Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTIndonesia merupakan sebuah negara hukum sebagaimana sudah tertuang dalam UUD 1945. Sebagai negara hukum, hak berpendapat di muka umum juga sudah dijamin dalam pasal 28 Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, dimana negara juga bertanggung jawab atas kecerdasan warga negaranya. Namun selama masa Orde Baru dan pasca Reformasi tindakan pembatasan akses informasi dan hak berekespresi di ruang publik masih dilakukan oleh negara. Baik pada masa Orde Baru maupun masa pasca Reformasi Indonesia masih belum berhasil mengaktualisasikan diri sebagai sebuah negara hukum. Kata kunci: Ruang Publik, Negara Hukum, Negara Orde Baru, Negara Pasca Reformasi

---

ABSTRACTIndonesia is a legal state as already stipulated in the 1945 Constitution. As a legal state, the right to freedom of opinion and expression has also been guaranteed in article 28 of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, where the state is also responsible for the intelligence of its citizens. However, during the New Order and Post Reform period, the restrictions on access to information and the right to freedom of opinion and expression in the public sphere were still carried out by the state. Both during the New Order and Post Reform era Indonesia still has not succeeded in actualizing itself as a state law."

"Skripsi ini berangkat dari melihat fenomena gejala dini deindustrialisasi yang terjadi di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru sebagai suatu masalah. Deindustrialisasi yang terjadi dianggap sebagai suatu pembalikan dari tren positif yang sebelumnya terjadi yaitu perubahan struktural di perekonomian Indonesia dalam bentuk industrialisasi di Era Orde Baru. Dalam rangka mencari penyebab dari fenomena tersebut di dalam ranah kajian ekonomi politik, skripsi ini menganalisis relasi negara dan (kelompok penguasa) modal dalam konteks Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Relasi kedua aktor ekonomi dan politik tersebut dianggap sebagai hal yang mengkondisikan arah perkembangan situasi perekonomian termasuk di dalamnya tren industrialisasi yang terjadi. Gamblangnya, skripsi ini berusaha menjawab rumusan permasalahan: ?Bagaimanakah Relasi Negara dan Mobile Investors dalam Industrialisasi di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru (1998-2014)??. Berlandaskan teori Kekuatan Struktural Pengendali Modal yang diabstraksikan oleh Jeffrey A. Winters, skripsi ini berusaha melihat faktor-faktor ekonomi, sosial, politik, dan stabilitas eksternal dalam konteks Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru yang memediasi kekuatan struktural pengendali modal dalam hal ini Mobile Investors, dan relasinya dengan negara Indonesia. Dari analisis tentang konteks ekonomi politik Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru dan faktor-faktor ekonomi, sosial, politik, dan stabilitas eksternal, diambil kesimpulan tentang semakin timpangnya relasi negara dan Mobile Investors, dalam artian menguatnya daya tawar Mobile Investors dan melemahnya daya tawar negara. Tren industrialisasi yang terjadi dengan demikian mencerminkan suatu pola yang terlepas dari perencanaan negara dan mengikuti secara penuh pertimbangan Mobile Investors dalam sistem pasar bebas yaitu sektor mana yang paling menguntungkan dalam jangka pendek lah yang menjadi fokus investasi tanpa pertimbangan tentang bagaimana dampaknya bagi perekonomian Indonesia dalam jangka panjang.

---

This research departs from seeing early symptoms of deindustrialization in Indonesia after the New Order as a problem. Deindustrialization that occurs is regarded as a reversal of the positive trend that has occurred previously, that is a structural change in the economy of Indonesia in the form of industrialization in the New Order era. In order to find the cause of this phenomenon in the realm of political economy studies, this research analyzes the relation of state and (the controllers) of capital in the context of the post-New Order Indonesia. Relation between these two economic and political actors is regarded as conditioning the development of the economic situation including the industrialization trend. Obviously, this research seeks to answer the question: "How is Relation Between State and Mobile Investors in Industrialization in Post-New Order Indonesia (1998-2014)?". Based on Structural Power of Capital Controllers theory abstracted by Jeffrey A. Winters, this research tries to look at economic, social, political, and external stability factors in the context of the post-New Order Indonesia that mediate structural strength of Capital Controllers, in this case The Mobile Investors, and their relationships with the Indonesian state. From an analysis of the political economic context of the post-New Order Indonesia and economic, social, political, and external stability factors, a conclusion is drawn about the relation of state and Mobile Investors, that is the strengthening trend of Mobile Investors?s bargaining power and the weakening of the state?s bargaining power. The industrialization trend thus reflects a pattern of whithering away from the planning of the state toward depending on free considerations of Mobile Investors in the free market system, in which the most profitable sector in the short term becomes the main focus of investment without consideration of how this can impact Indonesia's economy in the long term."

"This paper investigates why and how Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) have engaged in the soft power diplomacy of Islam in post-Suharto Indonesia and how they mobilise their vast resources and networks to do so. The nefarious effects of radical extremism have invited the Muslim world, including Indonesia, to revert to the notion of Islamic moderation, a justly balanced Islam (wasatiyyat Islam), and to promote it nationally and globally. In this sense, both state and non-state actors, such as Muhammadiyah and NU, have pulled themselves into soft power diplomacy. Drawing upon the lens of soft power and public diplomacy theory, this paper finds that Muhammadiyah and NU’s involvement in Indonesia’s soft power and public diplomacy is generated by shared interests in reinstalling a moderate identity at home and abroad. In this vein, through dialogues, cooperation, humanitarian action, and the establishment of special branches and sister organisations, the two most prominent Islamic institutions in Indonesia have attempted to internationalise the best practice of Indonesian Islam, rooted sociologically and historically in tolerance, openness, and temperance. This paper discovers that, although confronted by some weaknesses and challenges, Muhammadiyah and NU constantly attempt to craft global networks of moderate Islam and to recenter Indonesian Islam as a new centre of Islamic civilisation."