Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This paper investigates the role of financial technology (FinTech) in propelling economic growth in Indonesia from 1998 to 2018. The FinTech industry employs a technology-based business model to provide financial services, including lending, payment, investment, and financing services. The study is motivated by endogenous growth theory, which seeks to explain technology as the most important driver of economic growth. The study finds that FinTech startups are positively correlated with Indonesia’s economic growth. FinTech firms in their first year are found to be disruptive, but they fail to have serious consequences on Indonesia’s economic growth; however, they seem to significantly encourage economic growth in their second year. These findings are derived after accounting for other important growth determinants, namely, capital per labor, foreign direct investment (FDI), stock market development, and trade openness."

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis efek dari kebijakan desentralisasi fiskal terhadap beberapa indicator ekonomi seperti pertumbuhan ekonomi dan tingkat kesenjangan ekonomi di Indonesia. Secara teori desentralisasi fiskal dapat menyebabkan pertumbuhan ekonomi karena kebijakan tersebut menciptakan suatu efisiensi dengan cara mendekatkan pemerintah kepada masyarakat (Musgrave, 1959). Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa selain memberikan efek langsung, desentralisasi fiskal juga dapat memberikan efek tidak langsung terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi melalui indikator ekonomi lain seperti tingkat kesenjangan ekonomi. Terdapat beberapa indikator yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur desentralisasi fiskal, seperti yang dijelaskan oleh IMF dalam dokumen 'Government Financial Statistics' (2001), dan penelitian ini menggunakan salah satu indicator tersebut dalam mengukur tingkat desentralisasi fiskal yaitu tingkat desentralisasi fiskal berdasarkan total penerimaan provinsi dibagi dengan total produk domestik bruto provinsi tersebut. Dan dalam rangka melakukan test 'robust' terhadap hasil pengukuran, penelitian ini juga menggunakan indikator lain dari desentralisasi fiskal dalam dokumen IMF tersebut yaitu tingkat desentralisasi fiskal berdasarkan total pengeluaran provinsi dibagi dengan total produk domestik bruto provinsi tersebut. Penelitian ini akan melakukan analisis terhadap efek dari desentralisasi fiskal di 33 provinsi di Indonesia dari tahun 2004 hingga 2013. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis data panel dan metode 'Seemingly Unrelated Regression' (SUR) dalam proses analisis untuk mengakomodasi efek tidak langsung yang diberikan oleh desentralisasi fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi melalui tingkat kesenjangan. Hasil estimasi menunjukkan bahwa desentralisasi fiskal terbukti memiliki efek yang cukup signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Hasil estimasi menunjukkan bahwa Efek langsung dari desentralisasi fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi adalah negatif, namun efek tidak langsung dari desentralisasi fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi melalui penurunan tingkat kesenjangan ekonomi adalah positif, dan apabila dianalisis lebih lanjut, total efek yang diberikan oleh desentralisasi fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi secara langsung dan tidak langsung adalah positif.

---

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of fiscal decentralization policy on regional economic indicators such as economic growth and inequality in Indonesia. Theoretically, fiscal decentralization can lead to economic growth because it creates efficiency by bringing government closer to the public (Musgrave, 1959). This study argues that besides directly affect economic growth, fiscal decentralization also indirectly affects economic growth through other economic indicators such economic inequality. There are several indicators can be used to measure fiscal decentralization as explained by IMF Government Financial Statistics (2001), this study uses one of them, which is fiscal decentralization as a total provincial revenue as a share of GDP as fiscal decentralization measurement, and for robustness test, this study uses the other indicator measurement from the IMF which is fiscal decentralization as a total provincial expenditure as a share of GDP. Furthermore, this study analyzes the effect of fiscal decentralization across 33 provinces in Indonesia from 2004 to 2013. This study uses panel data and seemingly unrelated regression method in the analysis to accommodate the indirect effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth through inequality. The result shows that fiscal decentralization does have a significant relationship with economic growth directly and indirectly through inequality level. The direct effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth is negative, but the positive effect of fiscal decentralization in reducing inequality levels indirectly improves economic growth, which makes the actual total effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth is positive. Relevance to Development Studies Fiscal decentralization was first implemented in Indonesia in 2001, and after more than a decade, this policy should have given positive impact to Indonesian economy. If it does not have positive impact on the economy then Government of Indonesia should discover what went wrong with this policy. Because of that reason, this study try to analyze do the fiscal decentralization policy in Indonesia can improve their economic growth and reduce inequality level across provinces after more than years of implementation. Improving economic growth means creating more wealth for people and by reducing inequality all people can experience the effect equally. One of the purposes of Development Studies is to improve and create equal welfare for the people especially in the poor and developing countries. Because of that reason, this study is very relevance to development studies because it analyzes the impact of fiscal decentralization policy in Indonesia in improving economic growth and creating economic equality across provinces to improve their people wealth. "

