Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) khususnya di Indonesia atas transaksi yang terjadi di dalam mekanisme equity crowdfunding sebab adanya potensi penghasilan di dalam transaksi tersebut. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan teknik analisis data kualitatif. Analisis dilakukan dengan menjabarkan regulasi perpajakan di Indonesia yang berkenaan dengan transaksi equity crowdfunding kemudian lebih lanjut memperbandingan regulasi dari tahap peraturan umum hingga peraturan PPh yang berlaku di Malaysia dan Singapura terkait dengan transaksi tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa setelah dijabarkan dari payung hukum Pajak Penghasilan di Indonesia, bisa ditafsirkan bahwa terdapat penghasilan yang berbeda-beda tergantung pada peran yang dilakukan di dalam equity crowdfunding. Kemudian setelah diperbandingkan dengan negara Malaysia dan Singapura berdasarkan sudut pandang investee, platform, dan investor diketahui bahwa baik Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura memiliki perlakuan pajak yang cukup berbeda di beberapa sisi, perbedaan ini diharap dapat menjadi masukan kepada pihak pemerintah untuk melihat potensi pajak yang belum diraih dari transaksi equity crowdfunding.

---

ABSTRACT

This study aims to discuss Income Tax (PPh) in Indonesia for transactions that occur within because of the potential income that emerges. The research method used is a qualitative approach and qualitative data analysis techniques. The analysis was carried out by describing tax regulations in Indonesia relating to its transactions and then comparing regulations from the general regulatory to the applicable regulations in Malaysia and Singapore that related. The results indicate that after being elaborated from the regulations of income tax in Indonesia, can be interpreted that there is different income depend on the role played in equity crowdfunding. After being compared with Malaysia and Singapore based on the perspective of the investee, platform, and investors, it is known that Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have different tax treatment on several sides, this difference is hoped to be an input for the government to see the potential taxation not yet achieved from equity crowdfunding transactions."

"The background of the thesis is the highly development of various financial innovations and manipulations as well as the development of international trading, which will beneficial for big companies or multinational companies. One of them is Structured Trade Finance (STF) transaction that using LFC as financing mechanism, which is conducted by big agribusiness companies. As long as the business transaction of STF produces income in Indonesia, of course it should be governed by the Indonesia income tax system. Innovation in this practical commodity business is an interesting phenomenon to determine the character of its tax. The characterization of income is an important matter that emerges in imposing the tax of STP transactions that using L/C as an instrument. It becomes an important matter because it is related to the tax treatment including determination of tax rate for the income resulted from the STF transactions. Other thing that is mattered is that the STP transactions that are conducted by Taxpayer are not transparent and not disclosed well, which indicates an avoidance effort of tax payment.

The research method of the thesis is qualitative methodology with analytical descriptive approach. The two data collection?s methods that are used in this research are study literature and field data collection techniques. The technique of study literature in data collection was conducted by reading and understanding sciences books, magazines, papers, articles, international convention and the tax regulations. Meanwhile, the technique of field data collection was conducted by observing and direct communicating with the related research?s objects.

Basically, the STF transaction is a structured finance transaction based on borrowing. The experts in STF transaction in commodity's sector are able to design structurally the financing mechanism of L/C, by doing so, group of companies which are spread in various countries will able to take advantage in their internal cash flow to create benefit through financial arbitrage opportunities in the region. The concrete advantage for the Taxpayer for the STF transaction is in form of L/C prepayment discount, which is given by the bank as an issuer of the L/C that is positioned in this country. Based on the SHS concept of income, the benefit/ income obtained by the Taxpayer in conducting STF transaction is an income that subjected to tax because there is a substance economic increase. The characteristics of income will highly detemtine whether the income will be subjected to taxes or not, and also will determine the tax treatment of those income and the tax rate that will be imposed.

