Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Laporan magang ini membahas tentang upaya banding yang dilakukan oleh PT Wandadalam menghadapi sengketa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai tahun pajak 2012 terkait koreksiatas pos penyerahan yang PPN-nya dipungut sendiri dan pos penyerahan yang PPN-nyatidak dipungut. Hasil analisis menunjukkan yang menjadi penyebab dalam pokoksengketa adalah adanya perbedaan persepsi antara fiskus dengan Wajib Pajak mengenaipenyerahan Barang Kena Pajak BKP yang dilakukan oleh Wajib Pajak di KawasanBebas Batam. Fiskus beranggapan bahwa penyerahan BKP tersebut wajib dipungut PPNkarena tidak mendapat endorsement dari pejabat Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. SementaraWajib Pajak merasa bahwa prosedur penyerahan BKP sudah tepat dan telah diawasisecara penuh oleh Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai. Dalam laporan ini, diperolehkesimpulan bahwa atas penyerahan BKP tersebut tidak dapat mengesampingkan asassubstance over form sehingga Majelis memutuskan untuk mengabulkan seluruhnyabanding yang diajukan oleh PT Wanda.

---

This report explains an appeal made by PT Wanda related to the 2012 Value Added Tax dispute concerning the correction of the surrender post whose VAT is levied on its own and the surrender post whose VAT is not collected. The results of the analysis indicate that the cause of the dispute is the different perceptions between the tax authority and taxpayer regarding the delivery of Taxable Goods done by the taxpayer in the Batam. Taxauthority assumes that the delivery of Taxable Goods shall be levied on VAT because it does not get the endorsement from the Directorate General of Taxes officials. While thetaxpayer feels that the procedure of the delivery of Taxable Goods is correct and has beenfully supervised by the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. In this report, it isconcluded that the delivery of Taxable Goods cannot rule out the substance over form principle so that the Panel of Judges decide to grant all appeals filed by PT Wanda."

"Kegiatan retur tidak mungkin dihindari dalam proses bisnis perusahaan, termasuk pula yang dilakukan PT X. Sebagai salah satu perusahaan yang dikenakan koreksi pajak oleh DJP dalam hal pengkreditan Pajak Masukan atas perolehan Impor Barang Kena Pajak yang diretur kembali yang tidak memiliki hubungan dengan kegiatan usaha PT X pada Tahun Pajak 2015 dan 2017. Penelitian ini menganalisis koreksi pajak pertambahan nilai PT X terkait koreksi fiskus atas pengkreditan Pajak Masukan perolehan Impor Barang Kena Pajak yang diretur kembali ke luar Daerah Pabean yang berujung pada sengketa untuk Tahun Pajak 2015 serta menganalisis apakah sudah sesuai dengan asas ease of administration. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik penumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi kepustakaan. Sengketa disebabkan oleh adanya perbedaan argumen antara PT X dengan DJP terkait penafsiran peraturan yang berhubungan dengan frasa “kegiatan produksi, distribusi, pemasaran, dan manajemen” pada Pasal 9 Ayat 8 huruf b Undang - Undang Pajak Pertambahan Nilai dan Pajak Penjualan Barang Mewah. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan perlakuan atas koreksi yang dikenakan dengan tahun pajak berbeda kasus pengkreditan Pajak Masukan perolehan Impor Barang Kena Pajak untuk kegiatan retur kembali serta koreksi yang dikenakan kepada PT X tidak memenuhi asas ease of administration.

