Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"One of the great scandals in philosophy from around the beginning of the20th century has been the perpetuation of the idea that there is a substantialdistinction to be made between so-called analytic and continental philosophy—one that goes beyond issues regarding style and sociology. And, eventhough none of the respective participants in the dispute admits to being ableto give the distinction any articulation that does not slip between their fingers,the distinction remains today very real (in the stylistic and sociological sense),wielded by both sides for diverse, abject, anti-philosophical ends (inter alia):the perceived winning of arguments via the appeal to authority; ensuring thatone’s arguments will not be subject to wide-ranging critical scrutiny; themaintenance of one’s image and identity as a member of a particular philosophicalclub at the expense of others’ membership; the perceived entitlementto ignore (and dismiss without reading) vast tranches of literature as some“non-U” other. In short, I think that the belief in the viability of the distinctionis ideological in nature (in the pejorative, Marxist sense that I discuss inChaps. 7 and 8, and which, in a sense, is the guiding theme of this book).One then ought to ask in the present context: why include the word “analytic”in the title of this book? Am I not further securing the credibility of this ideology(used to maintain the positions of power of individual philosophersbelonging to each camp) by so doing? Am I not thus indicating my desire toengage with Islamic philosophy (depending on one’s perceived sense of tribalbelonging) in terms of the “right” or “wrong” way?"

"Publisher SynopsisPART I: THE CONCEPT OF GOD. Concepts of God and the Ultimate. Aristotle, Metaphysics 12; Stoics; Epicureans. Thomas V. Morris: The Concept of God. Clark Pinnock: The Openness of God-Systematic Theology. Sallie McFague: God and the World. Paul Tillich: A Christian-Buddhist Conversation. Buber, The Love of God and the Idea of Deity. Classical Theistic Attributes. Stephen T. Davis: Temporal Eternity. Hugh J. McCann: The God Beyond Time. St. Thomas Aquinas: Is God's Power Limited? George Mavrodes: Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence. Harry Frankfurt: The Logic of Omnipotence. St. Augustine: Divine Foreknowledge and Human Free Will. Nelson Pike: God's Foreknowledge and Human Free Will are Incompatible. A. Plantinga: God's Foreknowledge and Human Free Will are Compatible. William Rowe: Can God be Free? Edward Wierenga: The Freedom of God. PART II: TRADITIONAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. St. Anselm: The Ontological Argument. Immanuel Kant: A Critique of the Ontological Argument. The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Thomas Aquinas: The Five Ways. Samuel Clarke: The Argument from Contingency. William Rowe: An Examination of the Cosmological Argument. W. L. Craig and J.P. Moreland: The Kalam Cosmological Argument. Paul Draper: A Critique of the Kalam Cosmological Argument. The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God. William Paley: The Watch and the Watchmaker. David Hume: A Critique of the Design Argument. Richard Swinburne: The Argument from Design. Robin Collins: A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God. PART III: RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. Selections of Mystical Experiences. William James: Mysticism. William Alston: Perceiving God. Eugene G. D'Aquili and Andrew B. Newberg: The Neurophysiological Basis of Religions, Or Why God Won't Go Away. Jeffrey Jordan: Religious Experience and Naturalistic Explanations. Michael Rea: Divine Hiddenness, Divine Silence. PART IV: THE PROBLEM OF EVIL. Historical and Literary Perspectives. David Hume: The Argument from Evil. Gottfried Leibniz: Theodicy: A Defense of Theism. Fyodor Dostoevsky: Rebellion. Contemporary Formulations. J. L. Mackie: Evil and Omnipotence. W. Rowe: The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God. Paul Draper: Evolution and the Problem of Evil. Replies. Alvin Plantinga: The Free Will Defense. John Hick: Evil and Soul-Making. Alvin Plantinga: Supralapsarianism or "O Felix Culpa". Eleonore Stump: The Problem of Evil and the Desires of the Heart. Marilyn Adams: Horrendous Evil and the Goodness of God. Laura Waddell Ekstrom: Suffering as Religious Experience. PART V: MIRACLES. David Hume: Against Miracles. Peter van Inwagen: Of 'Of Miracles.' J. L. Mackie: Miracles and Testimony. Richard Swinburne: Evidence for the Resurrection. Hud Hudson: Hyperspace and Christianity. PART VI: DEATH AND IMMORTALITY. Plato: Immortality of the Soul. Bertrand Russell: The Finality of Death. John Hick: Immortality and Resurrection. Jeffrey Olen: Personal Identity and Life After Death. Prasannatma Das: A Hindu Theory of Life, Death, and Reincarnation. PART VII: FAITH AND REASON. Pragmatic Justification of Religious Belief. Blaise Pascal: The Wager. W. K. Clifford: The Ethics of Belief. William James: The Will to Believe. Rationality and Justified Religious Belief. John Hick: Rational Theistic Belief Without Proof. Anthony Flew, "The Presumption of Atheism". Michael Bergmann: Rational Religious Belief without Arguments. Louis P. Pojman: Faith, Hope, and Doubt. PART VIII: SCIENCE, RELIGION, AND EVOLUTION. The Relationship Between Science and Religion. Richard Dawkins: Science Versus Religion. Steven Jay Gould: Non-Overlapping Magesteria. Pope John Paul II: Faith and Science. Evolution, Naturalism, and Intelligent Design. William Dembski: Signs of Intelligence: A Primer on the Detection of Intelligent Design. Michael Murray: Natural Providence (Or Design Trouble). Alvin Plantinga: An Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism. Michael Bergmann: Commonsense Naturalism. PART IX: RELIGIOUS PLURALISM. John Hick: Religious Pluralism and Ultimate Reality. Alvin Plantinga: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism. David Basinger: Hick's Religious Pluralism and "Reformed Epistemology". A Middle Ground. Dalai Lama: Buddhism, Christianity, and the Prospects for World Religion. Joseph Runzo: God, Commitment, and Other Faiths: Pluralism Versus Relativism"