The determination factor of income characteristic from the STF transaction can be based on the substance of the transactions related with the obtained income. Through this research, it is shown that the income obtained from the STF transaction by using L/C technique can not exactly be classified as a business income as well as other income, although there are several criteria of business income and interest income are fulfilled by this transaction. The L/C prepayment discount can be classified as an interest income. The main reason is that based on the substance of income, the L/C prepayment discount could be the same as an interest. The difference is only about time of payment.

The planning of STF transaction that is conducted by PT ?X? can be classified as the tax evasion, the reasons are because the Taxpayer is considered as being not transparent and dishonest, and also morally disobedience of law. Due to the more sophisticated business method and technique, Taxpayers can avoid taxes payment, not only by using loopholes or taking advantages in the weaknesses of Tax Regulations but also the weaknesses in other regulations such as banking regulations.

In determine the characteristic of income of a business transaction, which is always developed in a various ways, it is better for the Taxpayers and the Tax Authority to analyze the nature of a transaction first, so it can be acknowledged the substance of the income that appropriate with the Tax Regulations. This research concluded that all regulations in a country have to greatly support each other. Improving access to bank information for tax purposes has to be considered by the regulations maker because it can reduce the probability of tax evasion which disservice our country."

"Serelah adanya krisis moneter pada tahun 1991 yang mana salah satu penyebabnya adalah kekurang hati-hatian dari banyak pemaahaan besar dalam mengelola keuangannya pada saat tersebut banyak peruqahaan mengambil pinjaman dalam valuta asing terutama USD, walaupun pendapatan yang diperoleh untuk membayar hutangnya tersebut dalam mata uang rupiah. Hal ini disebabkan oleh karena besarnya selisih tingkat bunga rupiah dengan tingkat bunga pinjaman valuta asing dan dilain pihak kurs rupiah terhadap mata uang asing sangatlah kuat.Krisis ekonomi mengakibatkan perusahaan- perusahaan mengalami kesulitan dalam membayar hutangnya yang dalam valula asing tersebut, dan pada akhirnya mengakibatkan kebangkitan.Belajar dari hal tersebut diatas, timbul kebutuhan akan instrument derivatif guna menutup resiko yang diakibatkan oleh perubahan kurs mata uang asing dan juga perubahan tingkat bunga. Pada saal ini banyak jenis-jenis derivatif yang digunakan oleh perbankan dan perusahaan-perusahaan lainnya dalam mengelola resikonya. lnstrument derivatif dirasakan semakin cepat variasi nya demikian juga jumlah transaksinya.Dilain pihak salah satu tujuan ulama dari pajak adalah untuk meningkatkan penerimaan negara Untuk ini diperlukan peraturan perpajakan yang memberikan kepastian hukum, bersifat adil, tidak menimbulkan distorsi dalam perekonomian atau tidak menggangu arus modal masuk yang dibutuhkan hagi pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pada akhirnya juga haruslah ekonomis dalam hal administrasinya.Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan cara studi kepustakaan yang diperoleh melalui buku, artikel penelitian. peraturan-peraluran perpajakan yang berlaku , Selain itu juga dilakukan pencarian informasi kepada pejabat dibidang perpajakan, konsulen pajak dan wajib pajak.Dari hasil penelitian yang dilakukan, menunjukkan belum adanya peraturan perpajakan yang komprehensif dalam hal derivalif. Hal ini disebabkan karena demikian majunya instrument derivatif, sehingga kebanyakan lebih melihat hakekat ekonominya dan menggunakan prinsip-prinsip akuntansi yang berlaku saja untuk memperhitungkan pajak atas transaksi derivatif.Selain itu juga dari uraian dapat dilihat peraturan-peraturan yang dibuat terkadang lebih mementingkan penerimaan pajak dan kurang memperhatikan hakikat ekonomi dari derivatif itu sendiri.Pada akhirnya disarankan untuk melakukan penelitian yang Iebih mendalam dan komprehensif untuk perpajakan atas transaksi derivalif yang mana melibatkan ahli-ahli dalam instrument derivatif seperti Bank Indonesia. Sehingga dapat diciptakan peraturan perpajakan yang dapat meningkaikan penerimaan negara dan dilain pihak hakekat ekonomi tetap diperhatikan sehingga tidak menggangu penumbuhan perekonomian.

