Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Major land reform programs have reallocated property in more than one-third of the world's countries in the last century and impacted over one billion people. But only rarely have these programs granted beneficiaries complete property rights. Why is this the case, and what are the consequences? This book draws on wide-ranging original data and charts new conceptual terrain to reveal the political origins of the property rights gap. It shows that land reform programs are most often implemented by authoritarian governments who deliberately withhold property rights from beneficiaries. In so doing, governments generate coercive leverage over rural populations and exert social control. This is politically advantageous to ruling governments but it has negative development consequences: it slows economic growth, productivity, and urbanization and it exacerbates inequality. The book also examines the conditions under which subsequent governments close property rights gaps, usually as a result of democratization or foreign pressure."

"Since 9/11, we have lived in an age of counterterrorism in which the spectre of terrorism justifies increasingly repressive and violent measures. Against this backdrop, legal scholars and human rights advocates have encouraged integration of human rights into the discourse of counterterrorism as the best way to counter such repression and violence. This book challenges that received wisdom by showing the ambiguous effects of such converged discourse on developing countries. It highlights the effect of terrorism discourse on human rights in two developing countries, viz., the Philippines and Indonesia, the efforts of local advocates in resisting abuses in the name of counterterrorism, and the persistence of violations despite legal and policy reforms in those countries. Applying a novel analytic framework drawn from critical terrorism studies and critical international law, the book provokes new thinking on the future of human rights advocacy in the age of counterterrorism."

"Summary:Intellectual Property and Property Rights is an invaluable reference work in light of the increasingly important policy debates over patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights."

"Edward Snowden's leaks exposed fundamental differences in the ways Americans and Europeans approach the issues of privacy and intelligence gathering. Featuring commentary from leading commentators, scholars and practitioners from both sides of the Atlantic, the book documents and explains these differences, summarized in these terms: Europeans should 'grow up' and Americans should 'obey the law'. The book starts with a collection of chapters acknowledging that Snowden's revelations require us to rethink prevailing theories concerning privacy and intelligence gathering, explaining the differences and uncertainty regarding those aspects. An impressive range of experts reflect on the law and policy of the NSA-Affair, documenting its fundamentally transnational dimension, which is the real location of the transatlantic dialogue on privacy and intelligence gathering. The conclusive chapters explain the dramatic transatlantic differences that emerged from the NSA-Affair with a collection of comparative cultural commentary."

"This book presents a quantitative history of constitutional law in the United States and brings together humanistic and social-scientific approaches to studying law. Using theoretical models of adjudication, Tom S. Clark presents a statistical model of law and uses the model to document the historical development of constitutional law. Using sophisticated statistical methods and historical analysis of court decisions, the author documents how social and political forces shape the path of law. Spanning the history of constitutional law since Reconstruction, this book illustrates the way in which the law evolves with American life and argues that a social-scientific approach to the history of law illuminates connections across disparate areas of the law, connected by the social context in which the Constitution has been interpreted."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini berfokus pada analisis perencanaan Kerja Sama Direktorat Kerja Sama dan pengembangan tahun 2007 dalam melaksanakan kegiatan kerja sama dalam memenuhi segala kewajiban Indonesia dalam World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) dan World Trade Organization (WTO). Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian kuantitatif.Penelitian menggunakan analisis perencanaan menurut stoner. Responden dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 100 orang yang terdiri dari 50 orang responden dari Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, dan 50 orang lain dari Departemen Perindustrian, Departemen Perdagangan, Departemen Luar Negeri, Konsultan dan Sentra HKI Universitas Indonesia.Dari analisis terhadap basil kuesioner, disimpulkan bahwa : 1) Masih banyak pegawai di Direktorat Jenderal HKI yang belum mengetahui proses perencanaan di Direktorat Jenderal MI; 2) Begitu pula dengan responden dari pihak eksternal yang rata-rata belum mengetahui kegiatan di Direktorat Kerja sama dan Pengembangan;.. 3) Kegiatan Kerja Sama Intemasional dilaksanakan untuk memenuhi kewiban Indonesia sebagai anggota WTO dan WIPO; 4) Dengan Analisis SWOT maka Ditjen HKI dapat mengetahui kelemahan dan kekuatan yang ada pada organisasinya; 4) Proses Perencanaan hares dilakukan oleh Ditjen HKI, berdasarkan hasil analisa data didapat perbedaan antara pihak internal dan eksternal mengenai kegiatan di Direktorat Jenderal HKI.

---

ABSTRACT

The Focus of this study is about international cooperation planning analisis at Directorate Cooperation and Development in the year of 2007 in case doing the cooperation in a Indonesia respect to the WIPO and WTO as a member. This is a Kuantitatif Research.

This Research is using planning analisis by Stoner. 100 Responden in this research which 50 responden from Directorate General Intellectual Property Rights and 50 responden are from Trade Department, Foreign Department, Intellectual Property Consultant and Intellectual Property Clinic from University of Indonesia.

From the quesioner, The following are the research results: 1) Employee in Directorate General Intellectual Property Rights does not knowing about the planning in their office; 2) From the Employee of Ekstemai they do not knowing about the system in Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights; 3) The International Cooperation was built because Indonesia as a member of WIPO and WTO and must respect to the WTO and WIPO agreement; 4) By the SWOT analisis data Directorate General of intellectual Property Rights must do the planning program because from planning analisis we know the strongess and the weakness of our organization."

"Terrorism law is as international as it is regionally distinct and as difficult to define as it is essential to address. Given recent pressures to harmonize terrorism laws from international organizations like the United Nations Security Council, the Financial Action Task Force, and the Council of Europe, this book presents readers with an up-to-date assessment of terrorism law across the globe. Covering twenty-two jurisdictions across six continents, the common framework used for each chapter facilitates national comparisons of a range of laws including relevant criminal, administrative, financial, secrecy, and military laws. Recognizing that similar laws may yield different outcomes when transplanted into new contexts, priority of place is given to examples of real-world application. Including a thematic introduction and conclusion, this book will help to establish comparative counter-terrorism law as an emerging discipline crossing the boundaries of domestic and international law."

"Comparative scholarship on judicial review has paid a lot of attention to the causal impact of politics on judicial decision-making. However, the slower-moving, macro-social process through which judicial review influences societal conceptions of the law/politics relation is less well understood. Drawing on the political science literature on institutional change, The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review tests a typological theory of the evolution of judicial review regimes - complexes of legitimating ideas about the law/politics relation. The theory posits that such regimes tend to conform to one of four main types - democratic or authoritarian legalism, or democratic or authoritarian instrumentalism. Through case studies of Australia, India, and Zimbabwe, and a comparative chapter analyzing ten additional societies, the book then explores how actually-existing judicial review regimes transition between these types. This process of ideational development, Roux concludes, is distinct both from the everyday business of constitutional politics and from changes to the formal constitution."