Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Nama : SONIA IVANA BARUSNPM : 160 693 4613Program Studi : Ilmu Hukum-Hukum KenegaraanJudul : ldquo;Kewenangan Pembatalan Peratuan Daerah oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri sebagai Executive Control terhadap Pemerintah Daerah rdquo; UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah jelas menyebutkan bahwa Menteri Dalam Negeri dengan instrumen berupa Peraturan Menteri, diberikan kewenangan untuk membatalakan peraturan daerah yang dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi, kepentingan umum dan/atau kesusilaan, adanya dualisme pandangan mengenai keabsahan penggunaan Peraturan Menteri untuk membatalkan perda juga memunculkan persoalan tersendiri. Belumselesai perdebatan mengenai keabsahan penggunaan Peraturan Menteri untuk membatalkan peraturan daerah, Putusan Mahkamah MK No. 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Putusan MK No. 56/PUU-XIII/2016 yang telah mencabut kewenangan Menteri Dalam Negeri untuk membatalkan Peraturan Daerah perda menibulkan permasalahan baru seputar eksistensi lembaga eksekutif pusat dalam hal membatalkan suatu peraturan daerah. Penulisan ini berbentuk yuridis-normatif yang menggunakan data-data skunder sebagai sumber datanya dan bersifat presfiktif yakni untuk memberikan saran penyelesaian terhadap topik yang diangkat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pada dasarnya, penggunaan peraturan menteri untuk membatalakan peraturan daerah kurang tepat, hal itu dikarenakan Menteri dengan Pemerintah Daerah tidak memiliki hubungan secara struktural, meskipun secara hiearki pearaturan menteri bisa saja berada diatas pearturan daerah, sehingga penggunaan instrumen hukum berupa Peraturan Presiden dianggap sebagai solusi paling ideal seperti yang digunakan dalam UU No. 32 Tahun 2004. Selain itu, Putusan MK yang kini menghilangkan kewenangan Menteri Dalam Negeri untuk membatalkan peraturan daerah, dianggap perlu dikaji lebih lanjut. Pasalnya, secara tidak langsung MK sudah menghilangkan kewenangan pusat eksekutif untuk melakukan kontrol terhadap daerahnya, padahal Indonesia adalah negara kesatuan dimana campur tangan pemerintah pusat kepada daerahnya adalah hal yang wajar dan bukanlah sesuatu yang melanggar konstitusi. Kata Kunci : Kewenangan, Peraturan Daerah, executive control

---

Name SONIA IVANA BARUSNPM 160 693 4613Study Program Ilmu Hukum Hukum KenegaraanTitle ldquo Regional Regulation Annulment by Minister Of Internal Affairs as Executive Control for Regional Government rdquo Law of Republic Indonesia Number 23 of 2014 about Regional government state that Minister of Internal Affairs with Ministerial Regulation, have an authority for annuling Regional regulation which is contradict higer rule of law provisions, public interest and or decency. Meanwhile, the duality of views about validity of Ministerial Regulation for annul Regional regulation creates contentions. Beside the contention about validity of Ministerial Regulation for annul Regional regulation, verdict of Constitutional Court number 137 PUU XIII 2015 and number 56 PUU XIII 2016 which has been revoked Minister of Internal Affairs authority for annul Regional regulation caused problem about the existance of executive in terms of annuling Regional regulation.This researchis in the form of juridical normative which is used secondary data as the resources and prespective point of view with the intention of providing solution towards the topic.The result of this research shows, basicly, the utilization of Ministerial Regulation for annul Regional regulation is not proper, because the Minister and Regional government are not related in a structural scheme, in despite of, Ministerial Regulation maybe higher than Regional regulation, with the result of that the most ideal solution is to use Presidential Regulation as in Law No. 32 of 2004.Moreover, verdict of Constitutional Court which is revoked the authority of Minister of Internal Affairs for annul Regional regulation, need to be reviewed. Because of that verdict, Contitutional Court undirectly revoked the authority of executive for controlling its region, considering Indonesia is an unitary state the central government intervention to the region is reasonable and not violating the constitution. Key Words Authority, Regional regulation, Executive Control"