---

Alier financial crisis in 1997, in which one of the causes is imprudence of big companies in managing their financial matter, many companies have taken loan in foreign currency whereas their income for paying their debt is in rupiah. This happen due to interest rate of rupiah higher than interest rate of foreign currency and also exchange rate of rupiah is relatively strong compare to other currency.The economic crisis caused many companies face difficulty in paying their debt in foreign currency and finally resulted in bankruptcy.Learning from this problem, there is a need of derivative instruments to mitigate risk offoreign exchange rate and interest rate. Currently there are many types of derivatives used by banks and other companies for risk management. Derivative instruments growth so fast both in types and amount of transactions.On the other side, one of the main objectives of tax is increase the government revenue. Due to that, there is a need for tax regulation which give certainty in law, equality, and not distorting economic or incoming fund which is needed for economic growth and linally should be efficient in administrative matter.This research was done through library study from books, articles and current tax regulations. In addition to that, searching of information was also done by interviewing tax officer, tax consultant and companies.Result of the research shows that there are no comprehensive tax regulation for derivative. This is due to the advances of derivative instrument therefore mostly look at the economic substance and using accounting principle in calculating tax on derivative.On the other hand, from the analysis it is found that in some taxes regulation that has been made occasionally put the importance ofgetting the tax revenue and less attention to the economic substance of derivative itsellf.Finally, it suggests that a comprehensive research should be conducted for taxation on derivatives transaction which shall involve expetts in derivative instruments such the Central Bank. This will result in creating tax regulation that will increase govemment revenue and on the other side will as well put attention to the economic substance, so that will not distort the economic growth."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas dampak penerapan PSAK 30 (Sewa) terkait konvergensi PSAK ke IFRS. Perubahan mendasar dari konvergensi tersebut adalah perubahan pendekatan dari rule based menjadi principle based. Penerapan standar tersebut memerlukan interpretasi dan judgment dari pengguna standar atas substansi transaksi sehingga dapat diperoleh justifikasi yang memadai. Dalam ketentuan perpajakan, terdapat pengaturan khusus atas transaksi leasing. Perbedaan pengaturan atas transaksi leasing menurut PSAK 30 dan ketentuan perpajakan akan meningkatkan biaya kepatuhan pajak, namun perbedaan tersebut masih dapat diatasi melalui rekonsiliasi fiskal. Apabila ketentuan perpajakan diselaraskan dengan standar akuntansi, perubahan pendekatan dari rule based menjadi principle based menimbulkan perubahan yang bersifat on balance sheet yang berdampak pada penurunan penerimaan pajak dari Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 23. Dengan demikian harmonisasi peraturan perpajakan dengan SAK tidak perlu dilakukan dengan pertimbangan utama prinsip kepastian dalam pemungutan pajak dan fungsi yang diemban pajak sebagai fungsi budgeter dan reguler.

---

ABSTRACTThe focus of this study is impact of application of PSAK 30 on lease accordance to convergence PSAK to IFRS. The basic change for said convergence is approach change from rule based to principle based. All user should have interpretation and judgment for transaction subtance to gain reasonable justification. On tax side, there are any special rule on leasing transaction. The difference of leasing transaction treatment between PSAK rules and tax rules will increase tax compliance cost, but we still can cover by fiscal adjustment. If the tax regulations are aligned with accounting standard, change of the rule-based approach to principle-based approach cause changes that are on the balance sheet that will impact on the decrease of tax revenue from income tax Article 23. For the said reason, harmonization tax rules and SAK will not be done by consideration of certainty principle on tax and the tax function as the budgeter and reguler."

"Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah tidak terlepas dari pengenaan pajak penghasilan. Pemerintah mengeluarkan Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 yang merelaksasi tarif pajak penghasilan (PPh) final bagi wajib pajak usaha kecil menengah (UKM), dari 1% menjadi 0,5% dan berlaku sejak 1 Juli 2018. Pelaku UKM yang bisa memanfaatkan PPh final dengan tarif khusus ini adalah yang memiliki omzet maksimal Rp 4,8 miliar setahun. Masalah yang akan dijadikan fokus penelitian antara lain Bagaimana Perbandingan Definisi UMKM yang dikenakan PPh Final dalam PP Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 dengan Definisi UMKM dalam Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2008, dan Apakah pengenaan pajak penghasilan final telah berdasarkan azas keadilan hukum dan perlindungan terhadap pelaku usaha UMKM setelah terbitnya PP Nomor 23 Tahun 2018. Metode Penelitian dilakukan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang bersumber dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan ditinjau dari segi keadilan dan perlindungan hukum terhadap UMKM dalam perpajakan (equity principle), pengenaan pada PPh Final tidak sesuai dengan prinsip keadilan dan perlindungan  karena tidak mencerminkan kemampuan membayar (ability to pay). Pemajakan yang adil adalah bahwa semakin besar penghasilan maka semakin besar pula pajak yang harus dibayar. Ini disebut dengan keadilan vertikal atau vertical equity. Penghasilan yang dimaksud disini adalah penghasilan neto. Berhubung PPh Final dihitung langsung dari peredaran bruto maka pemajakan tersebut tidak sesuai dengan konsep keadilan dalam pemajakan. Bahkan di dalam keadaan rugi pun, dengan pengenaan PPh Final seseorang atau badan usaha tetap harus membayar pajak.

---

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises can’t be excluded from income tax imposition. The Government Regulation (PP) Number 23 year 2018 issued by the government which relaxed income tax rate for small and medium enterprises (SME) taxpayers from 1% to 0.5% was valid from 1 July 2018. SMEs that can utilize the special rate final income tax rate are ones that has a maximum turnover of 4.8 billion rupiah per year. The main focus on this research includes Definition Difference between MSMEs subjected to the Final income tax rate of Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2018 and MSMEs subjected to the constitutional law Number 20 year 2008, also whether the imposition of final income tax has been based on the principle of legal justice and protection of MSME business after Government Regulation Number 23 of 2018 was issued. The method of research is normative juridical using secondary data from primary and secondary legal materials.

Research results shows that in terms of justice and legal protection of the MSMEs related to taxation (equity principle), the imposition of Final income tax rate is not in accordance with the principles of justice and protection because it doesn’t reflect ability to pay. Fair taxation is that the greater the income, the greater the tax obligation. This is defined as vertical equity. The income referred is net income. Final income tax rate is calculated directly from gross circulation, which is why the taxation is not in accordance with the concept of justice in taxation. Even in a state of loss, with the imposition of Final Income Tax each person and business entity must pay taxes."

