Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Studi ini merupakan evaluasi terhadap pelaksanaan program Young Changemaker Social Enterprise Academy YCESA 2.0 sebagai program pengembangan kapasitas Sociopreneur di Indonesia. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) sebagai kerangka pengumpulan data dan analisis dalam lingkup yang lebih strategis dan aplikatif. Hasil temuan CIPP kemudian dikaitkan dengan Konsep Capacity Building dan Sustainability sebagai dua aspek penting untuk melihat efektivitas program YCSEA 2.0. Hasil temuan CIPP menunjukan bahwa aspek input dan proses menunjukan permasalahan paling dominan, sedangkan aspek konteks dan produk menunjukan permasalahan yang paling minim. Pada aspek konteks, temuan menunjukan bahwa esensi hadirnya program sangat relevan dengan kebutuhan peserta, namun kriteria penerimaan peserta belum tertulis secara spesifik dan resmi. Pada aspek input ditemukan bahwa konten kegiatan pembinaan, kurikulum, serta fasilitas dan bantuan dana yang diberikan sangat relevan dengan kebutuhan peserta, tetapi sesi Product Launching dan Mentorship secara teknis belum optimal memberikan manfaat sesuai kebutuhan peserta. Aspek proses menunjukan bahwa mulai dari kegiatan Pra Launching (Survey & FGD), Pembinaan (Coaching Class & Bootcamp) dapat berjalan sesuai rencana tanpa hambatan yang berarti, namun kegiatan setelahnya seperti Mentorship dan Product Launching harus dilaksanakan diluar rencana karena kendala pandemi COVID-19. Lebih lanjut, analisis capacity building menunjukan bahwa program ini sudah mewujudkan aspek pengembangkan kapasitas pada tahapan perencanaan serta implementasi tetapi tidak dalam tahapan monitoring evaluasi program. Analisis sustainability menunjukan bahwa keberlanjutan program baru terlihat dari segi organisasi tetapi belum dapat terlihat dari implementasi program dan kebermanfaatannya karena jangka waktunya yang masih relatif sebentar.

---

This study is an evaluation of the Young Changemaker Social Enterprise Academy (YCESA 2.0) as a Sociopreneur capacity building program in Indonesia. This reasearch uses the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model as a framework for data collecting, analysis in strategic and applicable scope. The findings of CIPP are linked to the concepts of Capacity Building and Sustainability as two important aspects to see the effectiveness of the YCSEA 2.0 program. The findings of CIPP shows that the input and process aspects show the most dominant problems, while the context and product aspects show the least problems. In the aspect context, it is found that the essence of the program's presence is very relevant to the participant target needs, but the criteria for acceptance of participants have not been written specifically and officially. In the input aspect, it is found that the content of the Coaching Classes activities, curriculum, facilities, and financial assistance provided were relevant to the participants needs. However, the Product Launching and Mentorship activities were technically not optimal in providing benefits according to the participants needs. The process aspect shows that starting from Pre-Launching activities (Survey & FGD), Coaching Classes & Bootcamp has well implemented without significant obstacles. but the activities after that such as Mentorship and Product Launching, didn’t go according to the plan technically due to the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the capacity building analysis shows that this program has realized the aspect of capacity development at the planning and implementation stages but not in the program evaluation monitoring stage. Sustainability analysis shows that the sustainability of this program can be seen from the organizational side but has not been seen from the implementation and usability sides because the period is still relatively short.

