Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPerjanjian perkawinan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Perkawinan tidak memberikan pengertian maupun pengaturan mengenai isi perjanjian perkawinan. Undang-Undang Perkawinan hanya mengatur perjanjian perkawinan dibuat pada waktu atau sebelum perkawinan secara tertulis dan berlaku sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan. Perjanjian tersebut tidak boleh melanggar batas-batas hukum, agama dan kesusilaan, serta disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan setelah mana isinya berlaku juga bagi pihak ketiga sepanjang pihak ketiga tersangkut. Tesis ini membahas mengenai isi suatu perjanjian perkawinan dan keabsahan perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak disahkan Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan, serta pertimbangan hakim mengenai keabsahan surat kesepakatan pembagian harta bersama dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak disahkan Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan tetap berlaku sah dan mengikat para pihak yang membuatnya, akan tetapi tidak berlaku bagi pihak ketiga. Pertimbangan hakim mengenai keabsahan surat kesepakatan pembagian harta bersama kurang tepat dikarenakan isi surat kesepakatan antara Penggugat dan Tergugat mengenai proses perceraian tidak berkaitan dengan harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan, sehingga ketentuan yang berlaku secara sah dan mengikat Penggugat dan Tergugat hanya terkait pembagian harta bersama serta daftar harta bersama yang wajib dilaksanakan sesuai dengan apa yang tercantum dalam surat kesepakatan tersebut.

---

ABSTRACTPrenuptial agreement as arranged in Article 29 Marriage Law does not provide definition nor regulation regarding the contents of the prenuptial agreement. The law only regulates prenuptial agreement can be made at the time of or prior to the marriage performance, in writing, and takes effect as from the marriage being concluded. The agreement cannot be legalized if contrary to the restrictions set by the law, religion and morality, and should be legalized by the Registrar of Marriage where upon the contents shall also be binding to third parties as long as the third party involved. This thesis discusses the content of a prenuptial agreement and the validity of the prenuptial agreement that is not legalized by the Registrar of Marriage, as well as judge 39 s consideration regarding the validity of the joint property division agreement in Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 539 Pdt.G 2014 PN.Jkt.Pst. The author uses juridical normative research method with qualitative approach which is analytical descriptive. The results show prenuptial agreement that is not legalized by the Registrar of Marriage will remain valid and binding the parties, but will not apply to third party. The judge 39 s consideration regarding the validity of the joint property division agreement is inappropriate because the contents of the agreement concerning the divorce process are not related to the property in the marriage, so only the clause related to the division of the joint property and lists of the joint property are valid and binding the parties, which have to be carried out in accordance of what was stated in the agreement."

"Sebuah perjanjian pranikah adalah perjanjian yang dibuat oleh beberapa sebelum menikah untuk mengatur konsekuensi dari pernikahan ke properti. Berdasarkan pasal 29 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia, agar perjanjian pranikah dapat mengikat pihak ketiga, harus didaftarkan oleh catatan sipil pernikahan. Di sebuah Kasus pihak telah lalai untuk mendaftarkan perjanjian pranikah mereka, kata perjanjian tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat lebih pihak ketiga. Metode analisis adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Data dan bahan hukum yang diperoleh melalui penelitian sastra dan wawancara dengan Notaris dan Ex Notaris. Itu Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan dasar hukum dari pendaftaran pranikah perjanjian setelah menikah dan untuk mengetahui hukum mengikat perjanjian yang ke Pihak ketiga. Berdasarkan penelitian, ada peraturan mengenai pendaftaran perjanjian pranikah setelah menikah dalam hukum yang ada dan peraturan. Namun, ada kemungkinan bahwa Hakim berbasis keputusannya pada analogi hukum untuk mendaftar bahwa perjanjian pranikah sesuai dengan Peraturan di Perdata Indonesia tentang kelalaian mendaftarkan acara hukum (pernikahan, kematian) dalam pencatatan sipil dapat dilakukan melalui pengadilan. Untuk mendaftar (setelah itu) oleh kantor catatan sipil. pranikah yang Perjanjian yang telah terdaftar setelah menikah tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat terhadap pihak ketiga yang memiliki hubungan hukum sebelum pendaftaran itu.