"Indonesia termasuk melakukan perdagangan dan pengembangan derivatif yang tertinggal. Banyak sekali produk derivatif yang telah diperdagangkan di bursa intemasional tujuannya adalah untuk mengairahkan bursa dan mengembangkan keragaman produk di bursa, secara tidak langsung akan dapat mendongkrak perekonomian suatu negara, dengan investasi hanya beberapa persen dari total investasi atau hanya sebesar premium bisa memberikan keuntungan yang besar bagi investor.Berbagai Produk derivatif sudah diperdagangkan di Indonesia, baik yang diperdagangkan di bursa maupun di luar bursa. Baik berbentuk option, future, forward dan swap.Namun demikian peraturan perpajakan yang ada hanya berupa peraturan tentang forward dan swap, sedangkan future dan option belum diatur dalam bidang perpajakan. Artinya peraturan perpajakan yang ada belum mencover secara keseluruhan tentang perdagangan instrumen keuangan derivatif.Thesis ini yang berjudul perlakuan pajak penghasilan transaksi opsi atas saham mengkaji apa yang menjadi dasar pengenaan pajak dari derivatif kontrak opsi serta bagaimana mekanisme transaksi kontrak opsi dimaksud."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang analisis pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan terkait pembayaran Jaminan Hari Tua yang dilakukan oleh PT Jamsostek (Persero) selaku badan yang ditunjuk pemerintah sebagai badan penyelenggara jaminan sosial ditinjau dari asas kepastian hukum serta kendala yang ditmbulkan karena diberlakukannya UU No.36 Tahun 2008, namun tidak dibarengi dengan Peraturan Pemerintah yang terkait pembayaran Jaminan Hari Tua. Hal ini mengakibatkan ketidakpastian dalam penentuan dasar pengenaan pajak terkait pembayaran Jaminan Hari Tua. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menjelaskan apakah dasar pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan atas pembayaran Jaminan Hari Tua yang dibayarkan oleh PT Jamsotek berdasarkan PP 149 Tahun 2000, masih sesuai dengan asas kepastian hukum. Selain itu juga Untuk menjelaskan kendala yang dihadapi serta langkah-langkah yang dilakukan oleh PT Jamsostek. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat dinyatakan bahwa Peraturan Pemerintah No. 149 Tahun 2000 tentang Penghasilan berupa Uang Pesangon, Uang Tebusan Pensiun, dan Tunjangan Hari Tua atau Jaminan Hari Tua masih sesuai dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum dan memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap yang dapat dijadikan dasar pengenaan pajak penghasilan atas pembayaran Jaminan hari Tua yang dilakukan oleh PT. Jamsostek (Persero), serta kendala-kendala yang dihadapi oleh PT. Jamsostek Persero adalah tidak adanya kepastian aturan yang mengatur tentang pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan atas pembayaran Jaminan Hari Tua saat awal mula diberlakukan Undang-Undang Pajak Penghasilan No 36 Tahun 2008, namun kendala tersebut dapat diselesaikan oleh PT Jamsostek Persero

---

This thesis deals with analysis related to the imposition of income tax payments Old Aged Benefits by PT Jamsostek (Persero) as a government-appointed bodies as providers of social security agencies in terms of the principle of legal certainty and the constraints that ditmbulkan since enactment in 2008 of Law Number 36 Year, but not accompanied by the relevant government regulation Old Days Security payments. This has resulted in uncertainty in determining the tax base related to the Old Days Security payments. The objective is to clarify whether income tax base for the payment of Old Aged Benefits paid by PT Jamsotek based PP 149 of 2000, still in accordance with the principle of legal certainty. It is also to explain the constraints faced and the steps carried out by PT Jamsostek. This study was a descriptive qualitative research. Based on the research results can be stated that the Government Regulation no. 149 of 2000 on revenue of Severance Money, Money Ransom Pensions, and Benefits or Old Aged Benefits is still in accordance with the Principle of Legal Certainty and have permanent legal force which may form the basis of income tax for the payment of Old Aged Benefits made by PT. Jamsostek (Persero), and the constraints faced by PT. Jamsostek Persero is no certainty about the rules governing the imposition of income tax for the payment of Security Day at the beginning of the Old Law applied the Income Tax No. 36 of 2008, but these constraints can be solved by PT Jamsostek Persero"

