Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTBursa Efek Indonesia mengeluarkan Perubahan Peraturan No. III-I Tahun 2017 tentang Keanggotaan Marjin dan/atau Short Selling sebagai salah satu respon dari terjadinya kegiatan pengambilalihan yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan efek yang menimbulkan kerugian bagi nasabah.Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana kedudukan hukum para pihak, pengawasan dan penegakkan hukum dalam pengambilalihan dan apakah Perubahan Peraturan Bursa Efek Indonesia No. III-I tentang Keanggotaan Marjin dan/atau Short Selling efektif menyelesaikan kasus dalam Putusan No. 1564 K/PID/2014 dan Putusan No. 187/PDT.G/2009/PN. JKT.BAR. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Kesimpulan yang dicapai yaitu dari prosedur tersebut kedudukan hukum dari para pihak adalah nasabah sebagai debitur, perusahaan efek sebelumnya adalah kreditur dan perusahaan efek yang menerima pengambilalihan adalah pihak ketiga sebagai kreditur baru yang menggantikan kreditur lama, pengawasan tidak diatur secara spesifik dan belum efektif untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan dalam kasus Putusan No. 1564 K/PID/2014 dan Putusan No. 187/PDT.G/2009/PN. JKT.BAR. Saran yang diberikan adalah OJK sebaiknya memberikan pengawasan langsung dan Bursa efek Indonesia mengatur tentang pengambilaliahan ini lebih terinci serta nasabah yang harus memahami mekanisme pengambilalihan sebelum menyetujui untuk melakukan transaksi.

---

ABSTRACTIndonesia Stock Exchange issued Amendment of Indonesian Stock Exchange Regulation No. III I About Margin and or Short Selling Membership as one of the response of the takeover activities conducted by securities companies that cause harm to customers. The subject matter discussed in this paper is how the legal status of the parties, supervision and law enforcement in the takeover and whether the Amendment to the Indonesia Stock Exchange Regulation is effective in resolving cases in Decision No. 1564 K PID 2014 and Decision No. 187 PDT.G 2009 PN. JKT.BAR. The research method used is normative juridical research. The conclusion of the procedure is that the legal status of the parties is the customer as the debtor, the previous securities company is the creditor and the securities company receiving the takeover is a third party as a new creditor replacing the old creditor, the supervision is not regulated specifically and not yet effective to solve the problem in the case of Decisions. The advice given is that OJK should provide direct supervision and the Indonesia Stock Exchange regulates the acquisition in more detail as well as customers who must understand the takeover mechanism before agreeing to conduct the transaction."

"Skripsi ini membahas mekanisme transaksi marjin dan short selling dalam perdagangan saham di bursa efek sesuai dengan Peraturan Bapepam-LK No. V.D.6 Tahun 2008. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian menemukan bahwa beberapa perusahaan efek tidak menerapkan Peraturan Bapepam-LK No. V.D.6 Tahun 2008 dengan baik. Hal ini diperkuat dengan keputusan Bapepam-LK yang menjatuhkan hukuman denda kepada beberapa perusahaan efek. Pelanggaran tersebut merugikan banyak pihak yaitu perusahaan efek, investor, dan Bapepam-LK (selaku pengawas pasar modal di Indonesia).

---

The focus of this study is the mechanism of margin trading and short selling in stock exchange whether to follow Bapepam-LK Regulation No. V.D.6 Year 2008. This research is descriptive analytic. The result of this research found that there are few securities companies do not follow the Bapepam-LK Regulation No. V.D.6 Year 2008. This has been proven by Bapepam-LK decision to give penalty to those securities companies. This violation make disadvantage to some stakeholders such as securities company, investor and Bapepam-LK (as the regulatory organization stock exchange in Indonesia)."