---

A prenuptial agreement is an agreement made by a couple before marriage to arrange the consequences of a marriage to the property. Based on article 29 Paragraph 1 of the Indonesian Marriage Act, in order that a prenuptial agreement can bind the third parties, it must be registered by a civil registrar of marriage. In a case the parties have been negligent to register their prenuptial agreement, said agreement does not have binding power over third parties. The analytical method is a normative juridical approach. The legal data and materials are obtained through literary research and interviews with a Notary and Ex Notary. The purpose of this research is to find the legal basis of the registration of a prenuptial agreement after marriage and to know the legal binding of that agreement to the third parties. Based on the research, there is no regulation concerning the registration of a prenuptial agreement after marriage in the existing laws and regulation. However, there is a possibility that a Judge based his decision on a legal analogy to register that prenuptial agreement in accordance with the regulation in the Indonesian Civil Code concerning the negligence to register a legal event (marriage, death) in the civil registration can be done through a court order to register (afterwards) by the civil registration office. That prenuptial agreement that has been registered after marriage does not have binding power towards the third parties who have a legal relation before that registration."

"Pada umumnya masyarakat yang melakukan perkawinan campuran tidak memperhatikan dan mengetahui hal-hal yang harus dilakukan sebelum mereka melakukan perkawinan campuran terutama hal-hal yang menyangkut mengenai harta bersama yang diperoleh sepanjang perkawinan mereka. Pada dasarnya seseorang yang melakukan perkawinan campuran tidaklah dapat secara bebas untuk membeli hak-hak atas tanah di Indonesia dikarenakan pasangannya yang berkewarganegaraan asing tetap mempunyai hak tersebut karena adanya harta bersama. Hal ini karena adanya pembatasan hak kepemilikan tanah yang diatur dalam hukum pertanahan Indonesia pasal 1 jo pasal 21 Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 yang berazaskan kebangsaan.Penelitian kali ini berjudul "Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Kawin Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Terhadap Harta Bersama" dengan menggunakan metode kepustakaan yang bersifat normatif dengan jenis penelitian menarik asas hukum untuk mendapatkan gambaran menyeluruh terhadap permasalahan yang diteliti serta wawancara kepada narasumber atau informan untuk menambah informasi atas penelitian. Juga menganalisa putusan Pengadilan Agama Bandung nomor 495/Pdt.G/2005/PA.Bdg sebagai salah satu contoh perkawinan campuran. Seseorang yang melakukan perkawinan campuran harus membuat perjanjian kawin diluar persekutuan harta dan benda sebelum melakukan perkawinan serta didaftarkan agar dapat mengikat pihak ketiga serta adanya kepastian hukum.Hal ini agar tidak terdapat persatuan harta dan benda dalam bentuk apapun antara suami dan istri tersebut sesuai yang diatur dalam pasal 29 Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 jo pasal 139 Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Pada kenyataannya, masih banyak masyarakat yang melakukan perkawinan campuran dengan tidak membuat perjanjian kawin diluar persekutan harta dan benda karena unsur ketidaktahuan atau tidak adanya budaya membuat perjanjian kawin dalam perkawinan di Indonesia. Sehingga ketika terjadi perceraian dan pewarisan menimbulkan permasalahan dan dalam pelaksanaannya sering terjadi penyelundupan hukum. Ini dapat menyebabkan seseorang kehilangan atas hak atas tanah tersebut.

