Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini mempelajari hubungan antara posisi kecukupan modal minimum dengan biaya intermediasi keuangan dan perilaku pengambilan risiko sektor perbankan Indonesia dengan menggunakan kumpulan data panel dari 45 bank komersial Indonesia periode 2012 - 2017. Basel I, II dan III secara ketat diterapkan setelah krisis keuangan pada tahun 1997/1998 dan 2008 untuk memastikan stabilitas keuangan, diantaranya adalah dengan penerapan regulasi kecukupan modal minimum yang wajib dipenuhi oleh bank sesuai dengan profil risikonya. Namun demikian, apakah dampak persyaratan tersebut memberikan kontribusi yang positif bagi perbankan Indonesia, beberapa hasil studi empiris penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa persyaratan modal yang ketat dapat memaksa bank untuk meningkatkan biaya intermediasi keuangan mereka yang disebabkan alokasi modal yang tidak optimal. Dengan menggunakan regresi data panel Generalized Least Square (GLS), kami menemukan bahwa rasio modal bank memiliki hubungan negatif dan signifikan terhadap biaya intermediasi keuangan dan perilaku pengambilan risiko sektor perbankan, artinya persyaratan modal minimum dapat menurunkan risiko atau bank risk taking sehingga bank menjadi efisien dan selanjutnya menurunkan biaya intermediasi keuangan.

---

This study examines the relationship between minimum capital adequacy, the cost of financial intermediation and risk taking behavior Indonesian banking sector by using panel data from 45 commercial banks period 2012 to 2017. Basel I, II and III are strictly applied after the financial crisis in 1997 / 1998 and 2008 to ensure financial stability, among others is by applying the minimum capital adequacy requirements that must be met by the bank in accordance with the risk profile. However, whether the impact of these requirements contributes positively to Indonesian banking, some previous empirical studies have shown that strict capital requirements can force banks to increase their financial intermediation costs due to the rising of capital cost. Using the Generalized Least Square (GLS) panel data regression, we found that the bank's capital ratio has a negative and significant relationship to the financial intermediation costs and risk-taking behavior of the banking sector, it means that minimum capital requirements can lower bank risk taking which in turn lower the bankruptcy cost that shown by the lower of bank return on equity and subsequently lowering the cost of financial intermediation."

"Penelitian untuk mengetahui pengaruh tingkat modal (CAR), likuiditas (LDR) dan sektor makro ekonomi yaitu inflasi (INF), bunga (Rate), nilai tukar (Kurs) dan petumbuhan ekonomi (PDB) terhadap kredit perbankan (LTA) diIndonesia, dan apakah terdapat perbedaan diantara jenis bank dan perbedaan pada periode krisis. Analisis penelitian dilakukan menggunakan data panel dengan pendekatan dinamis untuk data tahun 2005 ? 2012. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa pemberian kredit perbankan Indonesia dipengaruhi pemberian kredit sebelumnya, tingkat modal, likuiditas, bunga dan inflasi. Namun hasil menunjukan bahwa kurs dan petumbuhan ekonomi tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kredit perbankan. Dan pada penelitian ini tidak terbukti adanya perbedaan diantara jenis bank. Sedangkan pada periode krisis terdapat perbedaan pengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap pertumbuhan kredit perbankan pada periode tahun 2007-Q2, tahun 2008-Q4 dan tahun 2009-Q2 yang berarti bahwa selama periode tersebut pertumbuhan kredit lebih rendah.

---

This research is to determine the effect of capital adequacy (CAR), liquidity (LDR) and the macro-economic sector, especially inflation (INF), interest (Rate), exchange rate (Kurs) and economic growth (GDP) of the bank credit (LTA) in Indonesia, and whether there are differences between types of banks and the difference in the period of crisis. In this study, data analysis was performed using a dynamic panel data approach for the data years 2005 - 2012 per 3-month period (quarter). Research shows that capital, liquidity, interest and inflation affect to Indonesia's banking loans. However, the results showed that exchange rate and economic growth have no significant effect on bank credit growth. In this study does not prove the differences between types of banks. While the crisis period were significant negatively influence the growth of bank credit in the period of 2007-Q2, 2008-Q4 and 2009-Q2, which means that during the period of lower credit growth."

"Penelitian ini melihat pengaruh jenis, kosentrasi kepemilikan, dan metode masuknya bank asing terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko dan rasio modal bank menggunakan data panel 87 bank di Indonesia dan Malaysia tahun 2003 ndash; 2016. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa bank milik pemerintah dan bank milik asing memiliki tingkat risiko dan rasio modal yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan bank milik swasta dan bank milik asing yang masuk dengan metode greenfield mengambil risiko yang lebih tinggi. Perilaku pengambilan risiko dan rasio modal juga terbukti memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap satu sama lain dan bank tebukti mengambil risiko lebih rendah dan rasio modal yang lebih tinggi selama krisis.