"Dalam negara kesatuan, peraturan daerah sebagai bagian dari hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan sekaligus wujud aktualisasi penyelenggaraan otonomi daerah perlu diawasi oleh pemerintah pusat. Pasca lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, pengaturan mengenai pengawasan peraturan daerah semakin ketat dan bervariasi bahkan melibatkan 3 (tiga) cabang kekuasaan di tingkat pusat. Berbagai macam pengaturan yang tidak sinkron pada tingkat pusat menjadi persoalan utama pemerintah daerah dalam menjalankan otonomi daerah dan menghambat perwujudan suatu peraturan daerah yang berkualitas sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk menjawab ketepatan sporadis pengaturan pengawasan peraturan daerah, menganalisis keterlibatan antar lembaga yang mengawasi peraturan daerah, serta menemukan desain pengawasan peraturan daerah yang komprehensif. Secara normatif, berbagai pengaturan dalam pengawasan peraturan daerah ditemukan problem inkonsistensi hukum yang saling tumpang tindih bahkan melampaui kewenangan. Secara kelembagaan, ego sektoral antar kementerian masih tinggi sehingga koordinasi sulit dijalankan, keterlibatan DPD selaku lembaga legsilatif tingkat pusat dalam mengawasi peraturan daerah tidak tepat, dan kewenangan antara Mahkamah Agung dan pemerintah pusat tidak seharusnya dipertentangkan karena memiliki ranah yang berbeda. Menjawab persoalan tersebut, diperlukan kesatuan pengaturan mengenai pengawasan peraturan daerah dalam bentuk Undang-Undang, pentingnya menegaskan fungsi pengaturan Presiden sebagai pemegang kekuasaan pemerintahan tertinggi dengan membentuk suatu pusat pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan untuk menertibkan peraturan perundang-undangan dari pusat hingga daerah, serta perlu dipertegas tujuan penyelenggaraan negara untuk kepentingan nasional bukan untuk kepentingan daerah atau terbatas untuk kepentingan pusat. Dengan demikan, bandul desentralisasi dan sentralisasi dapat berayun setimbang saling mendukung dan melengkapi sehingga kedua hal tersebut tidak harus dipertentangkan satu sama lain......In a unitary state, regional regulations as part of the hierarchy of laws and regulations as well as the actualization of the implementation of regional autonomy need to be supervised by the central government. After the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, the regulation regarding the supervision of regional regulations has become more stringent and varied, even involving 3 (three) branches of power at the central level. Various kinds of arrangements that are not synchronized at the central level are the main problems for local governments in carrying out regional autonomy and hinder the realization of a quality regional regulation in accordance with the needs of the community. This research is intended to answer the sporadic accuracy of the regulation or supervision of regional regulations, analyze the involvement of institutions that oversee regional regulations, and find a comprehensive design of supervision of regional regulations. Normatively, various arrangements in the supervision of regional regulations are found to be inconsistent in the law that overlaps and even exceeds the authority. Institutionally, the sectoral ego between ministries is still high so that coordination is difficult to carry out, the involvement of the DPD as a legislative institution at the central level in supervising regional regulations is inappropriate, and the authority between the Supreme Court and the central government should not be contested because they have different domains. Responding to this problem, it is necessary to have a unified regulation regarding the supervision of regional regulations in the form of a law, the importance of affirming the regulatory function of the President as the holder of the highest government power by establishing a center for the formation of laws and regulations to regulate laws and regulations from the center to the regions and needs to be emphasized. the purpose of state administration is for the national interest, not for the regional interest or limited to the central interest. Thus, the pendulum of decentralization and centralization can swing in balance to support and complement each other so that the two things do not have to be contradicted with each other."