"

"Studi ini merupakan evaluasi terhadap pelaksanaan program Young Changemaker Social Enterprise Academy YCESA 2.0 sebagai program pengembangan kapasitas Sociopreneur di Indonesia. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) sebagai kerangka pengumpulan data dan analisis dalam lingkup yang lebih strategis dan aplikatif. Hasil temuan CIPP kemudian dikaitkan dengan Konsep Capacity Building dan Sustainability sebagai dua aspek penting untuk melihat efektivitas program YCSEA 2.0. Hasil temuan CIPP menunjukan bahwa aspek input dan proses menunjukan permasalahan paling dominan, sedangkan aspek konteks dan produk menunjukan permasalahan yang paling minim. Pada aspek konteks, temuan menunjukan bahwa esensi hadirnya program sangat relevan dengan kebutuhan peserta, namun kriteria penerimaan peserta belum tertulis secara spesifik dan resmi. Pada aspek input ditemukan bahwa konten kegiatan pembinaan, kurikulum, serta fasilitas dan bantuan dana yang diberikan sangat relevan dengan kebutuhan peserta, tetapi sesi Product Launching dan Mentorship secara teknis belum optimal memberikan manfaat sesuai kebutuhan peserta. Aspek proses menunjukan bahwa mulai dari kegiatan Pra Launching (Survey & FGD), Pembinaan (Coaching Class & Bootcamp) dapat berjalan sesuai rencana tanpa hambatan yang berarti, namun kegiatan setelahnya seperti Mentorship dan Product Launching harus dilaksanakan diluar rencana karena kendala pandemi COVID-19. Lebih lanjut, analisis capacity building menunjukan bahwa program ini sudah mewujudkan aspek pengembangkan kapasitas pada tahapan perencanaan serta implementasi tetapi tidak dalam tahapan monitoring evaluasi program. Analisis sustainability menunjukan bahwa keberlanjutan program baru terlihat dari segi organisasi tetapi belum dapat terlihat dari implementasi program dan kebermanfaatannya karena jangka waktunya yang masih relatif sebentar.

---

This study is an evaluation of the Young Changemaker Social Enterprise Academy (YCESA 2.0) as a Sociopreneur capacity building program in Indonesia. This reasearch uses the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model as a framework for data collecting, analysis in strategic and applicable scope. The findings of CIPP are linked to the concepts of Capacity Building and Sustainability as two important aspects to see the effectiveness of the YCSEA 2.0 program. The findings of CIPP shows that the input and process aspects show the most dominant problems, while the context and product aspects show the least problems. In the aspect context, it is found that the essence of the program's presence is very relevant to the participant target needs, but the criteria for acceptance of participants have not been written specifically and officially. In the input aspect, it is found that the content of the Coaching Classes activities, curriculum, facilities, and financial assistance provided were relevant to the participants needs. However, the Product Launching and Mentorship activities were technically not optimal in providing benefits according to the participants needs. The process aspect shows that starting from Pre-Launching activities (Survey & FGD), Coaching Classes & Bootcamp has well implemented without significant obstacles. but the activities after that such as Mentorship and Product Launching, didn’t go according to the plan technically due to the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the capacity building analysis shows that this program has realized the aspect of capacity development at the planning and implementation stages but not in the program evaluation monitoring stage. Sustainability analysis shows that the sustainability of this program can be seen from the organizational side but has not been seen from the implementation and usability sides because the period is still relatively short."

""Evaluation is crucial for determining the effectiveness of social programs and interventions. In this nuts and bolts handbook, social work and health care professionals are shown how evaluations should be done, taking the intimidation and guesswork out of this essential task. Current perspectives in social work and health practice, such as the strengths perspective, consumer empowerment, empowerment evaluation, and evidence-based practice, are linked to evaluation concepts throughout the book to emphasize their importance.This book makes evaluation come alive with comprehensive examples of each different type of evaluation, such as a strengths-based needs assessment in a local community, a needs assessment for Child Health Plus programs, comprehensive program descriptions of HIV services and community services for the aged, a model for goals and objectives in programs for people with mental illness, a monitoring study of private practice social work, and process evaluations of a Medicare advocacy program and a health advocacy program to explain advance directives. Equal emphasis is given to both quantitative and qualitative data analysis with real examples that make statistics and concepts in qualitative analysis un-intimidating."--Pub. desc."

