Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pergantian kantor akuntan publik, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, dan penerapan good corporate governance (yang terdiri dari ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi komisaris independen, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, kompetensi komite audit, dan jumlah rapat komite audit) terhadap audit report lag. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan empat buah variabel kontrol, yaitu: profitabilitas perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan, opini going concern, dan jenis industri.Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji regresi linier berganda terhadap 331 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia per 31 Desember 2013. Sampel penelitian diperoleh melalui metode purposive sampling.Penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, jumlah rapat komite audit, profitabilitas perusahaan, dan jenis industri berpengaruh negatif terhadap audit report lag. Penelitian ini juga memberikan bukti empiris bahwa ukuran perusahaan dan opini going concern berpengaruh positif terhadap audit report lag. Namun demikian, penelitian ini tidak dapat memberikan bukti yang cukup untuk menjelaskan pengaruh dari pergantian kantor akuntan publik, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, proporsi komisaris independen, dan kompetensi komite audit terhadap audit report lag.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to examine the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, and good corporate governance implementation (which consists of the board of commissioner size, independent board of commissioner proportion, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, audit committee?s competence, and number of audit committee meetings) on audit report lag. This research also uses four control variables: the profitability of the company, the size of the company, going concern opinion, and the type of industry.The hypotheses testing is done by using multiple linear regression of 331 listed companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange of December 31, 2013. The samples are taken by using purposive sampling method.The research provides empirical evidence that board of commissioner size, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, number of audit committee meetings, the profitability of the company, and the type of industry have a negative effect on audit report lag. This research also provides empirical evidence that the size of the company, and going concern opinion have a positive effect on audit report lag. However, this research can not provide sufficient evidence to explain the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, independent board of commissioner proportion, and audit committee?s competence on audit report lag., The objective of this research is to examine the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, and good corporate governance implementation (which consists of the board of commissioner size, independent board of commissioner proportion, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, audit committee’s competence, and number of audit committee meetings) on audit report lag. This research also uses four control variables: the profitability of the company, the size of the company, going concern opinion, and the type of industry.The hypotheses testing is done by using multiple linear regression of 331 listed companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange of December 31, 2013. The samples are taken by using purposive sampling method.The research provides empirical evidence that board of commissioner size, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, number of audit committee meetings, the profitability of the company, and the type of industry have a negative effect on audit report lag. This research also provides empirical evidence that the size of the company, and going concern opinion have a positive effect on audit report lag. However, this research can not provide sufficient evidence to explain the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, independent board of commissioner proportion, and audit committee’s competence on audit report lag.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas pengawasan PPPK terhadap Akuntan Publik (AP) dan Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP), dan untuk mengetahui apakah pedoman pengawasan PPPK telah memadai dibandingkan dengan Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) dan Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA). Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh AP terkait laporan auditor independen yang tidak didukung dengan kertas kerja dan peningkatan jumlah temuan atas ketidakpatuhan AP dan KAP terhadap peraturan perundangan dan standar profesi, padahal AP dan KAP telah diawasi oleh Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan (PPPK) selaku regulator AP.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif deskriptif melalui observasi dokumen, wawancara dan studi literatur. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa secara umum efektivitas pengawasan PPPK terhadap AP dan KAP cukup efektif, namun diperlukan penyempurnaan dan implementasi atas pedoman pemeriksaan, di antaranya pertimbangan analisis resiko AP dan KAP melalui hasil pemeriksaan dan perbaikan atas implementasi monitoring tindak lanjut action plan. Peneliti juga menyimpulkan bahwa pedoman pemeriksaan PPPK cukup memadai dibandingkan dengan PCAOB dan ACRA. Selain itu Penelitian ini juga menemukan adanya overload tenaga pemeriksa PPPK dalam melakukan pemeriksaan terhadap AP dan KAP.

---

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PPPK supervision of the Public Accountant (Akuntan Publik/AP) and Public Accounting Firm (Kantor Akuntan Publik/ KAP), and to find out whether the PPPK supervision guidelines are adequate compared to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA). This research is motivated by the existence of violations committed by AP related to independent auditor's report which is not supported by work papers and increasing number of findings on non-compliance of AP and KAP to the regulation and professional standard, whereas AP and KAP have been supervised by Centre of Financial Profession Development (Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan/PPPK) as AP regulator.

The research method used in this study is descriptive qualitative method through document observation, interview and literature study. This study concludes that in general the effectiveness of PPPK supervision on AP and KAP is effective enough, but it is necessary to improve and implement the inspection guidelines, such as consideration of risk analysis of AP and KAP through the results of inspection and improvement on the implementation of follow-up monitoring of action plan. The researcher also concludes that the guidelines for PPPK examination are adequate enough compared to PCAOB and ACRA. In addition, this study also found the overload of inspectors in the PPPK examination of AP and KAP."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan sistem pengendalian mutu sesuai dengan SPM No.1 Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik pada KAP XYZ. Data dan informasi yang didapat, diperoleh dengan cara melakukan observasi langsung pada KAP tersebut. Adapun hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah sistem pengendalian mutu yang diterapkan telah meliputi unsur dalam SPM No.1 SPAP, namun demikian masih terdapat kendala ataupun masalah dalam prakteknya antara lain belum terlaksananya kebijakan dan prosedur pemantauan yang menjamin kualitas dan mutu atas pelaksanaan SPM di KAP tersebut, sehingga atas hal tersebut penelitian ini memberikan beberapa rekomendasi solusi agar mutu dan penerapan SPM pada KAP XYZ dapat sesuai dengan standar yang ada.

---

This research aims to analyze the implementation of quality control system that refers to SPM No. 1 Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik in public acounting firm of XYZ. Data and information obtained by doing direct observation to the company itself. And the result of this research is the quality control system that has been applied is already covered the component of SPM No.1 SPAP, however there are some obstacles and problems in practice such as failure in monitoring policy and procedure as a quality guarantee of the quality control system rsquo s implementation in this firm, therefore this research provides the recommendation of that condition in order to synchronize the implementation of quality control system with the standard."

"Social, economy and political condition, together with global competition that must be faced in the future, have pushed Central Government to apply decentralization policy, that more open and responsive, by publishing Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemerintah Daerah. This reformation of decentralization policy has been followed with reformation of fiscal decentralization policy by publishing Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1999 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.Change of law about decentralization has led to change of pattern of local budget allocation. Local government have to make budget that suit with public interest. Development function of local government must suit with development of local core competence, because that will create optimum trickle down effect for prosperity of local people.Goal of this research is to evaluate implication of fiscal decentralization policy to development of local core competence. Research design is qualitative-descriptive analysis.Based on research analysis, research conclusion are :1. Economic characteristics for Kabupaten (rural) and Kota (urban) are different. Core competence of urban area is industry especially in Java Island and trading especially outside Java Island, but core competence of rural area is agriculture.2. Economic sectors that form local core competence of Kabupaten/Kota do not get enough support from local development budget.3. Fiscal decentralization policy, Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1999. do not give incentive to local government for develop local core competence in local budget allocation priority that can raise local economic growth.This fact can be caused of: · Most of budget in APBD allocated for routine expenditure. Most of development expenditure allocated for funding sector that related to local infrastructure and basic needs.· Institutional weakness of Fiscal decentralization policy : there is no recommendation for develop local core competence at all stages/hierarchy of public policy"