"Tax Holiday merupakan salah satu bentuk insentif pajak penghasilan yang sedang digencarkan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia untuk dapat meningkatkan investasi asing di Indonesia. Saat ini kebijkan tax holiday dituangkan dalam PMK Nomor 150/PMK.010/2018, yang mana ketentuan tersebut termasuk ke dalam kebijakan yang tercantum dalam Paket Kebijakan Ekonomi XVI. Penelitian ini akan membahas mengenai faktor apa saja yang membuat kebijakan tax holiday sebelum diterbitkannya PMK Nomor 150/PMK.010/2018 tidak optimal, dan juga membahas mengenai implementasi kebijakan tax holiday dalam PMK Nomor 150/PMK.010/2018. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif dan juga akan menggunakan teknik analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat 3 faktor yang menyebabkan kebijakan tax holiday dalam peraturan sebelumnya tidak berjalan dengan optimal antara lain adalah, faktor ketidakpastian dalam pemberian keputusan tax holiday, faktor birokrasi dan persyaratan yang menyulitkan, serta faktor lain selain pajak, berupa kepastian hukum, stabilitas ekonomi, dan juga ketersediaan infrastruktur. Selain itu, berdasarkan teori implementasi yang dikemukakan oleh Grindle (1980), implementasi kebijakan tax holiday dalam PMK Nomor 150 Tahun 2018 sudah dilakukan dengan cukup baik. Aturan yang tertuang dalam PMK Nomor 150 Tahun 2018 sudah jauh lebih baik dibandingkan dengan peraturan sebelumnya, yang ditunjukan dengan kebijakan tax holiday yang lebih mengedepankan kepastian, kemudahan, dan kepercayaan kepada Wajib Pajak. Tetapi tetap saja masih terdapat beberapa kelemahan yang terdapat dalam proses implementasi kebijakan tersebut. 

---

Tax Holiday is one of the income tax incentives policy that being intensified by Indonesian Government to increase foreign direct investment in Indonesia. Tax holiday policy that contained in the MoF Regulation of the Republic Indonesia Number 150/PMK.010/2018 is included in XVI Economic Policy Package. Therefore this research is intended to analyse factors that make former tax holiday policy before Mof 150/PMK.010/2018 is not optimal, and also to analyse the  implementation of tax holiday policy that contained in MoF Regulation Number 150/PMK.010/2018. This research is using qualitative approach with descriptive researh type and qualitative analysis technique.

The result showed that there are three factors that make tax holiday policy before MoF 150/PMK.010/2018 is not optimal which are, uncertainty of the decision making of tax holiday, bureaucracy and difficult requirements factor, and also other non-tax factors such as certainty of law, economic stability, and infrastructure availibility. Furthermore, based on implementation theory stated by Grindle (1980), the implementation of tax holiday policy in Mof Regulation Number 150/PMK.010/2018 is already quite well. The regulation  itself is better than before, indicated by the fact that the new tax holiday policy is uphold certainty, simplicity, and trust to the taxpayer. However there are still some deficiency found in the implementation process of that policy. "

