai sumber berita utamanya, sehingga media ini hanya bergerak sebagai pelapor dan alat pemerintah. Sedangkan, ABC Online mengandalkan beragam sumber berita, baik dari Indonesia maupun Australia, bahkan elit politik maupun non-elit politik, seperti masyarakat dan praktisi perdagangan. Media ini juga tidak hanya melaporkan berbagai perspektif sumber berita, tetapi juga menyajikan analisis dan opininya mengenai kasus tersebut. ABC Online juga aktif melakukan verifikasi informasi sejak awal penguakan kasus ini ke ranah publik. ABC Online bahkan memberitakan kasus ini dengan frame yang menyudutkan Pemerintah Australia. Independensi ABC Online memungkinkan media ini bergerak secara maksimal sebagai aktor internasional. Berbeda dengan ABC Online, Antaranews.com masih banyak mengandalkan Pemerintah Indonesia sebagai sumber beritanya, sehingga frame yang digunakan sama dengan frame pemerintah. Hal ini mengakibatkan Antaranews.com memiliki dampak yang terbatas dalam ranah internasional.

---

This thesis explores the role of state owned mass media, namely Antaranews.com from Indonesia and ABC Online from Australia, in informing sensitive issues on international relations, such as the wiretapping of Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono by Australian intelligence. The research uses Tsvetelina Yordanova rsquo s media international relations interaction model to know the role of mass media as a domestic and an international actor. In President Yudhoyono rsquo s case, Antaranews.com and ABC Online emphasized Australia as the main problem of the case. Both media also frequently showed that the way Indonesian government suspended some cooperation was the best recommendation for Indonesia. As for Australia, both media also agreed that the Australian government needed to apologize and give clarification to Indonesia. Both media also thought that both countries would need to use a code of ethic for future cooperation. However, Antaranews.com and ABC Online also have some differences in informing the wiretapping scandal. ABC Online not only used Australian and Indonesian elite as its news sources, but also the public in both countries in a moderate amount. The media also provided more variety of frames than Antaranews.com in defining the problems and giving recommendations. Moreover, ABC Online not only gave a mere information, but also analysis and opinion in this case. ABC Online also actively verified information from Edward Snowden before publishing the story to the public. On top of everything, the media was not afraid to use frames that delegitimized Australian government policy. The autonomy of ABC Online makes it possible for the media to work as an international actor. On the other hand, Antaranews.com still depended a lot on Indonesian government and political elite as its news sources. The media used the same frame as the government and elites rsquo frame to inform the public. Therefore, the media had a limited impact as an international actor, because it had no stand on this issue."

"Tesis ini menjelaskan mengenai perjanjian keamanan Indonesia - Australia sebagai upaya Indonesia dalam mencegah gerakan separatisme di Indonesia timur. Cakupan pembahasan dalam penelitian ini meliputi faktor apa saja yang melatarbelakangi Indonesia dalam melakukan perjanjian keamanan dengan Australia, terkait dengan upaya Indonesia dalam mencegah gerakan separatisme di Indonesia timur dan keuntungan apa yang diperoleh dari perjanjian keamanan itu. Tujuan yang ingin dicapai dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami latar belakang Indonesia melakukan perjanjian keamanan dengan Australia dalam upayanya mencegah gerakan separatisme di Indonesia timur, serta untuk mengetahui dan memahami keuntungan apa saja yang diperoleh Indonesia dalam melakukan perjanjian keamanan dengan Australia.Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, yaitu untuk menjelaskan hubungan tentang karakteristik geografi yang terbuka dengan eskalasi gerakan separatis, sehingga perjanjian keamanan dijadikan langkah skenario terburuk bagi ancaman gerakan separatis di Indonesia timur. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder maupun data primer, yang diperoleh dengan menggunakan metode wawancara, studi kepustakaan dan studi dokumen. Sedangkan analisis datanya menggunakan analisis kualitatif interpretatif.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa faktor geografi merupakan poin penting dalam politik negara. Konfigurasi geografi Indonesia yang terdiri atas 17.480 pulau dan luas wilayah yang mencapai 7,9 juta km2, memiliki garis pantai yang panjangnya mencapai sekitar 81.000 km, mengakibatkan wilayah Indonesia menjadi sangat terbuka dan dapat dimasuki dari segala penjuru. Ketahanan wilayah Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan menjadi semakin kompleks karena luasnya perairan dan menyebarnya wilayah daratan. Karakteristik geografi yang sedemikian rupa sangat rawan akan berbagai ancaman keamanan serta berpotensi terhadap infiltrasi asing.Pertimbangan kedua dari latar belakang perjanjian keamanan adalah sebagai respon atas perubahan lingkungan strategis di level global, regional dan nasional. Ancaman kejahatan yang muncul dari perubahan lingkungan strategis tersebut adalah penyelundupan senjata, perompakan, terorisme maritim, people smuggling, penyelundupan obat terlarang, yang mana erat kaitannya dengan eskalasi gerakan separatisme dan konflik komunal di Indonesia timur. Dengan adanya perjanjian keamanan ini, kedua negara mempunyai kepentingan nasional yang hendak dicapai. Bagi Indonesia, kepentingan itu adalah kedaulatan dan keamanan, sedangkan bagi Australia kepentingan itu adalah keamanan nontradisional, seperti teroris dan kejahatan transnasional.Pertimbangan ketiga latar belakang perjanjian keamanan adalah faktor politik, dimana Australia harus menghormati kedaulatan dan integritas wilayah kesatuan NKRI.Secara umum, perjanjian keamanan Indonesia-Australia ini berisi tentang kerangka kerjasama yang mencakup 21 kerjasama dalam 10 bidang kerjasama, yakni meliputi kerjasama di bidang; pertahanan, penegakan hukum, pemberantasan terorisme, intelijen, kerjasama maritim, keselamatan dan keamanan penerbangan, pencegahan perluasan senjata pemusnah massal, tanggap darurat bencana, kerjasama organisasi multilateral dan membangun kontak dan saling pengertian masyarakat mengenai persoalan-persoalan di bidang keamanan. Sedang implementasi dari kerjasama keamanan tersebut diantaranya adalah pembangunan kapasitas (capacity building), operasi bersama, sharing intelijen dan informasi, joint exercises, yang kesemuanya itu dapat meningkatkan kapabilitas pertahanan dan keamanan Indonesia dalam merespon berbagai ancaman yang muncul, termasuk gerakan separatisme dan konflik komunal (intra-state conflict).Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa fungsi perjanjian keamanan bagi Indonesia adalah pertama, sebagai peningkatan kontrol wilayah dan geografi Indonesia yang terbuka, kedua, perjanjian keamanan sebagai respon atas ancaman non-tradisional dan ketiga perjanjian keamanan sebagai upaya integrasi wilayah dan integrasi politik. Dari ketiga fungsi tersebut, maka perjanjian keamanan Indonesia ? Australia merupakan upaya Indonesia dalam mencegah proliferasi gerakan separatisme di Indonesia timur.

