Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perjanjian kemitraan merupakan pedoman bagi para pihak dalam melaksanakan suatu hubungan kemitraan yang berisi hak dan kewajiban para pihak. Dalam suatu hubungan kemitraan yang baik diperlukan diterapkannya suatu asas proporsionalitas agar tercipta bentuk hubungan kemitraan yang berlandaskan prinsip saling memerlukan, menguntungkan, dan memperkuat. Namun dalam perjanjian kemitraan GO-RIDE, PT GO-JEK Indonesia dan PT. Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa selaku perusahaan penyedia aplikasi dianggap merugikan mitra driver. Perjanjian kemitraan yang dibuat secara sepihak oleh perusahaan tersebut dianggap berdampak pada ketidakseimbangan hak dan kewajiban yang tidak mencerminkan keadilan dan asas proporsionalitas yang seharusnya diterapkan dalam perjanjian kemitraan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan dengan tipe penelitian yuridis-normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas proporsionalitas yang seharusnya diterapkan dalam perjanjian kemitraan GO-RIDE masih belum diterapkan dengan baik dalam tahap pra-kontraktual, pembentukan, isi, dan pelaksanaan kontrak.

---

Partnership agreement as the guideline for the parties in executing partnership project contains the rights and obligation of each party. In an ideal partnership agreement, it is very necessary to apply the principle of proportionality in order to create a form of partnership which is based on the mutual need, benefits of each party to create a win-win partnership. But in GO-RIDE partnership agreement, PT GO-JEK Indonesia and PT. Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa as the application provider company is considered to be detrimental to GO-RIDE driver. The partnership agreement which is made by the company is considered to have impact on the imbalance of rights and obligations that do not reflect justice and the principle of proportionality that should be applied in the partnership agreement. The research method used is library research with juridical-normative research type. The results of the study indicate that the principle of proportionality that should be applied in the GO-RIDE partnership agreement is still not well implemented in the pre-contractual, formation, content and implementation stages of the contract."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai penerapan asas proporsionalitas dalam melandasi pembagian hak dan kewajiban antara Pemberi Waralaba dan Penerima Waralaba dalam setiap proses perjanjian waralaba. Asas proporsionalitas ini akan dilihat dari peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendapat ahli hukum. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode kepustakaan dan wawancara narasumber. Hasil penelitian ini adalah perjanjian waralaba yang dibuat oleh para pihak dinilai sah dan telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Namun demikian, masih terdapat permasalahan dalam proses pembentukan dan pelaksanaan perjanjian yang kurang sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan mengenai waralaba. Permasalahan tersebut berpengaruh terhadap kurang tercapainya penerapan asas proporsionalitas yang baik dan fair. Penulis menyarankan agar pemerintah sebaiknya membuat ketentuan waralaba yang lebih spesifik dan terarah, serta lebih berorientasi pada prinsip proporsionalitas.

---

This thesis provides explanation regarding the implementation of principle of proportionality in distributing the rights and obligations for franchisor and franchisee in each process of franchise agreement, which will be observed from the perspective of law and doctrines. This thesis applies a normative legal study with bibligraphical method and interviews. Subsequently, it has discovered that the agreement made by the parties is valid and appropriate in accordance with the Indonesian Civil Code. However, there are considerable amount of matters in the process of formation and implementation of this agreement which do not comply with the current franchising law. These matters affect on how the principle of proportionality on this agreement cannot be achieved properly and fairly. The writer suggests that the government should provide more specific, direct and proportionality oriented provision on the franchising law."

""With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside the courts, and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak, and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside of courts and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world, but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"

""With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside the courts, and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak, and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside of courts and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world, but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"

"Skripsi ini membahas bagaimana keberlakuan asas proporsionalitas di dalam perjanjian, dalam hal ini adalah Processing Agreement, sebagai salah satu bentuk perjanjian yang berlaku di bidang pengusahaan gas bumi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan seorang narasumber. Dalam keberlakuannya, asas proporsionalitas sering disamakan artinya dengan asas keseimbangan, padahal keduanya memiliki pemaknaaan yang berbeda satu dengan yang lainnya, di mana asas keseimbangan lebih menekankan pada tujuan akhirnya, yaitu untuk mencapai posisi yang sama antara para pihak, sedangkan asas proporsionalitas lebih menekankan pada proses hingga terciptanya hak dan kewajiban dari para pihak di dalam perjanjian. Selain itu skripsi ini juga membahas apakah Processing Agreement telah memenuhi syarat-syarat sahnya perjanjian menurut Hukum Perjanjian yang berlaku di Indonesia dan Amerika. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Processing Agreement telah memenuhi syarat sahnya perjanjian di Indonesia dan Amerika, dan telah ditemukan pula keberlakuan dari asas proporsionalitas dalam pembentukan dan pelaksanaan Processing Agreement.

