Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKKawasan Asia Tenggara merupakan salah satu kawasan penting dalam mengkaji perdebatan dan perkembangan konsep regionalisme. Pada kawasan Asia Tenggara, isu yang paling sering dibahas ialah mengenai regionalisme ekonomi. Negara-negara anggota kawasan Asia Tenggara berusaha melakukan integrasi ekonomi guna meningkatkan kondisi pertumbuhan ekonomi masing-masing negara. Namun demikian, berdasarkan kajian empiris terdapat ragam pandangan dalam menelaah dinamika perkembangan regionalisme ekonomi di Asia Tenggara. Oleh karena itu, tinjauan pustaka ini akan memetakan persebaran pandangan dari dinamika perkembangan regionalisme ekonomi di Asia Tenggara dengan menggunakan tiga pandangan utama Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Pandangan pesimis muncul dari pendekatan realisme bahwa terdapat hambatan-hambatan berupa pengaruh negara ekstra-kawasan, kebijakan proteksionisme dan kebijakan bilateralisme. Sedangkan pandangan optimis berasal dari pendekatan liberalisme, yakni pengaruh kelompok pro-liberalisasi, karakteristik dari open regionalism, pandangan ekonomi neoklasik, dan penguatan elemen institusi. Kemudian, perspektif strukturalisme ekonomi melihat bahwa model neoliberalisme yang berjalan perlu diganti dengan model ekonomi lainnya. Selain itu, tinjauan pustaka ini menemukan enam kesenjangan literatur dalam kajian regionalisme ekonomi Asia Tenggara, yakni kesenjangan literatur dari perspektif realisme, liberalisme, dan strukturalisme ekonomi, tren pembahasan literatur per periode, ketiadaan kajian konstruktivisme, dan rendahnya pembahasan kajian ASEAN Post 2015. Berdasarkan hasil tinjauan pustaka ini, terbuka kajian penelitian lanjutan yang dapat dikaji dari aspek praktis, politik-ekonomi, ataupun akademis, beragam penelitian baru seperti penggunaan pendekatan konstruktivisme.

---

ABSTRACTSoutheast Asia is one of the regions that worth to consider as a subject to analyzethe debate of development of regionalism concept. In Southeast Asia, theprominence issue is the economic regionalism. All member countries in the regionhave tried to build economic integration to increase their economic growth.However, based on empirical studies, there are many perspectives have been usedto analyze the dynamics of economic regionalism. Therefore, this literature reviewis focused to mapping the perspectives on the dynamics of development ofeconomic regionalism in Southeast Asia using three main perspectives ofInternational Relations. Literature from realism perspective has seen the skepticalpoint with themes like the influence of extra region countries, protectionismpolicy, and bilateralism policy. Meanwhile liberalism perspective has seen thateconomic regionalism in Southeast Asia has the positive point of views such aspro liberalization group, characteristic of open regionalism Southeast Asia,neoclassical economic perspective, and enhancement of institution. Whereas,economic structuralism argued economic regionalism in Southeast Asia need toshift from using neoliberalism to another model of economic development.Besides that, this literature review found six literature gap of economicregionalism in Southeast Asia, i.e. literature gap from three main perspectives,realism, liberalism and economic structuralism the debate of economicregionalism based on periods the absence of constructivism analyses and theshortage study about ASEAN Post 2015. The result of the literature review isshown that there are many studies still need to be done, in a practical aspect ofpolitical economy or academic aspect, new research that using constructivismperspective as tool of analyses."

"This article aims to review the evolution of the Republic of Vietnam (RVN)’s involvement in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which was founded in 1967 by Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia. South Vietnamese leaders and diplomats designed a new foreign policy under the administration of Nguyen Van Thieu (1967–75) that shifted focus to Southeast Asia alongside the RVN’s long-standing camaraderie with the United States. This demonstrated Thieu’s keenness to engage with regional states for the purpose of nation-building and an anti-Communist future. The RVN’s engagement with ASEAN reflected its efforts to foster a regionalization process along with peace, stability, and development in Southeast Asia, particularly after the withdrawal of the US and its allies. This study uses a qualitative approach, employing a wide range of archival collections housed at the National Archives Center II, Ho Chi Minh City and a handful of desk-research papers. The relationship is periodized into two phases. During the first phase (1967–72), the RVN embraced ASEAN’s values and, despite its observer status, expected help in achieving its security and economic goals. After the 1973 Paris Peace Accords, ASEAN increasingly distanced itself from the RVN as members changed their stances, particularly as attacks by the Democratic Republic of Vietnam escalated in RVN territories. This paper aims to bridge a gap in scholarship by examining the positioning of the RVN in international and regional relations during the Cold War."

"Summary:As the political drive to establish closer ties among Asian governments continues to gain momentum, there has been much debate about the realities of Asian regionalism. Does the community-building activity in fact signal the birth of ""Asia Major""? This book offers analysis of the political, economic, and strategic issues at stake."