Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"his book explores the unintended and unanticipated effects associated with ̀modernization' projects and tackles the key question that they provoke---why do policy-makers persist in such enterprises in the face of evidence that they tend to fail?" "Paradoxes of Modernization first discusses what is meant by ̀modernization' and ̀unintended consequences', placing public policy reform within more general intellectual and social trends. It presents eight case study ̀modernization' projects. Their architects promised faster trains, a more efficient and reactive health service, a more motivated public service, better performing local government, enhanced information for prospective US university students, reduced rates of child mainutrition in developing countries, and a free, open, safe, interconnected cyberspace for people to conduct their social and political life. Each case provdes a neat story with a paradox that varies the modernization theme and tackles the question: why was the project pursued? The conclusion categorizes the cases in terms of their outcome, from success to disappointment, and suggests some strategies for a more balanced version of modernization for current and future policy-makers"

"This paper discusses the current government bureaucratic problems in Indonesia that are multi-dimensional and protracted as a vicious circle. Government bureaucracy reform efforts in Indonesia will not be successful if they are still carried out in linear mindset that does not address the root of the problem. This paper also discusses how systemic and dynamic approaches to good governance can create the leverage to get rid of vicious circle in innovative ways. The result is in order to solve this complex and dynamic problem we need more comprehensive strategies which include four major areas, that is, political leadership, public policy harmonization (including rules and regulations), the application of merit system in all government agencies, and anti corruption movement.

---

Penelitian ini membahas masalah birokrasi pemerintah di Indonesia, yang multi-dimensi dan berlarut-larut sebagai lingkaran setan, dan membahas bagaimana pendekatan sistemik dan dinamis untuk tata kelola yang baik dapat menciptakan memanfaatkan untuk keluar dari lingkaran setan dan kemerosotan dengan cara-cara yang inovatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini, untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan yang dinamis dan kompleks diperlukan strategi komprehensif yang terdiri dari empat area yaitu, kepemimpinan politik, harmonisasi kebijakan publik (termasuk rules dan regulation), penggunaan merit sistem di instansi pemerintahan, dan bebas dari korupsi."

"ABSTRAKReformasi Birokrasi memiliki peran penting dalam mendukung pelaksanaanpembangunan nasional bidang kesehatan. Evaluasi menuju Wilayah BebasKorupsi /Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani dilakukan secara penilaian mandirioleh Tim Penilai Internal di tingkat Kementerian Kesehatan, yang selanjutnyaakan dilakukan oleh Tim Penilai Nasional dari Kementerian PendayagunaanAparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. Terdapat perbedaan yang cukupsignifikan antara hasil evaluasi yang dilakukan oleh TPI dengan TPN. Tujuanpenelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektivitas Penilaian mandiri dalam evaluasiWilayah Bebas Korupsi / Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani yang dilakukanInspektorat Jenderal untuk mempercepat Reformasi Birokrasi. Penelitianmerupakan studi deskriptif dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitianmenyebutkan bahwa regulasi belum lengkap, komunikasi pelaksanaan evaluasisudah jelas, pemimpin belum memahami sepenuhnya mengenai WBK/WBBM,masih terdapat benturan kepentingan, terdapat perbedaan karakteristik satuankerja, masih terdapat perbedaan motivasi, persepsi dan kemampuan sumber dayamanusia menjadi faktor yang berpengaruh dalam efektifitas pelaksanaan evaluasimenuju WBK/WBBM di Kementerian Kesehatan. Pelaksanaan penilaian mandirievaluasi menuju WBK/WBBM di Kementerian Kesehatan belum efektif sehinggamemerlukan evaluasi dan perbaikan lebih lanjut.

---

ABSTRACTImplementation of Bureaucratic Reform has an important role in supporting theimplementation of national development in the field of health. Evaluation to Freeof Corruption Area/Clean and Serve Bureaucratic Area was conducted throughself assessment by Internal Assessment Team (IAT) at Ministry of Health level,which will be futher evaluate by National Assessment Team (NAT) from Ministryof Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucracy Reform. There is asignificant difference between the evaluation results conducted by IAT and NAT.The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Self Assessment ofFree of Corruption Area/Clean and Serve Bureaucratic Area Evaluation conductedby Itjen Kemenkes in achieving Bureaucracy Reform in the Ministry of Health.This research is a descriptive study with qualitative analysis method. The studywas conducted in May-June 2017, located in DKI Jakarta area. The result of theresearch stated that the regulation is not yet complete, the communication of theevaluation implementation clear, the leader has not fully understand about WBK/WBBM, there is still conflict of interest, there are differences of work unitcharacteristic, there is still difference of motivation, perception and humanresource competence become a factors that influence effectiveness of theevaluation towards WBK/WBBM in the Ministry of Health. Self Assessmentimplementation towards WBK/WBBM evaluation in Ministry of Health havenot effective so require evaluation and further improvement."