"Kota Solo di bawah kepemimpinan Walikota Joko Widodo (2005 -2010 dan 2010 - 2015) merupakan salah satu daerah yang dirujuk sebagai best practice dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Tesis ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan causal maps kepemimpinan Joko Widodo dalam merumuskan kebijakan daya saing daerah di Kota Solo. Analisis data menggunakan teknik cognitive maps dengan panduan dari Ackermann, dkk., kemudian dikonversi melalui metode NUMBER (Normalized Unit Modeling By Elementary Relationship) yang diperkenalkan Kim Dong-Hwan, sehingga menjadi system dynamics dengan bantuan software Vensim. Untuk menunjang penelitian, teori yang digunakan untuk menganalisis yaitu teori daya saing daerah, teori kepemimpinan dan teori dynamic capabilities. Hasil dari penelitian ini berupa peta pemikiran Joko Widodo dalam kapasitasnya sebagai pemimpin dalam merumuskan kebijakan daya saing daerah di Kota Solo. Hasilnya berdasarkan causal maps Joko Widodo dalam merumuskan kebijakan daya saing daerah, penyebab (causes) daya saing daerah Kota Solo adalah program pro rakyat, yang pada akhirnya meningkatkan dua faktor pembentuk daya saing daerah, yaitu lingkungan usaha yang produktif dan meningkatkan kualitas infrastruktur dan lingkungan. Dalam perumusan kebijakan yang dilakukannya, Joko Widodo bersifat balancing atau keseimbangan antara satu kebijakan dengan kebijakan yang lainnnya. Hasil kebijakan daya saing daerah Kota Solo akan terlihat setelah 65 bulan berjalan. Sisi kepemimpinan Joko Widodo dalam merumuskan daya saing daerah dikategorikan ke dalam tipe transformational leadership. Joko Widodo mendorong praktek dynamic governance dalam kepemimpinnya. Agile process dan able people dimulai dengan melakukan reformasi di bidang pelayanan publik. Untuk kemampuan thinking ahead, thinking again dan thinking across Pemerintahan Kota Solo sebagian besar berasal dari Joko Widodo, sehingga diperlukan kebijakan khusus agar inovasi dan kebijakan yang telah berjalan dapat berkelanjutan di masa yang akan datang.

---

The city of Solo under the leadership of Mayor Joko Widodo (2005 -2010 and 2010 - 2015) is one of local areas referred to be as the best local government practice. This thesis aim is to describe the causal maps of Joko Widodo leadership in formulating a regional competitiveness policy in the city of Solo. Analysis of data using the techniques of cognitive maps using the guide of Ackermann, et al. Then converted through a NUMBER method (Normalized Units By Elementary Relationship Modeling), which was introduced by Kim Dong-Hwan, to become the system dynamics. The simulation process is help by Vensim software.

To support the research, theories used to analyze are the theory of regional competitiveness, leadership theory and the theory of dynamic capabilities. The results of this study was forming the causal maps of Joko Widodo in his capacity as a leader in formulating regional competitiveness policy in the city of Solo.

By the results on causal maps of Joko Widodo in formulating regional competitiveness policy, the causes of regional competitiveness in Solo is a propeople programs, which in turn increases the competitiveness of the two factors that forming regional competitiveness, which is a business productive environment and improvement on the quality of infrastructure and the environment. In the formulation of his policy, Joko Widodo reinforcing or strengthening of one policy with another policy. The results of competitiveness policy in the city of Solo will be seen after 65 months of practice.

Joko Widodo side of leadership in formulating regional competitiveness policy categorized into the type of transformational leadership. Joko Widodo encourage dynamic governance practices in leadership. Agile process and able people begin with reforms of public services. The ability of thinking ahead, thinking again and thinking across of the City of Solo mostly come from Joko Widodo, so it requires a special policy for innovation and policies that have run can be sustained in the future."