"Tulisan ini membahas mengenai Evaluasi program mikrotrans Jak Lingko, Transportasi Publik yang mengintegrasikan jalur di perkampungan ke dalam sistem trasportasi publik yang lebih luas di DKI Jakarta. Evaluasi telah dilakukan dengan melihat respon dari sisi penumpangnya. Berdasarkan studi sebelumnya diketahui bahwa untuk meningkatkan pelayanan moda transportasi umum perlu adanya keamanan serta kenyamanan selama perjalan yang diberikan oleh moda tranportasi umum. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner online, ditambah wawancara terhadap beberapa informan untuk melengkapi informasi yang diperlukan. Hasil evaluasi ini menunjukkan bahwa penumpang mikrotrans Jak Lingko memberikan respon positif dari adanya program mikrotrans Jak Lingko dilihat dari aspek pelayanan, fasilitas, keluhan dan manfaat dari mikrotras Jak Lingko. Aspek yang paling mendapat respon positif adalah aspek manfaat menggunakan mikrotras Jak Lingko sedangkan yang mendapat respon yang agak kurang positif adalah aspek masalah yang sering di keluhkan oleh penumpang. Hasil evaluasi ini memberikan saran perbaikan yaitu Pemerintah DKI Jakarta dan Instasi lainnnya membuat program mikrotrans Jak Lingko menjadi lebih baik serta sebagai bahan evaluasi tentang Transportasi publik/umum di Jakarta.

---

This paper discusses the evaluation of the Jak Lingko microtrans program, Public Transportation that integrates lanes in the village into a broader public transportation system in DKI Jakarta. Evaluation has been done by looking at the response from the passenger side. Based on previous studies, it is known that in order to improve public transportation modes services it is necessary to have security and comfort during the journey provided by public transportation modes. This study uses a quantitative approach with data collection techniques through online questionnaires, plus interviews with several informants to complete the information needed. The results of this evaluation indicate that Jak Lingko microtrans passengers gave a positive response from the Jak Lingko microtrans program seen from the aspects of service, facilities, complaints and benefits of Jak Lingko microtrans. The aspect that received the most positive response was the aspect of the benefits of using Jak Lingko microtras while those who received a slightly less positive response were aspects of the problem that were often complained of by passengers. The results of this evaluation provide suggestions for improvement, namely the DKI Jakarta Government and other institutions to make the Jak Lingko microtrans program better and as an evaluation material for public / public transportation in Jakarta."

"Sekolah relawan semula berdiri sebagai sebuah komunitas yang memiliki kegiatan berbagi pengetahuan dan wawasan terkait dunia kerelawanan. Dalam Sekolah Relawan terdapat program yang dinaungi oleh tim pembangunan masyarakat (community development) yang terdapat dalam lembaga Sekolah Relawan yaitu program akademi komunitas nusantara, program tersebut ada untuk menjadi wadah pendidikan alternatif bagi anak muda untuk belajar dan berkembang dalam bidang pengembangan masyarakat. Program ini bermanfaat namun belum pernah dilakukan evaluasi yang terstruktur selama lima tahun program ini berjalan, kecuali berdasarkan testimoni para penerima program. Oleh karena itu peneliti ingin melakukan evaluasi terhadap program Akademi Komunitas Nusantara untuk melihat apakah program berjalan baik berdasarkan kategori dari analisis evaluasi main analytical category (Relevan, Efektifitas, Dampak, Efisiensi, Keberlanjutan, dan Replikasi program) walaupun dalam studi ini tidak akan menggunakan kategori keberlanjutan dan replikabilitas, berdasarkan pertimbangan karena program yang dievaluasi belum rampung dan juga tidak adanya tendensi program ini akan direplikasi pada tempat lain. Berdasarkan hipotesis penulis atas program Akademi Komunitas Nusantara yaitu pemberdayaan masyarakat sudah memiliki kinerja yang baik berdasarkan analisis Main Analytical category karena efektivitasnya terhadap penerima manfaat, yang dimana para penerima manfaat telah mengimplementasikan pembelajaran mereka dalam tugas akhir mereka yang berkaitan langsung terhadap masyarakat. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan wawancara mendalam, dalam temuan di lapangan jumlah informan tidak sesuai dengan jumlah informan yang direncanakan, yang awalnya 14 orang dan pada akhirnya peneliti hanya mewawancarai 9 orang saja. Hal tersebut terjadi karena banyaknya informan yang tidak bisa dihubungi, menyocokkan waktu yang sulit antara peneliti dan juga informan, dan juga waktu penelitian. Hasil evaluasi dari program AKN sudah berjalan dengan baik berdasarkan kategori relevansi, efisiensi, dampak, dan juga efektivitas. Walaupun dalam kategori efisiensi masih ada yang perlu diperbaiki yaitu dalam sumber daya uangnya. Peneliti mengajukan rekomendasi agar sebaiknya uang semester dari penerima manfaat yaitu mahasiswa diturunkan dan tidak setinggi dengan sekarang dengan cara memperbanyak penerima manfaatnya.

