Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Storytelling merupakan strategi yang dapat digunakan dalam menyebarkan informasi, terutama dalam dunia kesehatan. Storytelling dalam kesehatan digunakan sebagai sarana untuk memberdayakan atau memberikan motivasi kepada seseorang, membujuk, dan juga memberikan pelajaran mengenai kesehatan. Tulisan ini ditujukan untuk membahas mengenai teknik penerapan storytelling sebagai upaya meningkatkan kesadaran terhadap pentingnya imunisasi dalam kampanye kesehatan kanker serviks. Konsep yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori rasionalitas naratif oleh Walter Fisher yang terdiri atas prinsip koherensi dan kebenaran. Konsepkedua yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah unsur dalam elemen storytelling oleh Joe Lambert yang terdiri atas insight, emotions, finding moment, visual, sounds, editing, dan sharing. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah riset evaluasi. Objek yang dievaluasi adalah 28 video yang dijadikan teaser dalam kampanye I am Truly Woman yang dilakukan oleh Koalisi Indonesia Cegah Kanker Serviks (KICKS). Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan, secara keseluruhan, teaser I am Truly Woman telah memenuhi prinsip dan unsur storytelling dengan baik.

---

Storytelling is a strategy that can be used to spread information, especially in health. Storytelling in health is used as a medium to empower or give motivation to someone, to persuade, as well as to give insights about health. This paper aims to discuss the application of storytelling as a means to raise awareness towards the importance of vaccines in health campaigns about cervical cancer. The first concept used in this study is the theory of narrative rationality by Walter Fisher, which consists of the principle of coherence and truth. The second concept used in this study is the theory about storytelling elements by Joe Lambert, which consists of insight, emotions, finding moment, visual, sounds, editing, and sharing. The method of this study is evaluation research. The objects evaluated are 28 teaser videos in the campaign I am Truly Woman by Koalisi Indonesia Cegah Kanker Serviks (KICKS). The result of the study shows that, overall, the teasers for the campaign I am Truly Woman complies the principles and elements of storytelling well."

"Latar Belakang: Kanker serviks merupakan ancaman bagi kesehatan reproduksi perempuan di Indonesia. Dengan metode skrining yang cost effective kanker serviks dapat dicegah, sehingga angka morbiditas dan mortalitas kanker serviks dapat diturunkan. Maka diperlukan metode alternatif yang lebih sederhana dan mampu laksana sebagai metode penapisan yang dapat mencakup lapisan masyarakat dengan sumber daya terbatas. Dengan prosedur skrining IVA atau VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid), diperkirakan mengurangi risiko kanker serviks seumur hidup sebesar 25%. Kekurangan IVA adalah bahwa metode ini bersifat subjektif dan interpretasi dapat bervariasi dari operator ke operator. Oleh karena itu, timbul pemikiran untuk melakukan dokumentasi IVA menggunakan kamera Smartphone yang disebut DoVIA (Documentation Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid). Bermodalkan dokumentasi IVA ini, dapat dilakukan konsultasi dan komunikasi dengan cara mengirimkan melalui aplikasi dan rangkaian kegiatan disebut TeleDoVIA (Telemedicine Documentation Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid). Tujuan: Evaluasi pemanfaatan Portal TeleDoVIA oleh tenaga medis dalam kegiatan skrining kanker serviks dengan metode IVA. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif. Dilaksanakan dalam periode Juli 2018-Januari 2019 dengan mengikut sertakan 82 orang Praktisi Medis yang mengirimkan 177 foto Dokumentasi IVA. Hasil: Praktisi Medis yang terlibat 59 orang (72 %) adalah bidan, 23 orang (28 %) adalah Dokter Umum yang bertugas di Puskesmas (92.7 %) dan Klinik Swasta (7.3%). Praktisi Medis yang berkonsultasi pada portal TeleDoVIA telah mencakup wilayah provinsi paling barat (Aceh) hingga Provinsi di Timur Indonesia (Papua Barat). Ketajaman gambar foto serviks dikatakan tajam sebesar (89.27%), hanya sebesar (10.73%) foto yang dikatakan kurang tajam. Mayoritas praktisi medis menerima jawaban dari konsultan dalam waktu >6-24 jam sebesar (44.1%). Praktisi medis yang mengaku paham sebesar (100 %) dan mengaku puas (100 %). Alasan praktisi medis melakukan konsultasi dengan alasan Konfirmasi (47.6%), Ragu (29.3%) dan Diskusi kasus (23.2%). Ketepatan diagnosis antara praktisi medis terhadap diagnosis konsultan sebesar (88.1%). Kesimpulan: Dengan Telemedicine Dovia dapat memudahkan praktisi medis mengirimkan dokumentasi IVA sebagai bahan diskusi dan konsultasi jarak jauh yang efektif.