"The birth of constitution No 22 & 25 year 1999 is the first step to repair the running of the governance that tends to be centralistic to a more decentralistic environment by giving expanded autonomy at local level. Both constitutions are expected to generate democratization by giving more space for public participation in the politics field, the handling at local level monetary, and the utilization of other local resources.History has says that during the implementation of constitution No. 5 year 1974, the nuances policy is dominantly have the nature of top down, rather than bottom up. This kind of policy have the tendency to minimize local government roles. Therefore, the concept of local development that focused on the involvement of the local interest's (participation approach) needs to be nurtured. The public participation can be representated through a good election process, so the people role's can be seen from local council strength in controlling policy execution by the executive.Public participation at the local level is interesting to study because basically the public participation on the execution of local autonomy is the form of representativeness from a policy. This is needed as a way to create good governance by developing, strengthening and public empowering with the condition that there civil society and people have capability therefore to begin initiatives, discussing, formulating recommendation, debating it, make an agreement, deciding, monitoring and evaluating the making process and executing public policy that within the authority of the government.Participation has a very important meaning for democratic government system, even means for the embodiment of power that lies in the people's hand. Participation means to ensure that every policy taken reflect .the people's aspiration. Studies on various literature shows that participation is a mayor part of good governance. The aim of this research is to analyze how is the process of formulating local regulation, where in the process of formulating it there are two factors that will be effecting the result of a local regulation draft being discussed, which is the articulation of various interest by the local council and the public participation in the process of formulating it. This research basically is trying to bring up and describing many things thats connected to public participation in the process of formulating local regulation. The method of this research used qualitative approach. This research also comes as a case study, its means so that the research are conducted more throughly and to understand the symptoms in a holistic approach. The data is gamed from studying various document that related with the formulation process of local regulation and by conducting in depth interview to the members and staff of local council that involved in formulating each local regulation, special committee for public order in Depok, the community leaders, and non government organization involved in the process of formulating local regulation.From the analization it is known that in connection with the law ground on the public participation in the process of formulating local regulation, there is no clear regulations for the citizen right to participate. This research is conducted at Depok city shows that the rules of Local Council in Depok City is not sufficiently accommodate the existence of public participation in the process of formulating local regulation.The research shows that are space to public participation formally and informally in the process of formulating local regulation, but the utilization of the space available is not maximal due to the process of formulating local regulation regarding public order in Depok City, public participation only existed at RDPU (Public Hearing). The participation happened only in the formal context, which is the involvement in the RDPU at the consultation level. In Am stein perspective this consultation level is in the "degree of Tokenism' which marked the existence of two-way dialogue between public and local council even the nature of the dialogue is cooptative."

"Skripsi ini membahas kewenangan Pengujian Peraturan daerah oleh pemerintah dan lembaga peradilan. Dualisme yang terjadi di Indonesia akibat ketidaktegasan peraturan yang mengatur kewenangan Pengujian Peraturan Daerah. Sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 145 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, serta ketentuan Pasal 145 ayat (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Undang Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kehakiman yang menyatakan Kewenangan dari lembaga Eksekutif dan Yudikatif tersebut. Akibat hukum dari pengujian terhadap Perda oleh Pemerintah adalah berupa pembatalan Perda sementara akibat hukum dari pengujian Perda oleh Mahkamah Agung apabila satu Perda yang dimohonkan bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang diatasnya maka Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan dan memerintahkan Pemerintah Daerah bersama dengan DPRD untuk mencabut Perda tersebut paling lama dalam waktu 90 hari. Terhadap putusan pembatalan Perda yang dikeluarkan oleh Mahkamah Agung tidak dapat diajukan Peninjauan Kembali (PK).

---

This thesis discusses the test applicable local authority by the Government and the judiciary, the Dualism that occur in Indonesia as a result of the tegasannya regulations governing authority Regulatory Testing area. As set forth in the provisions of article 145, paragraph (2) of law No. 32 of 2004 Concerning Regional Governments, as well as the provisions of article 145, paragraph (5) of law No. 32 of 2004 Concerning Regional Governments and Law Number 48 in 2009 About justice. Stating the powers of the Executive and the Judiciary.

Legal consequences of testing against the Government is a Perda cancellation of temporary legal effect from the Perda testing Change by the Supreme Court when a Perda who petitioned against the legislation above the Supreme Court granted the petition and ordered local governments along with the DPRD to unplug the longest Change within 90 days. Against the cancellation perda issued by the supreme court review may not be submitted."