---

In General, Couples of mixed marriage do not care and know what they should do before they enter married life, especially about their marital property. Principally, a person who did this marriage has limitation to posses land, because based on Article 1 jo article 21 Law Number 5 Year 1960 every possession that is purchased by a mixed couple after they are married is considered a collective possession. The couple would lose the right to own land because one of the parties was an expatriate.The research is entitled "Judicial Review Of Prenuptial Agreement In Mixed Marriage On Marital Property". The normative library method is used in this research for getting full description about the problem. Interview with the informant is used to add information for the research. I also analyze verdict of religious court of Bandung Number 495/Pdt.G/2005/PA.Bdg as an example of mixed marriage case. An Indonesian (man or woman) in a mixed marriage has to make prenuptial agreement for separation property before they married to protect their assets and limit parties? right. After that the prenuptial agreement has to be registered to bind third party and legal certainty.The prenuptial agreement to avoid joint marital property which is in line with article 29 Law Number 1 Year 1974 jo article 139 The Burgerlijk Wetboek.However, many mixed married couples who do not make prenuptial agreement in Indonesian marriage, since they are not familiar with making prenuptial agreement. Consequently, they find many problems when they divorce or one of them dies. Sometimes there is smuggling law which prohibit in our country and they can lose the right to own land."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai perkawinan campuran diantara Warga Negara Indonesia dengan Warga Negara Irlandia yang dilangsungkan di Hong Kong. Perjanjian kawin yang dibuat pasca perkawinan. Pokok permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah akta perjanjian kawin yang dibuat oleh Notaris terhadap perkawinan campuran, serta peran notaris selaku pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat perjanjian kawin pada pernikahan yang berbeda warga negara dan akibatnya apabila terjadi perceraian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yuridis normatif, dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian: Notaris sebelum membuat akta perjanjian perkawinan wajib melihat apakah sudah ada penetapan pengadilan terhadap permohonan para pihak atau suami istri yang hendak membuat perjanjian perkawinan di dalam masa perkawinan. Setelah adanya penetapan maka dalam membuat akta perjanjian kawin Notaris tunduk kepada ketentuan Pasal 15 dan Pasal 16 Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris. Peran Notaris adalah membuat dan memastikan perjanjian perkawinan mengikuti ketentuan perundang-undangan, dalam melaksanakan peran tersebut Notaris wajib bertanggung jawab secara Pidana, Perdata, dan Administratif.

---

ABSTRACTThe main topic of this Thesis is to discuss about an intermarriage between a Indonesian citizen and a Ireland citizen, that takes place in Hong Kong. The prenuptial agreement is made after they were married. The main problems in this thesis is the prenuptial agreement deed that rsquo s been made by the Notary about this intermarriage, and also the role of a Notary as a public attendant that have the rights to make a prenuptial agreement on a intermarriage, and the consequences if the marriage end in a Divorce. The Research Method used in writing this thesis is Juridical Normative, with Descriptive Analysis, with a qualitative approach. The result of this research before making a prenuptial agreement deed a Notary must check if there is already a court arrangement towards the applicant that wants to make the Prenuptial Agreement while in the marriage period. After the assignation when making of a Prenuptial Agreement a Notary must obey the clause 15 and 16 section in the Notary Billet Act. The role of a Notary is to make a deed and to make sure the Prenuptial Agreement follows the rules of the Act, in managing that role a Notary is obligated take responsibility for Criminal Law, Civil Law, and Administratif Law."

"ABSTRAKREGIKA CHRISTYProgram Studi : KenotariatanJudul : Perjanjian Kawin Pada Perkawinan Antar Negara Antara Warga Negara Indonesia Dan Warga Negara New Zeland Yang Dilakukan Di New Zeland Perjanjian Perkawinan yang dibuat oleh notaris di Indonesia terhadap perkawinan beda warga negara yaitu wanita WNI dengan seorang pria yang berkewarganegaraan New Zealand, yang tunduk pada peraturan perkawinan di New Zealand dikarenakan keduannya akan melangsungkan pernikahan di negara tersebut. Perjanjian perkawinan dibuat sebelum keduanya mengsungkan pernikahan di New Zealand, yang dibuatkan oleh Notaris di Indonesia. Dengan alasan bahwa pihak istri berkewarganegaan Indonesia dan pasangan ini akan berdomisili di New Zealand, sehingga atas hal tersebut membuat calon mempelai wanita yang berkewarganegaan Indonesia memiliki segudang pertanyaan mengenai kedudukan akta perjanjian perkawinan yang mereka buat di Indonesia oleh notaris Indonesia di New Zealand Selain ada persamaan maupun perbedaan tentang isi perjanjian perkawinan di Indonesia dan New Zealand, kedudukan terhadap harta-harta selama perkawinan terkait perjanjian kawin yang dibuat oleh Notaris di Indonesia dapat dikatakan bahwa mengenai status kepemilikan tanah WNI dalam harta bersama, berdasarkan undang-undang adalah dipersamakan haknya dengan hak atas tanah bagi pasangan WNA-nya, yakni hanya sebatas hak pakai, sedangkan hak Milik masih dapat diusahakan oleh WNI pelaku perkawinan campuran tanpa perjanjian perkawinan, tetapi dengan cara-cara ilegal. Kata Kunci :Hukum Perkawinan, Perjanjian Kawin, Warga Negara Indonesia, Warga Negara Selandia Baru.