"Pasar modal di Indonesia terus berkembang di tengah berbagai perubahan ekonomi dan politik yang terjadi balk di Iingkungan nasional maupun internasional. Dengan perkembangan tersebut pasar modal di Indonesia dituntut untuk dapat menyesuaikan diri dengan berbagai perubahan yang terjadi guna mendukung terciptanya iklim investasi yang kondusif, salah satunya adalah perangkat peraturan perpajakan khususnya pajak penghasilan.Pajak Penghasilan dlkenakan atas penghasilan, yaitu setiap tambahan kemampuan ekonomis yang diterima atau diperoleh Wajib Pajak dengan nama dan bentuk apapun yang digunakan untuk konsumsi atau menambah kekayaan Wajib Pajak. Penjualan saham dl pasar modal merupakan Salah satu objek pengenaan pajak penghasilan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 (2) UU PPh.Saat ini sistem pajak penghesilan di Indonesia memberlakukan kebijakan pemungutan PPh Final untuk transaksi penjualan saham di bursa efek yang tarifnya sebesar 0,1 % untuk saham biasa dan 0,5 % untuk saham pendiri. Pemungutan PPh Final bertujuan untuk memberikan kemudahan bagi Wajib Pajak dalam melakukan pemenuhan kewajlban perpajakan. Permasalahan yang teijadi apakah pemilihan kebijakan pemungutan PPh final tersebut menjadi pemilihan kebijakan yang efektif bagi fiskus dalam usaha menghimpun dana masyarakat untuk pembangunan maupun bagi Wajib Pajak dalam pemenuhan kewajian perpajakan. Permasalahan selanjutnya selain tentang efektivitas pemungutan pajak adalah masalah keadilan (equality) yang menjadikan azas dalam pemungutan pajak.Dalam tesis ini penulis mencoba melakukan analisis terhadap permasalahan diatas dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif guna menjelaskan efektivitas pemungutan pajak penghasiIan atas transaksi penjualan saham di bursa efek dan azas keadilan dalam pemungutan pajak. Penulis menggunakan pendekatan pencapaian tujuan, pendekatan sistem, pendekatan konstituensi strategis dan pendekatan nilai-nilai bersaing. dalam mengukur efektivitas. Untuk mengukur keadilan dalam pemungutan pajak penulis menggunakan pendekatan keadilan horizontal dan keadilan vertikal.Informan yang memberikan informasi dalam penulisan tesis ini berasal dari Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, pelaku pasar dan akademisi. Dari penelitian yang dilakukan dapat diambil kesimpuian bahwa kebijakan pemungutan PPh Final atas transaksi penjulan saham di bursa efek merupakan kebijakan yang efektif dalam pemungutan pajak. Efektivitas tersebut tercermin dari kemudahan, kesederhanaan dan faktor economic of collection dalam pemungutan pajak serta kepastian dalam penerimaan pajak. Efektivitas dalam pemungutan pajak tersebut ternyata tidak dibarengi dengan penerapan azas keadilan karena PPh Final yang dipungut tidak mencerminkan tax base penghasilan yang diterima atau diperoleh dari transaksi penjualan saham di bursa efek.

---

Capital market in Indonesia is expanding in the middle of various changes in economics and politics that occur surroundings both National and International. Along with the development of capital market in Indonesia is demanded to adjust with various changing to support the creation of condusive investment climate, one thing is tax law, especially in income tax.

Income tax is subject to income, is only realized increase in the tax payers economics well being, whether originating within or without Indonesia, that may be used for consumption or to increase the wealth of such tax payers. Selling of stock in the stock exchange is one of the object to income tax as defined in article 4 of income tax law.

Now, Indonesian income tax system put the policy into effect of final income tax collection upon transaction of stock selling on the stock exchange with rate 0,1 % for common stock and 5% for stock holder. Collection of final income tax intend to facilitate the tax payers to fulfilment his taxation, obligation. The problem that occur, whether the election of final income tax collection policy has become an effective policy for liscus in order to accumulation effort of people's fund to both development and the tax payers to fulfillment his taxation obligation. In addition to the effectiveness of tax collection, the next problem is equality that has become a principle of tax collection.

In this thesis, the writer try to analize all problems above with qualitatif method to explain the effectiveness of tax collection upon transaction of stock selling on the Stock Exchange and equality principle in tax collection. The writer uses: aims achievement approach, System approach, strategic constituency approach, and value competitive approach to measure effectiveness. To measure the equality of tax collection, the writer uses horizontal equality and vertical equity approach.

The informants who has has given informations in this thesis come from Directorate General of Taxation, practitioners, and academicians. The research results in a summary, which implies that find income tax collection policy upon transaction of stock selling on the Stock Exchange facilitate the form of effective policy in tax collection. Effectiveness is reflected from easy, simplicity, and economic of collection factors in tax collection and also certainty in tax revenues. Effectiveness in tax collection that?s not together with equality principle implementation because the collection of final income tax is not reflected the tax base of income that's received or accrued from transaction of Stock selling on the Stock exchange."