"Terdapat ketidakjelasan pembagian kewenangan pengawasan pemerintah pusat terhadap pembentukan peraturan daerah (Perda) yang dilakukan melalui harmonisai, evaluasi dan/atau fasilitasi. Secara sifat dan tujuan pengawasan tersebut merupakan hal yang sama sehingga dalam pelaksanaannya dapat menyebabkan pengawasan yang dilakukan menjadi tidak efektif. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini, dilakukan dengan pendekatan penelitian terhadap taraf sinkronisasi hukum yang menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur mengenai pembentukan peraturan daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukan, terdapat dualisme rezim pengaturan mengenai pembentukan Perda serta terdapat perbedaan kekuatan mengikat dari harmonisai dengan evaluasi/fasilitasi yang menyebabkan pengawasan yang dilakukan menjadi kurang efektif dan efisien. Selain itu, permasalahan terkait sumber daya Perancang juga menyebabkan rancangan Perda yang disusun masih memiliki kualitas yang rendah. Pengawasan pemerintah pusat terhadap pembentukan Perda sebaiknya dilakukan dengan penguatan pengawassan yang bersifat preventif. Oleh karena itu, untuk mendukung hal tersebut perlu dilakukan penyempurnaan regulasi yang mengatur mengenai pembentukan Perda, khususnya terkait pembagian kewenangan pengawasan pemerintah pusat. Penegasan peran Perancang, serta peningkatan kemampuan Perancang juga menjadi hal strategis terciptanya Perda yang harmonis.

---

There is vagueness in the division of authority over the central government's supervision of the regional regulation's formation through harmonization, evaluation, or facilitation. The similarity of the authority's nature and purpose causes ineffectiveness. This normative juridical research analyzes the synchronization between regulations about the formation of regional law. The study discovered that there is a dualism of the regulatory regime regarding the formation of Regional Regulations. It also has found differences in the law binding power of harmonization and evaluation/facilitation causes ineffective and inefficient supervision. Besides that, problems of Perancang's resources also causing the draft of regional regulations to still have low quality. Strengthening preventive control by the central government can create harmonious regional regulations that are in line with higher laws and regulations is the best form of supervision to be carried out for now. So there, it is necessary to refine the regulations about the formation of regional regulations, particularly related to the division of supervisory authority of the central government. The participation of legal drafter (Perancang) and an ability enhancement of legal drafter is also a strategic matter to create a harmonious regional regulation."

"ABSTRAKDibentuknya DPD merupakan salah satu solusi untuk mengatasi hubungan antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah, yang fungsi dan kewenangannya telah diatur di dalam UUD NRI 1945. Namun pasca diberlakukannya Undang-Undang yang mengatur mengenai MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD tahun 2018, Pada Pasal 249 ayat (1) huruf J DPD diberikan kewenangan untuk melakukan pemantauan dan evaluasi atas Raperda dan Perda. Hal ini kemudian menjadi problematika ketika DPD sebagai lembaga legislatif, harus melakukan pengawasan terhadap produk hukum daerah, yang berlaku dalam lingkungan daerah. Penelitian ini dilakukan guna menemukan jawaban atas permasalahan mengenai kewenangan DPD dalam melakukan pemantauan dan evaluasi atas Raperda dan Perda tepat atau tidak, serta bagaimana lingkup kewenangan dalam pemantauan dan evaluasi atas Raperda danPerda yang dilakukan oleh DPD. Ditinjau dari kedudukan dan kemampuannya, tidak tepat bila DPD diberikan kewenangan untuk melakukan pemantauan dan evaluasi atas Raperda dan Perda. Meskipun demikian, DPD telah merumuskan ketentuan yang mengatur mengenai lingkup dan mekanisme pelaksanaan kewenangan tersebut. Lingkup dalam melakukan pemantauan dan evaluasi yang dilakukan DPD adalah berbentuk rekomendasi. Rekomendasi ini selanjutnya akan disampaikan kepada DPR dan Presiden, bukan kepada daerah yang bersangkutan. Seharusnya dalam merumuskan suatu kebijakan, lembaga legislatif harus benarbenar memahami isi dan makna dari suatu produk hukum yang akan dibentuk, agar tidak menjadi masalah ketika produk hukum tersebut diterapkan. Selain itu, kewenangan DPD dalam melakukan pemantauan dan evaluasi atas Raperda dan Perda yang diatur dalam Pasal 249 ayat (1) huruf J ini dilakukan judicial reviewkarena kewenangan ini tidak tepat diberikan kepada DPD.