---

Background: Cervical cancer is a threat to women's health in Indonesia. With the screening method that is cost effective cervical cancer can be prevented, so that the cervical cancer morbidity and mortality can be reduced. Then an alternative method that is simpler and more feasible as a screening method that can cover a layer of people with limited resources is needed. The screening procedure with IVA or VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid) has been estimated to reduce the risk of lifetime cervical cancer by 25%. The disadvantage of IVA is that this method is subjective and interpretation can vary from operator to operator. Therefore, the idea arises to conduct documentation VIA using a Smartphone camera. This examination is called TeleDoVIA (Telemedicine of Documentation on Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid). With this VIA documentation, consultation and communication can be done by sending through applications and these activities called TeleDoVIA (Telemedicine Documentation Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid).

Objective: Evaluation review of the use of TeleDoVIA Portal by medical personel in the Screening of cervical cancer using the IVA method.

Method: This study is a descriptive study and was conducted in the period July 2018 - January 2019 by including 82 medical practitioners who sent 177 IVA Documentation photos.

Results: Medical practitioners that involved as much 59 people (72%) were midwives, 23 people (28%) were general practitioners who served in Public Health Center (92.7%) and private clinics (7.3%). The closest home town of medical practitioners is Central Jakarta (24.4%) and the furthest from Fakfak in West Papua (1.2%). The sharpness of cervical photographic images is said to be sharp at 89.27%, only by 10.73% photos that are not sharp enough. The majority of medical practitioners receive answers from consultants within >6-24 hour is 44.1%. the accuracy of diagnosis between medical practitioners and consultant diagnosis is 88.1%. Medical practitioners who claim to understand (75.6%) and claim to be satisfied (76.8%). Medical practitioners consulted the TeleDoVIA portal for reasons of confirmation (47.6%), doubtful (29.3%) and discussion of cases (23.2%).

Conclusion: With the presence of Telemedicine Dovia, it can make it easier for medical practitioners to send IVA documentation as a more effective discussion and consultation material even from remote area."

"Kanker serviks uteri masih menjadi masalah kesehatan masyarakat di Indonesia. Kejadian kanker serviks uteri sebesar 12,6/100000 wanita dan angka kematiannya sebesar 7,0/100000 wanita (IARC, 2008). Hal ini dimungkinkan karena faktor resiko yang masih belum tertangani di masyarakat. Multi paritas (khususnya paritas > 4 kali) atau jumlah melahirkan pada wanita sebagai salah satu faktor resiko kanker serviks uteri ternyata masih tinggi di masyarakat. Penelitian ini ingin mengetahui pengaruh paritas > 4 kali terhadap kejadian kanker serviks uteri di 6 rumah sakit Indonesia. Penelitian dilakukan dengan desain kasus kontrol berbasis rumah sakit, dengan sampel sebanyak 364 wanita yang telah dipasangkan berdasarkan asal rumah sakit dan umur interval 10 tahun. Analisis multivariat menggunakan conditional logistic regression. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa paritas > 4 meningkatkan resiko kanker serviks uteri OR: 1,85 ; CI 95% (1,14 -3,02). Oleh karenanya usaha untuk pengembangan program yang dapat membatasi kelahiran seperti program Keluarga berencana akan membantu menurunkan terjadinya kasus serviks uteri.

---

Uterine cervical cancer is still a public health problem in Indonesia with incidence rate of 12.6 / 100,000 women and mortality rate 7.0 / 100,000 women. (IARC, 2008). Indonesian mortality rate is still high due to the risk factors that have not been handled in community. Multi parity (especially parity > 4) or total of women giving birth as a risk factor for uterine cervical cancer was still high. This study aims to determine the effect of parity > 4 to uterine cervical cancer. The study design is a hospital-based case-control, which samples were taken from 6 hospitals and then matched by hospital and age interval of 10 years. Multivariate analysis using conditional logistic regression shows the parity > 4 increases the risk of uterine cervical cancer OR: 1.85, CI 95% (1.14 -3.02). Therefore, efforts to develop programs that can limit births as family planning program will help reduce the occurrence of cases of cervix uteri."

