Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This article examines domestic and international critiques of the literature of the Vietnamese-language writer Khái Hưng, who was active from the French colonial period to the eve of the Indochina War. It then explores changes and continuities in Vietnamese literary criticism in light of changes in the nation’s cultural policies. Khái Hưng was one of seven members and the most prolific writer of the Self-Reliant Literary Group, founded in 1933 in Hanoi. In 1941 he was arrested by the French for anticolonial activities. Following World War II, he supported the Vietnamese Nationalist Party as an editor of the Party’s newspapers. In 1946 he was captured by the Communist-led Việt Minh, and in 1947 he was executed. On the grounds that he was involved in the Party against the Việt Minh and was purged by the Việt Minh, few serious studies have been conducted on Khái Hưng despite his stature as a leading writer in the 1930s and 1940s. Although former South Vietnamese scholars recognized the importance of Khái Hưng’s late works, they had to start by collecting these materials, which had been scattered due to national division and war; also, South Vietnamese students of literature tended to prefer the study of foreign literature to domestic literature. After the fall of the former South Vietnam, those who fled abroad as refugees had to start earning a living from scratch. Therefore, few of them studied literature at academic institutions, and little serious research was conducted on Khái Hưng, including his activities in the latter years of his life. However, as Đỗ Lai Thúy points out, avoiding such “sensitive issues” in Vietnam makes it difficult to truly understand the country. This paper carefully traces the treatment of the literature created by Khái Hưng, who was recognized as a “sensitive issue.” At the same time, it attempts to dismantle the formula that was constructed with the rise of social realism: romanticism=bourgeoisie=decadence=reaction, which has become a simplified and somewhat established theory in Vietnamese literary history since Khái Hưng’s death. Focusing on a specific writer reveals the complex ways in which the cultural policies of a war-torn nation were operationalized at the civilian level."

"Karya sastra yang dihasilkan di dunia Sastra Indonesia begitu banyak jenisnya, baik dari sisi genre dan tema karya, ragam tulisan, sampai kepada bentuk fisik yang bermacam bentuknya. Pusat Dokumentasi Sastra H.B. Jassin (disingkat PDS HB Jassin) adalah salah satu lembaga yang bertugas untuk mendokumentasikan perkembangan dunia sastra tersebut, melalui pengumpulan koleksi karya sastra yang ada. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah tindakan preservasi yang dilakukan oleh PDS HB Jassin telah berhasil dilaksanakan dengan landasan teori piramida preservasi yang dikemukakan oleh Teygeler (2001). Metode penelitian yang dilakukan untuk menyusun tulisan ini adalah metode kualitatif melalui wawancara dan observasi, kajian dokumen. Masa transisi ke gedung sementara menjadi permasalahan utama yang diangkat di dalam tulisan ini, karena di dalam masa transisi ini tindakan preservasi yang dilakukan PDS HB Jassin terganggu. Secara umum, tindakan preservasi dapat dilaksanakan, namun tidak secara maksimal terkendala ketersediaan ruangan preservasi dan depo arsip yang terbatas, serta belum lengkapnya alat dan bahan untuk melakukan tindakan preservasi dokumen sastra.

---

There are many kinds of literary works produced in the world of Indonesian literature, both in terms of genres and themes of works, variety of writings, and various physical forms. H.B. Jassin Literary Documentation Center (abbreviated as PDS HB Jassin) is one of the institutions tasked to document the development of the literary world, through the collection of existing literary collections. This paper aims to see whether the preservation measures carried out by PDS HB Jassin have been successfully implemented on the basis of the preservation pyramid theory proposed by Teygeler (2001). The research method conducted in this paper is a qualitative method through interview, observation, and document review. The main problem raised in this paper is the transition period to a temporary building, causing a disruption during this transitional period in conducting the preservation actions carried out by PDS HB Jassin. In general, preservation actions can be carried out, but they are constrained by the availability of limited preservation rooms and archive depots, and the incomplete tools and materials for preserving literary documents."