---

This paper examines the effect of ownership type, concentration and foreign bank's entry mode towards bank's risk taking behavior and capital ratio using panel data of 87 banks in Indonesia and Malaysia in 2003 2016. The findings explain that that government owned bank and foreign owned banks take more risk and have higher capital ratio, also that foreign banks that enter the market with greenfield strategy tend to take less risk. This study also finds that bank risk taking behavior and capital ratio has negative effects towards one another, while banks take less risk and hold more capital during financial crisis period. "

"Penelitian ini menginvestigasi pengaruh likuiditas pendanaan terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko bank. Penelitian sebelumnya di negara maju menunjukkan bank yang mengalami peningkatan deposit lebih agresif dalam mengambil risiko di periode berikutnya, untuk meningkatkan profitabilitas dan mengejar kompensasi pribadi, serta adanya skema deposit insurance yang dapat menciptakan moral hazard. Menggunakan data 336 bank di 26 negara selama periode 2004-2016, penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya perbedaan perilaku pengambilan risiko antara tiap wilayah dalam kaitannya dengan likuiditas pendanaan. Pada bank-bank di Amerika Utara, Eropa, dan Timur Tengah, ditemukan hubungan positif antara deposit dengan risk weighted asset.Di Amerika Utara, peningkatan deposit juga berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penurunan z-scores. Di Asia Timur, peningkatan likuiditas pendanaan ternyata tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan untuk semua ukuran risk taking. Di Asia Tenggara, meningkatnya funding liquidity bahkan berkontribusi terhadap menurunnya perilaku pengambilan risiko.Hasil penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa penerapan skema explicit deposit insurance dapat meningkatkan agresivitas pengambilan risiko ketika bank mengalami peningkatan likuiditas pendanaan. Sebaliknya, bank cenderung mengambil risiko yang lebih rendah dalam merespons peningkatan likuiditas pada periode krisis keuangan global. Hal ini secara konsisten ditemukan di seluruh kawasan yang diteliti, kecuali di Asia Timur.

---

This research investigates the effect of funding liquidity on bank risk taking behavior. Previous research in developed countries shows that banks with higher deposits are more aggressive in taking risks in the next period, to increase profitability, pursue personal compensation, and the existence of deposit insurance schemes that can create moral hazard.

Using data of 336 banks in 26 countries over the period 2004 2016, this study shows differences in risk taking behavior between each region in relation to funding liquidity.In banks in North America, Europe and the Middle East, a positive relationship was found between deposit and risk weighted assets.

In North America, increased deposits also have a significant effect on the decrease in z scores. In East Asia, increased funding liquidity did not have a significant effect on all measures of risk taking. In Southeast Asia, increased funding liquidity even contributes to the decline in risk taking behavior.

The results of this study also indicate that the implementation of explicit insurance deposit scheme can increase the aggressiveness of risk taking when the bank has higher funding liquidity. In contrast, banks tend to take lower risks in response to increased liquidity in the period of global financial crisis. This is consistently found throughout the area studied, except in East Asia."

"Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan menguji pengaruh risiko kredit, modal bank, komisaris independen, dan komite audit terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan. Obyek penelitian ini adalah bank-bank umum konvensional dengan yang terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) pada periode 2017-2021. Teknik sampling yang dipakai yaitu metode purposive sampling. Teknik analisis data dilakukan menggunakan regresi data panel (fixed effect model). Hasil penelitian menampakkan bahwa ada pengaruh signifikan negatif dari risiko kredit pada kinerja keuangan perbankan yang dihitung dengan Return on Asset (ROA) dan tak ada pengaruh signifikan dari risiko kredit terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan yang dihitung menggunakan Net Interest Margin (NIM). Lalu terdapat pengaruh signifikan positif dari modal bank dan komisaris independen terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan yang dihitung menggunakan Return on Asset (ROA) dan Net Interest Margin (NIM). Selain itu, terdapat pengaruh signifikan positif dari komite audit terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan yang dihitung menggunakan Return on Asset (ROA) dan tak terdapat pengaruh signifikan dari komite audit pada kinerja keuangan perbankan yang dihitung menggunakan Net Interest Margin (NIM). Hasil penelitian tersebut dapat berkontribusi di bidang teoretis dan praktis (perbankan dan pengguna laporan keuangan terutama investor).