"Wanita yang menderita kanker serviks stadium lanjut mengalami malodor yang akan mengganggu kualitas hidupnya. Perawat memiliki kewajiban untuk membantu pasien dengan menggunakan pendekatan teori Unpleasant Symptom dan Self Care. Dengan menggunakan teori Unpleasant Symptom pasien dibimbing untuk mengenali keluhan dan dampak yang mungkin terjadi pada dirinya, sedangkan dengan teori Self Care pasien dibimbing untuk mengenali potensi dirinya dalam mengatasi keluhannya secara mandiri sesuai dengan kemampuan diri dan support systemnya. Dengan berdasar kepada dua konsep yang dikolaborasikan, dilakukan implementasi evidence based practice nursing (EBPN) menggunakan intervensi perawatan luka kanker dengan menggunakan formula topikal standar dengan melibatkan pasien dan keluarga. Hasil menunjukan bahwa perawatan luka kanker dengan formula topikal standar dapat mengurangi instensitas malodor dan meningkatkan gambaran diri pasien.

---

Woman with advance cervical cancer will experience malodour which would influence their quality of life. Nurses has a responsibility to help patient by using the Unpleasant Symptom and Self Care theory approaches. Using the Unpleasant Symptom theory, the patient is guided to recognize symptom and the effect that may occur to herself, whereas with the self care theory the patient is hint to know her own potential and manage her symptom independently according to her abilities and support system. Based on two colaborative concepts, evidence based practice nursing is implemented. Intervention given by nurse involved patients and families in giving a cancer wound care using standard topical formulas. The result show that wound care with standard topical formula effective to reduce malodour and improving patient self image."

"ABSTRAKTujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesintasan hidup pasien kanker serviks dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya.Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kohort retrospektif dengan analisis kesintasan. Pasien kanker serviks yang didiagnosis di Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo pada 1 Januari 2005 sampai 31 Desember 2006 dimasukkan dalam penelitian ini. Dilakukan pendataan tanggal dan umur saat diagnosis, tingkat pendidikan, stadium, jenis histopatologi, diferensiasi tumor, invasi limfovaskuler, jenis terapi, dan lengkapnya terapi. Jika pasien menjalani operasi, dinilai pula adanya tumor pada kelenjar getah bening(KGB) atau batas sayatan. Selanjutnya pasien diamati sampai minimal 5 tahun apakah pasien masih hidup. Kemudian dilakukan analisis kesintasan dengan metode Kaplan Meier. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesintasan dinilai dengan analisis Cox regression.Hasil: Diperoleh 447 pasien kanker serviks dalam kajian ini. Didapatkan median survival keseluruhan pasien kanker serviks 1916 hari (63 bulan) dengan kesintasan hidup 5 tahun 52%. Faktor umur, pendidikan, jenis pembiayaan, ukuran tumor, dan adanya invasi limfovaskuler tidak menunjukkan adanya perbedaan kesintasan. Stadium III dan IV memiliki kesintasan hidup yang lebih rendah dengan Hazard Ratio 3.27 dan 6.44. Diferensiasi buruk dan terapi tidak lengkap memiliki kesintasan yang lebih rendah dengan HR 2.26 dan 2.22. Jenis histopatologi lain-lain memiliki kesintasan yang lebih rendah dengan HR 2.85, namun tidak menunjukkan perbedaan bermakna pada uji multivariat. Pada pasien yang menjalani operasi disertai adanya tumor pada KGB menunjukkan kesintasan yang lebih rendah dengan HR 12.01, sedangkan adanya tumor pada batas sayatan tidak menunjukkan perbedaan kesintasan yang bermakna. Jenis terapi pada stadium awal ataupun sradium lanjut tidak menunjukkan perbedaan pada uji multivariat.Kesimpulan: Median survival pasien kanker serviks adalah 63 bulan. Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh secara independen terhadap kesintasan pasien kanker serviks adalah stadium, diferensiasi tumor, kelengkapan terapi, dan adanya tumor pada kelenjar getah bening.