---

ABSTRACTName REGIKA CHRISTYProgram of Study NotaryTitle Prenuptial Agreement Between Indonesian Citizen And New Zealand Citizen Which Conducted In New ZealandPrenuptial Agreement made by Indonesian public notary against a marriage of a different citizen, an Indonesian female citizen and New Zealand male citizen, subject to a marriage law in New Zealand due to her marriage will be conducted in that country. The prenup was made before the couple married in New Zealand, which was made by Indonesian public notary. For the reason that the bride of Indonesian citizen will be domiciled in Zealand, therefore causing the bride of an Indonesian citizenship has plenty of questions about the legality of their prenuptial agreement made by Indonesian public notary in New Zealand.In addition to the similarities anddifferences between the contents of the prenuptial agreement in Indonesia and New Zealand, the position of the marital property related to the prenuptial agreement made by Indonesian notary can be said that regarding the status of Indonesian citizen land ownership in marital property, according to the law, is equal to the right of land for their foreign spouse, which is the Right of Use Title Hak Pakai . While Freehold Title Hak Milik may still be cultivated by Indonesian citizen in mixed marriage without prenuptial agreement, but with ilegal means."

"Membina sebuah rumah tangga memang tidak semudah membalikkan tangan, pasti selalu ada konflik yang timbul terutama masalah harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan. Apabila sebelum melangsungkan perkawinan suami isteri tidak membuat perjanjian kawin, maka harta bawaan dan harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan menjadi harta persatuan bulat. Kemudian selama perkawinan berlangsung, terjadi sesuatu hal misal suami boros dan berkelakukan tidak baik yang mengakibatkan harta bersama akan habis, maka isteri dapat mengajukan tuntutan pemisahan harta kekayaan ke Pengadilan Negeri, karena perjanjian kawin sudah tidak dapat lagi dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung. Dari keadaan tersebut di atas, maka yang jadi permasalahan penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah akibat hukum dari pemisahan harta kekayaan yang dilakukan berdasarkan perjanjian kawin yang dibuat setelah perkawinan dan bagaimana secara yuridis pertimbangan Hakim mengenai pemisahan harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan sebagaimana ternyata dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2901 K/Pdt/2012 tanggal 9 Desember 2013. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dimana penulis dalam meneliti mengacu pada aturanaturan hukum yang ada. Maka ditemukan jawabannya bahwa akibat hukum yang timbul sebagaimana ternyata dalam kasus yang diteliti yaitu tidak dapat diadakan pemisahan karena isteri tidak memenuhi Pasal 186 BW, sehingga objek sengketa tetap menjadi harta bersama suami dan isteri. Untuk perjanjian pisah harta yang telah dibuat dihadapan Notaris menjadi batal demi hukum karena mengandung cacat yuridis dan bertentangan dengan undang-undang. Dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung sudah tepat dan telah sesuai dengan Pasal 119 BW, karena antara suami dan isteri tersebut tetap terjadi persatuan harta bulat. Sedangkan penerapan Pasal 29 ayat (4) Undang-undang Perkawinan dalam pertimbangan Hakim dianggap kurang tepat karena tidak terjadi perubahan perjanjian kawin.

---

Fostering a household is not as easy as turning the hand, there is always a conflict triggered by wealth in marriage. If spouse did not make a prenuptial agreement, separation asset and any asset they acquire during the course of their marriage would be community asset. Furthermore, during the marriage takes place, if there is something happen e.g. the husband is extravagant and does not have good manner which is caused community asset would be lost, the wife could propose a claim for asset separation to District Court, because prenuptial agreement could no longer be made after marriage took place. According to that circumstances, the consent of this research is how the legal consequences of the assets separation that is performed by prenuptial agreement made after marriage and how the juridical considerations of the Judge regarding separation assets in marriage, as it turns out in the Supreme Court Verdict No. 2901 K / Pdt / 2012 dated December 9, 2013. By using a normative juridical research method, the author in researching refers to rules of existing law. Then found the answer that the legal consequences arising in this case study that the separation cannot be held because the wife does not comply with Article 186 BW, then the object of dispute remain the property of the husband and wife. And the prenuptial agreement that has been made before a Notary cancelled and void because of flawed juridical and contrary to law. And Supreme Court decisions were appropriate and in accordance with Article 119 of the BW, as between husband and wife are still having community assets. While the application of Article 29 paragraph (4) of the Law of Marriage in consideration of Judges considered less appropriate because there is no change in prenuptial agreement."