---

Returns are unavoidable in the company's business processes, including those carried out by PT X. As one of the companies subject to tax correction by DGT in terms of crediting Input Tax on the acquisition of returned Imported Taxable Goods that have no relationship with PT X's business activities in the 2015 and 2017 Fiscal Years. This research discusses the analysis of PT X's value added tax correction related to the tax authority correction for crediting the Input Tax on the acquisition of the Imported Taxable Goods returned outside the Customs Area which resulted in a dispute for the 2015 Fiscal Year and analyzes with Ease of Administration principle in deliberation. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews and literature study. The dispute was caused by differences in arguments between PT X and the DGT regarding the interpretation of regulations relating to the phrase “production, distribution, marketing and management activities” in Article 9 Paragraph 8 letter b of the VAT Law and Sales Tax on Luxury Goods. The result of this research concludes that there are differences in the treatment of corrections imposed by different tax years in the case of crediting the Input Tax on the acquisition of Taxable Goods for returns and corrections imposed on PT X that do not fulfill the Ease of Administration principle."

"Laporan ini menganalisis ekualisasi pajak penghasilan badan dengan pajak pertambahan nilai PT OP Indonesia dalam rangka pengajuan restitusi pajak penghasilan badan. Terdapat beberapa kondisi yang menyebabkan PT OP Indonesia harus melakukan ekualisasi antara peredaran usaha dalam SPT PPh Badan dengan total penyerahan dalam SPT Masa PPN setahun. Ekualisasi yang dilakukan oleh PT OP Indonesia disebabkan karena ada perbedaan waktu. Dari hasil analisis tersebut diperoleh bahwa PT OP Indonesia telah melakukan kewajiban perpajakannya dengan baik dan ekualisasi yang dibuat oleh PT OP Indonesia tidak melanggar peraturan perpajakan.

---

This report analyze equalization of corporate income tax with value added tax PT OP Indonesia in order to apply for corporate income tax refund. There are several conditions that cause PT OP Indonesia made equalization between gross income stated in Annual Corporate Income Tax Return (1771 Form) and total delivery of taxable goods stated in Value Added Tax Periodic Return in annual. Equalization that had been made by PT OP Indonesia due to the time difference. The result of analysis shows that PT OP Indonesia has performed its tax obligation well and equalization made by PT OP Indonesia does not violate the taxation rules."

"Laporan magang ini membahas perlakuan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) PT HNM yang diikutsertakan dalam program Pengampunan Pajak pada tahun 2016. PT HNM merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak dalam bidang jasa manajemen perhotelan. Perlakuan pengampunan PPN akan dianalisa apakah sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Ketentuan yang dijadikan rujukan ialah UU No. 11 tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak, PSAK 70 tentang Pengampunan Pajak dan PSAK 25 tentang Kebijakan Akuntansi, Perubahan Estimasi Akuntansi, dan Kesalahan. Perlakuan atas harta bersih yang timbul dari program Pengampunan Pajak dianggap sebagai saldo laba menurut UU Pengampunan Pajak sedangkan menurut PSAK 70 harus dianggap dalam tambahan modal disetor. Lalu koreksi atas harta dan liabilitas yang timbul dalam pengampunan pajak harus sesuai dengan PSAK 25.

---

This report explains about treatment Value Added Tax (VAT) PT HNM, a hospitality management company, that participated in Tax Amnesty program in 2016. Amnesty treatment on VAT will be checked whether it is comply with the standards. Standards which become references are UU No. 11 2016, PSAK 70 and PSAK 25. Treatment upon additional net asset recognized as retained earning in Tax Regulation but recognized as Additional Paid in Capital in PSAK 70. Then correction for asset and liability that occur in tax amnesty should comply with PSAK 25."

