Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKThe capability of the Internal Government Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) is the ability to carry out supervisory tasks consisting of three interrelated elements: capacity, authority, and competence. The objective of this research is to give policy recommendations for enhanced APIP capability in the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Health. This research is a descriptive study with qualitative analysis method with in-depth interview and literature study. Results of this research indicate that there are some obstacles: the socialization done only to some employees of Itjen; no Special Team on the process of improving APIP capability; the time and task division is unclear; has no special budget yet; there has not been a derivative rule from the Internal Audit Charter (IAC); no reward and punishment system; no documentation of supervision working papers; the policy has not been internalized. This research concludes that the implementation of the policy has not been reached optimally based on PERKA BPKP Number PER-1633/K/JF/2011. Communication is the most influential factor in the implementation of APIP enhancement policy. The recommendation from this research are consistently socialize to employees within the Inspectorate General, make Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), allocate budget activities in 2018, create memorandum of understanding with other agencies, and self-assessment and program evaluation absolutely must do continuously."

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui level kapabilitas APIP sesuai dengan kerangka Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM) dan mengeksplorasi penyebab APIP tersebut belum mencapai level 3. Objek dalam penelitian ini adalah Inspektorat Kota Serang. Inspektorat Kota Serang dipilih menjadi objek penelitian karena Inspektorat Kota Serang masih berada pada level 2 dan yang terburuk di Provinsi Banten. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan wawancara dan analisis dokumen pendukung kemudian dibandingkan dengan indikator penilaian APIP berdasarkan peraturan BPKP. Hasil wawancara dianalisis menggunakan thematic analysis untuk mencari penyebab utama permasalahan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Level kapabilitas Inspektorat Kota Serang berada pada Level 2 infrastructure. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 6 penyebab kapabilitas Inspektorat Kota Serang tidak dapat mencapai level 3 yaitu kekurangan sumber daya manusia (SDM), lack of direction, motivational problems, personnal limitation, kurangannya dukungan pimpinan dan keterbatasan anggaran.

---

This research aims is to examine the level of APIP capability according to the Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM) and to explore the main causes why its capability has not reached level 3. The object in this reserach is the Inspectorate of Serang City. The Inspectorate of Serang City was chosen it was still at level 2 or the worst in Banten Province. The research method was carried out by interviewing and analyzing supporting documents then compared with the APIP assessment indicators based on the BPKP regulations. The results of the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis to find the main causes of the problem. The results show that the capability level of the Inspectorate City of Serang is at Level 2 infrastructure. The results also show that there are six main causes of the capability of the Inspectorate of Serang City not being able to reach level 3, such as lack of human resources (HR), lack of direction, motivational problems, personnal limitation, lack of leadership support and budget constraints."

"Dalam rangka memastikan bahwa kegiatan audit telah dilaksanakan sesuai denganstandar audit dan kode etik, pemerintah menetapkan kebijakan melalui Permen-PAN RBNomor 19 Tahun 2009 sebagai pedoman pengendalian mutu audit. Itjen Kemenkes RItelah membangun sistem pengendalian mutu audit, namun berdasarkan hasil penilaiantingkat kapablitas APIP melalui penilaian IACM menunjukkan hasil bahwa kegiatanaudit belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan sesuai dengan standar audit. Untuk itu penelitimerasa perlu untuk melakukan analisis implementasi pengendalian mutu audit untukmemperoleh gambaran dan informasi mendalam terkait bagaimana implementasipengendalian mutu audit di Itjen Kemenkes RI. Penelitian menggunakan metodekualitatif dengan tehnik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam , FGD dantelaah dokumen, sehingga triangulasi dilakukan dengan membandingkan informasi yangdiperoleh dari beberapa informan yang berbeda dan membandingkan dengan hasil telaahdokumen.Hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa Itjen Kemenkes telah membangun sistemkendali mutu audit namun prosedur pengendalian mutu audit belum sepenuhnyadilaksanakan sesuai langkah-langkah pengendalian mutu audit dalam Permen-PAN RBNomor 19 Tahun 2009 dan ouput yang dihasilkan belum sepenuhnya sesuai denganstandar audit. Selain itu belum memiliki rancangan dan belum menetapkan programpenjaminan dan peningkatan kualitas sehingga belum adanya mekanisme untukevaluasi/reviu dan penilaian atas kesesuaian kegiatan audit intern dengan standar auditserta evaluasi terhadap penerapan kode etik oleh auditor. Faktor penghambat belumoptimalnya pelaksanaan pengendalian mutu audit ini adalah dari aspek komunikasi masihbelum optimal sehingga perlu ditingkatkan terutama komunikasi pada tingkat pelaksanakebijakan. Pelaksanaan pengendalian mutu audit melekat pada bagian yangmelaksanakan tugas pokok fungsinya sehingga perlu adanya bagian/tim yangmengkoordinasikan untuk melakukan monitoring, evaluasi dan penilaian secara berkaladan berkelanjutan terhadap pelaksanaan pengendalian mutu audit, disamping itu perlumelengkapi pedoman/SOP yang mengatur mekanisme pengendalian dan penjaminanmutu audit. Sumber daya baik SDM, fasilitas dan anggaran masih perlu mendapatperhatian guna mendukung pelaksanaan kebijakan dan yang tidak kalah penting adalahperlunya meningkatkan komitmen dari seluruh pelaksana kebijakan.