"Pertumbuhan ekonomi suatu negara dapat dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor. Salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi pertumbuhan ekonomi tersebut adalah investasi dibidang ICT. Peningkatan perekonomian di Amerika adalah salah satu contoh yang dapat diambil sebagai akibat adanya investasi disektor ICT. Investasi ICT dapat membuka bidang usaha baru bagi perusahaan maupun industri yang menggunakan ICT sebagai alat usahanya. Selain membuka bidang baru, ICT juga dapat digunakan untuk optimisasi pekerjaan. ICT dapat digunakan untuk mempermudah pekerjaan, melakukan hal-hal yang tidak dapat dilakukan oleh manusia secara langsung, dll. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji sampai sejauh manakah dampak investasi ICT di Indonesia terhadap perekonomian Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini akan dilihat, faktor-faktor ICT mana sajakah yang memiliki korelasi tinggi dengan sektor perekonomian dan akan dicoba ditarik kesimpulan mengenai tanggapan positif dan negatif yang selalu menyertai investasi di sektor ICT.Hasil yang diperoleh adalah investasi ICT mempengaruhi pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia terutama disektor investasi telekomunikasi dan services piranti lunak. Penelitian ini juga menyimpulkan bahwa dampak investasi ICT tidak signifikan mempengaruhi perekonomian. Penyebabnya adalah data sekunder yang digunakan belum mencakup keseluruhan investasi ICT di Indonesia.

---

Economic growth in one country can be affected by many factors. One factor that can affect the economic growth is ICT Investment. The growth of economic in United States is one of the good examples as the result of the ICT investment. ICT investment can open a new work field for companies or even industries that use ICT as their production tools. ICT can also be used as an optimation tools for work. ICT can be used as a tool to simplify a job especially the job that can?t be done by human.

This research is to study the impact of ICT investment contributed to economic growth in Indonesia. In this research we will explore which ICT Investment factor that have high corellation with economic sector in Indonesia.

The result of this study shows that ICT investment affect Indonesia?s Economic Growth especially at telecommunication investments and software services. This research also concluded that ICT investment impact is not significant compare to economic growth. This may cause by the secondary data that used in this study were not complete."

"[Pengaruh positif infrstruktur terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi telah menjadi konsensus di antara para ekonom. Akan tetapi beberapa hasil penelitian menunjukkan hasil yang beragam. Walaupun investasi publik untuk infrastruktur relatif kecil tetapi Indonesia berhasil menjaga pertumbuhan ekonominya. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui kontribusi infrastruktur terhadap pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan data level provinsi di Indionesia, studi ini berusaha mengetahui kontribusi infrastruktur secara agregat dan individual terhadap perkeonomian daerah. Perhitungan regresi menggunakan efek tetap menunjukkan bahwa secara agregat infrastruktur berkontibusi secara positif kepada pertumbuhan ekonomi. Akan tetapi, studi ini tidak menemukan cukup bukti yang menunjukkan bahwa secara individual setiap tipe infrastruktur berpengaruh terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah kecuali untuk tipe infrastruktur air bersih. Dengan demikian, pembangunan infrastruktur akan lebih baik jika dilakukan secara komprehensif dan integral.;The positive impact of infrastructure on growth has become a consensus among the economist. However, many studies provide a mixed evidence. Althoughpublic investment on infrastructure is relatively small, Indonesia can maintain its economic growth. This study is aimed to examine contribution of infrastructure to economic development in Indonesia. By using provincial data in Indonesia, this study estimates the contribution of aggregate infrastructure and individual infrastructure on regional economic growth. From the fixed effect estimation, we find that aggregate infrastructure contribute to the regional economic growth.However, this study does not provide enough evidence to support the individual effect of infrastructure on regional growth in Indonesia except safe water access. Therefore, the infrastructure development cannot be partially implemented;The positive impact of infrastructure on growth has become a consensusamong the economist. However, many studies provide a mixed evidence. Althoughpublic investment on infrastructure is relatively small, Indonesia can maintain itseconomic growth. This study is aimed to examine contribution of infrastructure toeconomic development in Indonesia. By using provincial data in Indonesia, thisstudy estimates the contribution of aggregate infrastructure and individualinfrastructure on regional economic growth. From the fixed effect estimation, wefind that aggregate infrastructure contribute to the regional economic growth.However, this study does not provide enough evidence to support the individualeffect of infrastructure on regional growth in Indonesia except safe water access.Therefore, the infrastructure development cannot be partially implemented, The positive impact of infrastructure on growth has become a consensusamong the economist. However, many studies provide a mixed evidence. Althoughpublic investment on infrastructure is relatively small, Indonesia can maintain itseconomic growth. This study is aimed to examine contribution of infrastructure toeconomic development in Indonesia. By using provincial data in Indonesia, thisstudy estimates the contribution of aggregate infrastructure and individualinfrastructure on regional economic growth. From the fixed effect estimation, wefind that aggregate infrastructure contribute to the regional economic growth.However, this study does not provide enough evidence to support the individualeffect of infrastructure on regional growth in Indonesia except safe water access.Therefore, the infrastructure development cannot be partially implemented]"