"Skripsi ini membahas masalah hukum terkait transaksi marjin dan short selling dalam pasar modal indonesia. Transaksi marjin dan short selling mempunyai karakteristik yang khusus jika dibandingkan dengan transaksi efek biasa. Transaksi marjin/atau short selling mempunyai daya ungkit guna meningkatkan potensi keuntungan yang dapat diraih, namun disisi lain juga turut meningkatkan risiko yang ditanggung oleh investor tersebut. Sebagai sebuah transaksi dengan risiko yang relatif lebih besar dibandingkan dengan transaksi efek biasa maka kepastian dan penegakan hukum akan semakin diperlukan guna menjaga kepercayaan terhadap pasar modal Indonesia. Transaksi marjin dan short selling disini diatur oleh instrumen undang-undang dan peraturan pelaksanaannya. Dimana terhadap transaksi marjin dan short selling telah ditetapkan standarstandar yang patut dipenuhi baik oleh nasabah, perusahaan efek, dan bursa efek. Perusahaan efek dalam hal ini seringkali melakukan penyimpangan yang merugikan investor. Terhadap kerugian tersebut perlu dipertanyakan bagaimana pertanggungjawaban yang dapat diberikan. Hasil penelitian dalam skripsi ini menyimpulkan bahwa kerugian yang diakibatkan perusahaan efek dalam transaksi marjin dan short selling dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya apabila menyalahi perjanjian atau peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada.

---

This mini thesis is discusses the legal issues related to margin trading and short selling transactions in Indonesian capital market. Margin trading and short selling has special characteristics compared to the regular securities transaction. Margin trading and short selling has leverage capability to increase potential profits that can be achieved, but on the other hand also increase the risk borne by investors. As a transcation with a relative risk greater than regular securities transaction then enforcement and certainty of law will be increasingly important to maintain confidence in Indonesian capital market. Margin trading and short selling here is governed by the laws and instruments implementing regulations. Where by that regulation margin trading and short selling, standars that should be met either by the customer, securities companies and stock exchange is set. Company in this case often make violation that cause losses to investor. Against these losses needs to be questioned how accountability of securities company can be provided. The results of research in this mini thesis concluded that the losses caused by the securities company in margin trading and short selling transaction can be accounted as long it.s violating the relevant regulation or contract between them."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai fasilitas pembiayaan transaksi marjin yang diberikan oleh perusahaan efek terhadap nasabahnya Transaksi marjin ini mempunyai mekanisme tersendiri yang telah diatur didalam Peraturan Bapepam LK No V D 6 Tahun 2008 Berdasarkan penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analitis ini ditemukan adanya pelanggaran didalam mekanisme transaksi marjin terutama didalam mekanisme penjualan paksa force sell Pelanggaran tersebut berdampak merugikan berbagai pihak seperti investor dan perusahaan efek dan juga Bapepam LK selaku pengawas di bidang Pasar Modal Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa terhadap kerugian yang ditimbulkan oleh perusahaan efek atas pelanggaran yang dilakukan dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya sesuai dengan peraturan perundang undangan yang berlaku.

---

This thesis discuss about margin trading facility which provided by Securities Companies for their investor Margin trading has its own mechanism which regulated in Bapepam LK Regulation No V D 6 year 2008 Based on this descriptive analytical study author has found violation in margin trading mechanism especially in force sell mechanism That violation make disadvantage to some parties such as investor Securities Company and Bapepam LK as the regulatory organization in Indonesia capital market The results of research has shown that the losses incurred by Securities Company in margin trading can be held responsible in accordance with the legislation in force."

"Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana fasilitas marjin diberikan melalui perjanjian antara perusahaan efek dengan nasabahnya, kewenangan Bapepam-LK menyelesaikan sengketa yang timbul dari perjanjian marjin, dan bagaimana Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia (BAPMI) menyelesaikan sengketa yang timbul dari perjanjian marjin antara Ronny Susanto dan PT. Mandiri Sekuritas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa perjanjian marjin antara Ronny Susanto dan PT Mandiri Sekuritas melanggar Peraturan Bapepam-LK No. V.D.6 Tahun 1997, adanya kekeliruan Bapepam-LK dalam menerapkan kewenangannya dengan tidak menjatuhkan sanksi kepada PT. Mandiri Sekuritas, dan Putusan BAPMI yang lebih mengutamakan keadilan dan kepatutan ketimbang hukum yang berlaku dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut.