---

In order to ensure that audit activities have been carried out in accordance with auditingstandards and codes of conduct, the government sets the policy through Permen PANRB Number 19 of 2009 as a guideline for audit quality control. Itjen Kemenkes RI hasestablished an audit quality control system, but based on the assessment of APIPcapability level through IACM assessment shows that audit activities have not been fullyimplemented in accordance with audit standards. For that researchers feel the need toperform analysis of audit quality control implementation to obtain an overview and indepthinformation related to how the implementation of quality control audit in ItjenKemenkes RI. The study used qualitative methods with data collection techniquesthrough in depth interviews, FGD and document review, so triangulation was done bycomparing the information obtained from several different informants and comparing theresults of the document review.

The result of the research shows that Itjen Kemenkes hasbuilt an audit quality control system but audit quality control procedure has not been fullyimplemented according to audit quality control measures in PER PAN RB Number 19 of2009 and the resultant output is not fully in accordance with audit standard. Besides, ithas not yet designed and has not established the quality assurance and improvementprogramme so that there is no mechanism for evaluation review and assessment on theconformity of internal audit activities with audit standards and evaluation on theapplication of code of ethics by the auditor. The inhibiting factor is not optimal theimplementation of audit quality control is from the aspect of communication is still notoptimal so it needs to be improved especially communication at the level of implementingthe policy. Implementation of audit quality control attached to the part that performs themain task of its function so that the need for a section team that coordinate to conductmonitoring, evaluation and assessment periodically and continuously to theimplementation of quality control of audit, besides need to complete guidance SOPwhich arrange mechanism of quality control and quality assurance of audit. Resources of human resources, facilities and budgets still need attention to support the implementation of the policy and no less important is the need to increase the commitmentof all policy implementers.Key words Audit quality control Inspectorate General Regulation of Minister of Empowerment of State Apparatus number 19 of 2009 PKMA."

"ABSTRAKData and information on the health profile of Indonesia in 2016 showed only 29.5% of infants receive exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months, the low level of exclusive breastfeeding made the government issue a regulation on exclusive breastfeeding in Government Regulation Number 33 of 2012. The study aimed to analyze the policy implementation of exclusive breastfeeding at Cicalengka Community Health Center. The study used qualitative analysis with in-depth interview method, focus group discussion and literature study. The result of this study shows that breastfeeding policy implementation in health centers is not optimal, as seen from the low coverage of exclusive breastfeeding. Socialization of the policy has not been done as a whole, the time and task division is unclear and has no special budget and the standard operating procedures is not really used in carrying out the policy. Communication is the most influential factor in the implementation of the policy. There is no support and commitment from all employees in the implementation of exclusive breastfeeding policy. The suggestion is to consistently socialize to employees and the public, carry out supervision in an effort to secure the policy, run the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), allocate budget activities in 2018, create a memorandum of understanding with other agencies, and Self-assessment and program evaluation absolutely must do continuously."

"Penelitian ini akan melihat implementasi dari kebijakan Thaksin Shinawatra dan dampaknya terhadap masyarakat miskin di Thailand. Studi kasus yang akan digunakan adalah kebijakan kesehatan 30 Bath periode tahun 2001-2006 yaitu ketika Thaksin menjabat sebagai Perdana Menteri. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dampak yang dirasakan oleh masyarakat miskin setelah kebijakan ini diterapkan. Pertanyaan penelitian yang disusun adalah Bagaimana dampak implementasi Thaksin Shinawatra terkait kebijakan kesehatan 30 Bath kepada masyarakat miskin di Thailand? Dari pertanyaan tersebut terdapat hipotesis kerja yang datang dari pendapat penulis yaitu bahwa implementasi kebijakan Thaksin ini dianggap tidak efektif dan tidak sesuai dengan rencana yang telah dijanjikan karena masih terdapat masyarakat yang tidak merasakan kebijakan ini. Hipotesis tersebut akan dianalisis dalam penelitian ini dengan menggunakan data yang ada. Hasil dari penelitian ini menganggap bahwa dalam implementasi kebijakan kesehatan 30 Bath masih terdapat penyelewengan. Hal ini berdampak negatif kepada masyarakat miskin di desa. Dampak positif sifatnya lebih umum dibandingkan dampak negatif yang dirasakan langsung oleh masyarakat miskin ketika implementasi berjalan.