---

ABSTRACTObjective: To find out of the probability of 5 years survival rate on cervical cancer patients and to identify the influencing factors.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Cervical cancer patients treated at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in 2005-2006 were selected. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Demographic data collected were diagnosis time, age, and education level. Clinical data collected were stage, histopathology, differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and therapy. The appearance of the tumor on the specimen margin and lymphnodes was also noted in the patient underwent surgery. All the patients were followed up for minimal 5 years to know whether the patient was alive. Kaplan Meier methods was used to determine the survival rate probability and Cox regression analysis was used to assessed the factors influencing the cervical cancer survivalResult: A total of 447 cervical cancer patients was enrolled to this study. Median survival of these patients was 63 months and the overall 5-years survival probability was 52%. Age, education level, funding source, tumor size, and lymph-vascular invasion showed no significant differences on cervical cancer survival. Stage III and IV had lower survival probability (Hazard Ratio 3.27 and 6.44). Poor differentiated tumor and uncompleted therapy also had lower survival probability (HR 2.26 and 2.22). Histopathology of others had lower survival probability(HR 2.85), but wasn't significant on multivariate analysis. The presence of tumor on the cervical cancer specimen during operation showed worse survival probability (HR 12.01), otherwise the presence of tumor on specimen margin didn't show difference survival. Therapy types didn't showed any differences, either on early and advanced stage.Conclusion: Cervical cancer median survival was 63 months. Independent influencing factors in this study were cancer’s stage, tumor differentiation, therapy completeness, and the presence of the tumor on the pelvic lymph nodes specimen during operation."

"Kanker serviks merupakan kanker kedua yang umum terjadi pada wanita yang da- pat menjadi ganas. Keganasan dapat disebabkan oleh deregulasi jalur sinyal Wnt/β- katenin. Inhibisi TNKS2 dengan ligan inhibitor dapat menjadi salah satu cara un- tuk menghentikan deregulasi ini. Ligan-ligan inhibitor yang berhasil terbentuk dari fragmen-fragmen akan ditapiskan secara in silico untuk mendapatkan ligan kandi- dat obat terbaik yang lebih baik dari ligan inhibitor standar. Ligan dengan kode 1-69 merupakan ligan inhibitor yang lebih baik jika dilihat dari energi pengikatan, kelarutan, total polar surface area.

---

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women which can be ma- lignant. Malignancy can be caused by deregulation oleh Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Inhibition of TNKS2 with ligand inhibitor can be an alternative way to stop this deregulation. All of the inhibitors which assembled from fragments were screened in silico to get the best hit which is better than standard inhibitor. Ligand with codename 1-69 is a better inhibitor than the standard in the term of binding energy, solubility and total polar surface area."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan. Penelitian ini membahas perbandingan performa diagnostik antara pemeriksaan ultrasonografi dengan pemeriksaan klinis dalam mengukur ukuran lesi primer kanker serviks.Metode. Dilakukan uji diagnostik potong-lintang secara retrospektif terhadap pasien kanker serviks stadium IB di RSUPN Dr. Ciptomangunkusumo dari tahun 2009 hingga tahun 2014. Nilai diagnostik dari kedua pemeriksaan dihitung dengan luaran: sensitivitas, spesifisitas, nilai prediksi positif, nilai prediksi negatif, dan akurasi. Uji kesesuaian dari kedua pemeriksaan juga dihitung dengan ukuran makroskopik sebagai standar baku emas.Hasil. Dari periode tahun 2009 hingga tahun 2014, didapatkan 92 subjek yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dengan komposisi yaitu 65 kasus (70%) kanker serviks stadium IB1 dan 27 kasus (30%) kanker serviks stadium IB2. Ultrasonografi didapatkan memiliki nilai diagnostik yaitu sensitivitas 92%, spesifisitas 96%, nilai prediksi positif 92%, nilai prediksi negatif 96%, dan akurasi 95%. Sementara itu, pemeriksaan klinis didapatkan memiliki nilai diagnostik yaitu sensitivitas 51%, spesifisitas 92%, nilai prediksi positif 73%, nilai prediksi negatif 82%, dan akurasi 80%. Dari perhitungan kesesuaian antara ukuran pemeriksaan ultrasonografi dan ukuran makroskopik, didapatkan perbedaan rata-rata 0,56 cm. Sementara itu, dari perhitungan kesesuaian antara ukuran pemeriksaan klinis dan ukuran makroskopik, didapatkan perbedaan rata-rata 0,97 cm.Kesimpulan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemeriksaan ultrasonografi memiliki performa diagnostik yang lebih baik dibandingkan pemeriksaan klinis dalam mengukur ukuran lesi primer kanker serviks.