---

Sekolah Relawan was originally established as a community that has activities to share knowledge and insights related to the world of volunteerism. In the Sekolah Relawan there is a program that is under the auspices of the community development team contained in the Sekolah Relawan institution, namely the Akademi Komunitas Nusantara program, the program exists to become an alternative educational forum for young people to learn and develop in the field of community development. This program is useful, but there has never been a structured evaluation during the five years the program has been running, except based on testimonials from program recipients. Therefore, the researcher wants to evaluate the Akademi Komunitas Nusantara program to see whether the program is running well based on the main analytical categories of evaluation analysis (Relevant, Effectiveness, Impact, Efficiency, Sustainability, and Replicability of the program) although in this study will not use the categories of sustainability and replicability, based on considerations because the program being evaluated has not been completed and there is also no tendency for this program to be replicated elsewhere. Based on the author's hypothesis of the Akademi Komunitas Nusantara program, namely community empowerment, it has good performance based on the Main Analytical category analysis because of its effectiveness on beneficiaries, where the beneficiaries have implemented their learning in their final assignment which is directly related to the community. The data collection technique was carried out qualitatively with in-depth interviews, in the findings in the field the number of informants did not match the planned number of informants, which was initially 14 people and in the end the researchers only interviewed 9 people. This happened because many informants could not be contacted, matching the difficult time between researchers and informants, and also the research time. The evaluation results of the AKN program have been running well based on the categories of relevance, efficiency, impact, and effectiveness. Although in the efficiency category there is still something that needs to be improved, namely in the money resources. The researcher proposed a recommendation that the semester money from the beneficiaries, namely students, should be lowered and not as high as it is now by increasing the number of beneficiaries."

"Studi ini merupakan evaluasi sumatif terhadap Program Pemberdayaan Alternatif (Dayatif) Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten Sukabumi. Berdasarkan studi-studi yang telah ada sebelumnya, evaluasi program masih diperlukan untuk menganalisis lebih lanjut kekurangan yang ada dan juga untuk meningkatkan kualitas program yang akan diadakan selanjutnya. Adanya Program Dayatif ini dapat membantu para mantan narapidana kasus narkoba untuk kembali mendapatkan pekerjaan, dan tidak kembali terjerumus ke dalam penyalahgunaan narkoba. Evaluasi ini dilakukan menggunakan model evaluasi Main Analytical Categories yang menganalisis Relevansi, Efektivitas, serta Dampak yang dirasakan bagi para penerima program, serta analisis capacity building Program Pemberdayaan Alternatif (Dayatif). Hasil penelitian evaluasi ini menunjukkan bahwa konsep capacity building dapat dinilai dari dimensi pengetahuan, serta keterampilan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dimensi keterampilan masih perlu ditingkatkan lagi sebagai tujuan utama dalam program pemberdayaan. Selain itu, hasil analisis Main Analytical Categories juga menunjukkan bahwa Program Dayatif BNNK Sukabumi masih memiliki kekurangan dalam aspek relevansi, efektivitas yang disebabkan oleh kegiatan atau pekerjaan yang disediakan pada program pemberdayaan yang belum sesuai dengan kebutuhan masing-masing penerima program.