---

ABSTRACTThe establishment of DPD is solution to solve problems of central and regionalgovernments, whose functions and authorities have been regulated in theConstitution of Indonesia Republic of 1945. However, after the enactment of theLaw regulating the MPR, DPR, DPD and DPRD in 2018, Article 249 section (1)letter J DPD is given the authority to carry out monitoring and evaluation of theRaperda and Perda. This then becomes a problem when the DPD, as a legislative xinstitution, must supervise regional legal products, which apply in the regionalenvironment. This research was conducted to find answers to problems regardingthe DPD's authority to monitor and evaluate the draft regional regulation andregional regulation whether it is appropriate or not, as well as how the scope ofauthority in monitoring and evaluating the draft regional regulations andregional regulation conducted by the DPD. Judging from its position andcapacity, it would not be right for the DPD to be given the authority to monitorand evaluate the Raperda and Perda. Nonetheless, the DPD has formulatedprovisions regulating the scope and mechanisms for exercising this authority. Thescope of monitoring and evaluation carried out by the DPD is in the form ofrecommendations. These recommendations will then be submitted to the DPR andthe President, not to the regions concerned. In formulating a policy, thelegislative institution should really understand the content and meaning of a legalproduct to be formed, so that it does not become a problem when the legalproduct is applied. In addition, the DPD's authority to monitor and evaluate thedraft regional regulations and regional regulation as stipulated in Article 249section (1) letter J is subject to a judicial review because this authority is notproperly assigned to the DPD."

"ABSTRACTMusyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Musrenbang adalah forum antarpelaku untuk menyusun rencana pembangunan di tingkat nasional maupun daerah. Pelaksanaan musrenbang juga dimaksudkan untuk menampung aspirasi masyarakat terkait dengan pembangunan di wilayahnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat efektivitas pelaksanaan musrenbang dalam penyusunan dokumen Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah RKPD Kota Bekasi, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Untuk melihat efektivitas pelaksanaan musrenbangnya, penelitian ini menggunakan teori perencanaan yang baik dari Nugroho dan Wrihatnolo 2011 yang terbagi atas sistematis, terpadu, transparan, dan akuntabel. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post positivist dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa wawancara mendalam dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan musrenbang RKPD di Kota Bekasi tahun 2018 sudah cukup efektif, dapat dilihat dari terpenuhinya sebagian besar indikator pada keempat dimensi yang ada walaupun terdapat beberapa hambatan. Indikator pada dimensi transparan belum terpenuhi dengan baik yaitu terkait menampung setiap usulan yang masuk tanpa ada yang disembunyikan. Hal ini disebabkan karena adanya keterbatasan dalam hal sistem yang dipakai yaitu sistem e-planning. Hambatan pelaksanaan musrenbang lainnya adalah terkait dengan keterbatasan keuangan daerah yang membuat tidak semua usulan dapat diakomodir.

---

ABSTRACTDevelopment Planning Discussion Musrenbang is an inter government forum to develop national and regional development plans. The implementation of musrenbang is also intended to accommodate community aspirations related to development in the region. This study aims to see the effectiveness of the implementation of musrenbang in the preparation of Local Government Work Plan Document RKPD in Bekasi City, West Java Province. To see the effectiveness, this research used theory of a good planning from Nugroho and Wrihatnolo 2011 which is divided into systematic, integrated, transparent and accountable. This research uses post positivist approach with in depth interview and literature study for data collection techniques. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of musrenbang for RKPD document 2018 in Bekasi is quite effective, can be seen from the fulfillment of most indicators on the four dimensions that exist although there are some obstacles. Indicators on transparent dimensions have not met well that is related to accommodate every proposal that comes in without any hidden. This is due to the limitations in the system used is the e planning system. The other obstacles on the implementation of this musrenbang are related to the regional financial constraints that make not all proposals accommodable."