---

ABSTRACTObjective. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of ultrasound and clinical examination in measuring the size of primary tumor of cervical cancer.Methods. It is a retrospective cross sectional study for patients with cervical cancer stage IB in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital from 2009 to 2014. Diagnostic value of both examinations were calculated with outcome: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Resemblance test of both examinations were also calculated with macroscopic size as the gold standart.Result. From period 2009 until 2014, there were 92 subject which fulfilled the inclusion criteria, consisted of 65 cases (70%) cervical cancer stage IB1 and 27 cases (30%) cervical cancer stage IB2. Ultrasonografi was found to have diagnostic values as follow: sensitivity 92%, specificity 96%, positive predictive value 92%, negative predictive value 96%, and accuracy 95%. Meanwhile, clinical examination was found to have diagnostic values as follow: sensitivity 51%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 73%, negative predictive value 82%, and accuracy 80%. From the calculation of resemblance between ultrasound and macroscopic size, there was an average difference approximately 0.56 cm. Meanwhile, from the calculation of resemblance between clinical examination and macroscopic size, there was an average difference approximately 0.97 cm.Conclusion. It can be concluded that the ultrasound has better diagnostic value compare to clinical examaination in examining the size of primary tumor of cervical cancer., Objective. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of ultrasound and clinical examination in measuring the size of primary tumor of cervical cancer. Methods. It is a retrospective cross sectional study for patients with cervical cancerstage IB in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital from 2009 to 2014. Diagnostic value of bothexaminations were calculated with outcome: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,negative predictive value, and accuracy. Resemblance test of both examinations were alsocalculated with macroscopic size as the gold standart. Result. From period 2009 until 2014, there were 92 subject which fulfilled the inclusioncriteria, consisted of 65 cases (70%) cervical cancer stage IB1 and 27 cases (30%) cervicalcancer stage IB2. Ultrasonografi was found to have diagnostic values as follow: sensitivity92%, specificity 96%, positive predictive value 92%, negative predictive value 96%, andaccuracy 95%. Meanwhile, clinical examination was found to have diagnostic values as follow:sensitivity 51%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 73%, negative predictive value 82%,and accuracy 80%. From the calculation of resemblance between ultrasound and macroscopicsize, there was an average difference approximately 0.56 cm. Meanwhile, from the calculationof resemblance between clinical examination and macroscopic size, there was an averagedifference approximately 0.97 cm. Conclusion. It can be concluded that the ultrasound has better diagnostic value compare to clinical examaination in examining the size of primary tumor of cervical cancer.]"

"Tujuan penelitian ini untuk memperoleh gambaran secara mendalam tentang makna pengalaman suami dengan istri yang mengalami kanker serviks. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan cara wawancara mendalam. Pada penelitian ini ditemukan 9 tema yaitu : 1). Respon awal suami terhadap diagnosa kanker servik, 2). Pemahaman suami terhadap kanker serviks 3). Memberi dukungan kepada istri. 4). Memperoleh dukungan keluarga atau kerabat. 5). Bentuk penyesuaian suami terhadap istri dengan kanker serviks. 6). Pelajaran atau hikmah yang diperoleh setelah istri sakit. 7). Koping suami. 8). Harapan suami terhadap pengobatan istri. 9). Harapan suami terhadap pelayanan keperawatan. Peran perawat sangat dibutuhkan untuk dapat memberikan konseling pada pasangan.

---

Based on the study's purpose discriptive phenomenology was selected as appropriate design to discovery the essence of the experience. Results nine theme: 1). Experience during diagnosis period. 2). Husband's knowledge abaout cervical cancer. 3). Give social support for wive.4). Received social support from family and significant others. 5). Husband Adjustment with cervical cancer wive's. 6). Finding meaning in disease. 7). Husband cope. 8) Hoping wive-treatment. 9). Hoping with nursing care practice.Nurses roles needed for husbands and his partners to given counseling. And given about cervical cancer to increase husbands knowledged."