"Penyelenggaraan lelang di Indonesia dilaksanakan oleh Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL). Dalam Pasal 1A ayat (1) huruf c Undang-Undang Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (UU PPN) diatur bahwa penyerahan Barang Kena Pajak (BKP) melalui juru lelang termasuk ke dalam definisi penyerahan yang dikenakan PPN. Aturan tersebut juga dipertegas kembali di dalam Pasal 8 PP 1/2012. Pasca terbitnya Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan (UU HPP), PP 1/2012 statusnya sudah tidak berlaku dan digantikan dengan PP 44/2022. Namun, PP 44/2022 menghapus ketentuan mengenai tata cara pemungutan PPN atas penyerahan BKP melalui penyelenggara lelang. Hingga saat ini belum ada aturan pelaksana dalam bentuk Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) yang mengatur mengenai pelaksanaan pemungutan PPN atas penyerahan BKP melalui lelang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan pemungutan PPN atas penyerahan BKP melalui lelang di KPKNL dan menganalisis kebijakannya ditinjau dari asas kepastian (certainty). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan dan lapangan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa hambatan dalam proses pemungutan PPN atas penyerahan BKP melalui lelang di KPKNL, yakni kurangnya sinkronisasi antara kebijakan di bidang PPN dan lelang serta belum adanya kebijakan teknis pelaksanaan pemungutan PPN atas penyerahan BKP melalui lelang. Kebijakan PPN yang berlaku juga belum memenuhi asas kepastian (certainty) karena belum ada peraturan yang mengatur terkait siapa pihak yang menjadi Pemungut PPN. Kondisi ini dapat mengakibatkan hilangnya potensi penerimaan negara yang berasal dari PPN.

---

The organization of auctions in Indonesia is carried out by the State Assets and Auction Service Office. Article 1A paragraph (1) letter c of the Value Added Tax Law (VAT Law) stipulates that the delivery of Taxable Goods through an auctioneer falls under the definition of taxable delivery. This rule is also reinforced in Article 8 of Government Regulation No. 1/2012. After the enactment of the Harmonization of Tax Regulations Law (HPP Law), Government Regulation No. 1/2012 was repealed and replaced by Government Regulation No. 44/2022. However, Government Regulation No. 44/2022 removes the provisions regarding the procedure for collecting VAT on the delivery of Taxable Goods through auctioneer. To date, there are no implementing regulations in the form of a Minister of Finance Regulation that govern the collection of VAT on the delivery of Taxable Goods through auctions. This research aims to analyze the implementation of VAT collection on the delivery of Taxable Goods through auctions at the State Assets and Auction Service Office and to review the policy from the perspective of the principle of certainty. This study uses a post-positivist approach with data collection techniques including literature and field studies. The results of this research show that there are several obstacles in the process of collecting VAT on the delivery of Taxable Goods through auctions at the State Assets and Auction Service Office, namely the lack of synchronization between VAT and auction policies, as well as the absence of technical implementation policies for collecting VAT on the delivery of Taxable Goods through auctions. The current VAT policy also does not fulfil the principle of certainty because there is no regulation clarifying who is responsible for collecting the VAT. This situation can result in the potential loss of state revenue from VAT."

"PTPN V sebagai perusahaan yang menghasilkan minyak kelapa sawit memiliki beberapa proses produksi, antara lain memproduksi hasil perkebunan (tandan buah segar) dan proses pabrikasi. Bagi PTPN V keduanya merupakan satu proses yang terintegrasi, sedangkan Direktorat Jendral Pajak menganggap kedua hal tersebut adalah proses yang berbeda karena menurut Direktorat Jendral Pajak tandan buah segar adalah non barang kena pajak sehingga pajak masukan yang diperoleh tidak dapat dapat diperhitungkan terhadap pajak keluaran dari minyak kelapa sawit. Perbedaan interpretasi ini menimbulkan sengketa yang diajukan ke pengadilan pajak, dan berdasarkan kajian yang mendetail dari peraturan yang terkait, didapati bahwa kasus ini merupakan satu proses sehingga pajak masukan atas tandan buah segar dapat dikreditkan.

---

PTPN V as a company that produces palm oil has some production processes, such as producing crops (fresh fruit bunches) and the manufacturing process. For PTPN V are both single integrated process, while the Tax Auditor considers both of these is a different process because, according to the tax auditor of fresh fruit bunches are non taxable goods thus acquired input tax can not be counted against the output tax of palm oil. This different interpretations has led to the dispute submitted to the tax court, and based on a detailed study of the relevant regulations, it was found that this case is a process that input tax on fresh fruit bunches can be credited."