---

This thesis presents concerning the security agreement between Indonesia ? Australia as Indonesian efforts, preventing the movement of separatism in east Indonesia. The discussions in this research covered any factor that formed the background of Indonesia in carrying out the security agreement with Australia, in relation to Indonesian efforts in preventing the movements of separatism in Indonesia east. The aim that wanted to be achieved in this research was to know and understand the Indonesian background carried out the security agreement with Australia towards him prevented the movement of separatism in east Indonesia, as well as to know and understand any profit that was obtained by Indonesia in carrying out the security agreement with Australia.This research was descriptive analytical, that is to explain relations about the characteristics of geography that was open with the escalation of the movement of the separatist, so as the security agreement was made the step in the worst scenario for the movement threat of the separatist in Indonesia east. The data that was used was the secondary data and the primary data, that was received by using the interview method, the study of the bibliography and the study of the document.The result of this research emphasizes the application of geography in the practice of states politics. Geographical configuration of Indonesia comprising the 17.480 islands and a vast area thar reaches 7,9 million km2, has a long coastline which reaches about 81.000 km, resulted in the Indonesian territory to really was open and could be entered from all directions. Indonesian territory endurance as the archipelagic state became increasingly complex because of the extent of the spread of aquatic and land area.. The characteristics of geography that in such a way was very serious would various security threats as well as potential towards the foreign infiltration.Second consideration from the background of the security agreement was as the response to the change in the strategic environment in the global, regional and national level. The criminal threat that emerged from the change in this strategic environment was the smuggling of the weapon, piracy, maritime terrorism, people smuggling, the smuggling of medicine was banned, whichever tight his connection with the escalation of the movement of separatism and the communal conflict in Indonesia east. With the existence of this security agreement, the two countries had the national interests that will be achieved. For Indonesia, the interests were the sovereignty and the security, whereas for Australia the interests were the non-traditional security, like the terrorist and the transnational crime.Third consideration from the background of the security agreement was politically, Australia has to respect sovereignty and geographic integrity of Indonesia.Generally, this Indonesia-Australia security agreement contained about the framework of the co-operation that included 21 co-operation in 10 cooperation fields, that is covering the co-operation in the field; the defence, law enforcement, the eradication of terrorism, intelligence, the maritime co-operation, the safety and the security of the flight, the prevention of the expansion of weapons of mass destruction, preceptive the disaster emergency, the multilateral and constructive organisation co-operation contact and the community's mutual understanding concerning problems in the security field. While the implementation from this security co-operation among them was the development of the capacity (capacity building), the operation together, sharing intelligence and information, joint exercises, that all of it that could increase the defence capability and the Indonesian security in responding to various threats that emerged, including the movement of separatism and the communal conflict (intra-state conflict).Results of this research showed that the function of the security agreement for Indonesia was first, as the control of the territory and geography that were open, second, the security agreement as the response to the nontraditional threat and the third, security agreements as integration efforts of the territory and the integration of politics. From the three functions, then the Indonesian security agreement."