---

This study is a summative evaluation of the Alternative Empowerment Program of the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) of Sukabumi Regency. Based on previous studies, program evaluation is still needed to further analyze existing deficiencies and also to improve the quality of programs that will be held in the future. The existence of this Dayatif Program can help ex-convicts of drug cases to get back to work, and not to fall back into drug abuse. This evaluation was carried out using the Main Analytical Categories evaluation model which analyzed the relevance, effectiveness, and perceived impact of beneficiaries, as well as an analysis of the capacity building of the Alternative Empowerment (Dayatif) Program. The results of this evaluation study indicate that the concept of capacity building can be assessed from the dimensions of process, knowledge, and skills. Based on the results of the study, the skill dimension still needs to be improved as the main goal in the empowerment program. In addition, the results of the Main Analytical Categories analysis also show that the Dayatif Program of BNNK Sukabumi still has shortcomings in the aspect of relevance and effectiveness caused by the activities or work provided in the empowerment program that are not in accordance with the needs of each beneficiaries."

"Studi ini merupakan evaluasi kinerja program pengembangan olahraga pemuda oleh Lembaga Pedang Mas (Pemuda Bangkit Mandiri Sejahtera) untuk strategi pencegahan konflik. Evaluasi dilakukan bertujuan sebagai acuan bagi pengelola untuk pengembangan program kedepannya. Alat evaluasi yang tepat digunakan adalah Analytical Categories untuk mengukur aspek relevansi, efektivitas, dampak, keberlanjutan, dan analisis SWOT dalam menilai kinerja tata kelola program. Adapun, penilaiannya didapatkan dari penerima manfaat, dan tata kelola dari pengelola program. Hasil temuan evaluasi menunjukkan aspek yang paling memiliki kesesuaian yakni aspek relevansi dan aspek dampak. Dari aspek relevansi, program sesuai dengan kebutuhan pemuda yang mengalami hambatan infrastruktur dan fasilitas penunjang olahraga tidak layak. Program dapat mewadahi produktifitas pemuda dengan mencegah potensi terjadi konflik melalui perkumpulan pemuda, yang mengarah kepada kenakalan seperti, meminum-minuman keras, berjudi, mencuri dan tindakan kriminalitas. Kemudian, dari aspek dampak, program dapat mencegah perilaku destruktif pada pemuda yang dapat mengarah pada kriminalitas ataupun permasalahan yang lebih besar. Olahraga berperan sebagai wadah untuk menciptakan kondisi kondusif, dengan demikian pengembangan olahraga tepat bagi pemuda sebagai sarana konstruktif, khususnya pada daerah yang memiliki potensi konflik tinggi.

---

This study is an evaluation of the performance of the youth sports development program by the Pedang Mas Institute for conflict prevention strategies. The evaluation is carried out as a reference for managers for future program development. The right evaluation tool used is Analytical Categories to measure aspects of relevance, effectiveness, impact, sustainability, and SWOT analysis in assessing program governance performance. Meanwhile, the assessment is obtained from the beneficiaries, and the governance is from the program manager. The evaluation findings show that the aspects that have the most conformity are aspects of relevance and aspects of impact. From the aspect of relevance, the program is in accordance with the needs of young people who experience obstacles to infrastructure and inadequate sports support facilities. Programs can accommodate youth productivity by preventing potential conflicts through youth associations, which lead to delinquency such as drinking, gambling, stealing, and criminal acts. Then, from the aspect of impact, the program can prevent destructive behavior in young people that can lead to crime or bigger problems. Sport plays a role as a forum to create conducive conditions. Thus, the development of sports is appropriate for young people as a constructive means, especially in areas that have high potential for conflict."