"Undang-Undang Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Indonesia menganut metode Indirect Substraction Method untuk mendeteksi atau menguji kebenaran jumlah pajak yang terutang. Jumlah output tax lebih kecil daripada input tax, selisihnya merupakan kelebihan pembayaran pajak yang dapat direstitusi ataupun dikompensasi. Dengan menggunakan sistem self assessment dapat mengajukan restitusi Pajak Pertambahan Nilai atas penyampaian Surat Pemberitahuan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai dengan status lebih bayar. Studi ini merupakan penelitian implementasi kebijakan perpajakan atas restitusi PPN pasca pemberhentian Pemeriksaan Bukti Permulaan yang terjadi di PT. ABC dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi literatur dan wawancara mendalam. Dalam proses restitusi Pajak Pertambahan Nilai yang sedang diajukan oleh PT ABC, pihak DJP melakukan pemeriksaan bukti permulaan terhadap PT. ABC. Dengan dilakukannya pemeriksaan bukti permulaan kepada PT. ABC maka restitusi PPN yang diajukan oleh PT. ABC tertangguhkan. PT. ABC tidak terbukti melakukan tindak pidana dibidang perpajakan dengan demikian pemeriksaan bukti permulaan terhadap PT. ABC diberhentikan. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu Setelah diberhentikannya pemeriksaan bukti permulaan terhadap PT. ABC, DJP tidak langsung menerbitkan SKPLB sebagaimana diatur didalam Pasal 17B Undang-Undang KUP. Adapun dampak implementasi kebijakan restitusi PPN setelah dihentikannya pemeriksaan bukti permulaan bagi PT. ABC yaitu menyebabkan ketidakpastian atas restitusi yang diajukan dan tidak mendapatkan imbalan bunga atas SKPLB yang diterbitkan melebihi jangka waktu 12 bulan dan meningkatkan compliance cost PT. ABC.

---

The Indonesian Value Added Tax Act adheres to the Indirect Subtraction Method to detect or test the correct amount of tax payable. The amount of output tax is smaller than the input tax, the difference is the excess payment of taxes that can be refunded or compensated. By using the self assessment system, taxpayers can claim a Value Added Tax refund for the submission of Value Added Tax Return with overpayment status. This study is about the implementation of taxation policies on Value Added Tax (PPN) restitution after the termination of the Preliminary Investigation Tax Audit that occurred at PT. ABC by using a qualitative approach and in-depth interviews. In the process of value added tax restitution that is being submitted by PT ABC, the DGT execute the preliminary investigation tax audit to PT. ABC. By conducting preliminary investigation tax audit to PT. ABC then the VAT refund submitted by PT. ABC is suspended. PT. ABC is not proven to have committed a criminal act in the taxation field, thus preliminary investigation tax audit to PT. ABC was terminated. The results of this study are after the termination of preliminary investigation tax audit of PT. ABC, DGT does not directly issue SKPLB (Overpayment Tax Assessment Letter) as stipulated in Article 17B of the KUP Law. As for the impact of the implementation of the VAT restitution policy after the termination of the preliminary investigation tax audit PT. ABC, that is, causes uncertainty over the restitution that is submitted and does not receive interest benefits for SKPLB issued over a period of 12 months and increase compliance cost PT. ABC."

"The transaction price of goods, or service fees, are affected by a variety of factors such as types and quality of the goods concerned, competition, consumer demand and general economic condition. In general transaction prices constitute base prices added by the firm's margin. In the business world at a particular time transaction prices do not account for margins, with some perhaps even being found lower than the cost of goods production. However, tax authorities pay attention to related party transactions as their prices may be subject to manipulation. These prices will be set at arm's length if we compare them with those for independent parties. As a further result, the taxable income reported in tax returns of the taxpayers in question are less than what it should be. The main issue and question in the author's research are how to determine that a transaction has been conducted at arm's length and what connection can be found between the corrections made through audit and income tax revenue. The pricing set for transactions between related parties are called as transfer pricing. A related party transaction is deemed to occur when there is a link between the common and controlling shareholders, management of the parties involved, including their horizontal and vertical family relationships. One way to determine if there is an arm's length price is to compare the transfer pricing on related parties and those on unrelated parties. Some of the common approaches applied-are the comparable uncontrol price method, resale price method, cost plus method and comparable profit method.