"Perjanjian perkawinan yang mengatur mengenai harta benda perkawinan suami isteri tidak begitu dikenal oleh masyarakat muslim di Indonesia sebagai subyek hukum yang tunduk pada hukum Islam, sehingga jarang dilakukan karena kurangnya sosialisasi dan pemahaman mengenai hal tersebut. Dalam penelitian tesis ini, dibahas mengenai bagaimana kedudukan hukum perjanjian perkawinan antara subyek hukum beragama Islam menurut hukum Islam, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (UU Perkawinan), dan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) serta bagaimana akibat hukum dari perjanjian perkawinan antara subyek hukum beragama Islam yang tidak didaftarkan terhadap pembagian harta bersama dalam perceraian, dengan menganalisis kasus Putusan Nomor 0502/Pdt.G/2013/PA JS dan kesesuaian putusan tersebut dengan hukum Islam, UU Perkawinan, dan KHI. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Pada prinsipnya, hukum dasar dari membuat perjanjian perkawinan dalam Islam adalah mu?bah (boleh) sepanjang perjanjian tersebut tidak berisi hal-hal yang dilarang atau diharamkan syariat Islam (Surat Al-Maidah ayat 1). UU Perkawinan mengaturnya dalam Pasal 29 dan diatur lebih lanjut dalam Pasal 45 -52 KHI khusus bagi orang-orang yang beragama Islam (subyek hukum beragama Islam). Pasal 29 UU Perkawinan mengatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan harus didaftarkan/disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan. Akibat hukum dari perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak didaftarkan adalah tetap mengikat kedua belah pihak, namun tidak mengikat pihak ketiga. Perjanjian perkawinan tersebut dapat disahkan oleh hakim sepanjang isi perjanjiannya memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dan bagi kedua belah pihak perjanjian perkawinan tersebut tetap berlaku sebagai undang-undang (Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata).

---

The prenuptial agreement governing the property of conjugal marriage is not so well known by the moslems community in Indonesia as subjects of law subject to Islamic law, so it is rarely done due to lack of awareness and understanding on the matter. In the thesis, explained about how the legal position of the prenuptial agreement between the moslems legal subjects according to Islamic law, the law of marriage no. 1/1974 and compilation of Islamic law, as well as how the legal consequences of the prenuptial agreement between the moslems legal subjects which is not registered to the division of joint property in divorce, by analysing the verdict no. 0502/Pdt.G/2013/PA JS and the verdict conformity with Islamic law, the law of marriage no. 1/1974 and compilation of Islamic law. This thesis uses literature research method that is juridical normative. In principle, the basic law of making prenuptial agreement in Islam is mu?bah (allowed) as long as the agreement does not contain things that are prohibited or forbidden by Islamic shariah (Surah Al-Maidah ayah 1). The marriage law set down in Article 29 and further stipulated in Article 45-52 in compilation of Islamic, specifically for moslems (moslems legal subjects). Article 29 of the marriage law stipulates that the prenuptial agreement to be registered/authorized by the marriage registrar employees. The legal consequences of prenuptial agreements that are not registered are still binding on both sides of husband and wife, but does not bind third parties. The prenuptial agreement can be ratified by the judge throughout the content of the agreement meets the provisions of Article 1320 BW and for both sides of the prenuptial agreement is still valid as a law (Article 1338 BW)."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Menurut ketentuan Pasal 29 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan diatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan dibuat pada waktu atau sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan oleh pasangan calon suami isteri. Akan tetapi karena kurangnya pengetahuan masyarakat Indonesia mengenai pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan, maka banyak pasangan suami isteri yang membuat perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan dengan alasan permohonan perlindungan Hukum terhadap harta pribadi masing-masing terkait resiko tanggung jawab pekerjaan atau berakhirnya perkawinan karena suatu perceraian. Di dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian analitis deskriptif. Data yang dipergunakan adalah data sekunder, yaitudata yang berupa studi kepustakaan dan studi terhadap penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor : 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Hakim dalam menetapkan Penetapan Pengadilan tersebut, mengingat bahwa permohonan Penetapan perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan bertentangan dengan ketentuan pasal 29 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Dari hasil penelitian ini penulis mengambil kesimpulan bahwa Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 adalah satu-satunya peraturan yang berlaku di Indonesia yang mengatur mengenai pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan, namun atas dasar-dasar pertimbangan hukum Hakim yang penulis uraikan dalam penelitian ini maka Hakim mengabulkan permohonan pasangan suami isteri Junaida dan Kazuo Sawachi dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor : 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim.,dan setelah tanggal ditetapkannya maka penetapan Pengadilan tersebut dapat dijadikan sebagai dasar hukum dalam menjalankan pemisahan harta bersama di dalam perkawinan mereka