---

This study aims to examine the effect of credit risk, bank capital, independent commissioner, and audit committee on banks financial performance. The object of this study is conventional commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2017-2021 period. The sampling method used to determine the sample is purposive sampling. Data analysis techniques are performed using panel data regression (fixed effect model). The results show that there is a negative significant effect of credit risk on the financial performance of banks calculated using Return on Asset (ROA) and there is no significant effect of credit risk on banking financial performance calculated using Net Interest Margin (NIM). Then there is a positive significant effect of bank capital and independent commissioners on the financial performance of banks calculated using Return on Asset (ROA) and Net Interest Margin (NIM). In addition, there is a positive significant effect of the audit committee on the financial performance of banks calculated using Return on Asset (ROA) and there is no significant effect of the audit committee on the financial performance of banks calculated using Net Interest Margin (NIM). The results of such research can contribute in theoretical and practical fields (banking and financial statement users, especially investors)."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat pengaruh kepemilikan asing terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko perusahaan non keuangan di bursa efek indonesia periode 2008-2013. Dengan menggunakan dua variable kontrol yaitu leverage dan ukuran perusahaan.Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa Kepemilikan asing dan leverage berpengaruh secara negatif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko perusahaan, sedangkan ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh secara positif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko perusahaan.

---

This study aims to determine The Impact of Foreign Ownership on Corporate Risk Taking Behavior of non financial companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2008 2013. By using two control variables leverage and company size.

In this study found that foreign ownership and leverage have a negative and significant effect on corporate risk taking behavior, while firm size positively and significantly influence to corporate risk taking behavior."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh intellectual capital yang diukur dengan efisiensi penciptaan nilai dari intellectual capital dan capital employed terhadap ROA dan Market-to-Book Ratio. Penelitian ini menggunakan data laporan keuangan dan market capitalization dari 120 bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2004 sampai dengan 2008. Analisis secara empiris dilakukan dengan menggunakan regresi linear berganda. Hasil pengujian mengindikasikan bahwa efisiensi dari capital employed dan human capital memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap ROA; efisiensi structural capital memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap ROA. Efisiensi capital employed dan structural capital tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap Market-to-Book Ratio; efisiensi human capital berpengaruh negatif terhadap Market-to-Book Ratio.

---

This research attempts to investigate empirically the impact of intellectual capital measured by value creation efficiency of intellectual capital and capital employed on ROA and Market-to-Book Ratio. This research uses financial and capital market data of 120 banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2004 to 2008. Empirical analysis is conducted using multiple linear regression. Findings from empirical analysis indicate that value creation efficiency of capital employed and human capital have a positive impact on ROA; value creation efficiency of structural capital has a negative impact on ROA. Value creation efficiency of capital employed and structural capital have no impact on Market-to-Book Ratio; value creation efficiency of human capital has a negative impact on Market-to- Book Ratio."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari model bisnis, pengambilan risiko, profitabilitas, kekuatan modal dan kondisi krisis bank-bank umum terhadap Skala Ekonomi di Indonesia periode 2000-2016. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Stochastic Frontier Analysis untuk memperoleh nilai Skala Ekonomi dari Bank-bank umum di Indonesia. Kemudian, pengujian selanjutnya menggunakan metode panel dengan jumlah 101 bank umum di Indonesia dengan periode 17 tahun untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari model bisnis, pengambilan risiko, profitabilitas, kekuatan modal dan kondisi krisis bank-bank umum terhadap skala ekonomi. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa model bisnis dan pengambilan risiko kredit tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap skala ekonomi. Pengambilan risiko likuiditas, profitabilitas, kekuatan modal dan kondisi krisis berpengaruh negatif terhadap skala ekonomi.

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to observe the impact of business model, risk taking, profitability, capital strenght and crisis condition on economies of scale in Indonesian banking industry during 2000 2016. This study uses Stochastic Frontier Analysis to get Economies of Scale value of conventional banks in Indonesia. Furthermore, using panel data to know the impact of business model, risk taking, profitability, capital strenght and crisis condition on economies of scale in Indonesian banking industry. The results are busniness model and credit risk do not have correlation on economies of scale. Liquiity risk, profitability, capital strenght, and crisis condition have negative correlation on economies of scale. The researcher uses 17 years as the period of observation and 101 banks which is located in Indonesia as the sample. "

"[ ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh dari diversifikasi pendapatan yang dilakukan bank umum di Indonesia terhadap risiko kredit, kecukupan modal dan profitabilitas bank tersebut. Diversifikasi pendapatan diukur dengan melihat porsi pendapatan non bunga terhadap total pendapatan. Hipotesis diuji dengan regresi panel data melalui analisis random effect model. Penelitian ini menggunakan observasi data dari 180 bank umum di Indonesia periode 2011- 2013. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa diversifikasi pendapatan yang dilakukan oleh bank memiliki hubungan positif dengan risiko kredit, kecukupan modal dan profitabilitas bank.

---

ABSTRACT This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

;This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

;This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

;This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

;This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

;This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

, This research purposed to understand the effect of revenue diversification on credit risk, capital adequacy and profitability of commercial bank in Indonesia. Revenue diversification measured by proportion of non-interest income on total revenue. Hypothesis testing performed using panel data regression with random effect model analysis. The data of this research is 180 commercial bank in Indonesia during 2011-2013 periods. This research shown that revenue diversification has positive effect with credit risk, capital adequacy and bank profitability.

]"