---

The main issue discussed in this paper is how the margin facility provided through an agreement between the securities company and its customer, Bapepam-LK authorization to settle disputes arising from the margin agreement, and how the Indonesian Capital Market Arbitration Board (BAPMI) settle the disputes arising from the margin agreement between Ronny Susanto and PT. Mandiri Sekuritas. The method used is a normative juridical research. The results found that the margin agreement between Ronny Susanto and PT Mandiri Sekuritas has violated Bapepam-LK Rule No. V.D.6 Year 1997, there is a negligence by Bapepam-LK in applying its authority by not give any sanction to PT. Mandiri Sekuritas, and a vonnis of BAPMI who prefers fairness and propriety rather than the existing law, in resolving the dispute."

"Skripsi ini membahas aspek legalitas transaksi efek short-selling yang dilakukan pada masa krisis keuangan dan bentuk perlindungan otoritas bursa terhadap dampak penurunan harga yang tajam di bulan Oktober 2008. Penulisan skripsi ini adalah penelitian normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan kasus dimana pengumpulan data terutama menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Hasil analisa dan penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa transaksi efek short-selling dapat berubah posisi dari legal menjadi ilegal apabila dilakukan dengan cara dan pada waktu yang dilarang.

---

The study is focused on the legal aspect of short selling transaction during financial crisis and the authorities’ anticipation for market decline which reached its bottom on early October 2008. The market decline was indicated by impropriety short-selling transaction, therefore it need further investigation which conducted by the authorities days later. This scientific paper is an empiric-normative research using case study approach. The main conclusion of this study is that short-selling would be allegedly acclaimed illegal if exercised by using impropriet mechanism and/or within certain period which being forbid for macro economic reasons"

"Berkembangnya pasar modal menjadikan pasar modal mengemban peran yang cukup signifikan bagi pertumbuhan perekonomian pada masa modern saat ini. Salah satu kegiatan di dalam pasar modal sendiri adalah kegiatan perdagangan instrumen keuangan jangka panjang salah satunya adalah Pinjam-Meminjam Efek. Pinjam-Meminjam Efek hadir sebagai fasilitas yang dimanfaatkan bagi pemberi pinjaman yang ingin meminjamkan kepemilikan Efeknya dan pelaku Transaksi Short-Selling agar dapat melakukan Transaksi Short-Selling. Meskipun Transaksi Short-Selling sendiri memiliki kedua sisi pro dan kontra, Pemanfaatan fasilitas Pinjam-Meminjam Efek dalam Transaksi Short-Selling merupakan hal yang kerap dilakukan pada pasar modal di Indonesia dan perlu untuk diketahui lebih lanjut bagaimanakah implementasi mengenai pemanfaatan fasilitas Pinjam-Meminjam Efek dalam Transaksi Short-Selling di Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini, metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis adalah yuridis-normatif yang akan diteliti berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait dengan hukum pasar modal yakni terkait dengan Pinjam-Meminjam Efek dan Transaksi Short-Selling yang berlaku di Indonesia. Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis memberikan hasil bahwa masih terdapat beberapa regulasi terkait dengan Pinjam-Meminjam Efek dan Transaksi Short-Selling yang berlaku di Indonesia yang belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai bagi pihak-pihak yang terkait di dalam transaksi tersebut. Lebih lanjut, belum terdapat regulasi khusus mengenai risiko dan upaya penyelesaian risiko atas pemanfaatan fasilitas Pinjam-Meminjam Efek dalam Transaksi Short-Selling di Indonesia. Atas hal tersebut, penulis menyimpulkan bahwa harus diatur lebih khusus lagi khususnya terkait dengan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak-pihak terkait dan upaya penyelesaian risiko atas pemanfaatan fasilitas Pinjam-Meminjam Efek dalam Transaksi Short-Selling di Indonesia.