---

This research will look at implementation from Thaksin Shinawatra's policy and its impact towards poor society in Thailand. The case study to be used is health policy 30 Bath period 2001-2006 when Thaksin served as Prime Minister. The purpose of this research is to know the impact felt by the poor after this policy is implemented. The research question is how is Thaksin Shinawatra's implementation impact related to health policy 30 Bath to the poor in Thailand? From the question there is a working hypothesis that comes from the author's opinion that the implementation of Thaksin's policy is considered ineffective and not in accordance with the plan that has been promised because there are still people who do not feel this policy. The hypothesis will be analyzed in this study by using existing data. The results of this study assume that in the implementation of health policy 30 Bath there is still a diversion. This has a negative impact on the poor in the village. Positive impacts are more common than the negative impacts felt by the poor when the implementation works."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan bahan berbahaya dan beracun (B3) pasca akreditasi JCI di RSUPN dr.Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta Tahun 2014. Fokus penelitian ini adalah implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan B3 dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya yaitu komunikasi, sumber daya, disposisi dan stuktur birokrasi. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah berdasarkan data dari laporan ronde manajemen dimana banyak temuan-temuan pengelolaan B3 di lapangan pasca akreditasi JCI yang tidak sesuai dengan prosedur-prosedur yang telah ditetapkan dalam kebijakan pengelolaan B3 dan juga dilihat dari data Unit K3RS dimana terjadi beberapa insiden yang dilaporkan terkait dengan pengelolaan B3 pasca akreditasi JCI. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara mendalam, observasi tak berstruktur dan telaah dokumen. Pemilihan informan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Analisa data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis isi (content analysis).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan B3 pasca akreditasi JCI di RSUPN dr.Cipto Mangunkusumo belum berjalan dengan baik. Pada faktor komunikasi: Transmisi yang kurang maksimal, ketidakjelasan kebijakan dimana secara isi yang belum lengkap dan penyampaiannya ke lapangan belum optimal serta pelaksanaan kebijakan yang belum konsisten. Selanjutnya, pada faktor sumber daya: SDM, fasilitas dan anggaran masih belum memadai. Pada faktor disposisi implementor yang juga belum baik, para pelaksana kebijakan secara umum kurang cukup kuat memiliki komitmen untuk mendukung pelaksanaan kebijakan pengelolaan B3 ini. Terakhir faktor struktur birokrasi: Mekanisme pelaksanaan, koordinasi dan monitoring yang belum berjalan efektif.

---

This study was conducted to analyze the implementation of hazardous materials management's policy after JCI accreditation in RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo 2014. Focus of this research is the implementation of hazardous materials management's policy and factors that influence it, namely communication, resources, disposition and structure bureaucracy.

Issues raised in this research report are based on data from the management rounds where many findings in the field of management of hazardous materials after JCI accreditation is not in accordance with the procedures set out in the hazardous materials management's policy is also seen from the data of K3RS unit where there is some incident were reported to be associated with the hazardous materials management's policy after JCI accreditation.

This research method is qualitative with data collection techniques using in-depth interviews, observation and unstructured document review. Selection of informants using purposive sampling technique. Analysis of the data in this study using content analysis.

The results showed that the implementation of hazardous materials management's policy after JCI accreditation in RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo not going well. In the communication factor: Transmission less than the maximum, where policy uncertainty is incomplete contents and its delivery to the field is not optimal and the implementation of policies that have not been consistent. Furthermore, the factor of resources: human resources, facilities and budgets are not sufficient.

At the implementor disposition factors that also have not been good, the policy implementers generally have less commitment to perform strong enough to support the implementation of this hazardous materials management's policy. Last, bureaucratic structure factor: Mechanism implementation, monitoring and coordination made that have not been effective."

"Penelitian ini mengenai Implementasi Program JKN (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional) di RSUD Pasar Rebo. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist yang bersifat deskriptif yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui Implementasi Program JKN (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional) di RSUD Pasar Rebo yang diukur melalui Indikator-Indikator implementasi kebijakan. Jumlah Informan dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 15 orang, teknik pengumpulan data dengan menggunakan wawancara mendalam dan observasi. Hasil dari Implementasi Program JKN (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional) di RSUD Pasar Rebo adalah masih banyak masalah yang disebabkan oleh minimnya SDM, kerumitan sistem INA-CBG's, masalah pembiayaan klaim dan sosialisasi JKN.

---

This research is about the implementation of JKN Program (National Health Insurance) in Pasar Rebo Hospital. This study uses a post-positivist approach which aims to determine the Program Implementation JKN (National Health Insurance) in Pasar Rebo Hospital as measured by Indicators of policy implementation. Number of Informants in this study around to 18 people, the techniques of data collection using in-depth interviews and observation. Result of the Implementation of JKN Program (National Health Insurance) in Pasar Rebo Hospital is still having a lot of problems caused by the lack of human resources, the complexity of the system INA-CBG's financing problems and socialization JKN claims."

"The Doha Miinisterial Conference in 2001 launched the Doha Round with an ambitious Doha Development Agenda (hereinafter "DDA") that focusses on the core market access issues of agriculture, non-agricultural market access (hereinafter "NAMA") and services. Today, after more than a decade of negotiations, conclusion of the DDA is nowhere in sight. The negotiations were in fact suspended in 2006, but resumed in 2007. The Bali Ministerial Conference in December 2013 achieved some measure of success under the new Director General Roberto Azevedo. In particular, since the DDA launch, Ministers have now agreed on a final Trade Faciliation. "