The author surveyed the results of inspections conducted by the State Revenue Optimization Team (SROT) into related firm transactions.

From the survey, the author has found:

1. In practice it is difficult to arrive at an accurate comparative figure as the period of the audit above has been limited and data and information concerning similar firms to taxpayers are lacking. A new approach which has been employed by tax authorities in several countries for the purpose of reducing the occurrences of problems associated with the determination of transaction prices is called as the Advanced Pricing Arrangement. This method has been set out in Article 18(3a) of Law number 17 of 2000.

2. The corrections through audit into or the potential income tax revenue by SROT from the transactions conducted between taxpayers and their related parties amount to Rp 932,952,280,602. However, only Rp 51,821,609,658, or 5.55% of this amount was accepted by taxpayers. Hence, these taxpayers did want to pay a total of Rp 881,130,670,944, or 94.45%. The taxpayers then request of objection or appeals on the assessments made by the Director General of Taxation. However, the Director General of Taxation rejected these request . In addition, the Tax Court rejected appeals which amounted to Rp 4,696,385,476.

The corrections above were conducted due to the fact that:

- There has been lack of audit guidelines concerning related party transactions.

- Taxpayers are unable to make clear explanations on how they arrived at transfer pricing. In addition, the factors which cause transfer pricing vary from those affecting market prices, or the transaction prices among unrelated parties.

The author recommends as follows:

- Taxpayers should make a pricing policy whereby transaction prices are described and broken down. In addition, they should explain the factors which cause their transfer pricing to differ from market prices, or the transaction prices among unrelated company.

- Tax authorities set a comparative figure or indicator, taken from taxpayers' data bases, as a reference for auditor for the purpose of assessing transaction fairness.

- Consideration should be made to re-evaluate the fines in the form of interest payments, and penalties which are regulated in Law number 16 of 2000. Different sanctions, in the form of, for example, higher percentage or without correspondence adjustments, should be charged on taxpayers who do provide information on their related party transactions.

- Issuance of the implementation guidelines for Article 18(3a) of Law number 17 of 2000 to both taxpayers and the Directorate General of Taxation regarding agreements about the determination of transaction prices."

"Kebutuhan serta potensi biodiesel sebagai subtitusi solar menjadi penting untuk diperhitungkan dalam target bauran energi di Indonesia. Realitanya, masih terdapat berbagai isu yang menghambat perkembangan industri biodiesel, khususnya biodiesel non-kelapa sawit. Pada tahun 2009, pemerintah memberikan insentif Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Ditanggung Pemerintah (PPN DTP) atas penyerahan biodiesel di dalam negeri, namun kebijakan tidak dilanjutkan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis latar belakang insentif PPN DTP atas penyerahan biodiesel pada tahun 2009 tidak dilanjutkan, faktor yang mendorong diperlukannya kembali insentif, dan alternatif insentif dengan tinjauan kebijakan di Malaysia, Kolumbia, dan Jerman. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi kepustakaan dan lapangan. Hasil penelitian pertama, faktor yang melatarbelakangi PPN DTP atas penyerahan biodiesel di dalam negeri pada tahun 2009 tidak dilanjutkan adalah minimnya pemanfaatan, kebijakan salah sasaran, dan lemahnya dasar hukum. Kedua, biodiesel non-kelapa sawit memiliki berbagai faktor yang mendorong dibutuhkannya kembali insentif PPN dan alternatif insentif PPN yang dapat diberikan adalah PPN tidak dipungut. Ketiga, kebijakan insentif PPN atas penyerahan biodiesel telah diberlakukan di Malaysia, Kolumbia, dan Jerman sebagai dorongan dari pemerintah untuk industri biodiesel. 