"ABSTRAK

Penelitian eskperimental ini merupakan replikasi dari penelitian Bilewicz dan Klebaniuk (2013) tentang konsekuensi psikologis dari simbol religius yang terdapat di tempat umum di Polandia. Sama seperti Polandia, mayoritas penduduk Indonesia memeluk satu agama yang sama. Agama ini menjadi bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari kehidupan masyarakat sehari-hari. Penelitian ini hendak menguji adanya pengaruh dari simbol religius agama Islam di sebuah ruangan di kampus terhadap afek positif, afek negatif, dan sikap terhadap nonmarital sexuality. Penelitian menemukan tidak adanya pengaruh dari kehadiran simbol religius di ruangan, baik pada mahasiswa Islam yang religius maupun yang kurang religius. Hasil penelitian ini didiskusikan dengan referensi terhadap teori-teori psikologi lingkungan, religious identification, afek, dan sikap

---

ABSTRACT

This experimental study is a replication of Bilewicz and Klebaniuk’s study (2013) about psychological consequences of religious symbols in public space in Poland. Like Poland, in Indonesia the majority of the population has one same religion. This religion becomes an integral part of people’s daily lives. This study examined the effect of Islamic religious symbol in a university room on positive affect, negative affect, and attitude towards nonmarital sexuality. The study found that there is no effect of religious symbol display in the room, both on religious moslem students and less-religious moslem students. This result is discussed with reference to theories of environmental psychology, religious identification, affect, and attitude

"

"Analytic philosophy is roughly a hundred years old, and it is now the dominant force within Western philosophy. Interest in its historical development is increasing, but there has hitherto been no sustained attempt to elucidate what it currently amounts to, and how it differs from so-called 'continental' philosophy. In this rich and wide-ranging book, Hans Johann Glock argues that analytic philosophy is a loose movement held together both by ties of influence and by various 'family resemblances'. He considers the pros and cons of various definitions of analytic philosophy, and tackles the methodological, historiographical and philosophical issues raised by such definitions. Finally, he explores the wider intellectual and cultural implications of the notorious divide between analytic and continental philosophy. His book is an invaluable guide for anyone seeking to understand analytic philosophy and how it is practised."