---

The development of the capital market has made capital market plays a significant role for economic growth in modern times. One of the activities in the capital market itself is trading activities in long-term financial instruments, one of which is Securities Lending and Borrowing. Securities Borrowing and Lending is a facility that is used by lenders who want to lend their Securities ownership and those who do Short-Selling Transactions to be able to do Short-Selling Transactions. Although the Short-Selling Transaction itself has both pros and cons, the use of the Securities Borrowing and Lending Facility in a Short-Selling Transaction is something that is often done in the capital market in Indonesia and it is necessary to know more about how to implement the use of the Securities Borrowing and Lending facility in Short-Selling Transactions in Indonesia. In this study, the research method used by the author is juridical-normative which will be examined based on the laws and regulations related to capital market law, namely those related to Securities Borrowing and Lending and Short-Selling Transactions that apply in Indonesia. Research conducted by the author shows that there are still several regulations related to Securities Lending and Borrowing and Short-Selling Transactions that apply in Indonesia that have not provided adequate legal protection for the parties involved in the transaction. Furthermore, there are no specific regulations regarding risks and risk settlement efforts on the use of Securities Borrowing and Lending in Short-Selling Transactions in Indonesia. For this reason, the authors conclude that it must be regulated more specifically with regard to legal protection for related parties and efforts to resolve the risk of utilizing Securities Borrowing and Lending facilities in Short-Selling Transactions in Indonesia."

"Today Stock Exchange must giving a secure feel to all members for transaction process. On the process, they have to prepare guarantee fund, instead there are some fail or problem on payment. The approriate rules done by Bapepam for all the stock exchange members who do the transaction, they have to pay 0.01% from the transaction. The Bapepam give this order to PT. Kliring Penjaminan Efek Indonesia as an institution to make sure all the transaction are safe and to manage it. The 0.01% payment from the all transaction done by the stock exchange members become a problem when The Director General of Tax make a letter about free tax for all stock exchange members and called as others asser. On several time Bapepam also make a letter about note that the money guarantee will call as contribution for all stock exchange members who pay it. So what will be happen if they dont have data about the money guarantee paid by all the stock exchange members, who will own it ? and what will happen if we cannot get the tax from it ? How big the potential tax we cannot get ? Then what the quitable means for all the tax payer if the guarantee fund deductable expenses?This research use methode descriptif Analysis with Qualitative Approach. This methode use to make the theory more clear, to collect data, analyze it and get some conclusion. In this study, the writer find several subject which inside contradictory, there is no coordination to make a rule and the outcome will be wrong interpretation even could cost financial lost for tax payer. According to analyze by the writer it turn out that what the two institution doing is unproductive even they out of the principle about the guarantee fund. In the end, the conclusion is that we need to do more research, especially on law aspect, so that one cannot make a mistakes in the decision making process, accounting note, tax for money guarantee and overall a good system is necessary. The suggestion is we need to socialize our rules to all parties interest, need of strong basis of law to avoid financial lost for the country and tax payer."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana arus kas bersih, rasio total utang, marjin laba bersih, market to book ratio, dan ukuran perusahaandalam mempengaruhi investasi aset tetap, dengan sampel perusahaan?perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI dari tahun 2007?2011. Keseluruhan variabel tersebut diregresi dengan metode generalized least square (GLS) dengan data panel. Hasil yang ditemukan adalah adanya pengaruh yang signifikan antara arus kas bersih, rasio total utang, marjin laba bersih, market to book ratio, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap keputusan kegiatan investasi aset tetap baik berpengaruh positif maupun negatif.

---

This research aims to analyze normalized cash flow, total debt ratio, net income margin, market to book ratio, and total asset size in affecting investment in property, plant, and equipment of BEI-listed manufacturing companies from 2007?2011. All variables measured by using generalized least square (GLS) method and data panel. And the result of this research is normalized cash flow, total debt ratio, net income margin, market to book ratio, and total asset size significantly affecting the investment in plant and equipment with positive or negative effects."