"Peran kota adalah sebagai pusat aktivitas ekonomi suatu negara. Di Indonesia, aktivitas ekonomi terkonsentrasi di area perkotaan, terutama di kota-kota pesisir yang memiliki pelabuhan. Penelitian ini mengkaji peran pelabuhan terhadap pertumbuhan kota di Indonesia dan perbedaan pertumbuhan antara kota pelabuhan dan kota yang tidak memiliki pelabuhan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelabuhan berperan penting terhadap pertumbuhan kota, sesuai dengan pola pertumbuhan kota pelabuhan di Asia. Selain itu, terdapat perbedaan pertumbuhan kota pelabuhan dan kota yang tidak memiliki pelabuhan dilihat dari proporsi jumlah tenaga kerja manufaktur, kepadatan penduduk, dan rata-rata tingkat pendidikannya.

---

City acts as a core of economic activity in a country. In Indonesia, economic activity is concentrated in urban areas, especially in coastal cities which have ports. This study examines the role of port on cities? economic growth in Indonesia and the differences on growth among port cities and non-port cities. The result shows that ports play important role on cities? economic growth, similar with the pattern of port cities growth in Asia. Moreover, there are differences on growth among port cities and non-port cities in proportion of manufacture employment, population density, and average education level."

"Studi ini bertujuan untuk mencari chanel yang menghubungkan antara FDI dan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia dari sektor manufaktur, sektor nonmigas dan semua sektor ekonomi di Indonesia dengan menggunakan pendekatan Kausalitas Granger. Tes ini akan dilaksanakan dalam kerangka kointegrasi dan vektor model koreksi kesalahan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa ada kausalitas satu arah dari FDI terhadap PDB, namun, ekspor dan investasi domestik tidak dapat diperlakukan sebagai chanel di mana FDI bisa menguntungkan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia. Hasil penting lain menegaskan bahwa ada kausalitas dari PDB untuk FDI di Indonesia, di mana ekspor dan domestik dapat diperlakukan sebagai chanel yang menghubungkan antara PDB ke FDI. Hasil ini memiliki implikasi kebijakan yang penting bagi pemerintah Indonesia, seperti pemerintah harus fokus pada ekonomi domestik ketimbang promosi ekspor, mengelola stabilitas makroekonomi dan memberikan perhatian pada ekspor dan investasi dalam negeri untuk menarik FDI.

---

This study investigates various channels through which FDI could benefit economic growth in Indonesia from manufacture sector, non-oil sector and all economic sectors in Indonesia by using Granger Causality approach. This test will be implemented within a cointegration framework and vector error correction model. The findings show that there is a unidirectional causality from FDI to GDP, however, export and domestic investment cannot be treated as the channel through which FDI could benefit economic growth in Indonesia. Another important result confirms that there is causality from GDP to FDI in Indonesia, thus export and domestic investment can be treated as the passage. These findings have important policy implications such as the Indonesia government should focus in domestic economy rather than exports promotion; manage the macroeconomic stability and give attention in exports and domestic investment to attract FDI."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh modal manusia terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi regional di Indonesia. Modal manusia diduga berpengaruh terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi secara langsung dalam proses produksi, serta secara tidak langsung melalui Total Factor Productivity (TFP). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis data panel provinsi-provinsi di Indonesia dalam rentang 2004-2012. Hasil empiris menunjukkan bahwa modal manusia, yang diwakili oleh tenaga kerja berpendidikan minimal SMA, berpengaruh positif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi regional di Indonesia. Sementara modal manusia, yang diwakili oleh penduduk berpendidikan minimal SMA, berpengaruh positif terhadap pertumbuhan TFP regional di Indonesia dalam periode 2006-2012, baik secara langsung melalui inovasi domestik dan secara tidak langsung melalui efek spillover. Hasil lain dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa modal fisik berpengaruh positif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi regional di Indonesia. Selain itu perbedaan pertumbuhan rasio modal fisik per tenaga kerja regional berpengaruh positif terhadap perbedaan pertumbuhan output per tenaga kerja regional.

