Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In this book, which is based on a five-year study following over 200 students at seven colleges, the authors argue that becoming liberally educated is a complex and messy process involving making decisions and learning from them. Colleges create spaces (both physical and metaphysical) in which students must make decisions, often in the face of ambiguous situations. Some of these decisions--like declaring a major--are formal and happen infrequently. Others--like deciding to talk to a professor after class or balancing academic and extracurricular commitments--are informal and occur almost every day. Because most of these decisions have no right or wrong answers, the choices students make, and what they learn from these choices, shape their college experiences. Students can see their decision-making as opportunities to change and reflect, a process by which they learn about themselves and acquire practice for making decisions as adults after college. But they can also see decision-making as an obstacle course for which the best approach is to minimize risk, reduce uncertainty, and finish quickly. In "figuring things out," either seeing decisions as opportunities or obstacles, college students find themselves caught up in a process of self-creation and re-creation. This simple observation about the college experience has neither been fully appreciated nor systematically explored. Yet the implications of casting student experiences as a series of choices that offer opportunities for re-creation have consequences for students and colleges alike. Students don't just start college and then finish it. They start and re-start college many times"

"Helps students recognize ethical issues and dilemmas, reason carefully about ethical issues, clarify their ethical aspirations at the level demanded by the profession, and achieve a more ethical stance in their practice. This title places ethical decision making within the context of professional ethics, and provides useful guidelines"

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas tentang regulasi terkait kewenangan dankompetensi analis kesehatan dan tenaga medis di Indonesia serta tanggung jawabnya hukum dalam menyelenggarakan praktik kedokteran dalam bentuk tindakan medis. Pembahasan dilakukan melalui studi artikel dan studi kasus bersama menggunakan keputusan No.55 / Pid.b / 2011 / PN.Lbt. Bentuk penelitian tesis ini adalah metode kualitatif yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa analis kesehatan tidak berwenang untuk melakukan praktik kedokteran dalam bentuktindakan medis dan karena itu harus bertanggung jawab atas kedua hukum tersebut pidana atau perdata.ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses regulations related to authority andcompetence of health analysts and medical personnel in Indonesia as well as their legal responsibilities in conducting medical practice in the form of medical procedures. The discussion was carried out through article studies and joint case studies using decision No.55 / Pid.b / 2011 / PN.Lbt. The form of this thesis research is a normative juridical qualitative method. The results of the study concluded that health analysts were not authorized to practice medicine in this formmedical action and therefore must be liable for both criminal or civil law."