---

Under the terms of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, it is stipulated that a prenuptial agreement shall be made on or before the performance of the marriage by the bride and groom. However, because of the lack of public knowledge regarding the creation of a prenuptial agreement, many married couples in Indonesia enter into a prenuptial agreement after the marriage takes place on the grounds of legal protection of each of their personal properties associated with occupational responsibility risks or the dissolution of a marriage by divorce. In this study, the author used the juridical normative research method with the descriptive analytical research type. The data used is secondary data, i.e. data in the form of literature studies and studies on the Court Order of the East Jakarta District Court No. 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim. This study was conducted to determine and analyze the basis of the judges' considerations in determining the aforementioned Court Oder, given that the petition of the Court Order to legitimize the prenuptial agreement after the officiation of the marriage was contrary to the provisions of Article 29, paragraph (1) of Law Number 01 Year 1974 on Marriage. From the result of this research, the author concludes that Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 is the only rule in Indonesia that regulates the creation of prenuptial agreements. Nevertheless, on the grounds of the legal considerations of the judge that the author describes in this research, the judge granted the request of the couple Junaida and Kazuo Sawachi through East Jakarta District Court Order Number 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim., and after the date of its enactment, the aforementioned court order may be used as a legal basis in the dividing of the joint property in their marriage."

"[ABSTRAKTerbukanya suatu pewarisan adalah karena kematian. Sehingga, dengan terbukanyapewarisan maka di dalam KUHPerdata telah ditentukan siapa-siapa yang akanmenjadi ahli waris. Namun, adanya perbedaan penafsiran, suatu warisan tidakdidapatkan apabila di dalam suatu ikatan perkawinan telah dilaksanakan dengan suatuperjanjian perkawinan. Sehingga timbul permasalahan yaitu bagaimana pengaruhperjanjian perkawinan pisah harta antara suami dan istrinya terhadap hak mewarisserta bagaimana kedudukan hukum mewaris suami dan adik pewaris terkait sebagaiahli waris yang ditinjau dalam KUHPerdata. Terhadap permasalahan tersebut,dilakukan penelitian untuk menemukan titik terang akan siapa yang akan berhakmenjadi ahli waris. Selanjutnya, penyusunan tesis ini disusun dengan metodepenelitian hukum normatif, untuk mendapatkan hasil penelitian yang bersifat analisiskualitatif yaitu dengan menelaah data yang diperoleh. Akhirnya, sampailah pada hasilpenelitian bahwa suatu perjanjian perkawinan mengatur pemisahan harta kekayaanselama perkawinan, dengan putusnya perkawinan akibat kematian seseorang terhadapharta kekayaan, akan adanya pewarisan dalam bentuk perpindahan kekayaan dandalam pewarisanpun telah ditentukan siapa yang menjadi ahli waris, sehingga suatuperjanjian perkawinan tidak dapat menutup hak mewaris seorang suami. Kedudukanhukum seorang suami dan adik pewaris sebagai ahli waris telah ditentukan denganpenggolongan ahli waris yang mana golongan ahli waris terdekat menutup golonganahli waris terjauh. Dengan demikian, karena masih adanya suami, harta peninggalanpewaris, haruslah jatuh pada golongan pertama. Disarankan bagi Notaris untukmemberi penjelasan bila ingin membuat perjanjian perkawinan.

---

ABSTRACTThe opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has beendetermined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code(“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtainedwhen the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arisessuch as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right ofinheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inheritbetween husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. Inregards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information onwhose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed withnormative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitativeanalysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that aprenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, withdissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would betransfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determinedwhose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right ofinheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs havebeen determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancelfurther heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife,the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person.Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptialagreement, The opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has beendetermined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code(“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtainedwhen the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arisessuch as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right ofinheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inheritbetween husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. Inregards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information onwhose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed withnormative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitativeanalysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that aprenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, withdissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would betransfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determinedwhose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right ofinheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs havebeen determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancelfurther heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife,the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person.Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptialagreement]"