---

This research aims to analyze the influence of human capital on regional economic growth in Indonesia. Human capital expected takes effect on economics on production process and indirectly through Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth. This research was using panel data analysis method of provinces in Indonesia in period 2004-2012. Empirical result shows that human capital, represented by labor with minimum high school educated, has positive effect on regional economic growth in Indonesian. Meanwhile, the effect of human capital that represented by population with minimum high school educated has positive effect on regional TFP growth in Indonesia period 2006-2012, directly through domestic innovation and indirectly through spillover effect. This research also shows that physical capital has positive effect on regional economic growth in Indonesia. Furthermore, the difference of physical capital ratio growth per regional labor has positive effect on the difference of regional economic growth per regional labor."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh defisit fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia tahun 1990-2012. Metode yang digunakan adalah Ordinary Least Square dan Vector Error Correction Model. Tes-tes ekonometri yang dilakukan adalah Dickey Fuller, Augmented Dickey Fuller, dan Philip Perron unit root test, serta uji asumsi klasik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan dari defisit fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, pemerintah disarankan untuk mengambil kebijakan fiskal yang ekspansif dengan implementasi berupa peningkatan belanja negara sehingga mendorong permintaan agregat. Namun, pemerintah perlu mewaspadai berkurangnya dampak investasi yang diakibatkan dari naiknya suku bunga riil (crowding out). Kebijakan defisit dengan sumbersumber pembiayaan yang mendorong peningkatan jumlah uang beredar pun harus dilaksanakan secara hati-hati. Pemerintah juga perlu meningkatkan penerimaan sektor perpajakan.

---

This research is conducted to know the influence of fiscal deficit to economic growth in Indonesia from 1990 to 2012. Ordinary Least Square and Vector Error Correction Model are used as research method. Dickey Fuller (DF), Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF), and Philip Perron unit root test are used as econometric test. Other diagnostic tests like multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and autocorrelation are performed. The result showed that there is a significant influence of fiscal deficit to economic growth. Based on this result, government should take expansive fiscal policy by implementing increase in public expenditure that can encourage agregat demand. However, expansive fiscal policy through fiscal deficit from financing resources that support the increase the amount of money in circulation must be conducted prudently. Government should also increase the capacity of national revenue from tax."

"Penelitian ini mendalami mengenai peran perkembangan sektor finansial terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi. Variabel-variabel sektor finansial yang digunakan adalah kapitalisasi pasar saham, kredit perbankan, dan jumlah uang beredar. Sementara itu perekonomian direpresentasikan dengan variabel PDB (Produk Domestik Bruto). Analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode vector error correction model (VECM) dan impulse response function. Hasil analisis dengan menggunakan metode VECM menunjukkan bahwa dalam jangka panjang variabel-variabel perkembangan sektor finansial memiliki hubungan jangka panjang dengan PDB. Berdasarkan analisis impulse response function, terlihat bahwa shock positif kapitalisasi pasar, kredit perbankan, dan jumlah uang beredar direspon positif searah oleh PDB.

---

This research is exploring on the role of financial sector development to economic growth. Financial sector variables that are used in this is stock market capitalization, banking credit and money supply. Meanwhile, economy is represented by GDP. Analysis used in this research is Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), impulse response function. The result of the analysis shows that in the long term, financial development variables have causality relationship with GDP. Based on impulse response function analysis, it is seen that positive shock of financial sector variables responded with the increasing GDP in the next 10 years."

"Pada fungsi produksi Cobb-Douglas, faktor A(t) tidak hanya mencerminkan teknologi namun juga perbedaan kontribusi sumber daya dan institusi lintas wilayah dan waktu (Lin dan Liu, 2000). Penelitian ini mengasumsikan bahwa A(t) dicerminkan oleh belanja daerah sebagai parameter desentralisasi dan belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah. Sehingga penelitian ini tidak hanya menguji pengaruh belanja daerah namun juga pengaruh belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah dan belanja daerah. Dengan menggunakan data panel kabupaten/kota di Indonesia untuk periode 2010-2019 dan metode fixed effect model (FEM), hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa belanja desentralisasi yang diukur dengan belanja daerah serta belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah secara bersama-sama berpengaruh positif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah di Indonesia. Selanjutnya, belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah juga memiliki korelasi positif dengan belanja daerah kabupaten/kota di Indonesia.

---

In Cobb-Douglas production function, the term A(t) reflects not only technology but also difference in resource endowments and institutions across regions and over time (Lin & Liu, 2000). This study assumes that A(t) is reflected by local expenditure as decentralization measure and central expenditure spent in local. This study examines not only the effect of local expenditure but also the effect of central expenditure spent in local to economic growth. Using panel data of regencies/cities in Indonesia for 2010-2019 period and fixed effect model (FEM) methodology, the result shows that decentralization expenditure as measured by local expenditure, together with central expenditure spent in local has positive effect on local economic growth in Indonesia. Furthermore, central expenditure spent in local also has positive correlation with local expenditure of regencies/cities in Indonesia."