Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tujuan penelitian ini secara umum adalah untuk mendeskripsikan latar dalam novel Pertemuan Dua Hati, sedangkan secara khusus untuk menginterpretasikan latar fisik dan latar sosial novel tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan model penelitian kualitatif. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan struktural. Sumber datanya berasal dari novel yang berjudul Pertemuan Dua Hati karya Nh. Dini yang diterbitkan oleh PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, tahun 1992, cetakan keenam, dan terdiri dari 85 halaman. Berdasarkan hasil analisis terhadap novel tersebut, latar fisik yang disajikan pengarang cukup baik. Hal ini terlihat dari keterangan mengenai rumah dan daerah. Selanjutnya, latar sosial yang disajikan pengarang cukup baik. Hal ini terlihat dari pemaparan tentang keadaan ekonomi, pandangan hidup, dan sikap hidup tokoh.

---

The purpose of this study commonly described aboutthe background ofthe Pertemuan Dua Hati noveland specifically interpretedits physical background and social setting. The researchuseddescriptive method with qualitative research model. The research approach was usingstructural approach. The source of the data was taken from a novel entitled Pertemuan Dua Hatiby Nh. Dini which had been published by PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, in 1992, the sixth printing, and consists of 85 pages. Based on the analysis,itconcluded that the physical settingthat presentedbythe author was quite well. This can be seen from the description of the house and the area. Furthermore, the social background thatpresented by the author wasgood enough. It has been e xplanated from the conditional economy, the views of life and the attitude of the character."

"In general, the difference between qualitative and quantitative research canbe seen from the characteristics of data used (measured versus observed), datacollection methods (structured interview versus in-depth interview, participantobservation), and clearly, from the method of analysis. Example is quantitativeresearch with quantitative guidance (level of significance in hypothesis measuring,factor analysis in creating construct validity estimation of a variable measuring,and so on). Indeed, we need to analyze some of the questions related with thediffering between both, that include: do all qualitative research are researcheswhich emphasized in subjectivity and reflexivity? Do all qualitative researchemergent or exploratory in nature? Do all qualitative research ideographic innature? Isn?t there one research that nomothetic? How about the results foundusing proposition from the perspective of social construction of reality? Some of theanswers from the questions above will be discussed in this article."