---

The need and potential of biodiesel as a substitute for diesel become essential to be considered in Indonesia's energy mix targets. In reality, there are still various issues hindering the development of the biodiesel industry, especially non-palm oil biodiesel. In 2009, the government provided an incentive of Value-Added Tax Borne by Government on the domestic delivery of biodiesel, but the policy was not continued. The purpose of this research is to analyze the background of the discontinuation of the incentive on biodiesel delivery in 2009, the factors driving the need for its reinstatement, and alternative incentives by reviewing policies in Malaysia, Colombia, and Germany. The research employs a qualitative approach with literature and field studies. The first result of the research shows that the factors underlying the discontinuation of the VAT BPG on domestic biodiesel delivery in 2009 are the limited utilization, misdirected policies, and weak legal basis. Secondly, non-palm oil biodiesel has various factors driving the need for the reinstatement of VAT BPG incentive, and the alternative incentive that can be given is exempting VAT. Thirdly, VAT incentive policies on biodiesel delivery have been implemented in Malaysia, Colombia, and Germany as government encouragement for the biodiesel industry."

"Pajak Pertambahan Nilai tidak dipungut atas impor Barang Kena Pajak untuk kegiatan pemanfaatan panas bumi merupakan kebijakan untuk mendukung program pemerintah terkait ketersediaan listrik. Sebelumnya atas impor tersebut telah diberikan fasilitas dibebaskan. Industri pertambangan yang mendapatkan fasilitas ini hanya industri panas bumi. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, peneliti ingin menganalisis kebijakan fasilitas tersebut ditinjau dari asas netralitas dan asas keadilan dan menganalisis implikasi diberikannya fasilitas tersebut terhadap beban Pajak Penghasilan dan administrasi perpajakan bagi usaha panas bumi rezim lama dan rezim baru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan pada skripsi ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif. Data yang digunakan diperoleh dengan cara melakukan wawancara mendalam dengan beberapa narasumber yang dianggap relevan dengan permasalahan yang diangkat. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, fasilitas Pajak Pertambahan Nilai tersebut tidak sesuai dengan asas netralitas dan asas keadilan karena mendistorsi pilihan industri dalam melakukan impor barang, adanya kemungkinan barang yang diimpor oleh usaha panas bumi tidak benar-benar digunakan untuk kegiatan operasi panas bumi, serta menimbulkan perlakuan pajak yang berbeda dengan industri pertambangan lainnya. Implikasi fasilitas ini adalah meningkatnya Pajak Penghasilan Badan bagi rezim lama dan menurunnya Pajak Penghasilan Badan bagi rezim baru, serta lebih menghemat waktu dan biaya dalam proses pengajuan fasilitas Pajak Pertambahan Nilai tidak dipungut dibandingkan fasilitas dibebaskan.

---

Non-collected Value Added Tax on imports of Taxable Goods for geothermal utilization activities is a policy to support government program related to electricity availability. Previously, the import had been given a Value Added Tax Exempted Facility. The mining industry that gets this facility is only the geothermal industry. Based on this background, researchers want to analyze the facility policy in terms of the principles of neutrality and the principle of justice, as well as to analyze the implications of these facility to the income tax expense and tax administration for the geothermal bussiness in the old & new regime. The research method used in this paper is a qualitative research method. The data used in this thesis is obtained by conducting in-depth interviews with several speakers who are considered relevant to the issues raised. Based on the analysis, Value Added Tax facilities that are not collected on imports of Taxable Goods are not in accordance with the principle of neutrality and tax justice, because they distort the choice of industry in importing taxable goods. There is a possibility that taxable goods imported by geothermal businesses are not actually used for activities in geothermal operations, and cause different treatment with other mining industries. The implication of this non-collected VAT facility is the increase in corporate income tax for the old regime and the decline in corporate income tax for the new regime, and it saves time and costs in the process of submitting facilities compared to the VAT facility that was previously applied."