---

This thesis provides explanation the implementation of proportionality principle in an agreement, specifically in Processing Agreement as one of many contracts in oil and gas field. This thesis is a normative legal study with bibligraphical method and interviews. In the implementation, proportionality principle often given the same meaning as equality principle. Proportionality principle focuses on the process an agreement is made, while equality principle give more focus on the purpose of the principle itself, which is to create equality between parties.

This thesis also provides explanation on how Processing Agreement is said to be a legally binding agreement, based on contract law in Indonesia and in the United States of America. This thesis concludes that Processing Agreement is a legally binding agreement and there is the implementation of proportionality principle in the Processing Agreement."

"Ojol merupakan fenomena usaha baru yang muncul pada 2010 di Indonesia dengan kehadiran Gojek. Isu hukum yang muncul seiring dengan perkembangan ojol di Indonesia ialah keberlakuan hukum perburuhan dan hukum kemitraan terhadap perjanjian kemitraan ojol. Tulisan ini menganalisis poin-poin dalam hukum perburuhan dan hukum kemitraan guna menentukan ketentuan hukum yang sebenarnya berlaku dalam perjanjian kemitraan ojol. Hukum perburuhan dan hukum kemitraan memiliki perbedaan dalam hal subjek hukum, klausul-klausul, penyelesaian sengketa dan pengawasan. Perbedaan-perbedaan ini dipertegas oleh isi perjanjian kemitraan Gojek dan hasil wawancara terhadap pengemudi Gojek. Dari hasil analisis dampak perjanjian kemitraan Gojek bagi pengemudi Gojek, hukum yang berlaku terhadap perjanjian kemitraan ojol hanyalah hukum kemitraan dan bukan hukum perburuhan. Oleh sebab itu, perjanjian kemitraan ojol ke depannya harus mengalami penyesuaian pada bagian subjek hukum, klausul-klausul, penyelesaian sengketa dan pengawasan. Penyesuaian yang digunakan ialah aturan yang berlaku dalam hukum kemitraan di Indonesia.

---

Ojol is a new phenomenon that emerged in 2010 in Indonesia by the presence of Gojek. Legal issue that follows the development of ojol in Indonesia is the applicability of labour law and partnership law to ojol partnership agreement. This article analyzes points in labour law and partnership law to determine the law that applies in ojol partnership agreement. Labour law and partnership law have differences in term of legal subjects, clauses, dispute resolution and supervision. Theses differences are emphasized by the contents of Gojek partnership agreement and the result of interview with Gojek drivers. From the results of analyzing the impact of Gojek partnership agreement for Gojek dreiver, the law that applies in ojol partnership agreement is just partnership law and not labour law. Therefore, future ojol partnership agreement must undergo adjustments in term of legal subjects, clauses, dispute resolution and supervision. The adjustments must go according to partnership law in Indonesia."

"Hubungan kemitraan sebagai salah bentuk hubungan kerjasama antara pekebun kelapa sawit dengan perusahaan sebagai pemilik modal dan teknologi didasarkan pada suatu perjanjian yang dikenal sebagai perjanjian kemitraan inti plasma perkebunan kelapa sawit. Dalam implementasinya banyak terjadi kecurangan yang dilakukan perusahaan dalam hubungan ini. Notaris sebagai pejabat pembuat akta memiliki fungsi pengawasan yang dapat menutup peluang terjadinya kecurangan dengan cara menciptakan atau membuat perjanjian yang baik dengan pertimbangan-pertimbangan akibat hukum yang muncul dari perjanjian. Oleh karena itu sebaiknya perjanjian kemitraan perkebunan kelapa sawit dibuat dihadapan notaris agar tercapai keseimbangan dalam hubungan kemitraan perkebunan kelapa sawit.

---

Partnerships as one form of cooperative relations between oil palm planters with the company as the owners of capital and technology is based on an agreement known as the plasma core partnership agreement palm oil plantations. In the implementation of fraud by many companies in this relationship. Notary as an official deed maker has a supervisory function that could cover the possibility of fraud by creating or making good agreement with considerations of legal consequences that arise from the agreement. Therefore should the oil palm plantation partnership agreement made before a notary in order to achieve a balance in the partnership of oil palm plantations."